1,218
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,218

PostApr 15, 2010#76

Good news for the Missouri History Museum: a new restaurant called Bixby's is opening with the chef from the former Busch's Grove in Ladue at the helm. It will be managed by the Butler's Pantry.

Here's the complete story:

http://www.globe-democrat.com/news/2010 ... tion-spot/

3,807
Life MemberLife Member
3,807

PostApr 16, 2010#77

Zoo pylon is moving closer to 40, in case you didn't notice. I think it is a great idea, great way to advertise the fact the the zoo is located there.


712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostApr 28, 2010#78

In talks about expanding the ZMD most people bring up some lame counterpoint like,
"Yeah, but St. Charles wants its own zoo, which just duplicates the effort and further divides the region."

I don't think it has to be this way. The ZMD should be expanded to St. Charles, Jefferson, etc. Counties, but it should be done with the promise of better extension programs. How is it that Rolla and Mizzou manage to have extension programs all over the St. Louis area doing things that UMSL ought to? A good institution has the ability to reach beyond its geography.

What can the institutions in the ZMD do for St. Charles?

The botanical gardens can expand research and stewardship along the Missouri River and the confluence. The art museum, history museum, and science center could expand their k-12 programs and put their people in the St. Charles education system. The zoo can do a lot.

I'm not sure if you guys are aware of it or not but the World Bird Sanctuary is in trouble. They need money to continue their education and medical work. Do you like falcons eating pidgeons, great egrets in forest park, and bald eagles at the confluence, pelicans? That's the bird sanctuary at work. Reflect over the bird populations in the region over the past 20 years and you'll probably note an increase in size and diversity.
If they are in financial trouble and the zoo is ostensibly interested in animals... then why doesn't the zoo take take them under its wings? St. Charle's likes its Eagles Days, right? They could take over the Wolf Sanctuary too while they're at it. Both of these are in St. Louis County, but they're very active in the whole region. What St. Charle's scout troop hasn't had a raptor rehab presentation?

I really don't think expansion of the district should be framed in duplicated services, but expanded outreach. There are so many was Forest Park based institutions could benefit the suburbs without moving to them. If they do move out there, then it should be with the creation of a new service, like a summer camp facility or whatever. Look at the botanical gardens, their butterfly house is a totally different thing. St. Charles could have something like that.

PostApr 29, 2010#79

I've been thinking off and on for a while now about what Jefferson County could do to be a better part of the region. In light of what I wrote above about expansion of the ZMD requiring a non-compete agreement, I wrote wrote up a proposal for how Jeffco could put money into the region's flagship institutions without dividing their resources.

Specifically, in the event that Jeffco joined the ZMD, I think the Botanical Gardens and the Zoo should build paleontology and paleobotany centers in Mastodon State Park and make a museum for Pleistocene Megafauna and the flora they ate.

Obviously this would be done with whatever revenue could be collected in Jefferson County from the expanded district. It would not drain the Forest Park effort, but hopefully contribute to it.

Thoughts?

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostApr 29, 2010#80

^ Great idea. I think the cultural institutions need to show that they contribute to Jefferson County and others, but really, they already do so. I mean, many, many, many people from Jeff Co. and elsewhere in the metro visit these institutions frequently for free. A good part of any tax should go to the institution's main sites. I think outreach events would be more inline.

712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostApr 30, 2010#81

^Of course you're right. Most people I know in Jeffco are obsessed with the zoo and art museum, especially the parents of young kids. I think most of them would surely vote for inclusion if asked.

If a case is being made for inclusion though, it should not be based on nonsense like, "Only if we get our own zoo." We should be able to look at what the county already has that can be improved without competing for attention. Pretty much every county in the metro area has at least one museum or institution that is great enough for region-wide investment. The Metro-East has a few gems actually. A space museum??? Together with the science center, they could build an awesome space camp. The science center could have themed camps all over the region for kids looking at different sciences.

PostMay 12, 2010#82

The National Museum of Women in the Arts in DC has expanded their influence to the median of the boulevard that goes in front of their building.
My blog on that here.

Related to the pylon moving mentioned above and the often mentioned idea of putting gateway arches or something over the entrances to Forest Park, why not start an effort with Forest Park Forever to project the location of each institution in the park into the city.

The History Museum has an old streetcar parked outside it. That's good, but maybe Lindell along the park and going north as far as the metrolink station could be made more retro with random artifacts from the region's history. Put in historic sewer lids and advertise for events that happened 50 years ago. Maybe the Build Art Foundation and the History Museum together could come up with some weather resistent exhibits. The residents of the houses along the street would need to all agree though.

The Art Museum should really take over Fine Arts Drive and Lagoon as far as Skinker and then all of Skinker. Mosaic the road, put up bizarre sculptures, have rotating 6 month installations, set up podiums for human statues all along the way, etc.

The Zoo should take a dozen or so of Bob Cassilly's oversized concrete animals and dominate the Hampton Concourse. When people drive along 40, they should see a new zoo pylon that's a replica of the old one, but 10 times bigger with concrete apes hanging off it. Make that stretch of the highway completely wild.

The Science Center has already done an excellent job of bridging the city and the park. They could make a new DNA bridge maybe like the double-helix bridge in Singapore. Replicate some famous experiments in a bigger scale so drivers along the highway can understand them after driving by five or six times.

The new Shriner's Hosipital hopes to put art on the side of their interstate-facing parking garage. We should go with it. Let the Wash U Medical Complex claim Kingshighway and part of the eastern edge of the park. Not claim with buildings and expansion, but with artwork following a medical theme. Make cars on Kingshighway feel like blood vessals. One side red, one side blue, with weird floaty things all around. Imagine people saying, "Meet me by the lamp post half eaten by a white blood cell." Meet me by the statue of the doctor examining colestoral build up on the side of the Chase... hahaha

If all this was done in just a small token way the boundaries of the park could be completely changed. Art to the west, history to the north, doctors to the east, animals, beakers, and test tubes to the south. At the corners, interesting things can happen. The I-64/Kingshighway Cloverleaf could be dedicated to medical research. Kingshighway and Lindell would be about St. Louis Doctors of the past. The Wash U Circle could be full of art history and local stuff like regionalism. Lower Skinker could feature more animals gradually until the transition at I-64.

This can be done slowly over time, but Forest Park forever ought to consider it. The Animals Always sculpture by the zoo is a good start.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostMay 12, 2010#83

^Pretty ambitious. I'd be happy if they could just figure out how to hide all of the utilitarian crap that's so highly visible from the highway. Funny thing is, people have been complaining about the appearance of the southern edge of Forest Park for decades, but nothing seems to get done.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMay 12, 2010#84

^^ I like the ambition as well and more can always be done, but a lot has been done and I think we should celebrate that. The following weren't especially made for viewing at 60+mph from the Interstate, or cruising by on Hampton, Kingshighway or Oakland, but nor should they have been. Actually, my one complaint about the large zoo animal sculpture is that it's not in a great place for people to check it out on foot - that is, it's not near a zoo entrance or other purposely pedestrian area. (The science center's also done some median work on Oakland and WU/BJC built and maintain street lamps and plantings along and near Kingshighway and they've painted electrical transformer boxes with medical themes)




712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostMay 12, 2010#85

^Right, the Animal Always sculpture is in a weird place. It sure looks like an entrance to me. How come there's just a wall behind it? It looks like its designed to be walked through.

I think this is a Forest Park Forever issue more than the individual institutions.

How many steps are in a marathon?

While the above may seem ambitious, there's absolutely no time limit. Animals Always was my reason for writing. It's a great start, we should keep it up. One piece at a time. The history museum has one streetcar, when can we get them another outdoor artifact? The art museum is already dedicating itself to Fine Arts Drive, and for now they can just work on their expansion. We've got enough money and people around town to do this kind of thing in small steps. Maybe the zoo can start and the others can follow later. If somebody that worked for Wash U read the above and thought giant white blood cells would look cool... then there too, we could start with just one. The cancerous lump and the army of doctors fighting it would come later. :D

PostMay 26, 2010#86

Mayor Slay tweeted something about a pedestrian bridge at the zoo. Does anyone have details or pictures about that?

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMay 26, 2010#87

From the parking lot to the south entrance. For some time there has been a crossing guard at the pedestrian crossing at this point.




8,924
Life MemberLife Member
8,924

PostMay 27, 2010#88

DaronDierkes wrote:Mayor Slay tweeted something about a pedestrian bridge at the zoo. Does anyone have details or pictures about that?


video
http://www.ksdk.com/news/local/story.as ... yid=201632

712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostJun 05, 2010#89

The Zoo has plans for new bear and sea lion exhibits.

I just hope the plastic polar bears find an interesting new home somewhere.

The Red Pandas are pretty exciting, but I'm anxious for the Giant Pandas. If Giant Pandas only come as an extension of the Chinese diplomatic process, then a dimension of the 'Big Idea' ought to have the St. Louis zoo hiring a Giant Panda expert and keeping him stationed in Xian on Panda conservation duty and laying the groundwork for our eventual diplomatic victory. :D Seriously, not many American zoos have Giant Pandas. On this list many have red pandas, but so few Giant Pandas are out there. Most are on loan and come with a heavy financial obligation.

258
Full MemberFull Member
258

PostJun 05, 2010#90

When I see the new bridge from 64 as I drive past I think it looks so nice. I am loving it combined with the zoo sign movement. Both make me much more conscious of the zoo on a daily basis.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJun 05, 2010#91

The new Zoo exhibits sound great. I'm rather found of the current sea lion pool, though. I just hope they'll still throw fish to 'em. Great fun to watch.

712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostJun 05, 2010#92

The article mentions a large auditorium that would suggest an expansion of the animals as entertainment aspect of the zoo. :? so yeah, more fish throwing.

If you scroll to the bottom of the article, you'll see links to virtual tour videos for Sea Lion Sound, Grizzly Ridge, and whatever they're going to call the polar bear exhibit. The auditorium looks pretty Sea World like.

PostJul 21, 2010#93

The Science Center has turned 25 and stresses not its new $9.5 million dollar wing, but it's growing educational outreach programs and it's ability to bring in big events.

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostJul 21, 2010#94

DaronDierkes wrote:The Science Center has turned 25 and stresses not its new $9.5 million dollar wing, but it's growing educational outreach programs and it's ability to bring in big events.
It's a nice looking addition. The bonus is we get rid of that dreadful inflatable dome.

106
Junior MemberJunior Member
106

PostJul 21, 2010#95

hot dang! i was wondering what the construction on the driveway/old parking lot area was about, I guess it's prep for this! So what's going to happen with the area that used to be the exploradome? Is that inky-dinky "urban farm" by Monsanto going to take over that whole space? I hope so, no real need for another parking lot unless SLUH pulls an absolutely MASSIVE football game.

712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostJul 21, 2010#96

Since the new wing is replacing existing parking, I wouldn't be surprised if the Exploradome became a parking lot. It's in our DNA.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 21, 2010#97

DaronDierkes wrote:Since the new wing is replacing existing parking, I wouldn't be surprised if the Exploradome became a parking lot. It's in our DNA.
The new addition is taking up about 20 handicap parking spots and a dozen others. Hopefully the lot north of Berthold will become handicap parking and no other parking will be built.

5,722
Life MemberLife Member
5,722

PostJul 21, 2010#98

Since parking is in DNA, I would re-instate the street grid and put up a parking garage on the large existing surface lot. Top off the garage with a grass playing field as part of a green roof park. I know it would be more capital cost but it would satisfy any additional parking issues of an expanded Science museum, sustainable urban developement (letting people know that their in a city with streets and vertical parking doesn't hurt), and give the high school their desired playing fields in one shot.

339
Full MemberFull Member
339

PostJul 21, 2010#99

Alex Ihnen wrote:
DaronDierkes wrote:Since the new wing is replacing existing parking, I wouldn't be surprised if the Exploradome became a parking lot. It's in our DNA.
The new addition is taking up about 20 handicap parking spots and a dozen others. Hopefully the lot north of Berthold will become handicap parking and no other parking will be built.
I agree. It would be a shame if the Science Center didn't take note of the popularity of the City Museum outdoor activity area. Maybe they could provide a large scale scientific playground on the bubble site (like they used to have over near the planetarium).

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 21, 2010#100

^ The science playground is still there, though desperately needs to be redone.

Read more posts (213 remaining)