2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostJun 13, 2010#626

Regarding competitive positioning by Lambert and MidAmerica: I'm more of the mind to see split duties coming from each. Lambert would serve as the primary base of incoming cargo flights for distribution through the central US, and MidAmerica would operate as the mid-range stop-off for Chinese flights into Latin America. I don't see this cross-positioning derailing talks.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJun 14, 2010#627

I understand the point made in the P-D article, but I don't think that the Chinese businesses are going to be confused.

712
Senior MemberSenior Member
712

PostJun 14, 2010#628

When I first saw the headline, I figured they'd be talking about the tri-city port as Illinois' strategy. I guess this makes sense too. How is the freight connection between the two airports? Just trucks? How do they connect to the ports?

8,915
Life MemberLife Member
8,915

PostJul 06, 2010#629

check out page 34-35

http://www.stlcommercemagazine.com/arch ... 10/issue4/

Sounds like we pretty much have this wrapped up.

We would start with 1 flight 2-3 days/week to start. Final negotiations to happen in China in August/September.

Too soon to pop champagne?

2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostJul 06, 2010#630

^Absolutely too early to pop champagne. You know the old expression about counting chickens before they hatch, and being a sports town, you also know about the jinx factor. Same time, it would be smart to have a couple bottles chilled for the announcement.

Also: The article says that any launch may start with only 1 flight every 2-3 days. This is very appropriate and a good sign. The Big Idea is a long-term economic development concept, and with the properties ancillary to the airport ripe for build-out, this could be THE game changer over the next ten years for the region.

Moorlander: Chill the champagne, but crack open a couple beers for now.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 06, 2010#631

There likely won't be a moment to celebrate (maybe a Chinese 747 landing at Lambert for the first time?), but a slow increase in economic activity.

3,552
Life MemberLife Member
3,552

PostJul 06, 2010#632

I feel like this project has the potential for exponential job growth, but just like exponents in math class will start off slow like Alex said.
2 jobs spurs 4 jobs spurs 16 jobs spurs 256 jobs (of course this will likely be in the hundreds and thousands of jobs). Also I'm sure that all of the jobs wont be high paying jobs, but this is an area that is in need of all the jobs we can get.

106
Junior MemberJunior Member
106

PostJul 07, 2010#633

this is just plain/plane freaking huge, possibly even bigger than TWA. Passenger hubs are nice for executives, but cargo hubs... good grief, in so many years, we could be one of the biggest manufacturing cities in the country. and headquarters often like to be near the manufacturing plants, and airlines often like to hub up major headquartering cities, and then the entire country's air system wouldn't shut down every time there's a snowstorm in Chicago :lol:

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 07, 2010#634

That's certainly the hope! Maybe if Judge Dierker were as excited as you Mr. McKee would still have his $390M TIF!

3,552
Life MemberLife Member
3,552

PostJul 07, 2010#635

Yeah this definitely has the potential to greatly change the St. Louis economy. Anyone have any estimates of how many jobs on an average warehousing facility produces?

This has the potential to create a ripple effect through our economy. New jobs result in population growth and therefore new development throughout the region. Hopefully some of that new development will take place in the urban core.

2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostJul 07, 2010#636

What I find fascinating is how this would be a different logistics hub than that for any of the proximate major 3 shipping company hubs (Memphis, Indy, and Louisville). They hub the major shipments for their respective companies, wherein trucks bring in packages set to be delivered from all over the country, and they fly these packages on planes to other cities.

For StL, we would be having direct shipments between the US and China on flights holding multiple producers' goods. While much of it would be perishable foods like beef & pork, it assumedly will also grow to complex, time-specific deliveries, including high-end manufacturing and pharmaceuticals. For these products, manufacturers would want to set up proximate manufacturing sites for direct drop-off at the airport. Where FedEx gets their packages sent to Memphis from all over, we would have many shippers choose to move to StL and originate their manufacturing directly at the point of export. It really is amazing.

Whether it starts with food products like Hershey, or pharm products by Pfizer or GSK, or sensitive electronics by Dell or Cisco, we'll be due to see increased manufacturing grow from any set trading relationship, and with that new manufacturers.

My favorite angle: If the pharmaceutical angle is feasible, and it could better meet a Chinese demand for prescription drugs or high-grade supplements, we could see marked growth in major pharmaceutical companies locating here. Moving forward, it could provide for more growth to the BioBelt idea, increasing investment in CORTeX, and demand for chemists, researchers, and other scientists to StL. The thought of US-China Pharmaceutical Joint Ventures based domestically in Saint Louis is very feasible with time.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostJul 07, 2010#637

The other angle to me, is this part of bigger idea that goes well beyond what is on the mind of local leaders. In other words, do the Chinese consider this as one piece of the puzzle to build a competing brand to rival Fedex, UPS, DHL on the international scene. If so, it makes sense to establish their own North American hub versus an alliance. As noted, their is already multiple air freight/shipping hubs with the infrastructure in place to acccept planes.

2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostJul 07, 2010#638

Dredger wrote:The other angle to me, is this part of bigger idea that goes well beyond what is on the mind of local leaders. In other words, do the Chinese consider this as one piece of the puzzle to build a competing brand to rival Fedex, UPS, DHL on the international scene. If so, it makes sense to establish their own North American hub versus an alliance. As noted, their is already multiple air freight/shipping hubs with the infrastructure in place to acccept planes.
Absolutely. One of the reasons why Chinese freight haulers are the specific targets of our negotiation is their strategy for US goods being shipped to East Asia a la FedEx.

I'd happily have StL be their carrier's US hub.

Ditto for Air China passenger service.

1,364
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,364

PostJul 11, 2010#639

Sounds good to me.

2,835
Life MemberLife Member
2,835

PostJul 13, 2010#640

has anyone else noticed how more Asian STL is getting?
Great to see the diversity.
But seriously, we were downtown and at Lumiere this last weekend and the Asian population presence in STL has exploded.
I love it.

Also saw this article:
Springfield, MO News Leader:

Stores adjust to influx of Chinese college students
July 12, 2010

"While Springfield is no St. Louis, or any major city in California with much bigger Chinese populations, and still lacks in variety, Xi said Chinese students can find in Springfield what they need to please their stomachs."

http://www.news-leader.com/article/20107120364

106
Junior MemberJunior Member
106

PostJul 13, 2010#641

Ditto, i was shocked by the number of Asians at an UMSL concert i went to last year, and they're all over the place when i visit my mom at work (Barnes Jewish). I'm lovin it, looking forward to watching a Chinatown develop and using chopsticks more and more as it grows! :D

514
Senior MemberSenior Member
514

PostJul 23, 2010#642

Today's STLBJ story on Lambert's high landing fees quotes Michael Boyd, president of Boyd Group International, an aviation consulting firm in Evergreen, CO. Boyd basically shoots down this whole Chinese cargo idea.

It's behind the suscriber wall, but I'll quote his section.

http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... tory1.html

Boyd:

...a St. Louis-China freight connection is impractical given the cost of transporting cargo via air.....It's very expensive to move something by air, and it's only worth it to move cargo to a market where it's immediatly produced or consumed....Unless you have an immediate generator of cargo demand in St. Louis, the idea of putting a cargo hub there doesn't make sense...

Sounds like it's only a matter of time until serious MO/STL tax subsidies are offered for this idea.

719
Senior MemberSenior Member
719

PostJul 23, 2010#643

Boyd:

...a St. Louis-China freight connection is impractical given the cost of transporting cargo via air.....It's very expensive to move something by air, and it's only worth it to move cargo to a market where it's immediatly produced or consumed....Unless you have an immediate generator of cargo demand in St. Louis, the idea of putting a cargo hub there doesn't make sense...

Sounds like it's only a matter of time until serious MO/STL tax subsidies are offered for this idea.
If the China Hub idea takes off, i.e. tens of cargo flights a day to and from China, the fees can come down. Memphis, for instance charges only $ 1.35 per 1,000 pounds because of the great number of FEDEX flights.

Boyd is pointing out that you need to generate cargo demand. This is the single most important issue being researched and eventually resolved by the China Hub Committee. (I am optimistic.)

He's right when he states that it's only worth to move cargo to a market where it's immediatly produced or consumed. But that's the whole point. Tons of cargo are now flown to for instance LA and then shipped by freight train to the Midwest. It costs exactly the same to fly these goods directly to the central USA, (STL) where it needs to go in the first place.

Another important issue is that 80% of Chinese exports are now handled by non-Chinese carriers. The Chinese want to fly their products themselves. A St. Louis hub could help them achieve this goal.

106
Junior MemberJunior Member
106

PostJul 23, 2010#644

heck, the fees will come down if we get two or three flights a week as already planned. Cargo weighs a hulluva lot more than passengers, and I'm sure the people running Lambert would be willing to give the Chinese a "bulk" deal on landing fees.

As for a hub making sense here, let's look at the history behind hubs in the midwest. Originally, the plan in the 1800s was to hub the railroad system here in St. Louis because of our centrality. However, no one (at the time) could engineer a bridge to cross the Mississippi near St. Louis, so the rail hub was placed in Chicago, the next best option. Chicago grew exponentially because of the hub, but the hub was NOT placed there because of population/demand, it was placed there due to location. (I'll cite the Museum of Westward Expansion as my source).

Now that we have the technology to span the Mississippi (and more), China is probably looking at the States and saying, "Why the heck are you keeping your hub up in Chicago when you could move it to a place that doesn't get sacked with snow for a whole month out of the year?!" They probably don't care as much about where the population is now because they know that the masses will move if a more appealing option is given. They seem to be banking on St. Louis as that appealing option.

3,441
Life MemberLife Member
3,441

PostJul 24, 2010#645

Well we should be able to at least export fresh "Wild Mississippi River Fish." If we don't, Illinois will.

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/ ... t0713.html

"Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn hoped to spark a modern-day gold rush for fishermen on the Illinois River by signing an agreement to ship as much as 30 million pounds of Asian carp a year to China, where the fish are a delicacy."

"... in China, Asian carp are popular and highly coveted. Big River Fisheries is exploring a marketing campaign to sell "wild grown" Asian carp from Illinois' waters to upscale Chinese restaurants, the way premium beef is sold in the U.S., said Ross Harano, the company's director of international sales."

"Just like people pay a premium for Angus beef, we believe people will pay a premium for this," Harano said. "We're marketing it as 'Wild Mississippi River Fish.' It's all in how you market it over there."

1,364
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,364

PostAug 04, 2010#646

Am I the only one who finds irony in sending Asian Carp to an Asian country?

Anyway, as long as the China Hub gets done and it's beneficial, I will be fine with it.

1,524
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,524

PostAug 07, 2010#647

Mount Pleasant Winery is sending 90 cases of wine to China, their first export to China.

Can you imagine the possibilities for local wine production and the air hub if the Chinese acquire a taste for Norton?

667
Senior MemberSenior Member
667

PostAug 07, 2010#648

STLCardsBlues1989 wrote:Am I the only one who finds irony in sending Asian Carp to an Asian country?

Anyway, as long as the China Hub gets done and it's beneficial, I will be fine with it.
I think its good that Asian Carp is sent there. They're considered a nuisance and have ruined many rivers and streams. Chinese like eating fish, so its good to send some their way! :)

There are so much things that can be sent with this air hub, plus STL is centralized enough that trains from around the country can send some of their goods here. I can't wait for it to start happening!

3,552
Life MemberLife Member
3,552

PostAug 12, 2010#649

Decision time looming on China Hub project
By Tim Logan tlogan@post-dispatch.com > 314-340-8291 | Posted: Thursday, August 12, 2010 12:05 am

The region's bid to land Chinese air cargo flights is getting down to crunch time.

After two and a half years of talks and planeloads of trade delegations crisscrossing the Pacific, the political and business leaders pushing the project say they will know by New Year's if their efforts will take off.

link: http://www.stltoday.com/business/articl ... 13d91.html

2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostAug 12, 2010#650

^ Yes, decisions are imminent, and we'll know about the viability of this going forward within the next 6 months. And I am extremely excited to know how it goes. Personally, I'm of the belief that we will be having something like 4 flights / week between StL and the PRC, elevating that to be daily, and eventually being multiple daily flights (but not necessarily for years).

Hard to keep from being excited. Until then, I'll try to relax and reflect upon these guys' message:

Read more posts (1198 remaining)