Tapatalk

St. Louis, Chinese Air Hub & Aerotropolis initiative

St. Louis, Chinese Air Hub & Aerotropolis initiative

8,915
Life MemberLife Member
8,915

PostFeb 22, 2008#1

Paul McKee Jr. is spearheading an effort to make St. Louis the Midwest cargo hub for Chinese airlines, according to sources close to the initiative.



Civic leaders including McKee, St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay, St. Louis County Executive Charlie Dooley and Regional Chamber & Growth Association President and Chief Executive Dick Fleming are planning a trip to China in late March in an effort to land international cargo at Lambert-St. Louis International Airport.



This trip follows a two-day visit to St. Louis by China's ambassador to the United States, Zhou Wenzhong. McKee, Slay, Dooley and Fleming all attended a luncheon at the Danforth Plant Science Center Wednesday with civic leaders, including Senators Claire McCaskill and Christoper Bond. Also in attendance were McKee's sons, Chris and Joe McKee, and Steve Stone, the McKees' real estate attorney and a member of local law firm Stone, Leyton & Gershman. Stone is credited for playing a major role in orchestrating the St. Louis/China connection. McKee Jr. is credited with bringing the ambassador to town.



Bringing Asian air cargo to St. Louis could be a boon for both the airport and surrounding businesses. International air freight demand is forecasted to increase by about 5 percent annually between now and 2011, according to the International Air Transport Association (IATA). Airlines in the Asia-Pacific region are leading this growth. International air freight exported to and from Asia accounts for about 45 percent of total international freight and will account for more than 55 percent of new traffic by 2011, according to the IATA.



Routing some of this traffic to Lambert makes sense for Paul McKee Jr., who is chairman and chief executive of local development firm McEagle. McEagle is partnering with Clayco Realty Group to redevelop the 550 acres located along the eastern perimeter of Lambert. Plans for the $500 million development, known as NorthPark, include 5.5 million square feet of office, manufacturing and distribution facilities and retail.



Officials across the Mississippi in St. Clair County also have their sights set on the international cargo market. A delegation from MidAmerica St. Louis Airport in Mascoutah visited Hong Kong, Shinzen and Shanghai in January in an effort to make MidAmerica a stopping point for cargo flying from Asia to South America. The airport is in "advanced talks with freight forwarders" in Asia, according to Mark Kern, St. Clair County board chairman.



"We're in the process of building relationships and putting together routes and assembling enough cargo to make routes happen," Kern said. "Our goal is to put MidAmerica in the middle and create the hub between China and South America."



Kern declined to identify any specific entities that MidAmerica was meeting with but said the airport anticipates making "some significant announcements" regarding international cargo in the coming year.


http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... tory1.html

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostFeb 22, 2008#2

I could see how that would help their Blairmont project...

136
Junior MemberJunior Member
136

PostFeb 22, 2008#3

I don't see the connection between the two.



This is great news for the area. As long as we're letting the Chinese run roughshod over our economy, we might as well funnel their goods in and out of Lambert!

667
Senior MemberSenior Member
667

PostFeb 22, 2008#4

I think this would be a boon for the region. If these delegates can lure Air China Cargo or China Eastern Cargo to have operations here, that would be great for the region. I would add new jobs and more vitality for the region. Both Air China and China Eastern have cargo operations in Chicago. However, these 4 regional delegates need to help promote STL in order to lure them here. Nashville (BNA) has China Airlines (Taiwan) cargo land there, but no passenger flights. Hopefully, the lure of cargo could possibly add passenger flights from STL to PEK or PVG. However, I don't see that happening with out subsidies or incentives. :)



Northpark has a lot of available land for warehouses and sorting facilities!

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostFeb 23, 2008#5

bsever wrote:I don't see the connection between the two.


I'm not necessarily suggesting anything, just a thought. Can see a Northpark tie in as well.



With that said, I will actually give the McKee's credit on this one. Trade through Lambert could be really good for the area.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostFeb 23, 2008#6

^ Yes and no. More cargo trade through St. Louis is good. More through Lambert as opposed to MidAmerica? I am not so sure about that.

8,915
Life MemberLife Member
8,915

PostFeb 23, 2008#7

^ Keeping it at Lambert, and keep the business in the state.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostFeb 23, 2008#8

^ That doesn't mean Lamber is the better choice. There is more to look than what state the jobs and tax dollars will be in when considering highest and best land use.

8,915
Life MemberLife Member
8,915

PostFeb 23, 2008#9

agreed

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostFeb 23, 2008#10

bsever wrote:I don't see the connection between the two.
I see a possible connection. Think cheaper building materials and the means of transporting them. This is a smart, ambitious person with the means to make good things happen.

308
Full MemberFull Member
308

PostFeb 24, 2008#11

This could be great of stl, and I think one of the smartest and most opportunity filled business news in st. louis ive heard in a LONG TIME. I'm so happy stl is reaching out to the world vs. a past history of regional economic focus. This type of thinking is vital for any local micro economy to survive in the next century.

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostFeb 25, 2008#12

Hey, I'd be all for it even if they paid ZERO taxes/fees for use of Lambert. ANYTHING to make this F ing happen should be the policy stance. [-o<

2,687
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,687

PostFeb 25, 2008#13

I'm going to avoid the start of a MidAmerica vs Lambert Airport, and simply say that having two doors open is better than one.

3,552
Life MemberLife Member
3,552

PostFeb 25, 2008#14

I would let the Chinese takeover MidAmerica and run all international operations in the US from St. Louis. I mean this is extreme, but I can dream that our leaders our uber-progressive. But I wouldnt mind having a strong Chinese Influence in America. Look at what they did with Vancouver!!!!

8,915
Life MemberLife Member
8,915

PostFeb 25, 2008#15

I don't think I understand the scope of the economic boom this could bring to the area. Anyone care to explain?

2,835
Life MemberLife Member
2,835

PostFeb 25, 2008#16

First off, once the shipments of cargo get to STL from China there has to be service on this side, not only at the international airport but distributors as well.

667
Senior MemberSenior Member
667

PostFeb 25, 2008#17

JCity wrote:Hey, I'd be all for it even if they paid ZERO taxes/fees for use of Lambert. ANYTHING to make this F ing happen should be the policy stance. [-o<


I met up with Charle Dooley over the weekend and we discussed this issue. He said he and other regional officials will act on bring cargo shipments and trade from China to the US through STL. However, incentives and subsidies may be required initially, but over time it will be phased out once the infrustructure i.e. schedules, sorting facilities, warehouses, distribution are in place. This a great opportunity for this region to expand beyond. At least Dooley sees a future in this though I think he is hoping this would add more jobs and economic growth for the county and region specifically. As well as development in the Northpark area.

70
New MemberNew Member
70

PostFeb 25, 2008#18

for the economy it also adds flights and chinese affiliates that are going to live eat work in st. louis

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostFeb 26, 2008#19

goat314 wrote:I would let the Chinese takeover MidAmerica and run all international operations in the US from St. Louis. I mean this is extreme, but I can dream that our leaders our uber-progressive. But I wouldnt mind having a strong Chinese Influence in America. Look at what they did with Vancouver!!!!
:lol: :lol: Does anyone think we would allow a large Chinese operation to set up right next to Scott Air Force Base, using the same runways no less? Although all the spies could be good for our local economy I suppose...

252
Full MemberFull Member
252

PostFeb 27, 2008#20

I don't think I understand the scope of the economic boom this could bring to the area. Anyone care to explain?


I'm sure it won't just be for importing, but also exporting goods to China. Cargo flights will open opportunities for more MO/IL business to export to China at a lower cost. A direct cargo flight to/from STL also strengthens the regional business environment. It could even result in businesses relocating to this region or existing business to grow/increase sales.



I seem to remember a story in the STLBJ or Post about MO businesses that currently export to China. I found some info here:



http://stlouisfed.org/news/speeches/2006/07_31_06.htm

http://www.stlcommercemagazine.com/arch ... nomic.html

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/s ... enDocument

308
Full MemberFull Member
308

PostFeb 28, 2008#21

jlblues wrote:
goat314 wrote:I would let the Chinese takeover MidAmerica and run all international operations in the US from St. Louis. I mean this is extreme, but I can dream that our leaders our uber-progressive. But I wouldnt mind having a strong Chinese Influence in America. Look at what they did with Vancouver!!!!
:lol: :lol: Does anyone think we would allow a large Chinese operation to set up right next to Scott Air Force Base, using the same runways no less? Although all the spies could be good for our local economy I suppose...


Them commie spies, let's get em!



This post boils my blood as it illustrates a completely ignorant approach Americans take to any foreign policy related issue (assuming you're being serious).



Why do so many americans have this seeded impression of war and defense? Do you honestly think China wants to "fight" the US and send "spies"? We are brainwashed as a nation to think this, and as a result we become hostile as a nation. Are you that much of a sucker to American media to think of the world as the glory days of WWII and the Cold War?



Do me a favor jrblues, go visit china and live in shanghai, hong kong or beijing for a while. Get some cultural perspective and start making some intelligent posts. China is not aggressive, WE are aggressive. If anything the "spies" are no different than foreign students studying in the US to learn from our ways. But i'll admit there is a small espionage exchange going on between the two countries but extremely romanticized by the media.

2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostFeb 28, 2008#22

^I would imagine he wasn't being too serious seeing there were some smiley faces. However, you're reply is out of line and unnecessarily attacking.

308
Full MemberFull Member
308

PostFeb 28, 2008#23

and i think his response was out of line (again, assuming he was serious), so it's all a matter of perspective. :?

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostFeb 28, 2008#24

Does McEagle - McKee - actually have his hands in two new business parks bordering Lambert? There is NorthPark of course. The other one is on the north west side along Lindbergh Blvd. I see it from the air when coming and going as well as the new access road being built off Lindbergh and it is definitely seperate from Duke's new warehouse. Would I be correct? I would also be lobbying hard for any business coming from anybody from anywhere if I was him.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostFeb 28, 2008#25

phoaddict wrote:Them commie spies, let's get em!



This post boils my blood as it illustrates a completely ignorant approach Americans take to any foreign policy related issue (assuming you're being serious).



Do me a favor jrblues, go visit china and live in shanghai, hong kong or beijing for a while. Get some cultural perspective and start making some intelligent posts. China is not aggressive, WE are aggressive. If anything the "spies" are no different than foreign students studying in the US to learn from our ways. But i'll admit there is a small espionage exchange going on between the two countries but extremely romanticized by the media.
Small espionage exchange my ass. Do not underestimate the level of economic espionage coming from China. The threat is tremendous and also affects national security. I'm not saying we should be overly suspicious but corporations and government agencies must be ever-vigilant.


http://tinyurl.com/37nwwp wrote:Brenner, who directs the United States' counterspy efforts in the office of the director of national intelligence, says China's technology thieving is "the norm" among industrial nations. But if China is not unique, it does stand out — along with Russia, Cuba and Iran — as among the most active nations, Brenner says.



Beijing's goals aren't limited to traditional national security interests. The world's fastest-growing economy operates a shadowy technology bazaar where individuals offering trade secrets find a ready buyer. About one-third of all economic espionage investigations are linked to Chinese government agencies, research institutes or businesses, according to Bruce Carlson of the FBI's counterintelligence division, who leads the bureau's efforts to combat Chinese spying. Since 2001, the number of FBI investigations of suspected Chinese economic espionage cases increased 12%. "The basis for the whole program is money. People (in the USA) are looking to make a buck. China has money to spend," says Carlson.

Read more posts (1823 remaining)