Picked Oakland in terms of size, significant downtown/center variation in wealth as well as having major institutions & event venues or professional teams while still having neighborhoods like West Oakland or Fruitvale where people are trying to make ends meet while dealing with the crime, drugs and violence much like St. Louis as. Oakland believe has about 70,000 or 80,000 more residents at 400,000. The big difference is Oakland is going through a pretty significant gentrification and rents rising that makes CWE/Cortex success look like a drop in the bucket.Northside Neighbor wrote:Yes, segregation plays a part. However, at same time, the same business of drugs/prostitution/gambling is prevalent in all major cities such as Oakland. But Oakland has a third of the murders so far in 2016 and a violent crime rate less then St. Louis. Go down the bay and it drops in half again in San Jose. I would say Oakland has its fair share of segregation, homelessness and very tough neighborhoods to pretty well to do hillside neighborhoods.
Off the top of my head, I would bet that STL is maybe 2X as poverty stricken as Oakland and San Jose. Oakland is rapidly gentrifying. Formerly rough areas are being transformed by young affluent people buying homes and changing the demographics of the neighborhoods.
A better comparison would be Richmond, CA v. StL.
Richmond at 107,000 is a third the size of St Louis but really doesn't have some of the same dynamics of. A big part of Richmond is essentially a bedroom community for the Bay Area and sometimes people would be surprised to know that they are actually in Richmond city limits itself.





