5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostJun 03, 2009#451

Arch City wrote:
innov8ion wrote:Are you implying that you do not wish us to discuss crime statistics in a St. Louis thread on crime? Too bad.
Don't be foolish.
Note: posting profanity and obscenities



Please do not post profanity, obscenities, or spiteful remarks - Messages which contain excessive and pointless swearing, or insults aimed at other people, or politically offensive language will be removed.



Go to Forum Rules and Tolerances


Arch City wrote:Okay, so let's stick to discussing Downtown St. Louis crime stats since the most recent topic on the Crime thread is about the homicide that occured at Maggie O'B's in downtown St. Louis.



You can't do it. It's too much like right.
This is what the discussion's about, my man. Is it that hard to conceive that socioeconomic conditions in one neighborhood can impact nearby neighborhoods? Should we just ignore the City Circuit Attorney and Police Chief who indicate strong correlations between crime downtown and origins in North City?



I'm sorry, but the first step toward positive change is to face the god-damned truth. We're all in the same boat and we would do better to return from fantasyland and lift one another up.


Arch City wrote:Again, where are YOUR solutions? What are you doing to help the city progress socially besides offering up what paid officials are doing? What are you doing besides inflamming tensions via the safety of your Internet browser?



I submit you aren't doing jack.
The truth should not upset you. If it does, perhaps quiet contemplation may help.



Again, please respond. You likely have greater insight into North St. Louis and as such we are eager to hear of ideas you may have to reduce crime that originates from and manifests there. Are you sharing these ideas with your representatives and neighborhood associations? What are you doing to bring them to fruition? I'm sure there are many eager to help, to include myself.

907
Super MemberSuper Member
907

PostJun 03, 2009#452

ADMINS: I think PD commenter's hijacked Innov8ion and Arch City's accounts....

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostJun 03, 2009#453

Bottom line is we cannot make assumptions where these idiots are from until we get all the facts. They could have been from the Clinton Peabody projects for all we know.

719
Senior MemberSenior Member
719

PostJun 03, 2009#454

Today, the P-D ran an article on the front page about the fact that blacks are being pulled over at a higher percentage than whites.



On the same day:



A man was murdered at Maggie O'Brien's by two black men.



A man was found murdered in North Saint Louis



A man was killed when two black men chased and fired at a woman, a man and a 2-year old child in a Jeep and their car ran into an innocent bystander.



Could there be a reason why blacks are being pulled over at a higher percentage? Or is this bigotry by the Police?

2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostJun 03, 2009#455

Quote from STLToday comments regarding O'Fallon shooting. I couldn't help but chuckle a little bit about how these anonymous posters are so brave!





"Another white woman brings the joys of diversity to a safe town. Soon, St. Charles County will be just like St. Louis County, never to be safe again. What a shame."

PostJun 03, 2009#456

Oh yeah, and I know we are kind of off the bum talk...but...





I ate at Maurizio's. I was at the counter, watched a dude pull out a couple dollars and change to pay for a pint of vodka, then had the nerve to ask me for "some change" to buy a "slice" of pizza. Usually I'll say "No I don't have any" about change, but this time I just kept watching the fountain fill my drink and said "No." It felt good.



Sorry, uber-leftists 8)

2,093
Life MemberLife Member
2,093

PostJun 03, 2009#457

^I don't consider myself an uber-leftist, but Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh would certainly call me a "librul" and I don't give money to panhandlers.



Then again, you are a conservative Republican who doesn't fear the inside of the 270 loop so maybe those time saving stereotypes aren't always so accurate :)

12
New MemberNew Member
12

PostJun 03, 2009#458

innov8ion wrote:The probability is high that the murderer came from North St. Louis.

quote]

That's a fair assumption, but I will say a lot of guys that are murdered on the North Side or the West side aren't from those neighborhoods. A lot of the time those guys are from Wellston, U. City, South Side, Jennings, Dellwood, Pagedale, Bellefontaine Neighbors. It's not that cut and dry. those robbers very well could be from North St. Louis...or the could be from West St. Louis or South St. Louis, East Side, or somewhere in St. Louis County.



Also everything north of Delmar is not considered "North St. Louis" There is a West St. Louis section of town that is bounded by Natural Bridge on the north, Kingshighway on the east, City Limits on the west and Delmar as the southern border.

907
Super MemberSuper Member
907

PostJun 03, 2009#459

I am wondering if we actually need MORE of these crimes to make a change.... Hear me out.



If we have one or two more crimes where robbers shoot and kill, citizens might ACTUALLY not stand for it anymore and start arming themselves, in essence, leading to more criminals being shot by citizens. Which will hopefully stop the crime because the criminals will realize, "wholey crap, they are actually standing up to us, maybe this isnt worth $75 to rob someone"



Look at the 9/11 hijackings. No group of passengers are EVER again going to let someone hijack their plane. We are all so conscious that who ever hijacks a plane is now probably going to just slam it into the ground. So i can almost guarantee all passengers will do WHAT EVER it takes to physically stop future airplane hijackers.



So, could the same thing happen for everyday robberies? People are so afraid/or assume they are going to get shot that they say screw it, and fight back?



Just a thought...

7
New MemberNew Member
7

PostJun 03, 2009#460

I think the last few pages of discussion prove my point that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Someone please tell me how this discussion is significantly more informed and reasonable than the one in the reader comments thread on stltoday?

7,809
Life MemberLife Member
7,809

PostJun 03, 2009#461

The only good thing that will come out of this the following quote from the Post-Dispatch:


ST. LOUIS — Police Chief Dan Isom ordered extra patrols on the western fringe of downtown Tuesday, hours after brazen robbers killed a bartender in a failed holdup at Maggie O'Brien's, a popular pub.


Thanks for fixing those barn doors, Chief.

1,770
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,770

PostJun 03, 2009#462

These crime threads essentially serve for people to vent their frustrations. Read back and notice the pattern. Crime happens, details are solidified, anger is expressed, frustrations devolve into personal back and forth that isn't interesting for anybody but the antagonists. Pissing continues for a page or so and eventually ends in somebody getting exhausted and quitting. Usually there are some racially motivated comments mixed in (some are legitimate, others gratuitous, almost all are taken personally), and frequently somebody takes a cue to threadjack along the lines of either gun control or the necessity of having an armed citizenry. Oh yeah, sometimes conservatards and libpussies opportunistically engage in talking-point cockslapping about the necessity of either "personal responsibility" or public assistance for education and job training. Eventually, Doug shows up and blames crime on the clearance of Mill Creek, Jefferson Davis, Paul McKee, and urban renewal. Finally, somebody makes a dispassionate observation about the tiresome absurdity of it all, includes some funny terms like "cockslapping" in his post, and we all have a chuckle. By that time, another crime will likely have occurred so we can all start rolling the rock back up the hill.

3,766
Life MemberLife Member
3,766

PostJun 03, 2009#463

^Funny... :lol: True

2,093
Life MemberLife Member
2,093

PostJun 03, 2009#464

Good assessment TGE. Thanks for the comic relief :)



And while discussions of crime do get heated and some comments on here go a little over the edge, on the whole the discussion here is more substantial than 90% of what occurs on STL Today.



On this board no one jumps at the first mention of a crime to say "Just another night in the Loo" or other insensitive tripe.



I know folks who work for the Post might not want to hear it, but you really have to hunt to find an intelligent comment on most of those forums.



On this one I'd say (usually) the opposite is true.

7
New MemberNew Member
7

PostJun 03, 2009#465

southsidepride wrote:


I know folks who work for the Post might not want to hear it, but you really have to hunt to find an intelligent comment on most of those forums.



On this one I'd say (usually) the opposite is true.


I agree with the former, and I don't particularly mind hearing it.

941
Super MemberSuper Member
941

PostJun 03, 2009#466

TGE-ATW wrote:These crime threads essentially serve for people to vent their frustrations. Read back and notice the pattern. Crime happens, details are solidified, anger is expressed, frustrations devolve into personal back and forth that isn't interesting for anybody but the antagonists. Pissing continues for a page or so and eventually ends in somebody getting exhausted and quitting. Usually there are some racially motivated comments mixed in (some are legitimate, others gratuitous, almost all are taken personally), and frequently somebody takes a cue to threadjack along the lines of either gun control or the necessity of having an armed citizenry. Oh yeah, sometimes conservatards and libpussies opportunistically engage in talking-point cockslapping about the necessity of either "personal responsibility" or public assistance for education and job training. Eventually, Doug shows up and blames crime on the clearance of Mill Creek, Jefferson Davis, Paul McKee, and urban renewal. Finally, somebody makes a dispassionate observation about the tiresome absurdity of it all, includes some funny terms like "cockslapping" in his post, and we all have a chuckle. By that time, another crime will likely have occurred so we can all start rolling the rock back up the hill.


Best, i mean BEST, post EVER on the Urban STL forum.

2,093
Life MemberLife Member
2,093

PostJun 03, 2009#467

ttricamo wrote:
TGE-ATW wrote:These crime threads essentially serve for people to vent their frustrations. Read back and notice the pattern. Crime happens, details are solidified, anger is expressed, frustrations devolve into personal back and forth that isn't interesting for anybody but the antagonists. Pissing continues for a page or so and eventually ends in somebody getting exhausted and quitting. Usually there are some racially motivated comments mixed in (some are legitimate, others gratuitous, almost all are taken personally), and frequently somebody takes a cue to threadjack along the lines of either gun control or the necessity of having an armed citizenry. Oh yeah, sometimes conservatards and libpussies opportunistically engage in talking-point cockslapping about the necessity of either "personal responsibility" or public assistance for education and job training. Eventually, Doug shows up and blames crime on the clearance of Mill Creek, Jefferson Davis, Paul McKee, and urban renewal. Finally, somebody makes a dispassionate observation about the tiresome absurdity of it all, includes some funny terms like "cockslapping" in his post, and we all have a chuckle. By that time, another crime will likely have occurred so we can all start rolling the rock back up the hill.


Best, i mean BEST, post EVER on the Urban STL forum.


Completely agree! there really ought to be an award 8)

2,426
Life MemberLife Member
2,426

PostJun 03, 2009#468

TGE-ATW wrote:These crime threads essentially serve for people to vent their frustrations. Read back and notice the pattern. Crime happens, details are solidified, anger is expressed, frustrations devolve into personal back and forth that isn't interesting for anybody but the antagonists. Pissing continues for a page or so and eventually ends in somebody getting exhausted and quitting. Usually there are some racially motivated comments mixed in (some are legitimate, others gratuitous, almost all are taken personally), and frequently somebody takes a cue to threadjack along the lines of either gun control or the necessity of having an armed citizenry. Oh yeah, sometimes conservatards and libpussies opportunistically engage in talking-point cockslapping about the necessity of either "personal responsibility" or public assistance for education and job training. Eventually, Doug shows up and blames crime on the clearance of Mill Creek, Jefferson Davis, Paul McKee, and urban renewal. Finally, somebody makes a dispassionate observation about the tiresome absurdity of it all, includes some funny terms like "cockslapping" in his post, and we all have a chuckle. By that time, another crime will likely have occurred so we can all start rolling the rock back up the hill.


Post Of The Month! Especially the part about Doug! (we love you, Doug)

641
Senior MemberSenior Member
641

PostJun 03, 2009#469

And yet it all comes back to people knowing what's right and what's wrong. Blasting a man's face off at his place of work for $50 is wrong. But some people would rather blame that action on everything but the criminal's decision to engage in such behavior....SAD

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostJun 03, 2009#470

Hathaway wrote:I think the last few pages of discussion prove my point that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Someone please tell me how this discussion is significantly more informed and reasonable than the one in the reader comments thread on stltoday?
What are you talking about? You have, what, six posts here? I suppose you have a better handle on crime than Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce and Police Chief Isom? Is this what your pompous statement attempts to prove?



The Post Dispatch comment section is a maelstrom of city/county polarization. It's rendered practically useless because the community is so large which results in a flood of posts lacking a sense of community and accountability. We may disagree on this forum, but the discussion is much more intelligent, we gradually find middle ground, have developed a sense of community over time, and generally respect each other's opinions.



Like in this conversation

- Folks are getting frustrated w/ the recent string of violence. Before we observed criminals murdering other criminals. But now a popular bartender was murdered needlessly. Crime is hitting home and we're taking it personally.

- There is a positive correlation between violence downtown and depressed areas (Lefty makes a good point that areas other than NSTL are sources of crime as well, but the path of least resistance is from nearby areas.)

- Investment in depressed areas like Blairmont could improve safety there and in nearby areas

- Increased camera surveillance in public/private areas where such crime has become a pattern.

- If the violence continues unabated, could more people consider carrying weapons to protect themselves?



Good posts, TGE & SouthSide :P

1,770
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,770

PostJun 03, 2009#471

Well, it seems as if Innov8tion will take this round. It is very difficult to fight stereotypes in this town, they justify themselves entirely too frequently. From the new PD update.



"Police identified a man who was dropped off at Children's Hospital minutes after the robbery and shooting of Dolan as Derrick Bell, 30, of the 5000 block of Cote Brilliante. He died in surgery of a single gunshot wound to the chest.



"It has not yet been determined who shot Bell and, while we cannot say definitively that he was one of the two suspects" in the Maggie O'Brien's attack, said Police spokeswoman Erica S. Van Ross, "he is a probable suspect."

641
Senior MemberSenior Member
641

PostJun 03, 2009#472

That street comes up a lot in the paper. It produces some of STL's finest. Kind of like how the street on the Hill produced Garagiola and Berra.

210
Junior MemberJunior Member
210

PostJun 03, 2009#473

TGE-ATW wrote:Well, it seems as if Innov8tion will take this round. It is very difficult to fight stereotypes in this town, they justify themselves entirely too frequently. From the new PD update.



"Police identified a man who was dropped off at Children's Hospital minutes after the robbery and shooting of Dolan as Derrick Bell, 30, of the 5000 block of Cote Brilliante. He died in surgery of a single gunshot wound to the chest.



"It has not yet been determined who shot Bell and, while we cannot say definitively that he was one of the two suspects" in the Maggie O'Brien's attack, said Police spokeswoman Erica S. Van Ross, "he is a probable suspect."


Well, the guy won't be able to turn snitch on him now.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostJun 03, 2009#474

PD wrote:Police are still looking at surveillance video at Children's Hospital to try to learn the identity of Bell's companion. There were no surveillance cameras inside Maggie O'Brien's and a rotating street camera operated by the city was of no use because it was not positioned on the business at the time of the robbery.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostJun 03, 2009#475

TGE-ATW wrote:Well, it seems as if Innov8tion will take this round. It is very difficult to fight stereotypes in this town, they justify themselves entirely too frequently. From the new PD update.



"Police identified a man who was dropped off at Children's Hospital minutes after the robbery and shooting of Dolan as Derrick Bell, 30, of the 5000 block of Cote Brilliante. He died in surgery of a single gunshot wound to the chest.



"It has not yet been determined who shot Bell and, while we cannot say definitively that he was one of the two suspects" in the Maggie O'Brien's attack, said Police spokeswoman Erica S. Van Ross, "he is a probable suspect."
Read the bolded excerpt. In essence, they still aren't clear if Derrick Bell is an absolute suspect. :roll:



And ultimately, except for investigators and law enforcement, it shouldn't matter from what part of town are the perps. Outside of law enforcement, I submit that only internet racists would care this much. I don't want to be shot by anyone, anywhere, anytime. I'm sure Dolan, while running for his life, wasn't thinking, "What part of town are these men from?"



How ridiculous.

Read more posts (10222 remaining)