283
Full MemberFull Member
283

PostJan 09, 2015#326

I'll put myself out there. I'm against this.

Whooooooo parking. All the parking for your suburban heart's content, right in the heart of downtown.

Also, the line of buildings on Broadway. Tough sh*t for them? Absolutely ridiculous to spout the "we b makin jobs jobs jobs jobs" when you are demolishing the jobs and buildings that have stuck it out through the worst. Go f yourself.

For what? A couple hundred parking spaces? For some people that will high-tail it back to the TGI Fridays/Buffalo Wild Wings anchoring the strip mall in St. Peters?

Jobs my ass.

Ridiculous, harmful, and I hope this doesn't get built.

1,299
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,299

PostJan 09, 2015#327

St. Louisans are cheap. Rather than paying $30 to park a car, expect people to park at Metrolink stations, ride downtown, and walk from Laclede's Landing Station. They do that now for baseball games. But plenty will still pay to park close and tailgate. Maybe that's how they justify only building 10,000 spaces instead of the 15,000 they'd need at a suburban, non-transit accessible site.

641
Senior MemberSenior Member
641

PostJan 09, 2015#328

it's about tail-gating...hence the surface lots. The NFL is losing live attendance and has figured ou that providing a massive tailgating scene keeps people coning to the games....remember, everything in this plan is aimed at pleasing the NFL

1,299
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,299

PostJan 09, 2015#329

Personally, I love how projects like this bring out the true colors in people.

Raging debates about the value of the riverfront, historic preservation, sports, football, public financing, safety in the scary city, on and on.

The entertainment value alone is worth the price of admission!

641
Senior MemberSenior Member
641

PostJan 09, 2015#330

As for Aesir, your emotional rant has some holes in it...For one, how is the North Riverfront doing right now? Shall we just sit back and keep waiting for some organic, home-grown renaissance there...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA.

Keep waiting!!!!

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJan 09, 2015#331

Save Al's!

1,190
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,190

PostJan 09, 2015#332

Would this new stadium be a renaissance though? Why do we need a sea of parking so people can tailgate 8 Saturdays a year?

1,299
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,299

PostJan 09, 2015#333

Some respectable voices in the community are coming out in opposition to this announcement.

Will suburbanites and their football parties reign supreme in deciding what happens along the riverfront?

Who's going on the record supporting this project? The location appears to be mostly in the city's 5th ward. Whose ward is that?

190
Junior MemberJunior Member
190

PostJan 09, 2015#334

My initial 2 cents:

Howzabout moving the stadium just a bit north and saving those magnificent warehouses just east of the powerplant; also, the old buildings on Broadway between Dickson and Florida. So maybe 2500 spots are foregone to save some precious, vanishing "first 150 years" St. Louis history, while still making plenty of new. You can ditch the new glass construction pictured and get some of those needed spots back if you'd like. Get even more if you move the jail and those tanks between the site and the bridge. Why not? What's another 100m or so at this point? And is there a walking connection along 2nd to the Casino/Landing/Metro/Arch. I can't tell from the myriad of initial drawings.

That said, I'm pretty much floored by the swimming-in-the river design with the translucent upper deck?! Thumbs up! And the rehab and reuse of the powerhouse was unexpected by myself and much appreciated.

I know this is anything but what we might actually see constructed, but we could do a lot worse. Maybe we could do better, too.


7,810
Life MemberLife Member
7,810

PostJan 09, 2015#335

Northside Neighbor wrote:Some respectable voices in the community are coming out in opposition to this announcement.
Who?

PostJan 09, 2015#336

This land will be essentially unusable except for games and events.
What is it used for now?

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJan 09, 2015#337

KerrytheKonstructor wrote:My initial 2 cents:

Howzabout moving the stadium just a bit north and saving those magnificent warehouses just east of the powerplant; also, the old buildings on Broadway between Dickson and Florida. So maybe 2500 spots are foregone to save some precious, vanishing "first 150 years" St. Louis history, while still making plenty of new. You can ditch the new glass construction pictured and get some of those needed spots back if you'd like. Get even more if you move the jail and those tanks between the site and the bridge. Why not? What's another 100m or so at this point? And is there a walking connection along 2nd to the Casino/Landing/Metro/Arch. I can't tell from the myriad of initial drawings.

That said, I'm pretty much floored by the swimming-in-the river design with the translucent upper deck?! Thumbs up! And the rehab and reuse of the powerhouse was unexpected by myself and much appreciated.

I know this is anything but what we might actually see constructed, but we could do a lot worse. Maybe we could do better, too.

I just tweeted something similar. Save the Stampworks Lofts, the North Broadway buildings and Al's, and incorporate the Laclede Power Building (the one GRG was going to use as a trailhead) into the stadium design.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 09, 2015#338

KerrytheKonstructor wrote:My initial 2 cents:

And is there a walking connection along 2nd to the Casino/Landing/Metro/Arch. I can't tell from the myriad of initial drawings.
I don't think so... looks like the surface lot blocks where second is now.... looks like there is some kind of boardwalk, promenade along the river b/w the stadium and landing. Also, no boulevard but there is a greenway over 44/70 connecting to the Bottle District, which would remain parking,

9,566
Life MemberLife Member
9,566

PostJan 09, 2015#339

What's the area been used for in the last 20 years and what proposals are on the table for future use other then the stadium? Look I understand saving buildings but not every damn building needs to be saved. Sure history shows who we are but we aren't and we will never been the city of the 1930s 1940s and 1950s. 90% of the buildings there aren't used and the area is on NOBODYS RADAR for anything ever.

PostJan 09, 2015#340

• The new stadium will also include green space and recreational areas, as well as the redevelopment of the landmark Union Electric Ashley Street Power House, constructed in 1902.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 09, 2015#341

^^ What is more concerning to me than the demo of currently unused buildings is the demo of even used buildings that underwent magnificent rehab. Maybe the FarmWorks folks are fine with selling but if not that is a pretty serious issue if they tried e.d. for edge parking. There isn't any reason they couldn't suck it up and leave out that NW quadrant and make up for the lost parking spaces elsewhere.

1,190
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,190

PostJan 09, 2015#342

What is it used for now?
Its used for parking. Why do you think nothing happens there? And its going to stay as parking with this plan. The majority of the buildings that are there currently are being used. Why do we need to replace them with a parking lot? That area is lifeless because its primarily empty lots and parking. Putting in one large stadium and tearing down the remaining buildings, isn't going to change the usefulness of that area (except for game days).

I'm not against the stadium itself. Having it right on the river and next to the powerhouse building will be great. But its not going to revitalize the north riverfront. Warehouses will not be rehabbed because of this. Who would do that for 8 games a year?

9,566
Life MemberLife Member
9,566

PostJan 09, 2015#343

Of course the goal is to make it useful for more then 10 games a year (plus playoffs, so up to 12 in any given seasons). MLS home season is another 20 home games. And peacock did say that the land around it is open for devolopment

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostJan 09, 2015#344

The Stamping Lofts were renovated with LIHTCs. That's going to make demoing that building interesting in and of itself.

Based on what I have seen, there is enough room between the Cotton Belt building and the River to fit the stadium. Put it there, leave all of the historic buildings, and create a true neighborhood. The see of parking in the renderings is a no go for me. Developers will jump all over the existing buildings, and parking will work itself out as it has already for the last 20 years.

1,190
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,190

PostJan 09, 2015#345

^^I get the fact that the area is underutilized right now. We need to invest in the area. This stadium is good in that regard. I just don't think having a giant parking lot for tailgating is the right approach. I'm not saying no to the entire plan, just the monstrous amount of parking. That proposed lot is going in the wrong direction.

Most of that area has been parking lots until now which is exactly why its been underutilized.

190
Junior MemberJunior Member
190

PostJan 09, 2015#346

debaliviere wrote:I just tweeted something similar. Save the Stampworks Lofts, the North Broadway buildings and Al's, and incorporate the Laclede Power Building (the one GRG was going to use as a trailhead) into the stadium design.
I see no reason why the Stampworks Lofts building itself can't be saved also (and preferably to myself, would be). I had actually forgotten about it.

So we could (and again,...preferable to myself,...should) have some very good bits of authentic history on two opposing corners of a modern marvel and still have 8000 or more tailgating spots, I'd guess.

Somewhat morosely, I wouldn't be surprised at all if none of this ever comes to be. Other than Stampworks and Bissingers, of course. How could I forget Stampworks?

1,299
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,299

PostJan 09, 2015#347

The LIHTC recapture issue on Stamping Lofts/FarmWorks can be settled with a lot of $$$$, or "jack", as Kroenke likes to call it.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 09, 2015#348

^^ likely this never comes to pass.... the best chance is if Kroenke buys in and is very patient. Getting through the Army Corps of Engineers alone may take several years.

3,433
Life MemberLife Member
3,433

PostJan 09, 2015#349

These #STLNFL plans are pretty impressive. At least impressive enough to get Stan's attention long enough to try his pre-emptive issuance of a single artist drawing with a swimming pool and some kind of roof in the background. I don't recall seeing a football field anywhere in his artists conception. You'd think with his kind of money, he could get at least one artist to work overtime for him. I like what Peacock has done here. The plans appear to be advanced and serious.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJan 09, 2015#350

where is the stampworks lofts

Read more posts (5152 remaining)