604
Senior MemberSenior Member
604

PostJul 18, 2008#3651

DeBaliviere wrote:Whoop-de-freaking-do.



We're about to lose two major law firms that employ 1,000 people and lease over 300,000 sf of space.


Pehaps now that a development agreement is finalized, the city can at least sway one of these law firms to stay downtown. Apparently one is still considering Ballpark Village.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJul 18, 2008#3652

At first this was to be a fun and exciting project. Cordish/Cardinals/City Hall finally make the big announcement and it's "Woopty- Do"!



Shouldn't we be celebrating the announcement of the investment of 100's of millions of dollars in the dowtown core?

2,093
Life MemberLife Member
2,093

PostJul 18, 2008#3653

metzgda wrote:
DeBaliviere wrote:Whoop-de-freaking-do.



We're about to lose two major law firms that employ 1,000 people and lease over 300,000 sf of space.


Pehaps now that a development agreement is finalized, the city can at least sway one of these law firms to stay downtown. Apparently one is still considering Ballpark Village.


I agree. First things first. I was mad yesterday that residential isn't in Phase 1, but let's concentrate on getting the jobs to stay there and worry about Res later.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostJul 18, 2008#3654

Exactly. Given that both Brown and Centene seem to be using their clout as drawing cards to reel in major law-firm tenants, if Stifel is really interested in having a major presence in the BPV, it would be interesting to see if it couldn't clout to bring such a firm downtown.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJul 18, 2008#3655

JMedwick wrote:Exactly. Given that both Brown and Centene seem to be using their clout as drawing cards to reel in major law-firm tenants, if Stifel is really interested in having a major presence in the BPV, it would be interesting to see if it couldn't clout to bring such a firm downtown.


I hope so.



Stifel is a Thompson Coburn client.

1,026
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,026

PostJul 18, 2008#3656

I agree we need the residential - but this is a good thing. Especially considering that they are keeping the option of residential open - I was worried that they would build in such a way as to prohibit residential in the future ...



and - as a few others have mentioned - there are several spots right next to the stadium (out side of the BPV site) that could support high end residential with views as well (parking lot to the north - parking lot next to Westin) ...



I suspect that development of these lots was not very attractive until the BPV thing got worked out (people like to know their local competition before building big projects) ... hopefully finalizing this will free up the works for those lots as well ...



now I'm just praying that the designs are impressive - and tall

PostJul 18, 2008#3657

and you have to admit that the views from that stadium will be impressive with a few highrises sprouting up next to the outfield.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostJul 18, 2008#3658

DeBaliviere wrote:
JMedwick wrote:Exactly. Given that both Brown and Centene seem to be using their clout as drawing cards to reel in major law-firm tenants, if Stifel is really interested in having a major presence in the BPV, it would be interesting to see if it couldn't clout to bring such a firm downtown.


I hope so.



Stifel is a Thompson Coburn client.


Once again, another reason for the City to be proactive in partnering with Stifel, one of downtowns few growing stars.

1,026
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,026

PostJul 18, 2008#3659

on the converse ... I heard that Husch is moving from their old clayton digs into Blackwell's downtown office (they merged)

PostJul 18, 2008#3660

and another point - why in god's name is there not even a peep about this in the PD? Its not exactly a scoop .... they're pathetic

1,448
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,448

PostJul 18, 2008#3661

A major difference in the revised agreement is that Cordish wants to eliminate the residential component from its $387 million first phase of construction and save it for a later date when market conditions improve. Citing tight credit markets and a battered housing market, DeWitt said a new condominium tower does not make sense right now.



Cordish officials have always been careful to call the housing market in downtown St. Louis an emerging one, noting that no new residential high-rise projects have been built downtown in decades. In an April 18, 2006, memo to city officials, Cordish Director of Finance Jason Epstein said that the final project would change to meet evolving market conditions.



Slay has long pushed for condominiums or apartments as part of the plan, but is now willing to give Cordish more flexibility.


Um, what about the Roberts Bros. Tower? Why do people act like it doesn't exist??

63
New MemberNew Member
63

PostJul 18, 2008#3662

Couple thoughts:



1) I hope an agreement has actually been signed (the Business Journal says that the news conference will discuss an agreement "in principle" that has been reached.



2) If I am Cordish, why give up govt guarantees on the bonds? That seems to be a lot to give up. My only guess is that Cordish has the commercial tenants lined up and ready to go (at least to the extent that they feel the govt backing is unnecessary.

7,810
Life MemberLife Member
7,810

PostJul 18, 2008#3663

stlbluejay wrote:Couple thoughts:



1) I hope an agreement has actually been signed (the Business Journal says that the news conference will discuss an agreement "in principle" that has been reached.



2) If I am Cordish, why give up govt guarantees on the bonds? That seems to be a lot to give up. My only guess is that Cordish has the commercial tenants lined up and ready to go (at least to the extent that they feel the govt backing is unnecessary.


It's probably the same crap package of tennants they have at other Cordish developments.

-Lucky Strike

-Flying Saucer

-Howl at the Moon

-Makers Mark

396
Full MemberFull Member
396

PostJul 18, 2008#3664

http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... 00^1669963



Eight years after Ballpark Village was initially conceptualized, a deal has been reached between city officials and developers for the $650 million project to finally break ground.



According to those close to the negotiations, the city of St. Louis held firm to its position to not guarantee the bonds for the project -- a key point developer Cordish Co. sought -- or use general revenue funds for the project. Cordish has received guarantees on bonds for many of its mixed-use projects across the country, including its Power and Light District in Kansas City. No one involved in the local negotiations would talk on the record for this story.



Negotiations between St. Louis city officials, the St. Louis Cardinals and Baltimore-based developer Cordish Co. have spanned the past two months. The heavy lifting was handled by Mayor Francis Slay, Cordish Vice President Blake Cordish, Stifel Financial CEO Ron Kruszewski and Cardinals President Bill DeWitt III.



Those talks have now ended with a deal in place and a development agreement in the works for state and local officials to affirm in the coming weeks. A press conference announcing the agreement in principle is expected to come early next week. Pre-construction site work for the mixed-use development is expected to begin on the footprint of the former Busch Stadium later this summer.



Everyone gave up something in the deal. Cordish did not get the city-guaranteed financing on the project. City officials have always pushed for new residential units to be a part of the deal, but relented. The Cardinals unquestionably want to polish the image of the organization, which has taken a P.R. beating as no progress has been made on the site.



Construction won't be completed as previously planned by next year's All-Star Game in St. Louis. But work will be under way on a massive development that will give fans and visitors something to look at besides a vacant lot.



Ballpark Village will progress in phases, with a mix of office, retail and entertainment space planned for the initial build-out. The city of St. Louis has agreed to prorate its subsidy package to give Cordish more flexibility to build based on market demand. A nine-page term sheet for the deal stipulates that public subsidies will cover between 100,000 and 750,000 square feet of office space in the project and between 225,000 and 260,000 square feet of retail and entertainment space. Residential units could be added in a later phase, but there is no obligation to go forward with condominiums or apartments. Cordish would only qualify for incentives on a residential component if it develops 100 housing units or more, according to the term sheet.



The previously awarded city and state subsidy package totaled $115 million, based on the original scope of the project. An addition to the modified plan allows Cordish and the Cardinals to recoup up to $7.9 million to pay for infrastructure costs if it includes a hotel in the project.



The contentious battle over terms for the project has dragged on between the city and Cordish for nearly a year and a half since the city approved tax increment financing for the project in February 2007. Talks stalled earlier this year after Centene Corp. pulled out of its plans to build a $210 million headquarters building at Ballpark Village. Centene instead is pursuing plans to build its headquarters on property it owns near its current headquarters in Clayton.



Centene's reversal sent the developers of Ballpark Village back to the drawing board for the 12-acre site. When talks broke down, St. Louis officials turned to Kruszewski and Stifel Vice President Peter Czajkowski to hammer out an agreement that wouldn't put taxpayers on the hook to guarantee bonds for the project.



Stifel, which is based at the One Financial Plaza building at 501 N. Broadway downtown, is eyeing a move to Ballpark Village but has not yet made a decision on its office space needs. It is also expected to help the city sell the bonds to support the project. Stifel is among St. Louis' largest public companies with $793 million in annual revenue in 2007.



Reporter Christopher Tritto contributed to this story.





lrbrown@bizjournals.com

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJul 18, 2008#3665

steve wrote:Um, what about the Roberts Bros. Tower? Why do people act like it doesn't exist??


Makes no sense.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJul 18, 2008#3666

According to those close to the negotiations, the city of St. Louis held firm to its position to not guarantee the bonds for the project -- a key point developer Cordish Co. sought -- or use general revenue funds for the project. Cordish has received guarantees on bonds for many of its mixed-use projects across the country, including its Power and Light District in Kansas City.


What does this mean exactly???

31
New MemberNew Member
31

PostJul 18, 2008#3667

Who wants to place bets on dates for construction starts?

1,099
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,099

PostJul 18, 2008#3668

Your assignment is to write 1 or 2 paragraphs comparing and contrasting the three passages below.



Two local project buck the condo trend
Take the Ball Park Lofts at Cupples Station, within steps of Busch Stadium. A few weeks ago, well into the housing bust, developer Blue Urban staged what company President Kevin McGowan likes to call an "NFL-style draft" for sale of condos on the fifth and sixth floors of Building 9, one of three the company is renovating there.



All 36 units sold in 40 minutes. "That's about $9 million worth of condos," McGowan said.



...



McGowan knows location drove sales at Building 9. "If this wasn't across from the ballpark, we wouldn't even propose a condo project there right now," he said. "We'd do apartments."
Dewitt delivers
P-D: Will the project be recognizable compared to its original rendering?



BDJ: I think it will be recognizable from the original vision. I don't think residential will be Phase I. It will be a second phase. I hope the residential market comes back to where it's viable.
Ballpark Village: It's in the cards
Everyone gave up something in the deal. Cordish did not get the city-guaranteed financing on the project. City officials have always pushed for new residential units to be a part of the deal, but relented. The Cardinals unquestionably want to polish the image of the organization, which has taken a P.R. beating as no progress has been made on the site.

PostJul 18, 2008#3669

Moorlander wrote:
According to those close to the negotiations, the city of St. Louis held firm to its position to not guarantee the bonds for the project -- a key point developer Cordish Co. sought -- or use general revenue funds for the project. Cordish has received guarantees on bonds for many of its mixed-use projects across the country, including its Power and Light District in Kansas City.
What does this mean exactly???
See this 1996 St. Louis Business Journal article for reference.



City helping Marketplace shop for potential grocery store tenant
The city has a large stake in keeping St. Louis Marketplace alive. Unlike many TIF deals, the $15 million in bonds for St. Louis Marketplace are backed by the city. This means that if the shopping center does not generate sufficient taxes to meet the bond payments, the city must back up the shortfall. According to city officials, the debt service on the city-backed bonds is current.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostJul 18, 2008#3670

OK, here is a stab at it.



The City, DeWitt's and Cordish finally come to an agreement after realizing that time and opportunities have been lossed. Something needs to be built on the regions premium real estate. Their is simply too much money to made on this property if development is done right. The city kept itself from being a backer of bonds as a means to keep political support from Comptroller Green's office as well as the alderman who support her. In return, Cordish got more flexibility in what to build first by dropping residential in Phase I.



The development has everybody perplexed on the complexity of the area's residential market, specifically the condo market. Sales have fallening off dramatically on Wash Ave. Pyramid's collapse is causing people to guess on when or if construction will even start on the Laural while stopping new highrise projects cold, Skyhouse and Vallencia (in Richmond Heights). At the same time, developers who saw gold in Cupples Warehouses pounced. The well built and easy to rehab structures offered a chance to market condos at a reasonable price structure immediately while BPV languished



The big guessing game now is what will be built in phase I of BPV? No doubt a mix of chain restaraunts and some retail will happen. However, will their be a office tower as suggested. Will law firms flock west as suggested by the biz journal today? Can BPV of scale happen without a Centene in the picture? Can downtown support another hotel? In the end, lossed time means lossed opportunities in which markets are never static.

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostJul 18, 2008#3671

stlbluejay wrote:2) If I am Cordish, why give up govt guarantees on the bonds? That seems to be a lot to give up. My only guess is that Cordish has the commercial tenants lined up and ready to go (at least to the extent that they feel the govt backing is unnecessary.
Maybe because they have no intention of building a $650 million development any more? They will instead simply build a project, the size of which makes the added risk of no guarantees acceptable.


the Business Journal wrote:Plans still call for a $650 million multi-phased, mixed-use development similar to that proposed before Centene Corp. announced last September it would purchase a portion of the site and build a new headquarters there, according to Rainford and Cardinals President Bill DeWitt III.
They do? What, are they going to pave the parking lot with gold?


Moorlander wrote:At first this was to be a fun and exciting project. Cordish/Cardinals/City Hall finally make the big announcement and it's "Woopty- Do"!



Shouldn't we be celebrating the announcement of the investment of 100's of millions of dollars in the dowtown core?
How do you know it will be "100's of millions of dollars" of investment?


markofucity wrote:and you have to admit that the views from that stadium will be impressive with a few highrises sprouting up next to the outfield.
What highrises?

PostJul 18, 2008#3672

steve wrote:
Cordish officials have always been careful to call the housing market in downtown St. Louis an emerging one, noting that no new residential high-rise projects have been built downtown in decades.
Um, what about the Roberts Bros. Tower? Why do people act like it doesn't exist??
If by "people" you mean Cordish, then it's because they don't want to build residential. You do have to admit though, that you can't exactly call the Roberts Tower a market-driven project. I'm sure the loan-to-value ratio on their financing was pretty low. IOW, the Roberts Tower wouldn't have happened if they hadn't put tens of millions of their own dollars on the line.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJul 18, 2008#3673

jlblues wrote:
Moorlander wrote:At first this was to be a fun and exciting project. Cordish/Cardinals/City Hall finally make the big announcement and it's "Woopty- Do"!



Shouldn't we be celebrating the announcement of the investment of 100's of millions of dollars in the dowtown core?
How do you know it will be "100's of millions of dollars" of investment?


i'm sorry, what's your take? In your opinion how many $ of investment is it then? :roll:





New deal for Ballpark Village 'very close'

By Riddhi Trivedi-St. Clair

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

07/18/2008

A spokesman for St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay said today that Ballpark Village developers would have greater flexibility in deciding the size of the project under a revised plan.



A deal between the city and developers is very close, said Jeff Rainford, chief of staff for Mayor Francis Slay. An announcement could come as soon as next week, he said.



The eight-acre mixed-use development covering seven blocks originally was to include office and retail/entertainment space as well as a possible residential component. That mix likely will change under the new agreement, but specific details have not been released.



The developers, the St. Louis Cardinals and Baltimore-based Cordish Co., would not be tied to specific development targets and could take market conditions into account in deciding the scope of the project, Rainford said. Public subsidies would change with the size of the development.



"The way it could work, is they build a smaller project with a smaller subsidy or a larger one with larger incentives on a pro-rated basis," Rainford said.



The original plan called for the $387 million first phase of Ballpark Village to include 360,000 square feet of retail, 100,000 square feet of offices and an optional residential portion. The developers were to receive about $115 million in local and state tax breaks and subsidies.



The proposed deal allows the Cardinals and Cordish to build between 100,000 square feet and 750,000 square feet of office space. The retail part is uncertain, and residential would remain optional.



The new agreement would have to be approved by several groups, including the Board of Aldermen. The process could take eight to 10 months, Rainford said.



If approved, ground breaking could be early 2009


READ MORE HERE

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostJul 18, 2008#3674

Moorlander wrote:
jlblues wrote:
Moorlander wrote:At first this was to be a fun and exciting project. Cordish/Cardinals/City Hall finally make the big announcement and it's "Woopty- Do"!



Shouldn't we be celebrating the announcement of the investment of 100's of millions of dollars in the dowtown core?
How do you know it will be "100's of millions of dollars" of investment?
i'm sorry, what's your take? In your opinion how many $ of investment is it then? :roll:
Did you read the article you just quoted?


A spokesman for St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay said today that Ballpark Village developers would have greater flexibility in deciding the size of the project under a revised plan.



The eight-acre mixed-use development covering seven blocks originally was to include office and retail/entertainment space as well as a possible residential component. That mix likely will change under the new agreement, but specific details have not been released.



The developers, the St. Louis Cardinals and Baltimore-based Cordish Co., would not be tied to specific development targets and could take market conditions into account in deciding the scope of the project, Rainford said. Public subsidies would change with the size of the development.



"The way it could work, is they build a smaller project with a smaller subsidy or a larger one with larger incentives on a pro-rated basis," Rainford said.



The original plan called for the $387 million first phase of Ballpark Village to include 360,000 square feet of retail, 100,000 square feet of offices and an optional residential portion. The developers were to receive about $115 million in local and state tax breaks and subsidies.



The proposed deal allows the Cardinals and Cordish to build between 100,000 square feet and 750,000 square feet of office space. The retail part is uncertain, and residential would remain optional.
1) Cordish/Cardinals are only committed to building a $60 million project. This new agreement does not seem to have any increased level of commitment.

2) They are saying Phase I will only include between 100,000 and 750,000 sf of office space.

3) There will be no residential.

4) There is no commitment to the amount of retail, but lets say Phase I will include 150,000 sf.

5) There may be a mid-rise hotel.

6) There will be a parking garage, probably above-ground.

So, you tell me, on what are they going to invest "100's of millions of dollars"?

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJul 18, 2008#3675

Did you read the article you just quoted?

YES



1) Cordish/Cardinals are only committed to building a $60 million project. This new agreement does not seem to have any increased level of commitment. OK? Will you sleep better tonight if I alter my original statement to say 10s of millions instead of 100's?



2) They are saying Phase I will only include between 100,000 and 750,000 sf of office space. OK? i I could see that costing upwards of 100mill couldn't you?



3) There will be no residential. True, In phase 1



4) There is no commitment to the amount of retail, but lets say Phase I will include 150,000 sf. OK?



5) There may be a mid-rise hotel. OK?



6) There will be a parking garage, probably above-ground. DUH



So, you tell me, on what are they going to invest "100's of millions of dollars"? Roughly $100 mill in phase 1 and likley/possibly many times that in addition phases. Did you read the article I posted?

Read more posts (1085 remaining)