604
Senior MemberSenior Member
604

PostMar 08, 2008#2926

So does the KCP&L district have any residential options? From renderings it seemed similar to Ballpark Village in that there would be hundreds of condos and apartments built. From what I've seen however, it doesn't look like any residential component is there. To me, it seems like an isolated retail development with a new office headquarters and an empty entertainment center (Sprint Center). If KC doesn't get any residential built nor attract a team to Sprint Center quickly, I could see that development going downhill quickly.



Ballpark Village mirrors KCP&L so much it's scary. However, it seems that STL will be in a little better situation in that Cordish is required to have 250 condos in the first phase (at least some residential), we also have an office headquarters, AND we have a functioning entertainment center (Busch Stadium) next to the development.

459
Full MemberFull Member
459

PostMar 08, 2008#2927

^and the biggest point...we actually have a tenent (St. Louis Cardinals).

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostMar 08, 2008#2928

marc buxton wrote:St. Louis has too many established/burgeoning entertainment districts for the size of the market. Mom and Pop business will feel pressure and some will not make it after BPV opens. Local flavor so prevelant in St. Louis nightlife will be at risk. I also think centralization concepts will make it tougher on periphial entertainment areas such as the Cupples Warehouse district, Union Station/Locust, Olive/Midtown). I mean, how do you think Broadway Oyster Bar or BB's will fare with this monster down the street?


I suspect BB's & the Oyster Bar will be just fine. Because no matter what god awful dueling piano bar they might put into BPV, that crowd will never go to BB's.



Wait, you want me to pay $10 to hear Little Ed & The Blues Imperials? What music do they play?



They play blues.



You mean like Kenny G?



Ummmm...no.



Yeah, but I can get into the piano bar at BPV for free! And they play Beatles songs!



Have a nice evening....

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostMar 11, 2008#2929

Hey, just curious - the BPV hasn't broken ground right? I'm collecting T-shirts from failed "guarantees" - like the bottle district, patriots 19-0, St. Louis stallions....



I've got my BPV '08 shirt all ready to go. Just need to make sure it's not happening before I ship it to Nigeria.

2,386
Life MemberLife Member
2,386

PostMar 11, 2008#2930

On a slightly related topic, the news that Busch will hold concert series' during the summer (possibly) starting in 2009 means even more increased revenue for this project. First concert is DMB June '07.

2,427
Life MemberLife Member
2,427

PostMar 11, 2008#2931

Francis Slay was interviewed on Collateral Damage this evening, and when asked about the status of Ballpark Village, basically said that it's far from a done deal (I don't want to attempt to quote him verbatim, but it was very discouraging, I assure you of that). In short, he's very discouraged that it will happen at all.



Well, all I can say is, I told ya so. In typical St. Louis fashion, we've been duped into another bullsh*t promise, and we're saddled with yet another net loss. A big f**king hole in the ground. We'll be lucky if Centene bothers to stick around. I'm sure Charlotte or Atlanta would bend over backwards to lure them. Meanwhile, we're lollygagging like a bunch of bumbling idiots who can't get their sh*t together.



Prediction: 2009 will come and we will still have nothing but a hole in the ground. I pray that I am wrong.

3,548
Life MemberLife Member
3,548

PostMar 11, 2008#2932

I hope your wrong too Gasm. Ya know St. Louis has always been known as a northern city with southern politics, but these days it seems like we could benefit from some of those down south tactics. What really hurts the St. Louis area is a combination of Missouri politics, city/county split, racial tension, lack of leadership with vision, and lack of public support. The fact is most people here don't think of St. Louis as a first rate city, so thats why we get all of these half ass developments. Do you think this sh*t would go down in Atlanta or even Charlotte. Hell Naw! St. Louis's biggest enemies are the people and state we are in. Its crazy how people from other places can see the potential for greatness but we cant. As long as the people in St. Louis are content we will remain a second rate metropolitan with world class potential and what awards do you get for that :roll:. I'm seriously think about contacting some officials or the post or something. I want to know why St. Louisans have zero civic pride. If we had have the pride ATL had we would be twice as better.

You know how many metropolitan areas would kill for our:

architecture

central location on two major waterways

low cost of living

storied baseball franchise

unique culture

international effing monument on our front lawn that is heavily underutilized

history

St. Louis has no excuse not to be a top 10 metropolitan area like it was for most of its history.

27
New MemberNew Member
27

PostMar 11, 2008#2933

goat314 wrote:I hope your wrong too Gasm. Ya know St. Louis has always been known as a northern city with southern politics, but these days it seems like we could benefit from some of those down south tactics. What really hurts the St. Louis area is a combination of Missouri politics, city/county split, racial tension, lack of leadership with vision, and lack of public support. The fact is most people here don't think of St. Louis as a first rate city, so thats why we get all of these half ass developments. Do you think this sh*t would go down in Atlanta or even Charlotte. Hell Naw! St. Louis's biggest enemies are the people and state we are in. Its crazy how people from other places can see the potential for greatness but we cant. As long as the people in St. Louis are content we will remain a second rate metropolitan with world class potential and what awards do you get for that :roll:. I'm seriously think about contacting some officials or the post or something. I want to know why St. Louisans have zero civic pride. If we had have the pride ATL had we would be twice as better.

You know how many metropolitan areas would kill for our:

architecture

central location on two major waterways

low cost of living

storied baseball franchise

unique culture

international effing monument on our front lawn that is heavily underutilized

history

St. Louis has no excuse not to be a top 10 metropolitan area like it was for most of its history.


Slay just doesn't get it, unfortunately.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMar 11, 2008#2934

STLgasm wrote:I'm sure Charlotte or Atlanta would bend over backwards to lure them.


Yep, Charlotte continues to actively market itself for corporate relocations. Recently, 13-plus acres were created from reducing the footprint of freeway interchanges. Maybe St. Louis could market the Ballpark Village site similar to this City of Charlotte website (though maybe not create such a cheesy video intro that makes you look like the center of the universe).

835
Super MemberSuper Member
835

PostMar 11, 2008#2935

I think a lot of people predicted this. The grandiose proposals were just a tactic to get the public on board for the new stadium. As I've maintained all along, the old Busch was FAR superior to what we have now.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostMar 11, 2008#2936


10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMar 11, 2008#2937

southslider wrote:
STLgasm wrote:I'm sure Charlotte or Atlanta would bend over backwards to lure them.


Yep, Charlotte continues to actively market itself for corporate relocations. Recently, 13-plus acres were created from reducing the footprint of freeway interchanges. Maybe St. Louis could market the Ballpark Village site similar to this City of Charlotte website (though maybe not create such a cheesy video intro that makes you look like the center of the universe).


Does Charlotte have its own version of Clayton, stealing downtown's thunder?

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMar 11, 2008#2938

^There are multiple edge-cities (South Park, Ballantyne, etc.) in Charlotte, but they're all in within the city limits. Just imagine if St. Louis city limits extended to I-270, but also to I-255 for that matter, as Charlotte covers virtually everything inside I-485 and its CBD is centrally located. It also helps that the wealthiest areas are fairly equally south (South Charlotte) and north (Lake Norman) of the CBD, the former of which is even inside city limits, great for tax base. Finally, I'm sure it helps that the growing CBD (lowest vacancy rate in the nation) is dominated by finance, utilities and government, all sectors better suited for downtown than suburban office parks. Here are some maps on-line, if you're interested.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMar 11, 2008#2939

southslider wrote:^There are multiple edge-cities (South Park, Ballantyne, etc.) in Charlotte, but they're all in within the city limits. Just imagine if St. Louis city limits extended to I-270, but also to I-255 for that matter, as Charlotte covers virtually everything inside I-485 and its CBD is centrally located. It also helps that the wealthiest areas are fairly equally south (South Charlotte) and north (Lake Norman) of the CBD, the former of which is even inside city limits, great for tax base. Finally, I'm sure it helps that the growing CBD (lowest vacancy rate in the nation) is dominated by finance, utilities and government, all sectors better suited for downtown than suburban office parks.


Thank you. I wish our downtown was more like uptown Charlotte in some ways. It's been a few years since I've been there, but I love the concentration of corporate HQs and the fact that there are LOTS of cultural venues there. I hate how everything in STL is so spread out.

508
Senior MemberSenior Member
508

PostMar 11, 2008#2940

Prediction: 2009 will come and we will still have nothing but a hole in the ground. I pray that I am wrong.


I think you are wrong Gasm.... I predict that by 2009 we will have a nicely paved lot full of prime parking spots, for all those out of towners coming to the all star game.....

205
Junior MemberJunior Member
205

PostMar 11, 2008#2941

The world is not ending. In fact, I really don't think St. Louis needs BPV. Instead of putting all our money (in the metaphorical sense) on these concentrated megaprojects (BPV, Bottle District, St. Louis Centre to an extent), St. Louis needs to focus on getting "little" wins. We need to encourage small businesses to choose downtown St. Louis as their home, and we need to coax businesses already in the St. Louis area to relocate to downtown.



To me, this approach seems much safer than begging Cordish to do this project and praying that a domino effect will result.



If BPV falls through, it will be the loss of a potentially major job, retail, and residential addition. But it was a gamble to begin with, so we should move toward a more pragmatic approach.

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostMar 11, 2008#2942

brody wrote:The world is not ending. In fact, I really don't think St. Louis needs BPV. Instead of putting all our money (in the metaphorical sense) on these concentrated megaprojects (BPV, Bottle District, St. Louis Centre to an extent), St. Louis needs to focus on getting "little" wins. We need to encourage small businesses to choose downtown St. Louis as their home, and we need to coax businesses already in the St. Louis area to relocate to downtown.



To me, this approach seems much safer than begging Centene to do this project and praying that a domino effect will result.



If BPV falls through, it will be the loss of a potentially major job, retail, and residential addition. But it was a gamble to begin with, so we should move toward a more pragmatic approach.


Gamble? What gamble? It was A FREAKING AGREEMENT between the city, state, and Cardinals owners. They HAVE TO BUILD IT or pay the fines. Of course, I said from the beginning they'd never build the thing. No way the owners risk developing that much real estate (especially now in this market) when they can pay $30 mil or whatever and leave it as a big hole in the ground. Considering the cost of the new stadium they would've paid for, they STILL make out like bandits - a stadium they own and control that the city and state paid mostly for.



The good news is that the Cardinals are so awful (I'm projecting 12 wins this year - maybe 15 if Carp comes back healthy) that the fans are going to start noticing not only are the games lousy to go to, but the area has gotten worse with all the vacant land.



Keep up the good work Cards owners! Great effort City of STL! Go Team! :bash:

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostMar 12, 2008#2943

migueltejada wrote:Gamble? What gamble? It was A FREAKING AGREEMENT between the city, state, and Cardinals owners. They HAVE TO BUILD IT or pay the fines.
Actually, they only have to build a $60 million development to avoid paying the penalty. The Cardinals Hall of Fame/offices (which I'm sure they will proceed with eventually, no matter what happens), one or two retail spaces, and a massive parking lot might come close to that. IIRC, they have until 2011 before any penalty could be imposed.

508
Senior MemberSenior Member
508

PostMar 12, 2008#2944

:Violin : Well, gentlemen, it has truly been an honor playing with you. Those who wish may join me in playing "Nearer My God to Thee" in G-minor. :Violin : see you at the bottom of the pond....

3,548
Life MemberLife Member
3,548

PostMar 12, 2008#2945

I agree Magnatron what is the f'ing hold up! Is it just me or does this town have the worst luck and most waisted potential of any metro out there. What is wrong with this town? I love St. Louis, but this city can really bring your hopes up and send them crumbling to the ground.

190
Junior MemberJunior Member
190

PostMar 12, 2008#2946

As for the long delay, I used to work for a national retailer's real estate division and it would sometimes take them up to seven years to build what most people on this forum would describe as a cookie-cutter box.



There are many different parties involved with this deal, so you can expect this to take some time.

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostMar 12, 2008#2947

I am not convinced that BPV is dead by that segment. Lots of question marks but nothing overwhelming that would cause me to go around saying it wasnt going to happen unlike some on this board. Where is the confidence??? It sounds as if the City and Cards want to get it done but the holdup is with Cordish. Hopefully we hear soon whether Cordish is in or out as the developer as the Mayor stated. The one positive thing is that they are doing their best to do things the right way instead of settling for a dissapointing development. If Cordish is out isnt it possible to lure a new developer???

1,585
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,585

PostMar 12, 2008#2948

Well this is just the icing on the cake on my God-forsaken day.

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostMar 12, 2008#2949

jlblues wrote:
migueltejada wrote:Gamble? What gamble? It was A FREAKING AGREEMENT between the city, state, and Cardinals owners. They HAVE TO BUILD IT or pay the fines.
Actually, they only have to build a $60 million development to avoid paying the penalty. The Cardinals Hall of Fame/offices (which I'm sure they will proceed with eventually, no matter what happens), one or two retail spaces, and a massive parking lot might come close to that. IIRC, they have until 2011 before any penalty could be imposed.


Thanks for proving my point:



Whatever the fine is, it's LESS than the price of building the development, not to mention ongoing upkeep and maintenance costs that could add hundreds of thousands a year onto the project in losses. Why as the owner of a pro sports franchise that has the sweet end of the deal and the city by the balls would I EVER build the thing? Yeah sure I COULD make money - but no one ever got rich on coulds. Stick a fork in this one folks - unless the city wrests control from the Cardinals (not out of the realm of possibility), this one's D-U-N Done.

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostMar 12, 2008#2950

To tell you the truth, I'm still not worried. Granted, I haven't been able to get Collateral Damage to stream for me, but at this point we are still a month or two away from the projected start, if not more. And does anyone realize that Centene has only been on board since September? Remember, it's a pretty large building to design and engineer. I'm pretty confident at least Centene will be going up by the end of Summer. They will basically be a separate project on separate land. Everyone here is too emotional.

Read more posts (1810 remaining)