5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostFeb 13, 2007#1426

^ I'm sure Nelly and some of his local clones will want in on the action too.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostFeb 13, 2007#1427

dweebe wrote:Maybe redneck woman Gretchen Wilson can keep her Christmas light up all year long on her Ballpark Village condo.


Or my neighbors on Pernod could just move there. Still rockin' the Xmas lights in February...

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostFeb 13, 2007#1428

^lol, I'll have to look for that tonight since it will look and feel like Christmas.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostFeb 13, 2007#1429

In between Regal and Macklind, I believe. Pretty damn festive.

359
Full MemberFull Member
359

PostMar 07, 2007#1430

How much longer until construction starts?

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostMar 26, 2007#1431

Found a "marketing" rendering.




508
Senior MemberSenior Member
508

PostMar 26, 2007#1432

Gorgeous. I am keeping my fingers permanently crossed in hopes that we get something close to what we see, at least in terms of height.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostMar 26, 2007#1433

Very nice. I count about 30 floors on the tallest tower. That would really help balance-out the skyline.

139
Junior MemberJunior Member
139

PostMar 26, 2007#1434

That is going to be one sweet development! I showed my gf and she was asking me if I would live with her in one of the apartments or condos. As long as the development is built to look like the renderings I would have no problem. I just fear that the developers will short change it and it won't be as successful as it should be. It will only be huge if it is built huge.



I checked out the full scale model of this development and the tallest tower roughly matched the height of the Bank of America tower at 384 feet, so this should really bulk up the downtown skyline on the southern end where it needs it most.

508
Senior MemberSenior Member
508

PostMar 26, 2007#1435

I really like the 2 shorter towers on the west5ern side of the development. There is something classy about the square grid on those buildings that says "city" to me. Put an elevated train next to them I might actually confuse it with Chicago

459
Full MemberFull Member
459

PostMar 26, 2007#1436

I thought there wasn't going to be any condos in the 1st phase.

1,448
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,448

PostMar 26, 2007#1437

No, I think the city just removed the requirement that there be condos. I think Cordish wanted to to a market study or something to determine the correct ratio of offices to condos. Or something like that.

212
Junior MemberJunior Member
212

PostMar 26, 2007#1438

I really like how the buildings step back to allow some daylighting to filter into the development at various levels - reminds me of the old Lever House in New York (conceptually at least). I am very interested in seeing some detail on these building designs, but it appears they are moving in the right direction - very exciting. Thank you to the Cardinal ownership for hiring a development consultant that knows what they are doing.

476
Full MemberFull Member
476

PostMar 27, 2007#1439

I just dont think that any market study will show that they cannot support the maximum amount of condos that they projected at first. This is possibly the most favorable site in STL!

687
Senior MemberSenior Member
687

PostMar 27, 2007#1440

wheelscomp wrote:I just dont think that any market study will show that they cannot support the maximum amount of condos that they projected at first. This is possibly the most favorable site in STL!


But that's why you do the market study...

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostMar 29, 2007#1441

buckethead wrote:
wheelscomp wrote:I just dont think that any market study will show that they cannot support the maximum amount of condos that they projected at first. This is possibly the most favorable site in STL!


But that's why you do the market study...


Umm, don't you think that they would have done that market study two plus years ago, BEFORE they were selected as developer and started negotiating with the city. Of course they did, and they have done a few more market studies by now. That, as a reason for any delay or vague information about the project, is ludicrous.



I suspect part of the foot-dragging is that Cordish isn't a residential developer. They don't know what they are doing in that arena and they want to go with what they know, which is the low-hanging fruit of retail and office. Residential development is much more difficult to forecast, and carries much more risk, at least in their eyes, so they will avoid it until other new residential construction goes up around downtown, and around their project, and they have actual results to study. Needless to say, their residential will command a much higher price once BV is up and running, and Cupples Station and Pointe 400 are full. Of course they will also have more competition then...



My prediction is that we won't see any significant residential commitment from them until after Phase 1 is up and running and full. Not the way I would do it; I would think they would want to capitalize on the excitement generated by construction and retail tenant announcements to generate condo sales, but then my daddy and granddaddy didn't hire me and all of my siblings to run their development company...

687
Senior MemberSenior Member
687

PostMar 29, 2007#1442

jlblues wrote:
buckethead wrote:
wheelscomp wrote:I just dont think that any market study will show that they cannot support the maximum amount of condos that they projected at first. This is possibly the most favorable site in STL!


But that's why you do the market study...


Umm, don't you think that they would have done that market study two plus years ago, BEFORE they were selected as developer and started negotiating with the city. Of course they did, and they have done a few more market studies by now. That, as a reason for any delay or vague information about the project, is ludicrous.



I suspect part of the foot-dragging is that Cordish isn't a residential developer. They don't know what they are doing in that arena and they want to go with what they know, which is the low-hanging fruit of retail and office. Residential development is much more difficult to forecast, and carries much more risk, at least in their eyes, so they will avoid it until other new residential construction goes up around downtown, and around their project, and they have actual results to study. Needless to say, their residential will command a much higher price once BV is up and running, and Cupples Station and Pointe 400 are full. Of course they will also have more competition then...



My prediction is that we won't see any significant residential commitment from them until after Phase 1 is up and running and full. Not the way I would do it; I would think they would want to capitalize on the excitement generated by construction and retail tenant announcements to generate condo sales, but then my daddy and granddaddy didn't hire me and all of my siblings to run their development company...


I agree. I'm sure they did a market study two years ago, but as you know a lot can change in 2 years so I'd bet they want another one to re-evaluate (and I'd guess what ever type of development they are leaning towards in phase one the report would magically confirm it).

623
Senior MemberSenior Member
623

PostMar 29, 2007#1443

This links directly to a LARGE pdf, but the MoDESA market study for all components of BPV (including residential) is in the larger development plan document located here...



http://stlcin.missouri.org/Document/ald ... BB4071.pdf



Rather than guess about its contents and conclusions, download it for your casual reading pleasure.



The residential market study begins on page 114 of the PDF.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostMar 29, 2007#1444

^ seems to be only 10 pages

291
Full MemberFull Member
291

PostMar 29, 2007#1445

The item you want to look at is the attachement and it is almost 200 pages.



The market analysis takes up about 85 pages of the attachment and is pretty interesting reading.

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostMar 29, 2007#1446

If you want to borrow it, I have the entire document in a nicely bound book. In short, there's not really much to worry about as far as the residential market. But the potential office market is also very strong. We're basically repeating this over and over now.

1,067
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,067

PostApr 17, 2007#1447

My parents were down at the game on Sunday. My dad asked me if "my online forum source" had any new information about BPV as he noticed no signs of any change. I couldn't think of anything.....Still scheduled to start soon, I hope?

623
Senior MemberSenior Member
623

PostApr 18, 2007#1448

Not sure of the status, but seems they could at least put up a couple of big "Coming Soon" signs with the renderings.

367
Full MemberFull Member
367

PostApr 18, 2007#1449

I assumed construction would start once the weather changed, guess I was wrong...



I hope this doesnt turn into another bottle district

2,953
Life MemberLife Member
2,953

PostApr 18, 2007#1450

It's really sad that there isn't even any activity. And we've got the All Star game coming in? They aren't going to be ready.

Read more posts (3310 remaining)