12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJul 18, 2007#276

I'm with citywatcher. I've never understood why people paint bricks.

172
Junior MemberJunior Member
172

PostJul 18, 2007#277

Framer wrote:I'm with citywatcher. I've never understood why people paint bricks.


Yeah, like painting them red. Weren't they red to begin with? Brilliant.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 18, 2007#278

^ Of course I do like some of the brick homes painted around the Lafayette Square area - maybe a Victorian era fashion?

476
Full MemberFull Member
476

PostJul 18, 2007#279

Whitewashed brick can look very classy. (Except on westco McMansions)

2,953
Life MemberLife Member
2,953

PostJul 19, 2007#280

There's a white brick house on Westminster (iirc) on the East side of Skinker (first block east) that I absolutely love. Painted brick can look good.



I wish they would have stuck with the wooden panels instead of what they're doing. I think that would have looked better, particularly with the black of the building.

907
Super MemberSuper Member
907

PostAug 05, 2007#281

More pics...












1,585
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,585

PostAug 05, 2007#282

I'm shocked. They sure did a good job of turning that eyesore into one sexy building, imo.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostAug 05, 2007#283

It's amazing what a little taste can accomplish!

2,687
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,687

PostAug 05, 2007#284

It looks very European.

696
Senior MemberSenior Member
696

PostAug 05, 2007#285

Looks great. I like the contrast between the new and old architecture, and the way the tan marble links the two. Looks far better than the rendering posted by RBB.

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostAug 05, 2007#286

Looks great so far, and should look even better with the concrete block on the corner covered up and the retail spaces built out.

2,953
Life MemberLife Member
2,953

PostAug 06, 2007#287

I agree with Matt.



Although I still contest that they should have done the wood thing for the sides, instead of what they've got. JIMHO



Though it looks 1000 times better.

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostAug 06, 2007#288

trent wrote:I agree with Matt.



Although I still contest that they should have done the wood thing for the sides, instead of what they've got. JIMHO



Though it looks 1000 times better.


Was there ever a "wood thing" on the table?

385
Full MemberFull Member
385

PostAug 06, 2007#289

I believe the original renderings showed wood cladding on the exterior. I agree they should have stuck with this plan. It would have had a very distinctive look that would have been a great asset to the area. That said, I think they could have done worse than the stone they are useing, however, it is a little difficult to really judge the asthetics from a photograph.

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostAug 06, 2007#290

crbswiss wrote:I believe the original renderings showed wood cladding on the exterior. I agree they should have stuck with this plan. It would have had a very distinctive look that would have been a great asset to the area. That said, I think they could have done worse than the stone they are useing, however, it is a little difficult to really judge the asthetics from a photograph.


Do you know that it was wood, or did you just assume that, based on the color or something? I recall seeing some renderings, and that part of the building was brown colored, but I never saw anything that pointed to it and said "this part will be wood".

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostAug 06, 2007#291

An article said there would be some type of wood covering. I think the stone is a better look. I fear the wood would have appeared cheap.

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostAug 06, 2007#292

MattnSTL wrote:An article said there would be some type of wood covering. I think the stone is a better look. I fear the wood would have appeared cheap.


And not lasted as long.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostAug 06, 2007#293

Dang Robbie

1,878
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,878

PostAug 07, 2007#294

MattnSTL wrote:An article said there would be some type of wood covering. I think the stone is a better look. I fear the wood would have appeared cheap.


From this post on page one, quoting a P-D article:


The tough part is remaking the exterior. A plan by architect Joe Klitzing calls for putting a wood-paneled skin on the brick exterior and replacing the windows with aluminum frames and mirrored panes. "It is a contemporary European design."


-RBB

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostAug 07, 2007#295

I've been meaning to post this bad cellphone camera shop of a similar building in Cleveland. I think I took this in May - nice looking place IMO. Another good example of what can be done is these types of buildings.




2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostAug 08, 2007#296

Shimmy wrote:I'm shocked. They sure did a good job of turning that eyesore into one sexy building, imo.


Hopefully, this project will open some eyes in this town.



You can do amazing things with almost any building, no matter when it was built, provided you have an architect and structural engineer with a lot of knowledge and experience, and bit more of a, umm, worldy perspective. And, yes, taste helps too. :)

1,391
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,391

PostAug 09, 2007#297

I'm not a big fan of this project...yet. The grills with the windows look odd and it's a bit confusing with the 25 windows per unit. Also not a big fan of the color of the granite or whatever they are using.



Maybe I'll like it more once it's finished.

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostAug 09, 2007#298

I think black granite would have been a lot cooler. But still, it's a big improvement over what it was.

1,391
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,391

PostAug 09, 2007#299

Yeah, a grey or a white would've been much better than tan/brown/khaki/sahara sand/paper bag or whatever color it is.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostAug 09, 2007#300

The Central Scrutinizer wrote:I think black granite would have been a lot cooler. But still, it's a big improvement over what it was.


I agree. The current color is kind of 80's looking. That's my only gripe though.

Read more posts (166 remaining)