741
Senior MemberSenior Member
741

PostMar 22, 2025#1026


13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 22, 2025#1027

More CARnage

kMOV - 3 fatal crashes reported Friday in MSHP Troop C coverage area

https://www.firstalert4.com/2025/03/22/ ... rage-area/

PostMar 22, 2025#1028

"Brian McKenna, legendary St. Louis radio host killed in pedestrian crash"

Two pedestrians crashed into each other?

741
Senior MemberSenior Member
741

PostMar 22, 2025#1029

^ obviously should say "pedestrian struck and killed".

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 22, 2025#1030

"by driver with car"

741
Senior MemberSenior Member
741

PostMar 22, 2025#1031

^yes, of course.

677
Senior MemberSenior Member
677

PostMar 22, 2025#1032

quincunx wrote:
Mar 22, 2025

KMOV - 3 fatal crashes reported Friday in MSHP Troop C coverage area

https://www.firstalert4.com/2025/03/22/ ... rage-area/
What's the deal with people not wearing seat belts? I can't fathom being in a vehicle without wearing one. People are so dumb.

1,794
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,794

PostMar 23, 2025#1033

Seat belts are for betas.

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostApr 02, 2025#1034

A cyclist is dead after being struck by four(!) cars in south city 

https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/crime ... 8ef208cafe

2,260
Life MemberLife Member
2,260

PostApr 02, 2025#1035

Situation seems complicated. Sounds like the cyclist crossed lanes in an unpredictable manner, likely putting themselves in danger.

Zero excuse for fleeing the scene though.

Good example of why we can't police our way out of car violence, we must design our streets to be safe and compatible for all forms of transit that would use them.

A protected (with barrier) two-way bike lane along one side of Gravois probably would have prevented this situation but alas, we put parking over people.

6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostApr 03, 2025#1036

^Gravois really needs a road diet there and most other places, but it'll be an especially hard one to do since it's a state highway. I really regret the city handing control of state highways back over in exchange for passing off a few miles of road maintenance. I'm just beyond tired of hearing about people getting hit crossing that thing. I'd gladly sacrifice all the parking along Gravois for two good protected bike lanes and a center median big enough to serve as a pedestrian refuge. And restore the tree lawn with larger shade species. That street has become so very bleak. I swear, it wasn't always that way, but man, it's been awful so long now . . .

741
Senior MemberSenior Member
741

PostApr 03, 2025#1037

I don't know what "we can't police our way out of car violence" means..

I'd sure like to see better street design AND criminal consequence for those who drive recklessly.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostApr 03, 2025#1038

It means we'll never have enough police to keep an eye on every driver, everywhere, all the time.

Infrastructure is on duty 24/7. So are red light and speed cameras. So are speed governors and license, insurance and registration verification in cars.

406
Full MemberFull Member
406

PostApr 03, 2025#1039

Auggie wrote:
Apr 02, 2025
Situation seems complicated. Sounds like the cyclist crossed lanes in an unpredictable manner, likely putting themselves in danger.

Zero excuse for fleeing the scene though.

Good example of why we can't police our way out of car violence, we must design our streets to be safe and compatible for all forms of transit that would use them.

A protected (with barrier) two-way bike lane along one side of Gravois probably would have prevented this situation but alas, we put parking over people.
What I would like to know is, just what the hell happened to the proposed road diet plan they had for Gravois...there was a whole outline done with renders and everything. Did it just die on the vine? 
https://nextstl.com/2016/01/modot-prese ... nd-online/

2,623
Life MemberLife Member
2,623

PostApr 03, 2025#1040

I think they pretty much executed this MODOT plan. Made Gravois significantly better than it was, but it's still not close to an acceptable state.

Gravois should be a lane in each direction with a center turn lane south of 55. Similar to how it narrows down in Bevo. There should also be well protected bike lanes on each side, because it's actually one of the more efficient cycling routes in the city. Not many people use it at all today because the current setup is still wildly dangerous (AKA what just happened)

It's MODOT though, so don't get your hopes up

2,260
Life MemberLife Member
2,260

PostApr 03, 2025#1041

Baltimore Jack wrote:
Apr 03, 2025
I don't know what "we can't police our way out of car violence" means..

I'd sure like to see better street design AND criminal consequence for those who drive recklessly.
It means police can't stop a bike rider from putting themselves in danger by turning across the street in an unpredictable way. But road design could have.

1,044
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,044

PostApr 05, 2025#1042

One of the reasons  Gravois is so wide is that at one point In the not so distant past it had a reversible lane, eastbound in the morning and westbound in the afternoon. I'm assuming the building of the highways eventually made it obsolete.

6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostApr 06, 2025#1043

^I remember it well. And the signals hanging above it. :)

1,642
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,642

PostApr 07, 2025#1044

Woman charged in death of bicyclist on Gravois.
https://www.firstalert4.com/2025/04/06/ ... ghborhood/

741
Senior MemberSenior Member
741

PostApr 07, 2025#1045

Someone wrecked a  car into the utility pole at Chouteau and Tucker Saturday night.

Ever since the traffic lights are completely out there. Not flashing. Completely out. Since Saturday night.

 A major intersection between Dowhtown and Soulard just has completely dead lights. For almost two days.

Think about that when you vote.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostApr 07, 2025#1046

Yeah, that's bad, but I assume they put out those temporary stop signs in the meanwhile?  

741
Senior MemberSenior Member
741

PostApr 07, 2025#1047

^you'd think. But no.

677
Senior MemberSenior Member
677

PostApr 07, 2025#1048

leeharveyawesome wrote:
Apr 07, 2025
Woman charged in death of bicyclist on Gravois.
https://www.firstalert4.com/2025/04/06/ ... ghborhood/
Leaving the scene was obviously a big "no no", but what kind of punishment is expected given that it sounds like the bicyclist may have been at fault?

2,260
Life MemberLife Member
2,260

PostApr 07, 2025#1049

Tim wrote:
Apr 07, 2025
leeharveyawesome wrote:
Apr 07, 2025
Woman charged in death of bicyclist on Gravois.
https://www.firstalert4.com/2025/04/06/ ... ghborhood/
Leaving the scene was obviously a big "no no", but what kind of punishment is expected given that it sounds like the bicyclist may have been at fault?
Up to 7 years in prison, up to a $10k fine. She also intentionally lied to the police.

I think a couple years probation would be the most fair.

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostApr 07, 2025#1050

Didn't she tell the police that she was nowhere near the accident? I feel like that's the biggest no-no she committed. 

Read more posts (164 remaining)