1,793
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,793

PostJan 28, 2025#901

I almost want the city to reject the permit until they pick a different GC. Why let that jerk profit off the city any longer?

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

PostJan 28, 2025#902

Are there any other firms here that can even pull this off?  Seems like Clayco gets all the mega projects because they're the only game in town. 

16
New MemberNew Member
16

PostJan 28, 2025#903

St. Louis is actually rife with construction firms that could pull off a $150M tower off. McCarthy, ARCO, Alberici, Tarlton, Paric just to name a few.  McCarthy is building the new BJC tower plus Cardinal Glennon (over $1B total), plus a handful of other $200M+ projects in the region at the same time. Lucky for STL, the construction industry here could service 5+ of these types of new builds at the same time

1,793
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,793

PostJan 28, 2025#904

The Business Journal article indicated that the CWE submarket added 413 units in the first three quarters of 2024. Did they mean to say 413 units have been absorbed?

I just don’t know where those new units are coming from.

2,620
Life MemberLife Member
2,620

PostJan 28, 2025#905

It's not my favorite design, but I'm fine with it. It would honestly look a lot better if it was slightly taller than 100

704
Senior MemberSenior Member
704

PostJan 28, 2025#906

GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
It's not my favorite design, but I'm fine with it. It would honestly look a lot better if it was slightly taller than 100
Kings_Lindell_500.jpg (245.34KiB)

Agree, not my fav either but better than most of the boxes we see being built in Clayton and our midwest peers.

788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostJan 28, 2025#907

I like the first design more but like that this one is parallel to Kingshighway. Being the on corner I do wish it was taller than 100 too.  

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

PostJan 28, 2025#908

saintnotstlouis wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
St. Louis is actually rife with construction firms that could pull off a $150M tower off. McCarthy, ARCO, Alberici, Tarlton, Paric just to name a few.  McCarthy is building the new BJC tower plus Cardinal Glennon (over $1B total), plus a handful of other $200M+ projects in the region at the same time. Lucky for STL, the construction industry here could service 5+ of these types of new builds at the same time
Okay, Alberici and McCarthy can definitely handle the truth.  Paric is affiliated with McKee, so imagine they may not be welcome.  Thought Tarlton was more civil stuff.  Have they done high rise multi fam here or elsewhere?  Does Korte do this kind of thing? 

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJan 28, 2025#909

Tarlton has built many WashU buildings. They're not hire rises of course.

102
Junior MemberJunior Member
102

PostJan 28, 2025#910

TheWayoftheArch_V2.0 wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
saintnotstlouis wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
St. Louis is actually rife with construction firms that could pull off a $150M tower off. McCarthy, ARCO, Alberici, Tarlton, Paric just to name a few.  McCarthy is building the new BJC tower plus Cardinal Glennon (over $1B total), plus a handful of other $200M+ projects in the region at the same time. Lucky for STL, the construction industry here could service 5+ of these types of new builds at the same time
Okay, Alberici and McCarthy can definitely handle the truth.  Paric is affiliated with McKee, so imagine they may not be welcome.  Thought Tarlton was more civil stuff.  Have they done high rise multi fam here or elsewhere?  Does Korte do this kind of thing? 
I'm pretty sure Paric built BPV. Unsure if Tarlton would take on a residential tower, I know they just completed that massive parking garage for the new Neuroscience Building. Korte mostly focuses on large warehouses, government work, and healthcare. I doubt they'd take on a residential building even close to this size.

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

PostJan 28, 2025#911

BPV or Cardinal Way 1?  Mid rise and high rise different animals.

97
New MemberNew Member
97

PostJan 28, 2025#912

I like this new design, it's not amazing but in my opinion good. It's not a simple box and it adds to the skyline along Forest Park

23
New MemberNew Member
23

PostJan 28, 2025#913

So new architect, completely new building, new streetscape plan (although same old ugly street facing garage elevation).  Not that it would be much of a problem, but assume they must they go to Preservation hearing again.  Right?  

502
Senior MemberSenior Member
502

PostJan 28, 2025#914

JaneJacobsGhost wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
I almost want the city to reject the permit until they pick a different GC. Why let that jerk profit off the city any longer?
I see nothing wrong with a private development team selecting a private general contractor to build their project. Just because you disagree with the founder of Clayco doesn't mean he should be banned from ever doing any type of business in the City ever again. Besides, a design-build team (LJC and Clayco) could be a cost saving measure that guarantees the project gets done.

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

PostJan 28, 2025#915

I think someone else said it best: "not as elegant as the original."  Is it fine? sure.

1,793
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,793

PostJan 28, 2025#916

Chris Stritzel wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
JaneJacobsGhost wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
I almost want the city to reject the permit until they pick a different GC. Why let that jerk profit off the city any longer?
I see nothing wrong with a private development team selecting a private general contractor to build their project. Just because you disagree with the founder of Clayco doesn't mean he should be banned from ever doing any type of business in the City ever again. Besides, a design-build team (LJC and Clayco) could be a cost saving measure that guarantees the project gets done.
It’s not that I disagree with him, it’s that he’s an a**hole.

458
Full MemberFull Member
458

PostJan 28, 2025#917

Chris Stritzel wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
addxb2 wrote:
Jan 27, 2025
When a classic St. Louis sunset lines up over Forest Park, you're going to have one of the most interesting skylines in the Midwest. The light reflecting off the gold accents and 100. Architecturally unlike anything outside of Chicago.
In all honesty, St. Louis is the only City in the Midwest with such a development pattern (3 distinct skylines between the River and Forest Park). Really, this will look like a miniature version of Central Park. St. Louis sets itself apart on that front.

The redesign will likely look better once built than the renderings portray. I also think people were getting caught up in the look of the previous plan as the renderings were envisioning the building at dusk rather than the middle of the day. The building will pick up different colors throughout the day. I'm sure we'll see more angles of this one soon.
👍

102
Junior MemberJunior Member
102

PostJan 28, 2025#918

TheWayoftheArch_V2.0 wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
BPV or Cardinal Way 1?  Mid rise and high rise different animals.
One Cardinal Way. Their website also says they built Two Twelve Clayton.

547
Senior MemberSenior Member
547

PostJan 28, 2025#919

jacob_rb_15 wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
TheWayoftheArch_V2.0 wrote:
Jan 28, 2025
BPV or Cardinal Way 1?  Mid rise and high rise different animals.
One Cardinal Way. Their website also says they built Two Twelve Clayton.
St. Louis has half a dozen or more general contractors that could build the Albion.  We have a deeper general constractor roster than most metros.  Likely more than any peer metro.  

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

PostJan 28, 2025#920

I'm actually and truly impressed by ourself.  Which are the half dozen locks? 

1,793
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,793

PostFeb 10, 2025#921

I’m skeptical this project will proceed in its current form if 25% steel tariffs are here to stay.

788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostFeb 10, 2025#922

JaneJacobsGhost wrote:
Feb 10, 2025
I’m skeptical this project will proceed in its current form if 25% steel tariffs are here to stay.
Would think construction steel is made in the US so maybe they won't go up as much. 

1,793
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,793

PostFeb 10, 2025#923

That’s not how Tariffs work. Roughly 25% of steel is imported. If 25% of the domestic market has to raise prices to keep its margins, its competitors will do the same so long as they remain cheaper. Complimentary products will likely also see their prices rise like concrete.

1,020
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,020

PostFeb 10, 2025#924

JaneJacobsGhost wrote:That’s not how Tariffs work. Roughly 25% of steel is imported. If 25% of the domestic market has to raise prices to keep its margins, its competitors will do the same so long as they remain cheaper. Complimentary products will likely also see their prices rise like concrete.
Concrete is very local product and somewhat of a steel replacement.

1,793
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,793

PostFeb 10, 2025#925

The principal stands. What I described is precisely what happened to the washer and dryer market following the first Trump administration’s tariffs

Read more posts (139 remaining)