I think it could be divided into two categories: becoming an icon, or use of the icon. This high-rise isn't going to be an icon in its own right, but you could accuse it of the use of an icon (being a high-rise, and the wedge).
On a larger scale, chicago's skyline is iconic of that city, and aside from a few case studies like the sears tower, the whole is larger than the sum of its parts. That's when it becomes iconic. I personally have no problem with that; I'd love for us to be on Yahoo's 10 coolest skylines, at number 7 or something. My critique, ostensibly, of this building is it's use of the icon, as mentioned earlier. The wedge gives the building coolness points, but it also runs the risk of lumping the building into the latest fads category, again at #7.
On a larger scale, chicago's skyline is iconic of that city, and aside from a few case studies like the sears tower, the whole is larger than the sum of its parts. That's when it becomes iconic. I personally have no problem with that; I'd love for us to be on Yahoo's 10 coolest skylines, at number 7 or something. My critique, ostensibly, of this building is it's use of the icon, as mentioned earlier. The wedge gives the building coolness points, but it also runs the risk of lumping the building into the latest fads category, again at #7.






