9,542
Life MemberLife Member
9,542

Post5:06 AM - Feb 13#7476


13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

Post12:50 PM - Feb 13#7477

$50M per year in tax credits doesn't sound like much.

Post12:58 PM - Feb 13#7478

JaneJacobsGhost wrote:
3:46 PM - Feb 12
goat314 wrote:
3:45 PM - Feb 10
TheWayoftheArch_V2.0 wrote:
3:28 PM - Feb 10
50 million is a low cap.  Isn't Goldman seeking $25 for ATT alone? 

I agree the 10% disbursement to "rural" is vexing.  What qualifies as rural?  Don't all the small towns have main street district creation ability? 
Missouri has some of the saddest small towns I've seen. The state really hasn't invested in the little main street districts that would actually make them charming. 
Where outside of the NE and the west coast do you find charming small towns that aren’t college towns or exurbs of larger metro areas? Certainly not Illinois
???
Just about every county seat has the traditional courthouse town square.

1,794
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,794

Post7:40 PM - Feb 13#7479

That’s all it takes to be charming?

9,542
Life MemberLife Member
9,542

Post7:47 PM - Feb 13#7480

quincunx wrote:
12:50 PM - Feb 13
$50M per year in tax credits doesn't sound like much.
Nobody actually cares about that, as I said above the entire program is designed to give railway $25m in one year and att $25 in another but it passing won’t move either building forward without bunch of other things that are part of this bigger bill

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

Post7:57 PM - Feb 13#7481

JaneJacobsGhost wrote:
7:40 PM - Feb 13
That’s all it takes to be charming?
In a country of towns devastated by cars, yes.

Galena IL.png (650.15KiB)


Carlinville IL.png (530.78KiB)


Taylorville IL.png (951.81KiB)

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

Post8:22 PM - Feb 13#7482

I love eating at greasy-spoon diners on small-town courthouse squares. One of my favorite things about road trips.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

Post8:54 PM - Feb 13#7483

Amen

451
Full MemberFull Member
451

Post10:23 PM - Feb 13#7484

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/bus ... -top-story

Two dozen laid off as FanDuel Sports is closing its St. Louis office located at Ballpark Village.

(St. Louis was the headquarters for Fox Sports/Bally Sports/FanDuel Sports Midwest)

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk


9,542
Life MemberLife Member
9,542

Post11:30 PM - Feb 13#7485

Coffee shop at Wash Ave and 10th opens later this month and a restaurant/marker and speakeasy in basement of former San Market sometimes in May

This will put the restaurant/bar count on the block to 9

Post1:52 PM - Feb 16#7486

addxb2 wrote:
2:31 PM - Feb 10
Annoying that STL has to contribute to rural development.

Surprised it doesn’t require the City to abandon earnings tax in district.

Seems fastest any project would be approved is 2028 given state timeline and work needed to get City in compliance with other aspects.
That 10% is nothing, First it’s not money that would have stayed in the city. It’s money that would have gone to the state anyway,

For example

Last year downtown generated about $90m
For the state in state sales tax. If this passes that will be the baseline, so in year after the bill passes and downtown generates $100m, that difference of $10m is where the 10% comes from for the rural fund, so $1m

1,877
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,877

Post5:41 PM - Feb 17#7487

StlAlex wrote:
10:23 PM - Feb 13
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/bus ... -top-story

Two dozen laid off as FanDuel Sports is closing its St. Louis office located at Ballpark Village.

(St. Louis was the headquarters for Fox Sports/Bally Sports/FanDuel Sports Midwest)

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk
Does anyone know whether MLB.tv will take over any of these operations locally? Or will it all be produced centrally?

-RBB

9,542
Life MemberLife Member
9,542

Post7:13 PM - Feb 18#7488

City’s biggest concern with a bill that would keep $100s of millions a year in state taxes in downtown is that it would have to staff a one stop desk for permitting? Jfc
IMG_6941.jpeg (473.18KiB)

732
Senior MemberSenior Member
732

Post7:21 PM - Feb 18#7489

This schitt is maddening. DB, take the reins on this staffing issue.

451
Full MemberFull Member
451

Post8:46 PM - Feb 18#7490

whitherSTL wrote:This schitt is maddening. DB, take the reins on this staffing issue.
Meanwhile the Missouri State Legislature is making the staffing issues woese by making the city spend more money on LE in an era of declining crime. This sh*t is in fact maddening but you support it.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk


732
Senior MemberSenior Member
732

Post8:49 PM - Feb 18#7491

Thanks

90
New MemberNew Member
90

Post8:51 PM - Feb 18#7492

With AI tools that read/discern data and information quickly, is this that large of a lift?

2,675
Life MemberLife Member
2,675

Post9:01 PM - Feb 18#7493

^ bingo. The technology exists and leading engineering firms are working to implement. Larger challenge will be to get the bureaucrats to get comfortable with it. Plan review will be automated within next few years though. 

547
Senior MemberSenior Member
547

Post10:26 PM - Feb 18#7494

dbInSouthCity wrote:
7:13 PM - Feb 18
City’s biggest concern with a bill that would keep $100s of millions a year in state taxes in downtown is that it would have to staff a one stop desk for permitting?  Jfc
Funny how you have flipped flopped on this issues.  I was raising this concern over a year ago before Cara was elected and you seemed to defend the staffing levels.  Glad you have come around.  

9,542
Life MemberLife Member
9,542

Post10:38 PM - Feb 18#7495

STLAPTS wrote:
10:26 PM - Feb 18
dbInSouthCity wrote:
7:13 PM - Feb 18
City’s biggest concern with a bill that would keep $100s of millions a year in state taxes in downtown is that it would have to staff a one stop desk for permitting?  Jfc
Funny how you have flipped flopped on this issues.  I was raising this concern over a year ago before Cara was elected and you seemed to defend the staffing levels.  Glad you have come around.  
I have been on the same side of this issue since COVID started. Building permit review should
hire contracted staffing.

451
Full MemberFull Member
451

Post11:19 PM - Feb 18#7496

STLAPTS wrote:
dbInSouthCity wrote:
7:13 PM - Feb 18
City’s biggest concern with a bill that would keep $100s of millions a year in state taxes in downtown is that it would have to staff a one stop desk for permitting?  Jfc
Funny how you have flipped flopped on this issues.  I was raising this concern over a year ago before Cara was elected and you seemed to defend the staffing levels.  Glad you have come around.  
Cara ran on fixing everything and the central tenant to fixing anything is improving the city's staffing, an issue that has objectively not improved at all coming up on her first year. This despite an abysmal jobs market where people should theoretically be grasping for a stable job.

And her plan is getting pushed back because the state is raising police pay via the law she chose not to fight.

What's actually funny is how the chronic staffing issue the city has had for decades only became a problem in the last few years.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk


97
New MemberNew Member
97

Post6:29 PM - Feb 19#7497

StlAlex wrote:
11:19 PM - Feb 18
STLAPTS wrote:
dbInSouthCity wrote:
7:13 PM - Feb 18
City’s biggest concern with a bill that would keep $100s of millions a year in state taxes in downtown is that it would have to staff a one stop desk for permitting?  Jfc
Funny how you have flipped flopped on this issues.  I was raising this concern over a year ago before Cara was elected and you seemed to defend the staffing levels.  Glad you have come around.  
Cara ran on fixing everything and the central tenant to fixing anything is improving the city's staffing, an issue that has objectively not improved at all coming up on her first year. This despite an abysmal jobs market where people should theoretically be grasping for a stable job.

And her plan is getting pushed back because the state is raising police pay via the law she chose not to fight.

What's actually funny is how the chronic staffing issue the city has had for decades only became a problem in the last few years.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk
You say that as if choosing to fight the law would've guarantee a quick victory. Most likely it would've wasted time and money for the city

98
New MemberNew Member
98

Post6:39 PM - Feb 19#7498

Rick Prieto wrote:
6:29 PM - Feb 19
StlAlex wrote:
11:19 PM - Feb 18
STLAPTS wrote: Funny how you have flipped flopped on this issues.  I was raising this concern over a year ago before Cara was elected and you seemed to defend the staffing levels.  Glad you have come around.  
Cara ran on fixing everything and the central tenant to fixing anything is improving the city's staffing, an issue that has objectively not improved at all coming up on her first year. This despite an abysmal jobs market where people should theoretically be grasping for a stable job.

And her plan is getting pushed back because the state is raising police pay via the law she chose not to fight.

What's actually funny is how the chronic staffing issue the city has had for decades only became a problem in the last few years.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk
You say that as if choosing to fight the law would've guarantee a quick victory. Most likely it would've wasted time and money for the city
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

451
Full MemberFull Member
451

Post6:49 PM - Feb 19#7499

Otthouse wrote:
Rick Prieto wrote:
6:29 PM - Feb 19
StlAlex wrote:
11:19 PM - Feb 18
Cara ran on fixing everything and the central tenant to fixing anything is improving the city's staffing, an issue that has objectively not improved at all coming up on her first year. This despite an abysmal jobs market where people should theoretically be grasping for a stable job.

And her plan is getting pushed back because the state is raising police pay via the law she chose not to fight.

What's actually funny is how the chronic staffing issue the city has had for decades only became a problem in the last few years.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk
You say that as if choosing to fight the law would've guarantee a quick victory. Most likely it would've wasted time and money for the city
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Fiscally, yes, most likely.

But being morally righteous in a time dominated by evil is better than just going along with the evil. Especially when the morally right position also had a pathway for greatest fiscal success. You're just ideologically weak to choose what the city chose.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk


9,542
Life MemberLife Member
9,542

Post4:52 PM - Feb 20#7500

Month away
IMG_7045.jpeg (617.25KiB)

Read more posts (378 remaining)