70
New MemberNew Member
70

PostMay 16, 2008#126

any updates?

2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostJun 16, 2008#127

Here's a bunch of info on the China negotiations:



Link to StL Commerce Magazine's June 2006 issue, full of stories on the proposed China deals:

http://www.stlcommercemagazine.com/arch ... index.html



Story in today's P-D about StL and the PRC:


Chinese leaders, local businesses meet

By Tim Logan

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

Monday, Jun. 16 2008



Local business leaders made their pitch this morning in Clayton for closer trade ties with China to a delegation of investors and business people from the fast growing nation.



A 240-member trade delegation, including Chinese Vice Premier Wang Qishan, are visiting St. Louis among other U.S. cities. St. Louis and Chinese officials have been talking this year about expanding trade opportunities and developing an air cargo hub in St. Louis.



Several local companies including Town and Country-based Solutia Inc., and Ferguson-based Emerson signed trade deals worth $5.3 billion with Chinese companies. And in an address, Chinese Vice Minister of Commerce Ma Xiuhong called for closer relations between the two countries.



Chinese investment in the U.S. "Has just taken off," Xiuhong said through an interpreter."



China is Missouri's fourth largest trading partner with $1 billion in exports, and may soon pass Mexico and Korea, said Tim Nowak, executive director of the World Trade Center St. Louis.



Dan Duran, chief executive of the United States Soybean Export Council, said that China's growth will provide a huge market for more agricultural exports from the Midwest. One in six rows of soybeans grown in the United States goes to China today, a number that will likely grow.



"There's business to be done and there's people to feed, and we'll do that together," Duran said.


Source: http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/busine ... enDocument



I had heard that Wang Qishan was in StL over the whole weekend in anticipation of this; thank God it wasn't too humid.



While big things are still a ways off from reaching full implementation, it bodes very well for StL as a gathering place for such negotiations taking place and serious considerations of long-term partnership. The ancillary developments that can come from this could be huge, including and especially new businesses moving to StL to capitalize on the potential hub.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJun 16, 2008#128

I've always wondered why the World Trade Center - St. Louis is not in St. Louis.

597
Senior MemberSenior Member
597

PostJun 17, 2008#129

First Post. This is by far the most exciting news I've read about st. louis in awhile but I'm having trouble condensing this down to how it affects the average St. Louisan.



From what I've read this has the potential to create hundreds of new jobs. That just doesn't seem like a lot. I guess I'm having trouble figuring out how big a boom this could have on the city. It seems like it could potentially have a domino effect eventually but the direct impact would only be hundreds of jobs?





I came across this on http://www.lawa.org/lax/ to try and put it in perspective but I'm wondering if I'm completely off target.


Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is the #1 international gateway to Asia/Pacific. LAX is served by nearly 90 passenger and cargo airlines. International flights arriving at LAX from overseas make a substantial contribution to the economy of Southern California, adding $82.1 billion in total economic output, plus 363,700 direct and indirect jobs with annual wages of $19.3 billion in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego and Ventura Counties, according to a 2007 study by the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation.


Oh also goat314, I'm curious as to just how a Chinese presence in Vancouver transformed the city. I'm a computer scientist, so urban development/ the economy is almost lost on me. I know I should be excited about this but I'm not totally sure why. I guess thats why I came to this forum!

3,785
Life MemberLife Member
3,785

PostJun 17, 2008#130

The Chinese Presence in Vancouver was actually Hong Kong businessmen leaving after it came under the control of China. It's a little bit different. Moreover, it only had such a positive affect because of Vancouver's leadership insisting on urban design and density. We don't have such leadership.

2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostJun 17, 2008#131

Arch_Genesis wrote:First Post. This is by far the most exciting news I've read about st. louis in awhile but I'm having trouble condensing this down to how it affects the average St. Louisan.



From what I've read this has the potential to create hundreds of new jobs. That just doesn't seem like a lot. I guess I'm having trouble figuring out how big a boom this could have on the city. It seems like it could potentially have a domino effect eventually but the direct impact would only be hundreds of jobs?


Welcome. Simple rundown:



1. There is a fee charged for every plane touchdown, collected by the Lambert Airport Authority, right now somewhere around $18-27 each per touchdown or takeoff (someone please verify correct me where I'm wrong). They are looking at a large increase in total daily landings and takeoffs.



2. Hundreds of jobs are very good; it really is an important number. This figure represents new jobs from existing businesses in the StL area. As well, companies across the US will relocate for proximity to the potential hub. They will bring in hundreds more new jobs with them.



3. They will need new buildings, meaning well over a thousand new construction jobs on long-term projects. There are 700 acres of land being totally redeveloped for companies looking to work with the airport on deals like this, including the Hazelwood West and NorthPark sites. Plus, to support such a large jump in potential business, we can see increased construction around the whole area, from Earth City to Dupo.



4. Chinese businesses will establish presences in StL. More new workers will be living in StL, more native workers in jobs as well. General population cultural diversity will increase substantially (and we will have better Chinese restaurants). There will be increased net investment into the region as these new workers make their homes. And anyone who's been to cities in China knows that they like skyscrapers and would probably build in both Clayton and Downtown StL.



5. All these things are taxable. The Airport is still under the dominion of the City; increased revenues can fill up the coffers well. The County also is getting a great amount from this. We will finally be able to pay for a lot of stuff that we've needed, from roads to schools to police to MetroLink to whatever other areas are in the most need.



Focus: StL would be the hub for logistics and general business in the Midwest for the world's fastest-growing economy, with more than five times the population as the US and trillions of dollars to spend. We would be along for the ride the whole way through. This is an opportunity in the billions upon billions of dollars that has a long-term impact on every facet of the StL Metro Area's economy and quality of life.


Doug wrote:The Chinese Presence in Vancouver was actually Hong Kong businessmen leaving after it came under the control of China. It's a little bit different. Moreover, it only had such a positive affect because of Vancouver's leadership insisting on urban design and density. We don't have such leadership.


Yeah, our local, state, and federal leadership just came together in a non-partisan manner to recruit this new opportunity, not have it fall in our lap from preexisting business. Let’s please not start blaming them for this success.



If the Playmate Bikini Team came to my office, gave me ten million dollars, and told me that they’re flying me to Jamaica for a week vacation at their all-inclusive private resort, I wouldn’t complain that the resort may not serve my favorite breakfast cereal.

3,552
Life MemberLife Member
3,552

PostJun 17, 2008#132

^ Yeah, what Gone Corporate said. The more I read about this, the more I see that St. Louis really has a good shot at landing a sweet ass cargo deal. Hopefully our leaders wont do anything stupid to blow this, but these recent developments show how much St. Louis can really be a force when the region works together (instead of a fractured bureaucracy).

Here is some more news from today.



Chinese interest in the area intensifies

By Tim Logan

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

Tuesday, Jun. 17 2008



Thirty years ago, China opened the doors of its economy to the West.



Now St. Louis wants to open its doors right back.



Local business leaders hosted China's top economic minister and a delegation of

200 government and business leaders Monday for the latest round of steadily

intensifying talks about deeper trade ties between our region and the world's

fastest-growing economy.



It was the fourth high-level meeting between St. Louis and Chinese officials

this year, and the first visit by Vice Premier Wang Qishan, a top Chinese

economic official who stopped here on his way to meet with U.S. Treasury

Secretary Henry Paulson in Washington.



"His presence here speaks volumes about how seriously the Chinese are exploring

the notion of making St. Louis their Midwestern port of entry to the United

States," said Richard Fleming, president of the St. Louis Regional Chamber and

Growth Association.



(continued) http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/busine ... enDocument

2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostJun 17, 2008#133

goat314 wrote:


Chinese interest in the area intensifies

By Tim Logan

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

Tuesday, Jun. 17 2008

Parts I found the most interesting:
... (Vice Premier Wang) Qishan spoke at length of the importance of strong trade ties between China and the Midwest, and the role St. Louis will play in that.



China "landed on the East and West coasts first," he said. "But it is time that we moved our attention to St. Louis and the state of Missouri, and used the base here in St. Louis to expand our openness to the Midwest of the United States, to open up further and promote economic links."





... The air hub was a main topic of talks Monday between Qishan and Sens. Christopher "Kit" Bond and Claire McCaskill. And a group of Chinese aviation officials will be in town all week studying how to make it work.



"We're all agreed on where we want to go," Bond said after the meeting. "Now, we need to work out the details."


That Mr. Qishan said that, with intent, is amazing. This is happening much faster than I anticipated, like a Chinese company getting the Chinese government to be compliant and cancelling out excessive bureaucracy. Now Missouri, and StL City and County, are working openly and seamlessly to effect the steps necessary to see this through.



Within five years, we may have A380s landing daily at Lambert.

3,552
Life MemberLife Member
3,552

PostJun 17, 2008#134

they were talking about the deal on KMOX.

Total Information AM 6/17/08 Is St. Louis Going To Be Partners With China?

The RCGA's Fleming spoke with us about plans to make St. Louis a major import hub for China.


http://www.kmox.com/pages/66162.php

(its in the right column)

907
Super MemberSuper Member
907

PostJun 17, 2008#135

HHmmmm, i mean I am sure our officials were, "Mr. China we have a state of the art, brand new, never used 9,000 ft runway for you to use. Hell, we'll make sure no other airlines land on it! And if the weather gets hot, we will let you have priority takeoff on the 11,000ft one."



That right there seems pretty solid. :)

366
Full MemberFull Member
366

PostJun 18, 2008#136

zink wrote:HHmmmm, i mean I am sure our officials were, "Mr. China we have a state of the art, brand new, never used 9,000 ft runway for you to use. Hell, we'll make sure no other airlines land on it! And if the weather gets hot, we will let you have priority takeoff on the 11,000ft one."



That right there seems pretty solid. :)


Dont crush our enthusiasm :lol:

2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostJun 18, 2008#137

St. Louis Texan wrote:
zink wrote:HHmmmm, i mean I am sure our officials were, "Mr. China we have a state of the art, brand new, never used 9,000 ft runway for you to use. Hell, we'll make sure no other airlines land on it! And if the weather gets hot, we will let you have priority takeoff on the 11,000ft one."



That right there seems pretty solid. :)


Dont crush our enthusiasm :lol:
Nah, don't worry, Texas, because dink has a point. We have a brand new runway that can host massive air traffic and is currently underutilized. Remember, one of the reasons Chicago won't get such a cargo deal, although already a hub for commercial flights to China, is that O'Hare is saturated. Our underutilization is essential for this to be even considered. Add in MidAmerica for excess capacities, and we're lined up well.



What did we think, the W-1W Runway was going to be converted to a parking lot?



An interesting variable for this deal is the Chinese policy of gas subsidation. To spur commerce across the country, the PRC has instituted subsidies on gas so a gallon is about a buck apiece. I am sure that this includes jet fuel...

Today, FedEx announced that it would be on a downswing for the next few years as expenses for fuel are eating their earnings...

If Chinese cargo flight fuel is subsidized in the PRC, it could capitalize on much of that vacuum and substantially increase the likelihood of flight maximization as these fleets continue to operate as normal amidst these price wars. While other transport hubs stutter, Chinese subsidized fleets could maintain traffic scales in a StL hub.

Just a thought.

308
Full MemberFull Member
308

PostJun 20, 2008#138

Great read from chicago web site. This is REALLY exciting. Not only could it turn around and stimulate the economy locally, but it could be an historic deal for Chinese-US relations...(with stl in the center :)



http://www.examiner.com/p-182579~Chines ... _Ties.html

3,552
Life MemberLife Member
3,552

PostJun 20, 2008#139

^ Welcome back Phoaddict, haven't heard from you in a while. And yes! This is great news. I'm surprised more people havent been commenting on this deal, its really starting to heat up. We already will feel some kind of economic growth in St. Louis, because of the deals signed the other day....but if the Air Cargo deal goes down (which I feel confident about), this will change St. Louis as we know it. Like Gone Corporate was implying, this will create an economic domino effect which will cause substantial job growth, therefore a much need population boom and diversification, and a great deal of future investment in the St. Louis area, whether its Real Estate, Commercial, Educational, or Transportation.

Everyone check the latest podcast from Mr. Fleming of the St. Louis RCGA on KMOX.




597
Senior MemberSenior Member
597

PostJun 20, 2008#140

goat314 wrote:^ Welcome back Phoaddict, haven't heard from you in a while. And yes! This is great news. I'm surprised more people havent been commenting on this deal, its really starting to heat up. We already will feel some kind of economic growth in St. Louis, because of the deals signed the other day....but if the Air Cargo deal goes down (which I feel confident about), this will change St. Louis as we know it. Like Gone Corporate was implying, this will create an economic domino effect which will cause substantial job growth, therefore a much need population boom and diversification, and a great deal of future investment in the St. Louis area, whether its Real Estate, Commercial, Educational, or Transportation.

Everyone check the latest podcast from Mr. Fleming of the St. Louis RCGA on KMOX.





I'm curious goat314..how do you feel it? Economic growth that is. I honestly wouldn't know about it unless I hadn't read it here or a paper. But I'm on board with your optimism. However, I don't think it'll hit me until I see some progress in schools and some buildings go up and ofcourse an NBA Basketball team. And a great job opportunity for my Bachelors in Computer Science. I am hoping though that the domino affect will be all that you dream. 8)

3,552
Life MemberLife Member
3,552

PostJun 20, 2008#141

^ Well thats why I said we "will" feel the economic impacts of these agreements (obviously we haven't felt it yet, because the agreements are just being signed). The average person who isn't directly hired by one of these companies or knows inside stuff wont notice the economic impact until, we start seeing big time developments like a new basketball team or a major increase in population or jobs.

8,915
Life MemberLife Member
8,915

PostJun 20, 2008#142

How does an NBA team figure into this?



FYI, we aren't getting an NBA team any times soon.

597
Senior MemberSenior Member
597

PostJun 21, 2008#143

goat314 wrote:^ Well thats why I said we "will" feel the economic impacts of these agreements (obviously we haven't felt it yet, because the agreements are just being signed). The average person who isn't directly hired by one of these companies or knows inside stuff wont notice the economic impact until, we start seeing big time developments like a new basketball team or a major increase in population or jobs.


my mistake goat! but "already will" ?...which one is it? :D



and moorlander i think there's already a thread on this about st. louis not being able to support 4 major sports due to our economy. I think someone may have pointed out we're maybe 50 billion short in revenue. While I agree there probably won't be one here anytime soon (because Stern's a **** among other things) I'll feel, with the economic growth, a step closer to that goal.



Anyway here's to China doing great things for the city

308
Full MemberFull Member
308

PostJun 22, 2008#144

I think what this signifies is a stepping stone to once again become a world player, a necessity for any mid-American city wanting to boost it's significance in the country.



This is an extraordinary move for St. Louis and Missouri to ambitious enough to take this step.



Tell me if you see otherwise, but I would compare this in a way to Chicago's step towards developing the railway and concentrating on becoming the railway center of the US. How did that benefit chicago for being the center? True, we're not talking about people transporting, but we are talking about a central destination of economic exchange and logisitics, which therefore means a more attractive location of settling down -- in this case companies and divisions.



Logistics, although not everything, is vital to success of most companies. Look at Dell.

597
Senior MemberSenior Member
597

PostJul 15, 2008#145

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/s ... enDocument



while it seems highly for aesthetic reasons, I have to wonder if it has ANYTHING to do with China. They say its within budget even with how the airline business is doing but does it make sense, why would they pour 105 million into aesthetics. I'm trying to make a connection here somebody help me out. Certainly if they were trying to impress China there's other things they'd do with the $105M.

93
New MemberNew Member
93

PostJul 15, 2008#146

The airport is a dump right now, I fly through a lot of cities and St. Louis has a lot to be desired as airport aesthetics and conveniences go. I love that there is little to no cover when entering and exiting the airport, let me tell you it is not a fun way to start your business travel when you have to run or wait in the rain and have only one change of cloths. The ceilings through out the airport our so low, especially in the in the baggage claim area, it just is not inviting at all and almost claustrophobic. Upgrades are not only needed to help attract China, but the airport is many peoples first impression of St. Louis when they arrive and in my opinion it is not very welcoming. I think these updates are a necessary on timely update.

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostJul 16, 2008#147

we have the worst looking airport in the Country. Time to UPGRADE. I honestly think our airport could be rehabbed to look cool - IF done correctly. The existing shell terminal is pretty cool imo. maybe just strip and/or rebuild all the concourses. get rid of all those useless ticketing counters. whens the last time anyone used a ticketing counter or a DustBuster...

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostJul 16, 2008#148

^ That is ridiculous. There is no way our airport is the "worst looking in the country." Have you been anywhere? While the place has its problems, the improvements are progressing.



To be on par with some of the newer (DIA) facilities and major city/hub type airports we have some work to do for sure, but there are numerous comparable cities that have inferior airports to ours.

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostJul 17, 2008#149

Don't get me wrong, I LOVE our airport; it's home, and it has that cool gritty, yesteryear feeling to it, like they filmed Airplane in it, today.


Have you been anywhere?


yes. please tell me which city LARGER than st. louis that has a lower quality airport. Maybe the airport shouldn't be in the control of those who can't afford to keep it updated, ahem..the city...

PostJul 17, 2008#150

back to the chinese deal. I'd be in favor of basically handing the ENTIRE airport over to the Chinese government to jumpstart St. Louis as a major hub directly to china. bring on the planes, trade, and immigrants. imagine the departures board:

St. Louis to Beijing

- to Hong Kong



SISTER CITIES:

- Nanjing

- Wuhan

Read more posts (1698 remaining)