Set up almost done




+2

I can't recall a significant project that has ever kept its original vision in my limited memory. Its still about private capital financing the project based on what the owner/developer thinks the market will demand and tenants it can land. My hope is Cordish has a major law firm in its pocket that will pay a premium for at least part of the vision.addxb2 wrote: ↑9:14 PM - 8 days agoI'm not worried about a bait and switch. The building had to come down.
I am worried that the market (both macro and local) is going to be weaker when it's time to build and Cordish walks away from the original vision.
I feel like this development's scope was relatively based in reality. Thompson Coburn could easily be the company theyre targeting for the office portion and there's good evidence that there's strong demand for luxary apartments downtown. They're really making the building itself the attarction for residents as opposed to relying on downtown, like smaller projects do. I agree that the largest issue will be stagflation and broader economic trends, but I feel like market demand is not a big concern for this. Remember, new Class A office is actually in high demand.dredger wrote:I can't recall a significant project that has ever kept its original vision in my limited memory. Its still about private capital financing the project based on what the owner/developer thinks the market will demand and tenants it can land. My hope is Cordish has a major law firm in its pocket that will pay a premium for at least part of the vision.addxb2 wrote: ↑9:14 PM - 8 days agoI'm not worried about a bait and switch. The building had to come down.
I am worried that the market (both macro and local) is going to be weaker when it's time to build and Cordish walks away from the original vision.
But like you said, timing is brutal as a good argument can be made that we are heading towards or if not already in stagflation. That is worst situation to get this project breaking ground with interest rates not coming down for financing and costs keep creeping on ever upward trajectory.
A number of reasons, the main one being full financing likely isn't secured and the new buildings probably aren't fully designed yet and have yet to be approved when they are. Major utility work likely needs to be done for the whole site, soil testing needs to be done under the existing buildings which can't take place until they're removed, debris/dust/asbestos management with the tower coming down makes simultaneous new construction more difficult, etc.jacob_rb_15 wrote: ↑1:20 AM - 8 days agoNot sure if this has been brought up before, but why couldn't they begin construction on the residential tower while the existing tower is being demolished? Is it to save money or use the site of the old mid-rise as a "dumpster yard"?