5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostApr 15, 2011#126

tuff-turf wrote:Maybe Live and let live does mean I'm dealing with it. And I am.

Well then why subject yourself to it? You just solved your own problem.
"Live and let live" means to to ignore the problem. And I like the Loop. If it becomes a better place to hang out, I will. If not, I won't.

And it's not just my problem. It's the problem of all Loop stakeholders. If it's not taken care of, the Loop will go downhill. Because that's what we'll get with a, "live and let live" policy.

185
Junior MemberJunior Member
185

PostApr 15, 2011#127

You are being unnecessarily mean. I'm not even disagreeing with you about the Loop thing...well not everything. How in the hell do you know who I care about??? First you want to mace me now you know me well enough to say I don't care. You are confirming my first line in my post. I would be more afraid of some of you than I would be of a "mob" of kids. Anyhow, I don't feel like arguing with you is productive in anyway. We are all entitled to our opinions...or maybe not...I don't have kids after all.

Of course I don't want the Loop to go downhill. That's a sill question. What would you like to hear from me?

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostApr 15, 2011#128

tuff-turf wrote:You are being unnecessarily mean. I'm not even disagreeing with you about the Loop thing...well not everything. How in the hell do you know who I care about??? Do you have anger issues or something? First you want to mace me now you know me well enough to say I don't care. You are confirming my first line in my post. I would be more afraid of some of you than I would be of a "mob" of kids. Anyhow, I don't feel like arguing with you is productive in anyway. We are all entitled to our opinions...or maybe not...I don't have kids after all.

Of course I don't want the Loop to go downhill. That's a sill question. What would you like to hear from me?
I never said I would mace you. That's ludicrous. I'm being pointed for a reason. You don't seem to have any stance except that we shouldn't be judgmental of mobs that cause problems. What are you trying to say? What is your solution?

185
Junior MemberJunior Member
185

PostApr 15, 2011#129

I have said before I think they should really ENFORCE the curfew...it's in my post. But after reading Alex's statement about a curfew punishing the innocent (he has a valid point) it might not be the solution that works. I'm just stating my experiences and opinions in order to find a solution just like everyone else on this thread.

PostApr 15, 2011#130

Ah! Parts of my original post were accidentally deleted! There is no way, I could re-write that. Oh well.

PostApr 15, 2011#131

My apologies Innov8ion! It was actually you and not Alex who said a curfew would punish the innocent! See we agree!

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostApr 15, 2011#132

tuff-turf wrote:My apologies Innov8ion! It was actually you and not Alex who said a curfew would punish the innocent! See we agree!
Nice, I just got a little confused talking with you. You were talking about "live and let live" and it seemed you didn't believe that the actual sh*t disturbers should be held accountable. Guess it's easy to miscommunicate. And I wasn't trying to be mean. I just wanted to push your buttons a little to get to the point quicker. Perhaps its not the best way...

185
Junior MemberJunior Member
185

PostApr 15, 2011#133

No worries! I think my point would have come across quicker if most of it wasn't accidentally deleted. It was long and I was left with just the last paragraph which could be very confusing. I could see how miscommunications and misunderstanding can happen. I think we are all working for the same goal.

827
Super MemberSuper Member
827

PostApr 15, 2011#134

Those that are passionate in this thread apparently care a lot about St. Louis and the Loop...That is a good thing...The only thing I find disturbing in teh conversation is that unless someone says "We need to enfore the law WITH THE WRATH OF A MILLION SUNS!", that person can be viewed as not tough enough...

We've all seen "Lean on Me"...Yes, I agree it takes a guy with a baseball bat to bring order in the midst of mobs exhibiting chaos, anarchy and apathy all at the same time...But what made the that movie and the reality behind it work was the likely 60+ hours a week the principal and staff gave of the their own time at the school...The efforts to use energy to find and prosecute the perps in the crowd, but, more importantly, the greater energy used to find the 'good' kids in teh mob and nurture them...

Obviously, that is the JOB of educators and not the job of patrons on an evening out on the town...But there should be an attitude empathy (not weakness) by evening patrons for the majority of kids who aren't going to steal the wife's purse or jump a dad and his 8 year old on a darker corner...I think we would agree that attitude goes right along with the tough (and correct) stance against law breakers...You can't have it both ways...Well most of them are good kids (probably?) but we still have to exclude all of them (I thought they we're all mostly good?) because there ARE some thugs (yes there are) that will ruin it for everyone...

...It also seems that so often people can talk right past each other because of where the emphasis is put when an issue has multiple fronts...Enforcement of the law is critical here...Demanding that all people, no matter what color, religion or economic status follow the law is required in a free society...Read my earlier posts and you will see I agree with this...But suggesting that free citizens (tax payers (we all pay sales tax) be excluded from City streets or City services before they've done anything wrong because 'we just know the way the world works' only ensures that the problem will continue...

One of the worst things you can do in a rural Afghan village is heavy handedly start messing with everyone because, gosh darn it, some of them are criminals...This only ensures that any friends you may have been able to make, those who desperately want freedom under the law, will not trust you and will in fact work against you...You've got to get those who want peace and order to help out and make every effort to only lock up and punish those who deserve it...

We need identify the bad apples...and communicate to them just how serious we are as a community about following the law...And teh best way to be effective at this is to make even stronger efforts at including and welcoming (and controlling) the 'mobs' who just like to hang out at the Loop...

If this is just about business, then I can understand some of the responses here...If this is about furthering a community, then let's not let a very vocal minority tear down and destroy inclusiveness and the freedoms we all treasure...

Go cards.

185
Junior MemberJunior Member
185

PostApr 15, 2011#135

"We need identify the bad apples...and communicate to them just how serious we are as a community about following the law...And teh best way to be effective at this is to make even stronger efforts at including and welcoming (and controlling) the 'mobs' who just like to hang out at the Loop..."

Agreed...I sure wish my post wasn't "accidentally" deleted. I'm suspicious! just kidding. :wink:

827
Super MemberSuper Member
827

PostApr 15, 2011#136

^There are modern, relatively successful gov'ts in the world today who might do more than just delete your post...Can you imagine? :shock:

I have a feeling there is probably near consensus on this issue, the differences being where one chooses to focus emphasis...

185
Junior MemberJunior Member
185

PostApr 15, 2011#137

Again...agreed!

3,785
Life MemberLife Member
3,785

PostApr 15, 2011#138

I didn't mean to imply I support wider sidewalks to empower teenagers but the general population and street furniture. I also never said anything about appeasement. I said people who broke the law should be arrested.
“Is that because of racism, which I know so much about because I’m a white male who lives in Canada?”
More than someone who's gone corporate. Canada has racial problems as well they simply try to hide them under the facade of multiculturalism and the idea that they are superior to America on social issues. If people have problems with the fact that I am in Canada then they can tell me that when I get back on Saturday. So why don't you slow down Schwarzkopf. If you want Holyfield it's on.

185
Junior MemberJunior Member
185

PostApr 15, 2011#139

I understood what you meant Doug. I'm afraid I took the wrath while you were gone. We resolved it somewhat but my post was accidentally deleted. I almost had to pull out my Holyfield as well! There is some weird things going on in this thread when I think we all are fighting for the same thing with different opinions of the causes and solutions. This is a good healthy thread and a subject that needs to be discussed.

7,810
Life MemberLife Member
7,810

PostApr 15, 2011#140

doug wrote:If people have problems with the fact that I am in Canada then they can tell me that when I get back on Saturday.
If the weather turns good (they're currently forecasting 40's and 50's with rain) the first thing you should do is spend a couple of hours Saturday night hanging out in the Delmar Loop. Now maybe the media exposure will have changed things, but you have no idea what has been going on in U City for the last year.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostApr 15, 2011#141

Bourbon Street and to a lesser extent Beale Street are madness on weekends, with bands of drunken people everywhere. Most are revelers out for a good time, but some are angry, aggressive, belligerent, etc.... I can't speak to Beale as much, but in New Orleans they do a pretty good job of handling things, at least during the primary Wednesday through Saturday evening party times (excluding Mardi Gras of course), by having a constant and ubiquitous police presence. It'd be kind of sad if that's what things come to in the pleasant, side-walk dining, storefront strewn Loop, but if that's what it takes to keep people coming, then that's what they should do.

7,810
Life MemberLife Member
7,810

PostApr 15, 2011#142

wabash wrote:Bourbon Street and to a lesser extent Beale Street are madness on weekends, with bands of drunken people everywhere. Most are revelers out for a good time, but some are angry, aggressive, belligerent, etc.... I can't speak to Beale as much, but in New Orleans they do a pretty good job of handling things, at least during the primary Wednesday through Saturday evening party times (excluding Mardi Gras of course), by having a constant and ubiquitous police presence. It'd be kind of sad if that's what things come to in the pleasant, side-walk dining, storefront strewn Loop, but if that's what it takes to keep people coming, then that's what they should do.
Beale street puts gates up and makes people go through metal detectors on prime weekends. Do we want that on the Loop?

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostApr 15, 2011#143

The report on KMOX this morning was that the police presence will be doubled this weekend.

73
New MemberNew Member
73

PostApr 15, 2011#144

innov8ion wrote:
TheRemedy wrote:
Alex Ihnen wrote:^ So what's "the remedy"? It seems that some see the behavior discussed here as no big deal - perhaps people should just deal with it. If you don't like it, then don't go to the Loop?
I don't know if I, or anyone has the perfect remedy, I would start by giving the kids a place to go. When I was younger we would get a group of 100+, find an abandoned house or field and have a party and just hang out. We weren't trying to "take over" something, or raise hell, we just wanted to loiter, talk, and relax. Some kids have skate parks, some kids have libraries, some have gyms, sometimes they just need a place to meet without being hassled. Communication is a huge part in creating something that works, that's where I would start.
I'm not so sure about this. I grew up in small town Iowa w/ virtually nothing to do. We found things to do that didn't involve tearing up the town. Also, there are plenty of parks, libraries, and other activities throughout St. Louis so I don't quite get this stance. Perhaps you could elaborate.

The problem is that kids are swarming through the Loop like locusts and the cops don't seem to be doing much about the poor behavior. No matter the color distribution in a mob, mobs are unpredictable and typically volatile. Also, cops pepper spraying the kids to get them to disperse probably wouldn't be good PR.

How many citations are the cops giving to the unruly kids out there? Not enough, it seems. If the cops crack down on the shenanigans seriously, I guarantee you the sh*t will stop. The curfew will only exacerbate the problem as it punishes the innocent. It's time to start the tough love and stop the counterproductive curfew....

Would love to see a UCity cop do an IAMA on this topic.
There may be plenty of parks, libraries, activities etc. but none are attracting the kids. This could be because the general public would like to control every move and decision they make, or that they are treated like criminals upon showing up anywhere. Not everyone there is walking around tearing up the city.

I'm just saying pushing them out of the loop won't solve the problem, kids will always group up. You can get a topic started for "Loitering teens on Washington Ave." next.

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostApr 15, 2011#145

It my understanding Wash Ave already has a curfew as a result from the issues last summer. The reason we have to control their moves is because they can't behave. If we didn't the Loop, Wash Ave, and the Galleria wouldn't exist. It boggles my mind some people stick up for the kids on this issue.

339
Full MemberFull Member
339

PostApr 15, 2011#146

innov8ion wrote:Would love to see a UCity cop do an IAMA on this topic.
A fellow redditor?

73
New MemberNew Member
73

PostApr 15, 2011#147

downtown2007 wrote:It my understanding Wash Ave already has a curfew as a result from the issues last summer. The reason we have to control their moves is because they can't behave. If we didn't the Loop, Wash Ave, and the Galleria wouldn't exist. It boggles my mind some people stick up for the kids on this issue.
There is zero communication with the kids on this issue. I don't like to jump to conclusions and start labeling all kids there a problem because they crowd the sidewalk.

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostApr 15, 2011#148

doug wrote: So why don't you slow down Schwarzkopf. If you want Holyfield it's on.
Doug: Check your PMs. But while I’m not looking for you to “go Holyfield”, all I could think of from that quoted line was this…

wabash wrote:... (I)n New Orleans they do a pretty good job of handling things, at least during the primary Wednesday through Saturday evening party times (excluding Mardi Gras of course), by having a constant and ubiquitous police presence.
dweebe wrote:Beale street puts gates up and makes people go through metal detectors on prime weekends. Do we want that on the Loop?
Beale Street may be the model for it. I’ve never seen the metal detectors (and don’t think they’re called for on Delmar), but I’ve seen great crowd control with a formidable police presence on either side of the main strip, with road blocks and the occasional mounted unit. Inside the blocked-off areas, people are free to roam the street, and it’s allowed to be a fun atmosphere. I’ll add in that I’ve never seen Beale with a bunch of high school kids walking around; does anyone know if Beale has a 21+ rule going on?

Caveat is that Beale has directly parallel streets to the north & south, which can alleviate traffic, while Delmar does not.

Q: Could there be success in the Loop if they restricted vehicular traffic between Vintage Vinyl and the Delmar Lounge? Not as a long-term strategy, but does it work as a short-term break from the norm? Could more open-street festivals help alleviate all this, or would it exacerbate the rowdiness of high schoolers?

Q2: What if they carded people at blocked-off sidewalks along Delmar, not allowing anyone onto the Loop if they’re under 18? Would the Loop Business Community be in favor of having it be only 18+ on weekend nights?

2,093
Life MemberLife Member
2,093

PostApr 15, 2011#149

I've never understood the "wait till you're a parent" retort.

I am 39 and have elected not to have children. Does that mean I am in some sort of suspended adolescence? (well maybe I am but that would be the case whether or not I procreated)

Seems to me ALL of us--single, married, parents, non-parents--have opinions that are of equal weight.

That being said I probably agree more with Innov8ion than Tuff Turf on this subject. I just don't see what having kids has to do with it.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostApr 15, 2011#150

^ It's just an example. Parents do learn that lesson firsthand. It's no knock on those who don't have kids. I don't have kids.

Read more posts (220 remaining)