933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostMay 22, 2014#26

There's a lot of crazy stuff on that there internet.

I do hope DT's next tower is in BPV.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMay 22, 2014#27

dredger wrote: The one question is that I'm not clear on. Was Geoff @ Nextstl intending to post on Montgomery's tower and simply got beat on the scoop or is this a new, legitimate proposal? Geoff has gone silent and everybody is splitting hairs on words from a one paragraph reply that talked about three different things if not mistaken.
Nextstl said it was not the Montgomery... I think it was Alex that tweeted that.

3,544
Life MemberLife Member
3,544

PostMay 22, 2014#28

Alex also said that there was another development brewing. A few days ago he claimed that the city was getting a new development proposal every week, but I don't know if this new "development proposal" was going to be commercial, industrial, or residential. Either way there is a lot of things brewing. I expect another mini boom when IKEA opens. Also that Cortex expansion is going to be a big deal. The BJC expansion will likely also set off another wave when complete. If we hit it with the streetcar, we will likely see a built out Central West End and Midtown by 2030. If Midtown Station comes on line, the Central Corridor will be one of the fastest growing urban areas in the Midwest.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMay 22, 2014#29

^ I wouldn't be surprised by a Midtown Station announcement around the time IKEA breaks ground. It will be very interesting to see how that develops.... hopefully it has some urban design to it that would be at least more resembling the Richmond Heights development across from the Galleria that I can't remember the name of than a traditional strip retail zone.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostMay 22, 2014#30

Getting just a bit off topic here. But if there's one project that will be resurrected my money would be on Nadira Place @ Wash Ave & Tucker:

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMay 22, 2014#31

yummy. When was that proposed? I'd like a rendering with people in the JA windows, too!

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostMay 22, 2014#32

Way back between Spring 2005 and Spring 2006, I think this was the final proposal of an evolving development plan. Here's the thread for it: http://urbanstl.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=844

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostMay 22, 2014#33

^I don't know that is such a prime intersection I would think any building there should be at leat 15 stories. Obviously its an improvement over the surface lot but gd this Nadira Place could be built any number of places. Ideal locations for signature buildings don't.

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostMay 23, 2014#34

urban_dilettante wrote:somebody somewhere said that Kindred has a contract on the lot at Lindell and Euclid for a number of years yet. (i know that's a lot uncertainty so if anybody can clarify please do.) i presume the contract can be nullified if enough money is thrown at them.
Yes. It's a ten-year contract. The contract is online if you google the address. I think it would take a very large check for them to give up that lot.

8,909
Life MemberLife Member
8,909

PostMay 23, 2014#35

Kindred healthcare?

1,067
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,067

PostMay 23, 2014#36

I always liked the Nadira Place project. Agree it could go just about anywhere downtown, but there's something cool about smaller modern infill nicely tucked between older architecture. A smaller project may be more stable in the long run, also. To really go off topic, I'd love to see more modern townhomes with that look fill in lots in places like Soulard, Benton Park, Laf Square. Kind of like Art House, I suppose, only in a more classically residential part of town.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMay 23, 2014#37

^ how bout for the old Praxair site? That spot should be primed for residential development, and modern architecture could make for a nice transition to the old neighborhood.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostMay 23, 2014#38

Presbyterian wrote:
urban_dilettante wrote:somebody somewhere said that Kindred has a contract on the lot at Lindell and Euclid for a number of years yet. (i know that's a lot uncertainty so if anybody can clarify please do.) i presume the contract can be nullified if enough money is thrown at them.
Yes. It's a ten-year contract. The contract is online if you google the address. I think it would take a very large check for them to give up that lot.
that is unfortunate…

by the way, here's a rendering of the most recent (now also dead) proposal for the Skyhouse site (from 2011):



http://nextstl.com/2011/04/is-downtown- ... or-infill/

PostMay 23, 2014#39

moorlander wrote:Kindred healthcare?
yep.

7,805
Life MemberLife Member
7,805

PostMay 23, 2014#40

Presbyterian wrote:
urban_dilettante wrote:somebody somewhere said that Kindred has a contract on the lot at Lindell and Euclid for a number of years yet. (i know that's a lot uncertainty so if anybody can clarify please do.) i presume the contract can be nullified if enough money is thrown at them.
Yes. It's a ten-year contract. The contract is online if you google the address. I think it would take a very large check for them to give up that lot.
Then someone is way overpaying to under utilize that lot just for parking. I've never seen that lot more than half full.

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostMay 24, 2014#41

roger wyoming II wrote:^ how bout for the old Praxair site? That spot should be primed for residential development, and modern architecture could make for a nice transition to the old neighborhood.
Praxair is in play, but I don't know the plans. Owners of Moulin/Vin de Set/etc are buying everything east of the trucking company to the gas station. Legislation is moving through the Board of Alderman making the area eligible for tax benefits. Their presentation at the Planning Commission included no specifics. That probably means it's early in the planning stage.

1,067
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,067

PostMay 24, 2014#42

Are those the same owners of PW Pizza/21st amendment? At first blush, I'd like to see what they could do with more land and opportunities.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMay 24, 2014#43

^ yes. Its good to hear they are on the prowl; I can't wait to hear more details on what they have in mind.

7,805
Life MemberLife Member
7,805

PostJun 30, 2014#44

Koplar Hires Kohn Pederson Fox (KPF) to Design CWE Landmark Project
http://nextstl.com/2014/06/koplar-hires-kpf/

We'll see...

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJun 30, 2014#45

^ if this was the big announcement from Geoff, its kind of a letdown. Hopefully something great will come of it, but I was hoping for concrete plans.

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostJun 30, 2014#46

This will be a sizable project.

3,544
Life MemberLife Member
3,544

PostJun 30, 2014#47

Yes, this could easily be multiple towers. A site that big could pack in at least 3 nice size towers.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostJul 01, 2014#48

So I wonder if this is Koman's grandiose project that could be bigger than BPV. Which gets to another thought. Is this going to be residential, hotel, office, or all of the above. If so, I it will be interesting to see who can get ground broken on tower first, DeWitt/Cordish or Koplar/Koman.

Also, I also think this is a let down if this is what Geoff's teaser was about. I was really expecting a BPV residential tower announcement or Drury Inn going ahead with their Laclede's tower. In other words, a firm ground breaking date on an existing proposal. Right now, if all three lots are involved, you essentially got another BPV and Bottleworks without the renderings but a well known architect none the less to do the renderings.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostJul 01, 2014#49

I'm assuming a shared parking arrangement could be reached with the two neighboring towers opening up the lots fronting Pine for development.

So IMHO this thing should be taller than the Chase. I am not a huge booster of tall for the sake of being tall but in this case I want to see a tower tall enough for a tourist viewing deck/bar/restaurant at the top. I believe this is one place where you could look east to downtown, Arch, Grand Center, Cathedral Basilica, South to the Botanical gardens, West over Forest Park to Clayton. A tourist here could see a smorgasbord of options to entertain their visit to St. Louis. I'm not sure how tall it needs to be to do that but IMHO it needs to be at least that tall and include some way of calling attention to what St. Louis has to offer for tourists.

Secondly I know the hotel market is pretty Saturated in St. Louis, but I think in the Central West End there is a lot less capacity. I'd like to see a upscale but not top of market branded hotel such as a Hyatt Regency, Hilton, Embassy Suites, or Marriott, as a component of this project. Basically I want to see tourism as a major component of any project here. Main entrance and Valet should be on Kingshighway. Something more like Union Station's Valet IMHO would be better than a circle drive type valet you see at hotels like the Ballpark Hilton.

Also I realize the condo market is a little soft compared to apartments but a large component of this project should be condominiums. This would be and should be a premiere address in the city and is probably the only place i can imagine luxury condos with sticker prices closer to 400K-500K could work, outside of possibly Clayton (sorry but i don't think downtown is there yet).

Next I am sure there will have to be a parking component to this project. The streetcar may be coming, or it may not, but no matter what there will be parking. That said It should be COMPLETELY hidden from view from Pine, Kingshighway, or Lindell. Preferably underground. The on exception is it might make sense for the parking to have an access drive off of Pine. That way the alley access could be restricted for uses such as, loading docks, and garbage pickup.

Lindell should have street level retail. A Cullinaria or City Target would be great but I'm not ready to hold my breath on that one. I just don't think they will be able to commit with the given restrictions on space and parking. Also I think Lindell and Euclid South West corner is a better location for either. If they didn't have retail on Kingshighway, or Pine I would be OK with that. I think that's a realistic expectation of the sites retail potential as it relates to its ability to drive foot traffic and its accessibility by car.

As far as styling I know a lot of people think it should be a gleaming glass tower. I personally would prefer to something with a little more industrial look, with alot of exposed structural members. The Aqua, in Chicago, has been copied several time already, but something like that with maybe a little different twist might also be a possibility.

Something unique on the roof would be cool too. Thoughts include; a roof top forest, green energy features like solar cells or wind turbines, light beams, a torch. Something that really sets this place apart.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 01, 2014#50

^ I think that's a pretty good vision.... just a couple thoughts:

- the hotel market is doing better and that's why we're seeing more action on that front. I could see a hotel component for this.
- I'm not sure about an additional grocer in the neighborhood but perhaps a relocated and expanded Straub's would be a good fit and make it more competitive with WF's. Trader Joe's also likes to follow WF into new markets, but I'd prefer Midtown Station for a TJ's.
- I think there also could be an office component here.... I wouldn't build anything spec, but I wouldn't doubt that a company may express interest in having a marquee location.
- For height, I'd like to see at least as high as the Chase for at least the building that would anchor the Lindell corner.
- I'd like to see at least 500 residential units (assuming it incorporates the south lot fronting Pine)

Read more posts (1014 remaining)