thanks southsidepride you get it
. now i will imagine peace
The ignorant minority have a loud voice.innov8ion wrote:Sorry, but that's a logical fallacy. The views of an ignorant minority have nothing to do with the issues noted in the petition letter: https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id ... EHvTjwBOngsouthsidepride wrote:To be fair to loftman the photo in the Post Dispatch showing two African-Americans on Washington Street who were not engaging in any illegal behavior got quite a few racist responses on their website.
Anything else is a mere distraction.
- 6,775
So?Doug wrote:The ignorant minority have a loud voice.innov8ion wrote:Sorry, but that's a logical fallacy. The views of an ignorant minority have nothing to do with the issues noted in the petition letter: https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id ... EHvTjwBOngsouthsidepride wrote:To be fair to loftman the photo in the Post Dispatch showing two African-Americans on Washington Street who were not engaging in any illegal behavior got quite a few racist responses on their website.
Anything else is a mere distraction.
Doug also stated (before he edited his post) that he practices the politics of distraction. Distraction aka misdirection or sly manipulation. That's the same game that Lure and loftman are playing, too. Stay classy, San Diego...Doug wrote:The ignorant minority have a loud voice.innov8ion wrote:Sorry, but that's a logical fallacy. The views of an ignorant minority have nothing to do with the issues noted in the petition letter: https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id ... EHvTjwBOngsouthsidepride wrote:To be fair to loftman the photo in the Post Dispatch showing two African-Americans on Washington Street who were not engaging in any illegal behavior got quite a few racist responses on their website.
Anything else is a mere distraction.
Club Lure, loftman, and Doug may have different core views from the white trash 'ignorati,' but what do they have in common with the same, loud, ignorant minority they speak of? They're also loud, ignorant for their sly manipulation meant to divide our city, and hold a minority view.
Remember, misdirected views (no matter what stance) are only meant to distract and have nothing to do with the serious issues noted in the petition letter: https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id ... EHvTjwBOng
The issue is solely about the safety for all downtown and the detrimental behavior stemming from Club Lure and a portion of its patrons. The hearing is August 27th.
- 13
+1innov8ion wrote:Doug also stated (before he edited his post) that he practices the politics of distraction. Distraction aka misdirection or sly manipulation. That's the same game that Lure and loftman are playing, too. Stay classy, San Diego...
Club Lure, loftman, and Doug may have different core views from the white trash 'ignorati,' but what do they have in common with the same, loud, ignorant minority they speak of? They're also loud, ignorant for their sly manipulation meant to divide our city, and hold a minority view.
Remember, misdirected views (no matter what stance) are only meant to distract and have nothing to do with the serious issues noted in the petition letter: https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id ... EHvTjwBOng
The issue is solely about the safety for all downtown and the detrimental behavior stemming from Club Lure and a portion of its patrons. The hearing is August 27th.
Yes, I am a huge player in the issue and distracting everyone. It's hard to distract from gunfire and my observations on race present and past were not for that purpose. Obviously no one wants guns going off downtown. I wish that the same attention was given to other areas where this happens to be a lot more common. Will these downtown residents work with other neighborhoods in the same manner?
- 8,922
How is it the downtown residents responsibility to work with other neighborhoods? If those neighborhoods banded together like the downtown residents, maybe they would see things change. Just a thought.
- 6,775
I won't. I don't see any of them working with us.Doug wrote:Yes, I am a huge player in the issue and distracting everyone. It's hard to distract from gunfire and my observations on race present and past were not for that purpose. Obviously no one wants guns going off downtown. I wish that the same attention was given to other areas where this happens to be a lot more common. Will these downtown residents work with other neighborhoods in the same manner?
- 1,611
Doug wrote:Yes, I am a huge player in the issue and distracting everyone. It's hard to distract from gunfire and my observations on race present and past were not for that purpose. Obviously no one wants guns going off downtown. I wish that the same attention was given to other areas where this happens to be a lot more common. Will these downtown residents work with other neighborhoods in the same manner?
So Step 1 is create "white guilt" and Step 3 is "safe, perfect utopia." What is step 2? Also, do you collect underpants for profit?

Doug is 2nd from left
St. Louis parochialism at its finest.Moorlander wrote:How is it the downtown residents responsibility to work with other neighborhoods? If those neighborhoods banded together like the downtown residents, maybe they would see things change. Just a thought.
"Banding together" isn't as easy in areas suffering decades of high unemployment. Political participation happens to be tied to socioeconomic status. Organizing has an opportunity cost that the poor might not be able to afford when their basic needs are not being met. Moreover, living in areas of high crime and joblessness does bring about a sense of hopelessness and disbelief in community efficacy. The middle class environment with which we grew up in does not exist in these areas. So blaming the problem on those who live there isn't really fair while the position limits change. Of course suspicion will exist on both sides as St. Louis is very entrenched, us vs. them, with little cooperation. We don't discuss gentrification, crime, or controversial topics in public or private with people of markedly different backgrounds. But discussion and joined action needs to happen if we want to address crime City wide.
If your concern isn't about controlling the racial composition of downtown, but only public safety, this is your imperative. With starved areas so nearby, absent a police sate or Paul McKee's style of blockbusting, it's impossible to keep crime out of downtown no matter how many clubs you close. It would be better to invest in North St. Louis' existing social and physical capital along with forming relationships between neighborhood groups which can address crime and other problems. Again though I have concerns how this Lure issue is being handled, the public reaction is impressive and should be applied to other areas. I hope again alarm isn't because the issue happens to be seen as "this area demands our attention as we invested so much thus far/the Huns are invading quickly bring the Legion." If the same energy placed into this was joined with others, bringing the same about of scrutiny to problems in other areas, couldn't we fix more of the City?
Localism and fragmentation will not reduce crime in the aggregate. I would like to reiterate that neighborhood racial composition determines the responsiveness of public service delivery. Joe Frank found that areas like the 28th Ward submit drastically fewer complaints to the CSB, for example, than the 4th Ward though they have numerically similar populations. The former also gets quicker response times from our City. Anecdotally we know this is similar with the police. People are calling and complaining about the state of their neighborhoods. It's not as if they are lazy, do not care, or actually enjoy living next to a collapsing building. Frank concludes, and I agree, "...this study indicates that race drives service delivery...The national political discourse in 2008 and 2009 has highlighted the “post-racial” administration of newly elected President Barack Obama. But in many local communities like Saint Louis, racial discrimination, racial segregation and racial conflict are still very much part of the political discourse. And that racial tension influences how services are delivered on a daily basis."
Very well, moving on.... Create a new thread if you like. No need to hijack this one.
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk
- 6,775
Yawn.Doug wrote:St. Louis parochialism at its finest.Moorlander wrote:How is it the downtown residents responsibility to work with other neighborhoods? If those neighborhoods banded together like the downtown residents, maybe they would see things change. Just a thought.
"Banding together" isn't as easy in areas suffering decades of high unemployment. Political participation happens to be tied to socioeconomic status. Organizing has an opportunity cost that the poor might not be able to afford when their basic needs are not being met. Moreover, living in areas of high crime and joblessness does bring about a sense of hopelessness and disbelief in community efficacy. The middle class environment with which we grew up in does not exist in these areas. So blaming the problem on those who live there isn't really fair while the position limits change. Of course suspicion will exist on both sides as St. Louis is very entrenched, us vs. them, with little cooperation. We don't discuss gentrification, crime, or controversial topics in public or private with people of markedly different backgrounds. But discussion and joined action needs to happen if we want to address crime City wide.
If your concern isn't about controlling the racial composition of downtown, but only public safety, this is your imperative. With starved areas so nearby, absent a police sate or Paul McKee's style of blockbusting, it's impossible to keep crime out of downtown no matter how many clubs you close. It would be better to invest in North St. Louis' existing social and physical capital along with forming relationships between neighborhood groups which can address crime and other problems. Again though I have concerns how this Lure issue is being handled, the public reaction is impressive and should be applied to other areas. I hope again alarm isn't because the issue happens to be seen as "this area demands our attention as we invested so much thus far/the Huns are invading quickly bring the Legion." If the same energy placed into this was joined with others, bringing the same about of scrutiny to problems in other areas, couldn't we fix more of the City?
Localism and fragmentation will not reduce crime in the aggregate. I would like to reiterate that neighborhood racial composition determines the responsiveness of public service delivery. Joe Frank found that areas like the 28th Ward submit drastically fewer complaints to the CSB, for example, than the 4th Ward though they have numerically similar populations. The former also gets quicker response times from our City. Anecdotally we know this is similar with the police. People are calling and complaining about the state of their neighborhoods. It's not as if they are lazy, do not care, or actually enjoy living next to a collapsing building. Frank concludes, and I agree, "...this study indicates that race drives service delivery...The national political discourse in 2008 and 2009 has highlighted the “post-racial” administration of newly elected President Barack Obama. But in many local communities like Saint Louis, racial discrimination, racial segregation and racial conflict are still very much part of the political discourse. And that racial tension influences how services are delivered on a daily basis."
Speaking of Lure, will the Trupiano's be linked in any way with the creep who killed the lady in Sunset Hills the other day? Do they know him? I don't know. Just wondering....
Not to my knowledge. What posts?
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk
Another baiting and trolling manifesto from Doug. The first line was something like "You're all racists."innov8ion wrote:Not to my knowledge. What posts?
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk
I checked the moderator log and found nothing related. That means that Doug likely erased it himself. Probably an appropriate choice...dweebe wrote:Another baiting and trolling manifesto from Doug. The first line was something like "You're all racists."innov8ion wrote:Not to my knowledge. What posts?
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk
I haven't deleted anything.
It seems the venues on Washington are being a little reactionary. Had some issue at Shiver last night.
How long are the police going to barricade the West bound lane? Are we turning Washington Avenue into a pedestrian mall?
It seems the venues on Washington are being a little reactionary. Had some issue at Shiver last night.
How long are the police going to barricade the West bound lane? Are we turning Washington Avenue into a pedestrian mall?
- 3,235
Which was?Doug wrote:
It seems the venues on Washington are being a little reactionary. Had some issue at Shiver last night.
Things are definitely being deleted on the forum. Was there another revert recently?
Something happened to the server during the day today and urbanSTL was down. I had to roll back to last night's snapshot. I know what the problem was and it won't happen again. Sorry all.TheRemedy wrote:Things are definitely being deleted on the forum. Was there another revert recently?
- 3,235
Never had any issues there. Only complaint is the music was a bit loud. Bartenders were nice and it was a good atmosphere when I was there. I highly recommend trying it. Good addition to the area.


