I appreciate your input, glad to know he is real. Although, many of his posts I've read can be classified as "troll" posts. They offer nothing to the conversation, and only instigate ignorant discussion regarding race or other off topic issues. If I wanted to read some of this garbage I'd go to STL today.Framer wrote:No, you're wrong about Doug. He's not an anonymous troll hiding behind his keyboard. He's quite well known in local urbanist circles, and he has an impressive record of active, hands-on participation in many causes near and dear to all urbantists. Sure, his style can be abrassive, but hey, the squeeky wheel gets the oil.TheRemedy wrote: Doug, you are nothing but a forum troll. I don't believe you are truly for any of the points you attempt to make. Please leave the forum.
I certainly don't agree with everything he says, but that's what discussion boards are all about - the free exchange of ideas. This forum, and this city, would be a lesser place without Doug.
And now, back to our regular mayhem....
Prove it...Moorlander wrote:I was wondering when the mob connection would be brought up. Nick does have ties to the mob.
Nick and Tony's dad was a low level mobster who did two stints in jail for gambling and running a book making operation. The best part of "Daddy the Mobster's" history, he lost money every year on his book making. The feds commented they never heard of a mobster who lost money, it was attributed to Daddy Trupiano's personal gambling losses. The family has never been well respected in the Italian/Mob community. Nick pulling the mob card just shows how dumb they are. Real mobsters don't scream they are mobsters from the rooftop.
Sources - my grandparents who are acquainted with the older members of the Trupiano family.
Sources - my grandparents who are acquainted with the older members of the Trupiano family.
I sent this email to the owners of Lure, interested downtown residents, and members of the media this morning. Let's see what the owners of Club Lure have to say for themselves now...
Dave wrote:Alright, enough is enough you guys. We're not here to attack each other. We're here to shed light on the situation with Club Lure and talk about ways we can work together to improve the quality of life in our neighborhood. This kind of divisive behavior plays right into their hands. It's likely they feel the only chance they have of sticking around is to divide the neighborhood and the city. Why do you think they pulled their offensive antics with the posters that declare downtown racist?
You see, no one here has a problem with hip-hop. Chief Isom, our Police Commissioner who happens to be black, made the following statements that played during Jake's interview. (BTW, I think Jake did a good job and was pretty objective):
1. "What we point to is behavior. And that's what we're focused on. What's the behavior that's being caused as a result of these clubs or what's the behavior centered around these clubs?"
2. "I don't know if its hip-hop music itself, it's the people who are coming. I mean, my kids listen to hip-hop and they don't go around around shooting."
3. "The problem with that is we can't be in front of the clubs 24 hours a day and so we do have other responsibilities in the city of St. Louis."
4. "We do know that there have been several shootings late at night after the closings of these clubs. We do believe that some of these are related to people that are frequenting these clubs."
As Jeff Rainford states, "When you have facts you fight your battles with facts, when you have the law behind you, one fights with the law, when you have nothing behind you, you pound your fist and make noise." Therefore, Club Lure's claim of racism is nothing more than a pitiful smoke screen and offensive as it attempts to divide the city we love.
Let's get back to the previous question about how well Club Lure fits in with the downtown family of residents, businesses, and entertainment venues. The Jack Thompson HOA made a reasonable request last year asking for smoke and sound abatement. You know, I would have had the expectation that smoke from the first floor would not seep all the way up to the top floor. So what was the building owner and Tony Trupiano's response? That they couldn't afford it. That these folks shouldn't have bought a condo located over a nightclub... How many thousands of dollars a month do you spend on security, Rob? You guys couldn't afford a fraction of that in a one-time improvement that would help establish good faith with your neighbors? And you had the gall to rub it in their faces by telling them they shouldn't have bought there in the first place? Lure owners, how would you like it if your neighbors treated you like that? Probably not very well.
Lucky's and Club Lure haven't been open that long, have they? Weren't folks living in Jack Thompson before then? I know the Meridian was around before the Trupiano's moved in. So why did you open a club in a mixed-use, residential area? Didn't you know there would be an expectation that you be a respectful partner and not a detriment to the neighborhood? Didn't you know that residents would not approve of gunfire and other violence stemming from nearby clubs? You see, you aren't the only one that can turn the tables.
Rob, Nick, and the rest of Club Lure owners:
You have long had the opportunity to treat your downtown neighbors with respect. Yet at each step, you spit in our faces. When we asked for smoke and sound abatement, you laughed at us. When we asked for you to throw more responsible parties to limit the recurring violence and nuisance behavior, you called us a bunch of racists. Your words and actions have made it clear that you are unwilling to take responsibility and be a productive member of the downtown neighborhood. In fact, your actions have shown you to be a detriment to it. These facts and how you have behaved will be addressed in the upcoming Excise hearing. And I'd like to be honest with you. For the despicable way you have behaved, I personally hope you are shut down and shut down soon.
But as we all know, it's never too late to start being a good neighbor. Will you own up to your disrespect for the downtown neighborhood and city at large? If you desire to stay, what reasonable changes do you propose that could make you a positive part of this neighborhood?
Gentlemen, it's past time for you to step up to the plate and come clean with the same people you have repeatedly bullied and disrespected. On one hand you slam us in the media and call us a bunch of racists. On the other, you pretend that you're our partners in progress. We aren't as stupid as we look, fellas. Maybe it's best that you start with an apology. (Jake, please let them answer for themselves.)
Respectfully,
Dave
- 8,922
Moorlander wrote:I was wondering when the mob connection would be brought up. Nick's family does have ties to the mob.
Just something I know from being a long time StL resident. I have no proof.
- 6,775
I see what you did there!Moorlander wrote:Moorlander wrote:I was wondering when the mob connection would be brought up. Nick's family does have ties to the mob.
Just something I know from being a long time StL resident. I have no proof.
From the Lure email string today...
Jennifer Asher wrote:Dave,
As a resident of JT Square I would like to thank you for summing up my frustration with club Lure's owners. I feel like I have been saying these things, and people keep wanting to have meetings with Lure, we've had meetings, they have had many many chances to be good neighbors, and repeatedly they say they want to move forward and be good neighbors, but when it comes down to it, all they have is excuses, accusations, and NO CHANGE. Would any of you want to go to endless meetings to remedy a situation that Lure has refused to rectify for over a year, where your nine year old daughter is living in a room that fills with smoke at least three nights a week. She has breathing issues, asthma and allergies. Would you want to give them three more weeks to change something they have failed to change for over a year? Tony Trupiano called me and asked me, "Why did you move in over a bar?" We live on the sixth and seventh floor! Who would think that smoke would come all the way up to the seventh floor??? I expected SOME noise, but not smoke, not belligerent clients, and workers of Lure in the resident's lobby. No one at City Hall, Lure, DSLRA safety, seems to grasp the gravity of this situation for me, or my frustration with the way Lure has responded. I understand that downtown wants businesses to thrive, but does anyone want business to drive residents out or keep them away, or diminish the investments we have made? Don't we need residents? There's plenty of businesses downtown that contribute taxes, we need residents, I pay taxes to the city too! We all do! How much tax money would the city lose if residents start leaving? Any other business in that location would contribute taxes, fly-by-night nightclubs are not lasting businesses, would Lure be here in twenty, fifteen, even ten years if their liquor license wasn't under scrutiny? Doubt it.
First Lure's management ridiculed me for moving downtown, now they have called me a racist for wanting to protect my daughter, and my investment. I am tired of their attitude, I am tired of their lies, I am tired of their rhetoric. I will not let them bully me any longer. I will be at that hearing with my daughter, my photos, and my numerous first hand accounts of what goes on here.
Thank you Dave for understanding.
okay, one thing. how the hell is smoke getting up to the seventh floor and filling rooms? do the smoke eaters pump directly into their central air? i'm not saying it's a lie, i'm just asking how that could even happen without the building being on fire.
^ The club has no smoke eaters and has refused to buy them. See: http://www.urbanreviewstl.com/?p=8226
UrbanReviewSTL wrote:So last Friday night I went to their condo located at Tucker & Washington Ave at 1am (technically Saturday morning). I had never been in the residential part of this building. Like most, the lobby contains a mail center and an elevator. But this resident lobby contained something I’ve seen in no other: massive amounts of cigarette smoke.
Typically in these buildings the commercial spaces are kept separate from the resident spaces. However, it is common to permit emergency egress through an otherwise resident-only space. The club’s exit door is at the end on the left in the above image.
We took the elevator up to the top — the 6th floor. I was so bothered by the lobby smoke their hall seemed refreshing. We peaked into the emergency staircase.
The stair leads up to the roof. The bedrooms/bathrooms for the four 6th floor units are located on the 7th floor. A former opening from the stairwell is adjacent to her daughter’s bathroom. Each Friday & Saturday night the smoke makes its way up the stairwell forcing them to run the exhaust fan in her bathroom.
This couple’s unit is in the middle of the floor. They said the neighbor with the entrance opposite the elevator (above) gets smoke through the elevator shaft.
Their loft was very nice. I didn’t even attempt the spiral stair but we talked for about 15 minutes. Their windows which face West were closed but I could hear the music from the club below — we are on the 6th floor!
Heading back down the hall to the elevator I could now smell the smoke on their floor. Coming off the elevator into the lobby I was again confronted by the visible smoke. Just then a young man exited the club into the resident lobby to talk on his phone. I can’t imagine putting up with 1) this smoke and 2) having strangers in what should be secured space.
- 8,922
When does the City Smoking ban kick in. That will solve one of the issues.
- 10K
January 1, IIRC.Moorlander wrote:When does the City Smoking ban kick in. That will solve one of the issues.
Section (7) of the smoking bill delineates exclusions. Lure is not exempt as their floor space is greater than 2,000 square feet. Casinos are exempt. Taverns or clubs are considered bars, as defined in item (1) of section (2), and are only exempt if they meet the criteria in item (7) of section (7.)bonwich wrote:Aren't casinos, taverns and "clubs" exempt?
- 2,939
Nothing says "upscale" like not being able to afford smoke-eaters. Bowling alleys have smoke-eaters (but not Goose bottle service). It's not like they're trying to install a full kitchen hood system, after all. As a regular cigarette smoker, I'm disgusted to realize they don't have proper ventilation.
Why not have smoke-eaters, really? Is management hoping people can just get contact highs after a little puff-puff-give? Or are they really just that cheap?
Why not have smoke-eaters, really? Is management hoping people can just get contact highs after a little puff-puff-give? Or are they really just that cheap?
just came from a walk down Washington ave police everywhere ,why is it all ways after the fact,should have always been police presence on Washington ave.here's a idea foot patrol 
i went downtown tonight as well, and the police presence was really impressive. a cop came into the bar (Nara) and just hung out for a while, talking to patrons, strolling about.
oh, and Nara now has one of their flatscreens tuned to their CCTV feed of the street outside, which was a little unsettling to see. but i guess that shooting was a block away.
oh, and Nara now has one of their flatscreens tuned to their CCTV feed of the street outside, which was a little unsettling to see. but i guess that shooting was a block away.
When people on this forum advocate banning G-Rides downtown then I think the owners of Lure have a point. The early comments on this thread certainly had hints of racism such as as those regarding the Black Eyed Pea's and Chingy brining gun violence to the area. The owners of these clubs cannot filter everyone who patronizes their clubs and I don't believe these shootings were taking place inside. How can you tell if someone is going to cause a problem? By their clothes or the way they dress? Discrimination. If there's an issue with violence outside then make sure the area has a heavier police presence. Perhaps the owners could pay extra for these police? Bourbon Street, and the French Quarter, has 100 times the amount of debauchery that exists at these two or three isolated venues. It's also arguably one of the safest areas of New Orleans and has quite a large amount of African American visitors. Maybe the police here should figure out how the NOPD controls these large crowds? I can say from personal experience they don't take any bullsh*t. Beyond that how about the police keep their larger presence downtown while the owners of Lure could remove any 18+ nights as well as maybe closing at 1:30 during the week?
If people don't like smoke or loud music then don't live above or near a club. Cities need entertainment areas. If Washington Avenue residents want an insular, quiet street then simply say that. Get a neighborhood plan and zoning changes which prohibit clubs and do a liquor moratorium. That will solve the problem. But it would also keep out whites who attend these venues on non-hip hip nights and also prohibit the opening of new Chad-friendly sports bars. You can't discriminate against a class of businesses selectively based upon the type of patrons they might attract a few nights a week. Not only is that improbable legally it's racist. If anything the crime on Washington Avenue should bring not "how do we get them out of our neighborhood," but "how can we solve crime in our City regardless of neighborhood."
Instead of ruining the area for everyone who visits, if Washington Avenue residents have a problem with noise then relocate to a private street in the Central West End where the public realm does not exist. This way they can selectively choose when they're exposed to noise pollution or G-Rides as they visit the areas which might contain them. If we're talking about defensible space?
Established neighborhoods have a reputation for attributes such as Soulard's partying scene. Those who move there should expect a level of noise. However, this conflict obviously exists because Washington Avenue isn't established and has different proposed directions. I agree that crime must be controlled for the area to survive but a quiet, boring downtown sounds like one not worth visiting or living near. Turning Washington Avenue into Creve Coeur with terra cotta will not progress downtown. People don't visit downtown at night in order to simply stare at your residential loft. They visit because it's a regionally unique environment in which to throw back a few beers, dance, and meet people.
If people don't like smoke or loud music then don't live above or near a club. Cities need entertainment areas. If Washington Avenue residents want an insular, quiet street then simply say that. Get a neighborhood plan and zoning changes which prohibit clubs and do a liquor moratorium. That will solve the problem. But it would also keep out whites who attend these venues on non-hip hip nights and also prohibit the opening of new Chad-friendly sports bars. You can't discriminate against a class of businesses selectively based upon the type of patrons they might attract a few nights a week. Not only is that improbable legally it's racist. If anything the crime on Washington Avenue should bring not "how do we get them out of our neighborhood," but "how can we solve crime in our City regardless of neighborhood."
Instead of ruining the area for everyone who visits, if Washington Avenue residents have a problem with noise then relocate to a private street in the Central West End where the public realm does not exist. This way they can selectively choose when they're exposed to noise pollution or G-Rides as they visit the areas which might contain them. If we're talking about defensible space?
Established neighborhoods have a reputation for attributes such as Soulard's partying scene. Those who move there should expect a level of noise. However, this conflict obviously exists because Washington Avenue isn't established and has different proposed directions. I agree that crime must be controlled for the area to survive but a quiet, boring downtown sounds like one not worth visiting or living near. Turning Washington Avenue into Creve Coeur with terra cotta will not progress downtown. People don't visit downtown at night in order to simply stare at your residential loft. They visit because it's a regionally unique environment in which to throw back a few beers, dance, and meet people.
Don't be selfish and think you posses exclusive ownership over the neighborhood simply because you rent or own a loft. Downtown is a destination and you live there! We should be happy for its success! Should we put up street barriers or a gated fence around Washington Avenue so Dave and Company can determine who gets in? This conflict reminds me of the anti-Latino stuff which occurred on Cherokee Street a few years ago. Maybe you guys spend too much time inside your secure loft because downtown's sidewalks are surely dead as a doornail absent people visiting from outside its boundaries. It has not "matured" enough to the point where it can throw everyone out who isn't a resident. Maybe if you had 50,000 residents, but I bet that a lot of them would leave if you decided to ban entertainment from the area. One of the benefits of urban living arises from being able to party and not drive home. Hopefully a solution can be found which reduces crime and preserves our nightlife as there's no correlation between them.innov8ion wrote:Or perhaps downtown has matured to the point where clubs are no longer welcome and can instead inhabit non-residential areas such as the Landing & Lumiere?
The Black Eyed Peas consist of one white girl, two black guys, and a Shoshone Indian for the record. My thought that elements of the band playing at club Lure would not end well was not based on race, it was based on the size of a crowd they were likely to generate.
- 6,775
I lost track of the number of false dichotomies. Was anyone keeping score at home?Doug wrote:When people on this forum ...blah blah blah...
Maybe when you move out of your parent's Wildwood basement and into a downtown loft, then your opinion will be given more weight. Maybe.
^I live about 200 feet from Clinton Peabody.
I suppose you never learned to read.
I suppose you never learned to read.
- 6,775
Is that next to Applebee's?Doug wrote:^I live about 200 feet from Clinton Peabody.
Yeah, I eat there every day with your mother. Her AARP card gets us a good discount.
- 2,386
...boom?
Back to the topic at hand and not cs' wonderful mother (I'm sure Doug isn't "blockbusting" her), a sense of what you are coming into is definitely necessary. I am in agreement with Doug, as well as the neighborhood.
In regards to Cigarette smoke, shouldn't this be a building issue? Shouldn't the club be sealed off permanently from the resident lobby, which should have restricted access, and shouldn't the building have insulation to stop smoke from wandering up various parts of the building? I realize (thankfully) that the pending smoking ban will make this a moot point, but in the meantme maybe this issue is one for the building owner/developer/manager?
I have to agree with Doug on the noise. Washington avenue was not a sleepy corner of the metro when you moved in. It has always been one of the hearts of the metro's entertainment, and should not be changed from that. It is a good thing it is there. We had this same problem in college. Older couples moved into houses on the biggest party street for our school, one block off campus. They continually complained about noise and basically made everyone miserable. The neighborhood had been what is was for many years, an error in anticipation for what you are coming into is no excuse for everyone else to suffer.
And then we get to the crime. This is obviously a detriment to the whole area. Yes it is an important issue and club owners should do their part to help. If they do not comply, or have no interest to, they should be removed and replaced (not eliminated) with owners willing to take responsibility. The problem is not the fact that there are clubs, it is with the specific business that is currently there. An elimination of even one club permanently would be a terrible loss. Don't let one situation cascade into something that steamrolls against an absolute essential downtown business segment.
Back to the topic at hand and not cs' wonderful mother (I'm sure Doug isn't "blockbusting" her), a sense of what you are coming into is definitely necessary. I am in agreement with Doug, as well as the neighborhood.
In regards to Cigarette smoke, shouldn't this be a building issue? Shouldn't the club be sealed off permanently from the resident lobby, which should have restricted access, and shouldn't the building have insulation to stop smoke from wandering up various parts of the building? I realize (thankfully) that the pending smoking ban will make this a moot point, but in the meantme maybe this issue is one for the building owner/developer/manager?
I have to agree with Doug on the noise. Washington avenue was not a sleepy corner of the metro when you moved in. It has always been one of the hearts of the metro's entertainment, and should not be changed from that. It is a good thing it is there. We had this same problem in college. Older couples moved into houses on the biggest party street for our school, one block off campus. They continually complained about noise and basically made everyone miserable. The neighborhood had been what is was for many years, an error in anticipation for what you are coming into is no excuse for everyone else to suffer.
And then we get to the crime. This is obviously a detriment to the whole area. Yes it is an important issue and club owners should do their part to help. If they do not comply, or have no interest to, they should be removed and replaced (not eliminated) with owners willing to take responsibility. The problem is not the fact that there are clubs, it is with the specific business that is currently there. An elimination of even one club permanently would be a terrible loss. Don't let one situation cascade into something that steamrolls against an absolute essential downtown business segment.
- 6,775
Yes, this is a building issue. But when Lure has told the residents of that building to f*ck off for well over a year now, it speaks to the kind of people they are. Now that Kraiberg is on their ass, they're falling all over themselves trying to "open a dialog" and be good neighbors. Oh, but this time they really, really mean it.newstl2020 wrote:In regards to Cigarette smoke, shouldn't this be a building issue? Shouldn't the club be sealed off permanently from the resident lobby, which should have restricted access, and shouldn't the building have insulation to stop smoke from wandering up various parts of the building? I realize (thankfully) that the pending smoking ban will make this a moot point, but in the meantme maybe this issue is one for the building owner/developer/manager?
This isn't about "noise". I/we have no complaints about Flannery's or the 12th Street Diner or Copia or any of the other 20 bars up and down Washington. Only 1 club (I can't speak about Sugar) dumps 200 people on the sidewalk at 3:00 in the morning, who then yell, start fights, shoot off fireworks, shoot guns, honk horns, park motorcycles on the sidewalk, etc. I wonder which club that is?newstl2020 wrote:I have to agree with Doug on the noise. Washington avenue was not a sleepy corner of the metro when you moved in. It has always been one of the hearts of the metro's entertainment, and should not be changed from that. It is a good thing it is there.
Again, only 2 clubs are being targeted here. No one is calling for the other 18 (or whatever) to be shut down. Only 2. One has 50 police visits, the other is gaining fast. I was in the bar business for 4 years. We had ZERO police visits. When you go out of the way to invite trash to your club, you can't just kick them out at 3:00, lock the doors behind them and then throw up your hands and say "not our problem anymore". The liquor law makes it quite clear that it is your problem. Apparently the folks at Lure have never read it. There's more to liquor violations than just serving a 19 year old.newstl2020 wrote:And then we get to the crime. This is obviously a detriment to the whole area. Yes it is an important issue and club owners should do their part to help. If they do not comply, or have no interest to, they should be removed and replaced (not eliminated) with owners willing to take responsibility. The problem is not the fact that there are clubs, it is with the specific business that is currently there. An elimination of even one club permanently would be a terrible loss. Don't let one situation cascade into something that steamrolls against an absolute essential downtown business segment.




