313
Full MemberFull Member
313

PostMay 19, 2016#26

Did someone post a render/site plan?

Surface parking seems unacceptable that close to the Metrolink station. But of course Cardinals/Cordish didn't get the memo.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMay 19, 2016#27



I'm unclear on whether that parking is for inside the building.... otherwise leasable space would only be 75% of the building's square footage if my math's correct. That seems low.

9,655
Life MemberLife Member
9,655

PostMay 20, 2016#28

^ what does the closeness to the metrolink station have to do with parking? Unless all workers will be coming from the airport parking lot or shrewberry it really isn't relevant. And at $91,000 per job, most will be coming from west co.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostMay 20, 2016#29

^Those are some really good troll points. Good thing you brought them up.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMay 20, 2016#30

Is this worth a 25 year tax abatement?

249
Junior MemberJunior Member
249

PostMay 20, 2016#31

^The answer is no, and the lawyers for the developers admitted as much when the HUDZ committee heard the bill. Some abatements are so ludicrous that the BoA can't even stomach them. Coatar was forced to withdraw the bill.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMay 20, 2016#32

^ yeah, this one was a little unexpected in the first place and without an anchor tenant sure to bring new high-paying jobs to the city I'm not going to throw a sad if it doesn't get done. If Koman had said they had a 20 year lease for say Scottrade to set up a decent presence downtown I'd be more sympathetic to big subsidies. We'll see if this gets re-worked or just goes to the files.

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostMay 20, 2016#33

wabash wrote:^Those are some really good troll points. Good thing you brought them up.

LOL. You made me snort.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMay 20, 2016#34

Just looking at some of these other board bills for tax abatement for downtown redevelopment projects....

the one for the Gills 705 Olive (hotel + residences) is for 20 years and the one for 1501 Washington (hotel) is for 15 years. The abatement past 10 years is for 50% as capped by state law. Anything more than 10 years raises my frustration level a bit, but unlike the Koman proposal these projects at least would redevelop key historic buildings. I do think historic preservation and also affordable housing components should get a bit of bonus if you will when it comes to city subsidies.

1706 Washington (residential) is for 10 years.

PostMay 31, 2016#35


1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostMay 31, 2016#36

Ok... I'm on board with subsidies to get this built. St. Louis desperately needs modern, glass, class A office space to start drawing companies downtown. This rendering sold me.

249
Junior MemberJunior Member
249

PostMay 31, 2016#37

chaifetz10 wrote:Ok... I'm on board with subsidies to get this built. St. Louis desperately needs modern, glass, class A office space to start drawing companies downtown. This rendering sold me.
What if it doesn't need subsidies to get built? Do we still give out the coupon just because they ask? Not against it, we should at least make the developers prove they need the incentives though.

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostMay 31, 2016#38

Yeah, I should have clarified this a bit. 25 years? Heck no. But I'm game for giving them 10. If anything, it's a slap in the face to Cordish and the Cardinals who have stalled this whole time. Let another developer come in, give them something equal to what Cordish/Cardinals got for BPV, and let that show that Cordish has no room to come back and demand more for a Phase II.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMay 31, 2016#39

^ I think 10 year is pretty reasonable especially if they have a tenant lined up bringing new jobs to the city... rumor is a large tech tenant is coming to downtown btw but I have no idea where.

1,612
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,612

PostMay 31, 2016#40

roger wyoming II wrote:^ I think 10 year is pretty reasonable especially if they have a tenant lined up bringing new jobs to the city... rumor is a large tech tenant is coming to downtown btw but I have no idea where.
^ Like Microsoft?

249
Junior MemberJunior Member
249

PostMay 31, 2016#41

That's what I am thinking. Minimum, we should at least make them prove the case. No viable development "needs" a 25yr abatement.

Future state, we have a scoring matrix where the level of incentive (if any) is determined by how many boxes they can check. Criteria to be determined, but there need to be some sort of criteria.

5,720
Life MemberLife Member
5,720

PostMay 31, 2016#42

ricke002 wrote:
roger wyoming II wrote:^ I think 10 year is pretty reasonable especially if they have a tenant lined up bringing new jobs to the city... rumor is a large tech tenant is coming to downtown btw but I have no idea where.
^ Like Microsoft?
I believe Microsoft and 200 jobs are already rumored as going to CORTEX.

Would love to hear for the sake of St. Louis that large established tech company going to take up some major ATT one center footage

1,585
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,585

PostMay 31, 2016#43

I just want to use this opportunity to express my excitement about all the recent development news in St. Louis. This, Cortex expansion and growth, multiple projects in the CWE, the Arcade being redeveloped, and rumors of the Railway Exchange and JA, just to name a few. These times remind me of last decade before the market crashed when we had the Park East rising and rumors of multiple towers in the CWE to go along with BPV and the Bottle District. This time the plans seem more grounded and organic, which means hopefully we actually get more done. Good times.

346
Full MemberFull Member
346

PostMay 31, 2016#44

I just want to use this opportunity to express my excitement about all the recent development news in St. Louis. This, Cortex expansion and growth, multiple projects in the CWE, the Arcade being redeveloped, and rumors of the Railway Exchange and JA, just to name a few. These times remind me of last decade before the market crashed when we had the Park East rising and rumors of multiple towers in the CWE to go along with BPV and the Bottle District. This time the plans seem more grounded and organic, which means hopefully we actually get more done. Good times.
Couldn't agree more!! Exciting times for the city and glad to see so many "new" projects come online!

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMay 31, 2016#45

ricke002 wrote:
roger wyoming II wrote:^ I think 10 year is pretty reasonable especially if they have a tenant lined up bringing new jobs to the city... rumor is a large tech tenant is coming to downtown btw but I have no idea where.
^ Like Microsoft?
Not them, as dredger says they appear slated for a new Cortex building.

I'd like to think twitter would set up a decent presence downtown, but they aren't doing so hot right now. Square has hinted that they are just getting started in Saint Louis, so they might be a better prospect for a nice prodigal son returning home story. But then you'd wonder if they'd just expand in Cortex as well. Of course the google rumor has been around for a couple years.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostMay 31, 2016#46

Looks like a great design.

It's paying homage to Cupples Station while moving forward with modern design and flair.

Great, great looking TOD infill.

403
Full MemberFull Member
403

PostMay 31, 2016#47

I like the design myself looks fresh modern and a little daring.
This is what Downtown needs however not for 25 years of tax abatements perhaps if it were 30 or more floors but this project doesn't justify such a tax reprieve .
here are a few tech companies that may set up shop downtown google apple square twitter Facebook comcast charter amazon just to name a few

PostJun 01, 2016#48

More i think of this development i kind of wish they add at least several more floors as i think this location is another prime location for residential in fact i think this would be a great location to add a mix of office residential and retail as its close to the metro station

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostJun 01, 2016#49

St.Louis1764 wrote:here are a few tech companies that may set up shop downtown google apple square twitter Facebook comcast charter amazon just to name a few
Not really a true representation of companies that might have interest in downtown offices though. You can't just list out random tech companies, especially a list that includes some with zero presence in STL and others that have recently announced plans elsewhere in the region (or have seen there corporate presence decline in the region).

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostJun 01, 2016#50

^^Residential would be a great additional element. But between the highway, off-ramp, and Metrolink tracks I wouldn't call it a "prime location" for that use. Techy offices with lots of glass is actually kind of perfect.

I agree that some retail element along the northern elevation would be good - between the Metro station and Ballpark the foot traffic is pretty decent right there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Read more posts (108 remaining)