So Koman is asking for tax incentives to move a tenant from one of their existing developments (literally across the street) to this new one?jshank83 wrote:Brian Feldt is reporting Asynchrony is the tennet for Cupples X
Seriously?
So Koman is asking for tax incentives to move a tenant from one of their existing developments (literally across the street) to this new one?jshank83 wrote:Brian Feldt is reporting Asynchrony is the tennet for Cupples X
Was Asynchrony the company that WWT bought or I'm I mistaken?jshank83 wrote:Brian Feldt is reporting Asynchrony is the tennet for Cupples X
Really, it's more like moving next door as that is more of an entrance to a parking lot than a street. But it does seem a bit ridiculous when you think about it. On the other hand, they are growing at a pretty nice pace so this is actually a company I could definitely see actually fulfilling the job growth promise.andrewarkills wrote:So Koman is asking for tax incentives to move a tenant from one of their existing developments (literally across the street) to this new one?jshank83 wrote:Brian Feldt is reporting Asynchrony is the tennet for Cupples X
Seriously?
Thanks,andrewarkills wrote:^That's correct.
Yeah, if it's truly a situation where they are growing out the gills and they really need a new space to meet their needs that's one thing but it's quite another if it is just getting neat new space at a reduced rate. I think generous subsidies should be tied to new jobs added and some kind of clawback provision in place.MRNHS wrote:Really, it's more like moving next door as that is more of an entrance to a parking lot than a street. But it does seem a bit ridiculous when you think about it. On the other hand, they are growing at a pretty nice pace so this is actually a company I could definitely see actually fulfilling the job growth promise.andrewarkills wrote:So Koman is asking for tax incentives to move a tenant from one of their existing developments (literally across the street) to this new one?jshank83 wrote:Brian Feldt is reporting Asynchrony is the tennet for Cupples X
Seriously?
One of my good friends from high school works at KPMG. He's heard numerous talks by management about needing updated office space. Clayton has been an idea raised numerous times. BPV or Cupples could be an attractive alternative if they're just looking for updated space.STLrainbow wrote:^ I don't recall hearing anything about KMPG looking for more space outside of 10 S. Broadway... btw, that's where Nestle Purina is in the CBD and with the additional 60,000 sq. ft. of space I think they have four floors in the building now.
Yeah, if it's truly a situation where they are growing out the gills and they really need a new space to meet their needs that's one thing but it's quite another if it is just getting neat new space at a reduced rate. I think generous subsidies should be tied to new jobs added and some kind of clawback provision in place.MRNHS wrote:Really, it's more like moving next door as that is more of an entrance to a parking lot than a street. But it does seem a bit ridiculous when you think about it. On the other hand, they are growing at a pretty nice pace so this is actually a company I could definitely see actually fulfilling the job growth promise.andrewarkills wrote: So Koman is asking for tax incentives to move a tenant from one of their existing developments (literally across the street) to this new one?
Seriously?
I believe Nestle Purina is at 100 N. Broadway - the Bank of America Tower.STLrainbow wrote:^ I don't recall hearing anything about KMPG looking for more space outside of 10 S. Broadway... btw, that's where Nestle Purina is in the CBD and with the additional 60,000 sq. ft. of space I think they have four floors in the building now.
It's on the TIF Commission agenda for this Wednesday. It got continued to this month in December. Options are: being continued again/withdrawn/significantly changed/revived in its current form. My money is on one of the first three, probably option one or two.chriss752 wrote:Is this project dead? Haven't heard or seen anything on it since Early November.
I've heard it's not going to happen, but I suppose there's always a chance.chriss752 wrote:Is this project dead? Haven't heard or seen anything on it since Early November.
That's what I have heard as well. This was just posted on the city website, it's the agenda for Wednesday's meeting. Not dead yet, but not moving forward any time soon.debaliviere wrote: I've heard it's not going to happen, but I suppose there's always a chance.
Not sure, but Asynchrony was supposedly Koman's main tenant, and they've since announced that they've signed a lease elsewhere in Cupples.dredger wrote:Anyone think that Koman might have lost a prospective tenant to BPV phase II? Speculation on my part but Cordish/DeWitt got what they wanted and in short order as far as incentives go. They pretty much can offer a lease deal on known terms.
The other thought running through my head but speculation is WWT after spending some dough on new HQ is putting Asynchrony expansion on a holding or planning for a slower growth pattern since WWT's big chunk of revenues is via federal government contracts. In other words, WWT doesn't want to commit some of its cash flow on Asynchrony expansion as it waits and sees if their is any bite behind the political rhetoric of big changes coming in the first 100 days.STLrainbow wrote:^ Obviously a new building wouldn't be ready for a couple years so it could be that the increased lease at Cupples 9 as well as the additional space at 10th & Spruce are just to tide the growing company over. Anyway, the TIF hearing on Cupples X was continued to February.

