I'd definitely recommend joining your neighborhood listserv, and it's a good place to discuss crime issues. I will say that after feeling pretty low, to know that this city is full of these good, strong people is pretty awesome, there's some real soldiers here. I don't know that neighborhoods really come together, or are capable of coming together like this all over the metropolitan area.
- 5,433
That would be a wonderful start in my opinion. Forgive me for not having straight or complete facts in front of me as I type, but if I remember correctly, Missouri has roughly 30,000 inmates in its correctional facilities, and roughly half of them are nonviolent offenders. I believe Missouri also has one of the highest prison populations per capita.steve wrote:A nice start would be to legalize marijuana (at least).
So I wonder how many felons go free in St. Louis and Kansas City so we can provide room and board to stoners from Moberly and Sikeston? I realize that's a big assumption, and I don't even know how you'd begin to address the 800 lb. gorilla of meth production and abuse and the impact that has had on Missouri, but I think something is seriously wrong if we're even close to half of our state's prison population being nonviolent offenders.
I have to agree. I think we should get the dope smokin' stoners out of jail and back to work providing tax dollars that could keep the violent offenders in jail for their full term.
- 2,093
Agreed. Marijuana should be legalized and taxed
I don't think it'll happen until a fair number of our older voters finally pass away though.
Somehow they buy into the "War on Drugs" for poor people who smoke pot but think it's just fine when wealthy folks like Rush Limbaugh abuse prescription medication.
I don't think it'll happen until a fair number of our older voters finally pass away though.
Somehow they buy into the "War on Drugs" for poor people who smoke pot but think it's just fine when wealthy folks like Rush Limbaugh abuse prescription medication.
I'm always stunned at the number of baby boomers who freely admit to having smoked in the past but are against legalization now (definitely not all of them). Hopefully our younger generation won't get more conservative as we age as well!
- 3,767
Since we are on the subject of marijuana, I thought I'd ask about K2.
Does anyone know if there is a viable test for K2 on the market. This 'drug' has become a nightmare, especially in the construction industry. If anyone has heard, please share what you know. Thanks.
Does anyone know if there is a viable test for K2 on the market. This 'drug' has become a nightmare, especially in the construction industry. If anyone has heard, please share what you know. Thanks.
- 6,775
You will.aragx6 wrote:Hopefully our younger generation won't get more conservative as we age as well!
- 710
I think the military has used a test for "spice," guess that's similar. Didnt realize K2 was becoming a problem - i remember the good old 90s when I'd see westplex construction workers leaving needles on their bench seats.DOGTOWNB&R wrote:Since we are on the subject of marijuana, I thought I'd ask about K2.
Does anyone know if there is a viable test for K2 on the market. This 'drug' has become a nightmare, especially in the construction industry. If anyone has heard, please share what you know. Thanks.
"If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart; if you're not a conservative at 40, you have no mind" - Winston ChurchillThe Central Scrutinizer wrote:You will.aragx6 wrote:Hopefully our younger generation won't get more conservative as we age as well!
Downtown anti-parking garage civil disobedience went too far today as a man jumped from a garage to his death. I would have chosen a more significant structure personally.
My girlfriend's co-worker witnessed the man jump as she was on a smoke break. Pretty messed up and probably economy related.
My girlfriend's co-worker witnessed the man jump as she was on a smoke break. Pretty messed up and probably economy related.
- 11K
I'll add money to the Churchill quote. Oh, and children. That is, "If you're not a conservative at 40, you have no mind, no money and no kids." It's not an absolute, but I've seen it happen in my family and am understanding it more and more myself!Framer wrote:"If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart; if you're not a conservative at 40, you have no mind" - Winston ChurchillThe Central Scrutinizer wrote:You will.aragx6 wrote:Hopefully our younger generation won't get more conservative as we age as well!
Really? I don't see how the political/socioeconomic tension of my days so far will bring about some Reaganite backlash simply because I have gray hair?
Churchill's comment shouldn't be applied to modern times. He was a supporter and implementer of the UK's welfare state. He would not agree with Thatcher.
Churchill's comment shouldn't be applied to modern times. He was a supporter and implementer of the UK's welfare state. He would not agree with Thatcher.
- 6,775
We're talking about normal people.Doug wrote:Really? I don't see how the political/socioeconomic tension of my days so far will bring about some Reaganite backlash simply because I have gray hair?
- 11K
Well, this is just my observation and intuition, but as one gets more money they tend to like to keep more of it and as they have children they seem to worry more about crime and drugs and be less tolerant of both.
- 1,000
I think you can be very concerned with crime yet still understand that there are underlying reasons that need to be addressed. I am making the assumption that becoming conservative means that you want to see all criminals executed.Alex Ihnen wrote:Well, this is just my observation and intuition, but as one gets more money they tend to like to keep more of it and as they have children they seem to worry more about crime and drugs and be less tolerant of both.
/slight exaggeration
//I've been reading stltoday comments
I am not tolerant of crime but aware of white privilege. Minorities are subject to the rule of law, but decades of exploitation benefiting whites came at the expense of minorities. You do realize that denied wealth though discrimination has multi-generational implications? Today racism still exists within housing, employment, and schooling. Are you aware that in 2006 HUD received the largest number of housing discrimination complaints on record? During his 2008 Philly speech, Obama was correct in neglecting to mention modern racism as whites always suggest that no problem exists. During the 1960's a super-majority of whites polled said that African Americans had the same opportunities as anyone else, neglecting to realize they lived in an apartheid state. In essence whites are not a reliable barometer to gauge racial conflict. Perhaps this oblivious state remains as many whites do not have daily, personal contact with people of color? Maybe whites are narcissistic and only want to see cultural representations of themselves ignoring therefore any trend that undermines their positive self-image?
Maybe as a pejorative "urban pioneer" you see yourself as civilizing FPSE, I hope you don't, however think of yourself from the perspective of an African American resident born in that neighborhood 20-30 years ago before it was as "nice" as it is today. Imagine growing up without basic goods and services or imagine being a father at that time losing your job from GM on Natural Bridge. How would you feel and what would you do with ever-decreasing options? Peter Raven was on KWMU today and championed the McRee Town demolitions. He said that if not for MOBOT the slums would have been far worse and people may not have returned investing in surrounding areas. This kind of arrogant vs. them, those people in the "slums" as our enemies, mentality does not reduce crime and only drives wedges through the social fabric of our City. Instead of MOBOT guarding Rome from the Goths, what if whites didn't leave due to 30 years of exclusive access to HUD and VHA loans that expressly prohibited minorities? What if these people, even today, could get repair loans for their homes? What if block grants didn't end up in affluent suburban areas?
Of course you want to protect your home, wife, and kids, but that doesn't mean some unknown African American City resident doesn't want the same thing. Perhaps they do not have the same amount of time to be as engaged as you? Again socioeconomic status determines the ability of people to fight for change. Those who lived in poor areas for a long time might feel some sense of apathy after seeing the area degrade with ineffective responses or blatant disregard from the police and City Hall. So maybe don't expect some people to move with you as maybe they're simply burnt out. Finally, what do you expect some individual person exactly do to when confronted with gangs and drugs -- assume this guy/gal does not know about the CSB, alderman, or even about neighborhood associations? He calls once and the cops come an hour later after the criminal is long gone. Maybe this is because the caller is black or because crime is expected to be expected in the neighborhood. Will he call again? If he cannot afford to leave the City, as so many whites did, since his neighborhood is not desirable then isn't he simply captured in the neighborhood without an equal voice? That could have quite a depressing effect on the person's outlook.
Have you ever been unemployed? I have been for almost a year. If not for UI benefits, my middle class family (and wonderful girlfriend) with resources able to assist me, I might have lost my apartment. Maybe I could end up pointing a gun at you because I need to eat like everyone else? This would be wrong, and I should be punished, but have some empathy. The basic needs and cultural desires of most St. Louisans are similar. We all want personal safety and financial stability. The upper echelons of society tricked middle class Americans into believing they might be lucky enough to advance into their ranks, therefore embrace neoliberalism. They also prodded white America's existing anxiety over minorities by convincing them that minority advancement (or equity) comes at Caucasian expense. Minorities take white jobs when data shows that, with equal experience, the opposite is always true. Yet whites scream reverse racism as if minorities control the means of production which they most certainly do not hold a monopoly over. We need to stop thinking that African Americans are looking for an AFDC check to buy a Cadillac. Many are trying to buy basic household stuff for their kids. If this is jumbled and makes no sense then blame the coffee at Foam. I am sorry for perhaps being somewhat forceful, however I take offense to the notion that the identification of inequity comes with the defense of criminal behavior. That is most certainly untrue. It irks me to no limit when some people move into devastated areas and spout off middle class law and order rhetoric without understanding that these areas reached their depleted state due to chosen divestment and neglect. Decades of, and current, discrimination in jobs, housing, and public/private services explains why things are so bad. If we want to rebuild in an equitable manner then also look at the root causes of crime not simply jailing offenders, viewing the community with antagonism or suspicion, and critics of the current reality as guilty white people giving criminals exceptions to the law.
Maybe as a pejorative "urban pioneer" you see yourself as civilizing FPSE, I hope you don't, however think of yourself from the perspective of an African American resident born in that neighborhood 20-30 years ago before it was as "nice" as it is today. Imagine growing up without basic goods and services or imagine being a father at that time losing your job from GM on Natural Bridge. How would you feel and what would you do with ever-decreasing options? Peter Raven was on KWMU today and championed the McRee Town demolitions. He said that if not for MOBOT the slums would have been far worse and people may not have returned investing in surrounding areas. This kind of arrogant vs. them, those people in the "slums" as our enemies, mentality does not reduce crime and only drives wedges through the social fabric of our City. Instead of MOBOT guarding Rome from the Goths, what if whites didn't leave due to 30 years of exclusive access to HUD and VHA loans that expressly prohibited minorities? What if these people, even today, could get repair loans for their homes? What if block grants didn't end up in affluent suburban areas?
Of course you want to protect your home, wife, and kids, but that doesn't mean some unknown African American City resident doesn't want the same thing. Perhaps they do not have the same amount of time to be as engaged as you? Again socioeconomic status determines the ability of people to fight for change. Those who lived in poor areas for a long time might feel some sense of apathy after seeing the area degrade with ineffective responses or blatant disregard from the police and City Hall. So maybe don't expect some people to move with you as maybe they're simply burnt out. Finally, what do you expect some individual person exactly do to when confronted with gangs and drugs -- assume this guy/gal does not know about the CSB, alderman, or even about neighborhood associations? He calls once and the cops come an hour later after the criminal is long gone. Maybe this is because the caller is black or because crime is expected to be expected in the neighborhood. Will he call again? If he cannot afford to leave the City, as so many whites did, since his neighborhood is not desirable then isn't he simply captured in the neighborhood without an equal voice? That could have quite a depressing effect on the person's outlook.
Have you ever been unemployed? I have been for almost a year. If not for UI benefits, my middle class family (and wonderful girlfriend) with resources able to assist me, I might have lost my apartment. Maybe I could end up pointing a gun at you because I need to eat like everyone else? This would be wrong, and I should be punished, but have some empathy. The basic needs and cultural desires of most St. Louisans are similar. We all want personal safety and financial stability. The upper echelons of society tricked middle class Americans into believing they might be lucky enough to advance into their ranks, therefore embrace neoliberalism. They also prodded white America's existing anxiety over minorities by convincing them that minority advancement (or equity) comes at Caucasian expense. Minorities take white jobs when data shows that, with equal experience, the opposite is always true. Yet whites scream reverse racism as if minorities control the means of production which they most certainly do not hold a monopoly over. We need to stop thinking that African Americans are looking for an AFDC check to buy a Cadillac. Many are trying to buy basic household stuff for their kids. If this is jumbled and makes no sense then blame the coffee at Foam. I am sorry for perhaps being somewhat forceful, however I take offense to the notion that the identification of inequity comes with the defense of criminal behavior. That is most certainly untrue. It irks me to no limit when some people move into devastated areas and spout off middle class law and order rhetoric without understanding that these areas reached their depleted state due to chosen divestment and neglect. Decades of, and current, discrimination in jobs, housing, and public/private services explains why things are so bad. If we want to rebuild in an equitable manner then also look at the root causes of crime not simply jailing offenders, viewing the community with antagonism or suspicion, and critics of the current reality as guilty white people giving criminals exceptions to the law.
- 6,775
Yawn. More of the same nonsense, I assume.
- 1,642
You got a Twitter version?Doug wrote:I am not tolerant of crime but aware of white privilege. Minorities are subject to the rule of law, but decades of exploitation benefiting whites came at the expense of minorities. You do realize that denied wealth though discrimination has multi-generational implications? Today racism still exists within housing, employment, and schooling. Are you aware that in 2006 HUD received the largest number of housing discrimination complaints on record? During his 2008 Philly speech, Obama was correct in neglecting to mention modern racism as whites always suggest that no problem exists. During the 1960's a super-majority of whites polled said that African Americans had the same opportunities as anyone else, neglecting to realize they lived in an apartheid state. In essence whites are not a reliable barometer to gauge racial conflict. Perhaps this oblivious state remains as many whites do not have daily, personal contact with people of color? Maybe whites are narcissistic and only want to see cultural representations of themselves ignoring therefore any trend that undermines their positive self-image?
Maybe as a pejorative "urban pioneer" you see yourself as civilizing FPSE, I hope you don't, however think of yourself from the perspective of an African American resident born in that neighborhood 20-30 years ago before it was as "nice" as it is today. Imagine growing up without basic goods and services or imagine being a father at that time losing your job from GM on Natural Bridge. How would you feel and what would you do with ever-decreasing options? Peter Raven was on KWMU today and championed the McRee Town demolitions. He said that if not for MOBOT the slums would have been far worse and people may not have returned investing in surrounding areas. This kind of arrogant vs. them, those people in the "slums" as our enemies, mentality does not reduce crime and only drives wedges through the social fabric of our City. Instead of MOBOT guarding Rome from the Goths, what if whites didn't leave due to 30 years of exclusive access to HUD and VHA loans that expressly prohibited minorities? What if these people, even today, could get repair loans for their homes? What if block grants didn't end up in affluent suburban areas?
Of course you want to protect your home, wife, and kids, but that doesn't mean some unknown African American City resident doesn't want the same thing. Perhaps they do not have the same amount of time to be as engaged as you? Again socioeconomic status determines the ability of people to fight for change. Those who lived in poor areas for a long time might feel some sense of apathy after seeing the area degrade with ineffective responses or blatant disregard from the police and City Hall. So maybe don't expect some people to move with you as maybe they're simply burnt out. Finally, what do you expect some individual person exactly do to when confronted with gangs and drugs -- assume this guy/gal does not know about the CSB, alderman, or even about neighborhood associations? He calls once and the cops come an hour later after the criminal is long gone. Maybe this is because the caller is black or because crime is expected to be expected in the neighborhood. Will he call again? If he cannot afford to leave the City, as so many whites did, since his neighborhood is not desirable then isn't he simply captured in the neighborhood without an equal voice? That could have quite a depressing effect on the person's outlook.
Have you ever been unemployed? I have been for almost a year. If not for UI benefits, my middle class family (and wonderful girlfriend) with resources able to assist me, I might have lost my apartment. Maybe I could end up pointing a gun at you because I need to eat like everyone else? This would be wrong, and I should be punished, but have some empathy. The basic needs and cultural desires of most St. Louisans are similar. We all want personal safety and financial stability. The upper echelons of society tricked middle class Americans into believing they might be lucky enough to advance into their ranks, therefore embrace neoliberalism. They also prodded white America's existing anxiety over minorities by convincing them that minority advancement (or equity) comes at Caucasian expense. Minorities take white jobs when data shows that, with equal experience, the opposite is always true. Yet whites scream reverse racism as if minorities control the means of production which they most certainly do not hold a monopoly over. We need to stop thinking that African Americans are looking for an AFDC check to buy a Cadillac. Many are trying to buy basic household stuff for their kids. If this is jumbled and makes no sense then blame the coffee at Foam. I am sorry for perhaps being somewhat forceful, however I take offense to the notion that the identification of inequity comes with the defense of criminal behavior. That is most certainly untrue. It irks me to no limit when some people move into devastated areas and spout off middle class law and order rhetoric without understanding that these areas reached their depleted state due to chosen divestment and neglect. Decades of, and current, discrimination in jobs, housing, and public/private services explains why things are so bad. If we want to rebuild in an equitable manner then also look at the root causes of crime not simply jailing offenders, viewing the community with antagonism or suspicion, and critics of the current reality as guilty white people giving criminals exceptions to the law.
Politics (usually of the liberal sort) accidentally screwed the black man out of his manhood. That's what happened, pal.
- 1,000
Seriously? Because politics of the conservative sort treated the black man with dignity?leeharveyawesome wrote:Politics (usually of the liberal sort) accidentally screwed the black man out of his manhood. That's what happened, pal.
- 1,642
I believe in its un-politicized, simplest and truest form the answer is YES. However, the version we have today is not much like the version that me and Johnny Ramone and Dennis Hopper and Abe Lincoln could have ever envisioned. And that sucks, pal.
The length of your arguments doesn't make your point more valid. I don't care if you drop a manifesto worthy of John Galt in here: the owners of Lure are still not being responsible and should loose their liquor license.Doug wrote:I am not tolerant of crime but aware of white privilege...
- 124
You are incorrect in your statement. HUD provided loans to whites and minorities alike. Would you like the contact info for several black, Indian and Asian families that live in there?Instead of MOBOT guarding Rome from the Goths, what if whites didn't leave due to 30 years of exclusive access to HUD and VHA loans that expressly prohibited minorities?
Have you considered volunteering with all of your extra time rather than spending it ranting and making yourself look like a fool? Maybe then you could work to eradicate poverty and crime rather than just b**** and moan at whitey about causing it.
Also, what would you do if Mommy and Daddy could not support you while unemployed? Sounds like you may be on of the white folk you are always ranting about. Feel guilty about that?
Should urbanstl's forums be renamed to Barry Goldwater's view on urbanism because it seems we have a lot of Newt Gingrich ideologues posting here with little knowledge on these topics. To suggest that minorities were able to access loans historically, and do not face discrimination today, happens to be an alternate reality. To claim that progressives, in general, mistreated minorities ignores fundamental flaws placed into these programs. They were structured for failure due to compromises with private industry from fears of evil socialist government housing -- which is never what we had in the United States. I could go into all of these aspects but I guess essays, or actual thought beyond snarky one liners, isn't allowed on this forum. I feel like I am at a tea party.






