3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostJan 03, 2009#101

doug, why do you always defend these criminals?

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostJan 03, 2009#102

JCity wrote:doug, why do you always defend these criminals?


Don't you see? They're not criminals, it's society who is the criminal. We made them carry the guns to the bar. Because of racism, or something.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostJan 03, 2009#103

Well one can't deny that there is a portion of truth in what Doug suggests.

3,785
Life MemberLife Member
3,785

PostJan 04, 2009#104

I am not defending criminals. I'm indicating that society isn't producing upstanding citizens when we stack the deck and deny them equal opportunity.

424
Full MemberFull Member
424

PostJan 04, 2009#105

gopher wrote:or even a simple thank you when you see them on the street. This type of grass roots support goes a long way to letting our civil servants know that we support them regardless of what the media is saying.
This makes the job worth it... I have only been thanked a few times on the street, but it always takes me back and helps me realize why I do what I do and why I love it so much.

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostJan 04, 2009#106

Doug wrote:I am not defending criminals. I'm indicating that society isn't producing upstanding citizens when we stack the deck and deny them equal opportunity.


I agreed with you. We (society) forced those guys to shoot at each other outside of Ten14.



As a result, I have grounded myself to my bedroom today, and I can't come out until I figure out a way not to make criminals use their illegal guns.

1,137
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,137

PostJan 04, 2009#107

Doug wrote:I am not defending criminals. I'm indicating that society isn't producing upstanding citizens when we stack the deck and deny them equal opportunity.
huh? If this is a slant about equal opportunities for minorities, we have the highest office about to be handed over to a black man. He pursued the dream and got it. Many hours of labor over school work and intelligence to know right from wrong is an opportunity that you have and black or white (or any other color), you have what is needed to be successful.

The criminal element is a spawn of laziness and broken families which feels they are entitled to all that people who work hard have. I think the time to make excuses in terms of equal opportunities is gone. I can also safely say that there are many a criminals in the country side (or as we say in the boonies) who are not minorities, but are criminals due to the same causes mentioned above.

2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostJan 04, 2009#108

Unless it's totally random, there is a green Grand Am parked across the street from my house with the license plate "U2 ACRO." Just an fyi, I think someone tried breaking in to your car. My Grand Prix's lock was popped and I can't open the door, but they didn't get in. My Grand Am's lock was popped, they got in, but I didn't have anything to steal. I knocked on a couple of doors but couldn't find you.

PostJan 04, 2009#109

Both cars were broken in to/attempted to be broken in to last night. Looks like they took a crowbar and tried prying off the lock. The Grand Prix that was the cash cow with a DVD player and GPS, they were unsuccessful, unless they just intended on making the handle inoperable...in that, they succeeded. They did get in to my Grand Am but that's my beater to-and-from work car, so they didn't get anything. They could have gotten my book of CDs in the back seat, but I guess they got spooked or are really stupid.

PostJan 04, 2009#110

u2acro wrote:In August, however, my car was broken into and things were stolen -- most notably and sadly my totally-full, first-edition U2 iPod that I left in the console box ONE FREAKING NIGHT. Sigh. It still hurts. The police said that there had been a recent rash of break-ins of my particular type of car, so thieves must have figured out some flaw, much like the Death Star. The windows weren't broken or anything -- the lock was jimmied or picked or whatever, and the plastic/metal around the lock was cracked. The car itself was still in good condition. I guess they were polite thieves.


Okay, so maybe you didn't get broken in to. But I could turn around and do 5 paces and be at your car, so I didn't think it was a coincidence. But, they did get in to my Grand Am.

PostJan 04, 2009#111

My wife is convinced that since no one else appears to have been targeted in the break ins except for our 2 cars and that our door was kicked in over 8 months ago, we are being targeted. I doubt that.

2,093
Life MemberLife Member
2,093

PostJan 04, 2009#112

^are there any teenage punks in the neighborhood that might just want to razz the new family? I think you are probably right that it's just coincidence. I just hope you guys haven't soured on Dogtown or anything. My friend's mom has lived on Mitchell for decades and hasn't had a problem. My sister and brother-in-law had their house broken into on two separate unrelated occasions (well the one time it wasn't breaking in since a back door was left unlocked) and had their truck stolen on the second occasion.



and where did they live? St. Charles.



Ironic thing is the same week my sis lost her truck my car got stolen from in front of my apt. on Shaw.



I found it funny that people asked me if I would move from the city after that happened but didn't ask my sister if she would leave St. Charles after something worse happened to her--it's one thing to have your car jimmied into and started with a screwdriver. It's another to have someone get into your house when your family is sleeping and steal the keys off the kitchen table!

2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostJan 04, 2009#113

southsidepride wrote:^are there any teenage punks in the neighborhood that might just want to razz the new family? I think you are probably right that it's just coincidence. I just hope you guys haven't soured on Dogtown or anything. My friend's mom has lived on Mitchell for decades and hasn't had a problem. My sister and brother-in-law had their house broken into on two separate unrelated occasions (well the one time it wasn't breaking in since a back door was left unlocked) and had their truck stolen on the second occasion.



and where did they live? St. Charles.



Ironic thing is the same week my sis lost her truck my car got stolen from in front of my apt. on Shaw.



I found it funny that people asked me if I would move from the city after that happened but didn't ask my sister if she would leave St. Charles after something worse happened to her--it's one thing to have your car jimmied into and started with a screwdriver. It's another to have someone get into your house when your family is sleeping and steal the keys off the kitchen table!


Well, we've been here for 8 months and the first incident was when we were out of town for the weekend on like the first week we lived there. It hasn't soured me for Dogtown, just makes me wish I could afford a couple of alarms for my car, and a weapon. It hasn't soured me, but my wife is convinced we are "targeted" and has mentioned escaping to suburbia. But at the same time, she is about as negative on suburbia as I am, so it's probably just the newness. It was also a bit disheartening that we were the ONLY target. I walked one block north and one block south and didn't see anyone else that had any attempts on their vehicles. The biggest pain of it is we just had our side mirror replaced on that car on Friday. Now we have more problems. Oh well, we're fortunate to have found an auto body person who will let us buy the part ourselves then install it. So I'll probably call Black Lane Auto Parts in Caseyville tomorrow and see what we can do.

1,137
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,137

PostJan 04, 2009#114

I know this is a $$ option, but you can get a motion sensing camera with spotlights for < $100. I am sure you have spent more on repairs and this is something you and some neighbors may be able to pitch in. Worth a try. Lights scare stupid people :)

214
Junior MemberJunior Member
214

PostJan 04, 2009#115

Well there's always this deterrent...






The inventor claims it is unlikely to kill but would "definitely blind" the assailant.

424
Full MemberFull Member
424

PostJan 05, 2009#116

A few months after first moving to the hill, my car (grand am) and my wifes car (alero) were broken into... the only 2 cars that it happened to out of like 15 in the area...

1,510
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,510

PostJan 05, 2009#117

We were broken into on Dec 14 and Had a 32" flatscreen, a smaller flatscreen in the kitchen and my Mac Powerbook laptop stolen. Other than that, nothing was stolen or damaged.

214
Junior MemberJunior Member
214

PostJan 05, 2009#118

As far as gunshots, fights, and other sundry things I believe the following state law would apply.



For the aggressive bum issue see specifically sections:

1-(a),(b),(d), and specifically, my personal favorite (e).

and

2-(a),(b)



From: http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/C500-599/5740000010.HTM
Peace disturbance--penalty.

574.010. 1. A person commits the crime of peace disturbance if:



(1) He unreasonably and knowingly disturbs or alarms another person or persons by:



(a) Loud noise; or



(b) Offensive language addressed in a face-to-face manner to a specific individual and uttered under circumstances which are likely to produce an immediate violent response from a reasonable recipient; or



(c) Threatening to commit a felonious act against any person under circumstances which are likely to cause a reasonable person to fear that such threat may be carried out; or



(d) Fighting; or



(e) Creating a noxious and offensive odor;



(2) He is in a public place or on private property of another without consent and purposely causes inconvenience to another person or persons by unreasonably and physically obstructing:



(a) Vehicular or pedestrian traffic; or



(b) The free ingress or egress to or from a public or private place.



2. Peace disturbance is a class B misdemeanor upon the first conviction. Upon a second or subsequent conviction, peace disturbance is a class A misdemeanor. Upon a third or subsequent conviction, a person shall be sentenced to pay a fine of no less than one thousand dollars and no more than five thousand dollars.


Now to the more difficult part... we need to actually go to jury duty and do our part. I've sat through jury selection and some of the people in there are complete idiots.

104
Junior MemberJunior Member
104

PostJan 07, 2009#119

First, add me to the list of people who believes that Crime should have its own group. There are too many facets to this conversation to shove into a single thread.



Now, on to the police helicopter. It's circling nearby right now. It was circling elsewhere earlier in the evening. It's an almost daily nuisance in South City. Now, I don't know much about helicopters but I do know for certain that they are profoundly expensive to maintain and operate.



I've seen testimonials from the police department about just how useful the thing is. However, in any line of work there is always some bigger better tool that would make life easier. Within private industry, basic economics generally prevent an organization from employing resources beyond its means. As we all know, however, the economics of reason are often tossed out the window in civil government.



My question is this...in a perpetually cash strapped city where everyone seems to agree that more cops walking the beat (or any cops walking the beat, for that matter) would be beneficial to our crime problem, is anyone taking a good hard look at the cost/benefit of keeping that thing up in the air every night? It doesn't seem to do much for deterring crime and that should be, IMO, the number one priority. Further, I propose that its nightly presence perpetuates the feeling of a war zone and acts as a psychological trigger, of sorts, for the criminal element.

6,660
AdministratorAdministrator
6,660

PostJan 07, 2009#120

Expenses for the helicopters are currently shared with the county. It patrols within both areas. I think St. Charles was or is buying in for responses as well.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJan 08, 2009#121

Looks like they caught the Glendale robber. 63122 can sleep a little better at night now.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostJan 08, 2009#122

JasonBlack wrote:Now, on to the police helicopter. It's circling nearby right now. It was circling elsewhere earlier in the evening. It's an almost daily nuisance in South City. Now, I don't know much about helicopters but I do know for certain that they are profoundly expensive to maintain and operate.



I've seen testimonials from the police department about just how useful the thing is. However, in any line of work there is always some bigger better tool that would make life easier. Within private industry, basic economics generally prevent an organization from employing resources beyond its means. As we all know, however, the economics of reason are often tossed out the window in civil government.



My question is this...in a perpetually cash strapped city where everyone seems to agree that more cops walking the beat (or any cops walking the beat, for that matter) would be beneficial to our crime problem, is anyone taking a good hard look at the cost/benefit of keeping that thing up in the air every night? It doesn't seem to do much for deterring crime and that should be, IMO, the number one priority. Further, I propose that its nightly presence perpetuates the feeling of a war zone and acts as a psychological trigger, of sorts, for the criminal element.


As Matt already pointed out above, the costs are shared with other jurisdictions. I've also heard that the police do nightly practice runs over south St. Louis, although I don't know whether that's really true. That said, I completely agree with you about how the helicopter makes this part of the city feel like a war zone. Don't get me wrong, as I'm sure there's plenty of evidence that supports its use as a crimefighting tool, but on the ground it just seems like a nuisance that may or may not have a real impact on crime.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJan 09, 2009#123

Helicopters are the way to go when tracking a fleeing suspect.

2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostJan 09, 2009#124


907
Super MemberSuper Member
907

PostJan 10, 2009#125

^

Yea... that is crazy!

Read more posts (10572 remaining)