2,940
Life MemberLife Member
2,940

PostFeb 03, 2021#1251

Everyone, we're 14 days into the new Administration, which will last 4 years. Can we at least let the lunar cycle change before going Chicken Little? 

In the interim, maybe let's talk new policy objectives and how STL can best capitalize on them... You know, like the name of this thread? 

438
Full MemberFull Member
438

PostFeb 03, 2021#1252

Absolutely, the problem is which of them can be taken seriously? I'd gladly eat that $2000 check if it meant we'd get some kind of green infrastructure/job guarantee legislation passed into law (with or without Republican support). Lots of local problems could be addressed with just the earnings tax revenue infusion from the newly employed.

744
Senior MemberSenior Member
744

PostFeb 03, 2021#1253

Mark bringing up Tara Reade--a story relegated to Newsmax and OAN--pretty much sums up the limits of his objectivity to this administration in the first two weeks. 

And I agree--let's discuss how the current situation in DC might benefit STL in terms of policy. 

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostFeb 03, 2021#1254

^Great idea. The infrastructure bill is the 800lb. guerrilla in terms of impact at the local level. Although, I think it will be easier to find compromise on electric grid modernization, wind and solar generation, highway construction, FAA initiatives, and interstate rail (including freight), before urban transit. Hopefully the lobbyists for the MTA, CTA, APTA, etc... make themselves heard.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostFeb 03, 2021#1255

SB in BH wrote:
Feb 03, 2021
And $1400 might be trivial to an urban dilettante...
🙄  i meant to say "$600," as in the difference between $1400 and $2000 which, again, he never even promised. you're really reaching.
P.S. "dilettante" =/= "debutante."

PostFeb 03, 2021#1256

MarkHaversham wrote:
Feb 03, 2021
urban_dilettante wrote:
Feb 03, 2021
SB in BH wrote:
Feb 03, 2021
Mark’s analysis of the Democratic Party and Pres. Biden in particular is spot on. His campaign platform, much like Obama’s, says FDR, but his cabinet nominees, deference to Republicans, 4 decade career, and the record of the prior Democratic Administration suggest we’ll get something akin to the elder Bush Administration at best. Witness dithering over the promised $2000 checks as prologue to the next 4 years.
a nitpick, but $2000 checks were never promised. the promise was a total of $2000 per eligible citizen, including the $600 that the Trump admin approved.
Even if you think voters should have understood that the Democrats were including $600 from Trump in their $2000, Trump provided $1800 in checks and Joe Biden is shooting for $1400 (that allegedly is already being bargained down to $1000 before means testing). They're only getting that much via reconciliation due to their worship of the filibuster, so this is their only shot this year. Democrats are lecturing voters for not understanding $1400+$600=$2000 but I think voters will understand $1400 < $1800.

Edit: And Trump is the one who was cheerleading the $2000 that Democrats bandwagoned onto! They're literally emphasizing that they are completing Trump's $2000 checks. It's farcical.
you're moving the goal posts. it has nothing to do with what i think voters should understand. you are sniping Biden for not following through on a fabricated promise.
also, Biden has 4 years to outperform the whopping $1800 in stimulus checks that Jesus Trump gave us (about the sum total of the good he did in his 4 years).

patience. it's been 2 weeks.

addendum: not seeing the "farcical." should Dems cancel the checks because Trump endorsed them? not acknowledge that he endorsed them? everybody already knows. what would be gained by doing that? seems you'll complain either way.

179
Junior MemberJunior Member
179

PostFeb 03, 2021#1257

I'd bring up the war mongering that's already starting. Blinken stating Iran could have nuke capability in a month! Omg, be scared...even though we've heard this scare tactic story since 2012. We know where this is leading.
You don't have to listen to OAN or Newsmax to see who makes up Biden's cabinet or to know what to expect in the next four years. You don't have to even be a conservative, just objective.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostFeb 03, 2021#1258

^ Biden wants to return to the 2015 nuclear deal (i.e. oversight) that Trump canceled, which restricts Iran's ability to produce high-enrichment plutonium for weapons but not low-enrichment plutonium for power. he's not going to invade Iran.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostFeb 04, 2021#1259

ibleedlou wrote:
Feb 03, 2021
We know where this is leading.
Where? 

9,674
Life MemberLife Member
9,674

PostFeb 04, 2021#1260

ibleedlou wrote:
Feb 03, 2021
You don't have to listen to OAN or Newsmax to see who makes up Biden's cabinet or to know what to expect in the next four years. You don't have to even be a conservative, just objective.
experienced professionals?

438
Full MemberFull Member
438

PostFeb 04, 2021#1261

Dilettante—“a fabricated promise.” No, he literally said “elect Democrats and $2000 checks will go out the door immediately,” just days before the GA election.” You can find a dozen sources that reported it, and I bet you could even find the audio of the speech if you cared to look.

“You’re moving the goalposts.” No, that’s the Democrats. First it was $2000 checks, then $2000 in two installments, now it’s $1000 for couples earning <$75k based on an average of 5 year rolling averages of your pre-tax income prorated for Chained Urban CPI in odd numbered years for the last two decades.

“Experienced professionals.” Yes, each has been through the MICC revolving door at least twice, and can be counted on to make sure nothing will fundamentally change, just like Joe promised.

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostFeb 04, 2021#1262

Here is some much better, and truthful information about these checks. Certainly more useful than the crap most of you are spewing here.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... d-to-know/

Now, let’s put an end to this pissing match and get back on topic.

947
Super MemberSuper Member
947

PostFeb 04, 2021#1263

MarkHaversham wrote:
Feb 03, 2021
brianadler6545 wrote:
Jan 30, 2021
Trololzilla wrote:Yeah well I think it's fairly well established at this point that the Democratic Party is nearly exclusively populated with weak-willed pushovers focused so much on "unity" and "not rocking the boat" that they'll let Republicans do whatever they want and walk all over them. It's how we ended up in this mess in the first place, and it's not going to get any better. Democrats and Republicans are essentially the same - they're all corporatist oligarchs; one just pretends to be "woke" while the other is at least up-front about not being your friend. 

Bet the stimulus checks will be pushed back as long as possible now too - just long enough for people to forget about the whole stock market fiasco going on right now to prevent people from investing stimulus money into the market and realizing it's all a sham. Gotta keep the masses in line, I spose.
Saying they're essentially the same is an extremely privileged standpoint.

To the immigrant families who have suffered over the last four years, people from Muslim-majority countries denied entry, catastrophic COVID response, attempts to derail Healthcare, abortion access, etc. Even their support of Democracy is completely opposite.

I agree Democrats are often pushovers,  but come on, the parties are fighting for completely opposite things.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
This post is a pretty good illustration of how similar the Democrats and Republicans are. Joe Biden is continuing to run the concentration camps that opened during the Obama administration; he's continuing our catastrophic COVID response and promising to open schools in his first 100 days (when he plans to have maybe 1/6th of the population vaccinated, including zero children); he campaigned on a public option in opposition to M4A, and he's already giving up on even that (also too-generous COVID stimulus will automatically cut Medicare due to Dem's 2010 PAYGO law, oops); he's gearing up for more war in the Muslim Middle Eastern countries, continuing Obama's neoliberal consensus foreign policy.

Joe Biden is a much bigger threat to democracy than Donald Trump ever was. For all his many, many faults, Donald Trump at least gave a sh*t about following through on his campaign promises. He tried his darndest to build the wall and stick it to brown people just like he promised. Joe Biden spent his first week in office reneging on every significant promise (including the $2000 checks*). If politicians don't even try to follow through with the promises that get them elected, in what sense can we claim this is a democracy? What's the point of voting?

*The Democrats ran all over Georgia telling voters "vote Democrat and we'll send you a check for $2000". Excuses don't matter, that's what they said and they aren't doing it. People all over Georgia and the rest of the country are trying to pay their bills, they're looking at a $600 check with Donald Trump's name on it while the Democrats hem and haw over sending more. Don't blame Joe Manchin or the Republicans, those people all existed and were known to Democrats before they campaigned on $2000 checks. Don't send $1400 in April and pretend it completes the $2000 in December, rent is due every month.

I'm amazed at how much Liberals love being technically correct, compared to actually appealing to voters. Liberals spent the last decade after the ACA losing seats while explaining to people that Obama said "if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor" but he can't control medical networks and they change things all the time to save money and the ACA is pushing for cost savings but he didn't tell them to trim the network and also if you change insurance you can't necessarily keep your doctor due to different networks so technically Obama was telling the truth when he said you can keep your doctor even though you couldn't keep your doctor after all. Apparently that was so much fun they're all set to spend the '22 and '24 campaigns whining about how all the voters struggling with bills just don't understand that $1400 was actually enough to fulfill their promise so it's voters' fault if Democrats lose.

I mean, I know the Democrats value being important rich people and the whole working class liberal values thing is kayfabe. I just don't understand the liberal voters lining up in front of the truck, waiting to get run over again.
Until now, I had no idea that Glenn Greenwald was posting in this forum.

PostFeb 04, 2021#1264

MarkHaversham wrote:
Feb 03, 2021
Bart Harley Jarvis wrote:
Feb 03, 2021
MarkHaversham wrote:
Feb 03, 2021
You hired somebody to renovate you're house and for the first two weeks they're just saying "yeah I'm gonna keep sledgehammering all the walls and pulling out the wiring", and you're like "well he just started, maybe he needs more time to get into the swing of it".
Yeah, I'd expect someone to fix it correctly, rather than patch over it.   Clown.
So you think Biden refusing to provide healthcare reform or adequate stimulus is a necessary first step to providing healthcare and stimulus, or did you just forget the house was a metaphor?
And what magic wand do you think he should use to make both of those things happen right this second?

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostFeb 04, 2021#1265

sc4mayor wrote:
Feb 04, 2021
Here is some much better, and truthful information about these checks.  Certainly more useful than the crap most of you are spewing here.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... d-to-know/

Now, let’s put an end to this pissing match and get back on topic.
I'm usually skeptical of the Post but this article summed things up pretty clearly.
Biden enthusiastically endorsed the checks during the Georgia runoff elections, vowing Americans would receive $2,000 stimulus payments if Democrats won those races. Biden has since insisted on sending stimulus payments worth $1,400, to supplement the $600 December payments (for a total of $2,000), while expressing openness to tightening eligibility surrounding who receives them

947
Super MemberSuper Member
947

PostFeb 04, 2021#1266

MarkHaversham wrote:
Feb 03, 2021
and of course Tara Reade
You mean the woman whose story completely fell apart within weeks of it coming out?

https://www.thenation.com/article/polit ... legations/

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/202 ... ation.html

179
Junior MemberJunior Member
179

PostFeb 04, 2021#1267

dbInSouthCity wrote:
Feb 04, 2021
ibleedlou wrote:
Feb 03, 2021
You don't have to listen to OAN or Newsmax to see who makes up Biden's cabinet or to know what to expect in the next four years. You don't have to even be a conservative, just objective.
experienced professionals?
Sure, experienced war hawks and wall street backers can be professionals, even in the workers party. Great point!

2,940
Life MemberLife Member
2,940

PostFeb 04, 2021#1268

DEMs, stop sniping GOPers! 
GOPers, stop sniping DEMs! 

FFS y'all, get back on target. Talk policy, not partisanship or talking points. 
Also, IDGAF about the $1,400 checks here, because that's not policy. 

Q: What so far in the current administration will directly impact STL? I'd like to know the future of our City and Metro Area... Anything on infrastructure funding? 

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostFeb 04, 2021#1269

MarkHaversham wrote:
Feb 04, 2021
sc4mayor wrote:
Feb 04, 2021
Here is some much better, and truthful information about these checks.  Certainly more useful than the crap most of you are spewing here.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... d-to-know/

Now, let’s put an end to this pissing match and get back on topic.
I'm usually skeptical of the Post but this article summed things up pretty clearly.
Biden enthusiastically endorsed the checks during the Georgia runoff elections, vowing Americans would receive $2,000 stimulus payments if Democrats won those races. Biden has since insisted on sending stimulus payments worth $1,400, to supplement the $600 December payments (for a total of $2,000), while expressing openness to tightening eligibility surrounding who receives them
last i'm going to say about it, but he did not promise $2000 payments in addition to the already-planned $600 payments. show me where he said "$2000 in addition to the $600" or "a total of $2600" and i'll concede that he trivially changed his promise. otherwise it's just interpretation.

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostMar 16, 2021#1270

While this is part of the Covid relief bill...I put this here because it seems the money comes with few strings (outside of restricting its use from tax cuts and pension obligations).

‘So transformative’: St. Louis region expected to see $700 million infusion of federal aid
www.stltoday.com/tncms/asset/editorial/ ... db4cdb637b

2,792
Life MemberLife Member
2,792

PostMar 16, 2021#1271

I really can’t wait to see how this is used. St. Louis is finally on the winning end of something, an overly generous stimulus.

PLEASE DONT BLOW IT


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 16, 2021#1272

This might push up the Compton and Lindell/Union bridge replacements.

2,663
Life MemberLife Member
2,663

PostMar 16, 2021#1273

I would hope some could go to the N/S fund for a pilot BRT route

2,792
Life MemberLife Member
2,792

PostMar 16, 2021#1274

Just ideas I have going...

Get everyone back to work:
- 24/7 childcare facilities for a year for employees of hard hit industries
- public transit free to under 18, 65+, and low-income riders
- Job training, job training, job training

Address neighborhood security:
- social worker in every school for 5 years
- fast implementation of traffic calming
- citywide Ring program
- invest in program to monitor expired tags
- expand operation to prevent dumping (vehicles and staff dedicated to cleaning everyday)

Capital Improvements / transportation:
- implement downtown multi-modal
- fast implementation of traffic calming on high crash corridors
- provide hundreds of parklets and new outdoor spaces
- updated facilities on every route with 10 minute frequency
- use bi-state, city, and private funds to finally launch bikeshare
- rebuild Fairgrounds, O’Fallon, Hyde, and St. Louis Place parks
- rebuild MetroLink stations currently in redesign
- fund implementation of BRT - N/S
- leverage GRG funds to connect River Des Peres and Forest Park

Development:
- get serious about eTOD at Grand, Cortex, and downtown stations
- cover financing gaps on low-income home buyers

2,075
Life MemberLife Member
2,075

PostMar 16, 2021#1275

Just an idea: 

Set aside $30M. Contract a city-owned construction company to build an attractive brick multi-family housing on 'well thought out - demand based' LRA properties? Spend $400K (tax free) building a solid 4-family flats across emerging South and North City neighborhoods... rent the units out for $350-$500/mo to applicable low-income residents... 

Wouldn't be too difficult to build a model that allows for a break even costs and covers insurance / maintenance / management / etc. 

You could build 30 units in Year 1, 30-ish more in year 2, and then create a self-funding mechanism off of the rent that just continues to build 3 to 4 multi-family buildings every year until the market for low income housing demand is met/sustained.

Read more posts (155 remaining)