1,093
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,093

PostJan 06, 2011#4651

Does anyone have anymore details of the presentation of the new plans? I read that its on the 19th of this month but i couldnt find anything else. Im guessing its not public.

http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/news ... -city.html

2,386
Life MemberLife Member
2,386

PostJan 11, 2011#4652

No one has gotten a glimpse of these new plans yet?

The Chariot can get up an active construction crane but no one can take a picture of a few pieces of paper? I am dissapointed in us.

3,544
Life MemberLife Member
3,544

PostJan 15, 2011#4653

Ballpark Village, 2011 plan

Ballpark Village, Take 5

The latest version of the long-awaited development plan north of Busch Stadium.

Phase one: 225,000 square feet of office space, 100,000 square feet of retail and entertainment. Cost: $146.1 million

All phases: 750,000 square feet of office space, 360,000 square feet of retail and entertainment, 250 condominiums. Cost: $555 million

link: http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... 57390.html

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostJan 15, 2011#4654

ST. LOUIS • The scaled-back vision of Ballpark Village that the Cardinals will unveil on Wednesday includes 100,000 square feet of stores and restaurants and a new corporate headquarters for St. Louis-based Stifel Financial Corp., ready to open by the summer of 2013.
http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... c7cff.html

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJan 15, 2011#4655

Think we could lure a corp HQ from Illinois for BPV given they are freaking out about the tax increase there? ADM? CME?

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostJan 15, 2011#4656

Or State Farm Insurance from Bloomington.

Here's a brief comparison of building dimension approximations to put the Ballpark Building into context.

Gateway One - 29,500 sq.ft. floorplate - 15 stories
Centene Plaza - 27,000 sq.ft. floorplate - 17 stories
Bank of America Plaza - 23,000 sq.ft. floorplate - 31 stories
Proposed Ballpark Building - 17,000 sq.ft. floorpate - 14 stories
Laclede Gas Building - 13,500 floorplate - 31 stories

So it should be slightly bigger than the Laclede Gas, with about the height of Gateway One.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostJan 16, 2011#4657

Glad that a more realistic phased approach is how this project is going to happen. Too much retail/entertainment would kill existing business and the real estate market isn't ready for a residential tower. Think of all the other projects adding units downtown happening at the moment.

However, still can't help but think that they could go at least twenty stories and have at least 150,000 to 175,000 sqf of speculative class A space, enough for Stiffel Nichols to expand into, the 50,000 sqf, as well as snag another business as Wabash and Quincunx suggest. My thoughts are based on a couple items which seem logical to me from a take of the market and competition. Maybe I'm way off base so to speak with my limited knowledge.

1) First, BPV, In my opinion is not competitive with Centene's second tower in providing enough new Class A office space at 50,000 sqf. Instead you become another developer competing on renderings instead of availibility. St. Louis has its fair share of developers chasing a small number of clients
2) Second, Realisitically their is no serious proposal on the table to build Class A office space downtown in the immediate future. Why sell yourself short now when in three years you will have the new Mississippi River Bridge open and maybe a new 22nd interchange offering comparable development opportunities - downtown with good freeway access?
2) Third, you must be willing to position yourself on the possibility of air china hub.
3) Fourth, I think you see IL businesses have a legitimate concern on taxes and what path to go forward on. St Louis might get legitimate consideration.

827
Super MemberSuper Member
827

PostJan 16, 2011#4658

^I wonder if what is being built is exactly what could be financed. I'm not sure any bank in America is interested in much speculative and costly commercial space.

I'd like to think though that talk among the various players bringing BPV to reality is to quickly green light an additional tower as soon as a viable tenant is found. Maybe the gun is loaded on BPV expansion and all that it needs is the trigger squeezed by a new tenant?

I'm still thinking that Google should be "helped" here to establish their new internet/fiber optic thing (shows you how much I know about it, ha). How about a customized, high tech tower next to iconic Busch Stadium and cementing downtown's tech status?

547
Senior MemberSenior Member
547

PostJan 16, 2011#4659

goat314 wrote:Ballpark Village, 2011 plan

Ballpark Village, Take 5

The latest version of the long-awaited development plan north of Busch Stadium.

Phase one: 225,000 square feet of office space, 100,000 square feet of retail and entertainment. Cost: $146.1 million

All phases: 750,000 square feet of office space, 360,000 square feet of retail and entertainment, 250 condominiums. Cost: $555 million

link: http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... 57390.html

What does everyone think about the 250 condos bit?

827
Super MemberSuper Member
827

PostJan 16, 2011#4660

^Doesn't the blue print for downtown calls for an additional 6K or 8K residents in the next decade? They're gonna have to live somewhere, so why not?

I'm just hoping (if they get built) they're not all priced at $350K and up. I'd like to be able to buy something across the street from the stadium and retire in it. Then have it paid off by the time I need to find somewhere to play "walker tag" and "I remember when...."

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostJan 16, 2011#4661

Still undecided if BPV condo's would help the situation with the remaining/undeveloped Cupples warehouses or not. On one hand, new construction might bring in more people to look in the immediate area and discover the warehouse. Or, the opposite, any possible client go to BPV and the remaining warehouses become more and more candidates for demolition.

547
Senior MemberSenior Member
547

PostJan 16, 2011#4662

RobbyD wrote:^Doesn't the blue print for downtown calls for an additional 6K or 8K residents in the next decade? They're gonna have to live somewhere, so why not?

I'm just hoping (if they get built) they're not all priced at $350K and up. I'd like to be able to buy something across the street from the stadium and retire in it. Then have it paid off by the time I need to find somewhere to play "walker tag" and "I remember when...."
I agree, but the number seems low to me, most likely (at least this is my guess) because they will be decent sized and high priced.

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostJan 18, 2011#4663

quincunx wrote:Think we could lure a corp HQ from Illinois for BPV given they are freaking out about the tax increase there? ADM? CME?
Just an FYI ADM bought new office space in Downtown Decatur, IL back in December. They are set for a while...see my post in the Illinois Section for more details.

1,190
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,190

PostJan 19, 2011#4664

Well, there is one step down, some more to go.

http://www.stltoday.com/business/column ... 78c22.html

I don't like this though....
But even this smaller project isn't certain. The lead tenant - widely believed to be Stifel - has not yet fully committed, DeWitt said. And the sale of bonds this summer - expected to be $35 million but potentially as much as $45 million - is still dependent on "market conditions."

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostJan 19, 2011#4665

While they would restore the street grid north of Busch into eight square blocks, only two of the blocks would be developed in the project's $146 million first phase. The other six would become surface parking lots until demand emerged for building on them, at which point a combination of office buildings, retail space, garages, condominiums and possibly a hotel are planned.
Were there no plans provided?

What street grid gets restored? The street grid is fairly locked on all four sides by a Stadium, two parking garages and the Ballpark Hilton complex.

They must mean that they are making their own street grid, especially to come up with 8 blocks.

66
New MemberNew Member
66

PostJan 19, 2011#4666

When will the plans be released to the public?

I thought I heard that it would be today.

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostJan 19, 2011#4667

I personally am just ready for SOMETHING to be built. I'm holding out hope that if one building gets constructed (Stifel Nicolaus' tower), maybe the floodgates will open and more tenants will show interest.

547
Senior MemberSenior Member
547

PostJan 19, 2011#4668

The latest and the greatest on BPV...

http://www.stltoday.com/business/column ... 78c22.html
ST. LOUIS - The new plan for Ballpark Village received its first blessing from a public agency Wednesday morning.

A city agency gave its OK to up to $47 million in tax revenue bonds to help build a first phase of the long-awaited project, which would include a a retail complex and 13-story office building likely to house financial services firm Stifel Financial Corp. across from Busch Stadium.

Cardinals President Bill DeWitt III and Chase Martin, of the team's development partner Cordish Co., laid out their plans for the site, which they say would be the "premier" office development in the region, and the first new office tower built downtown in a quarter century.

"This will be a marquee development that will be seen all over the world every time the Cardinals play," said Martin. "It's a very attractive site."

But their vision is significantly smaller than earlier versions that have been pitched in the six years the Cardinals have been trying to build Ballpark Village.
I say make the Cards pay the fines they are supposed to and then consider TIF funding. Even then, TIFs should not be such a large percentage of the project cost.

As for the surface parking lots!?!?!?!? GREAT

---
Moderator edit: Shortened the P-D quote for fair use. Please don't quote full articles.

1,000
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,000

PostJan 19, 2011#4669

I wish the somebody would include a reasonable and reliable projection of what these sort of tax incentives really mean.

604
Senior MemberSenior Member
604

PostJan 19, 2011#4670

There are a couple positives to take out of this if it becomes a reality.

- A street grid is being put into place and money is being used to provide utilities for the additional blocks created. This makes it much easier and attractive for building on these additional blocks. Perhaps the Cardinals would be willing to sell these plots to other developers and then we might see a more organic, diverse end product that gets built in a quicker timeframe.
- No mention of the "urban plaza". Hopefully this gets scrapped since we have an urban plaza a block away.

547
Senior MemberSenior Member
547

PostJan 19, 2011#4671

metzgda wrote:There are a couple positives to take out of this if it becomes a reality.

- A street grid is being put into place and money is being used to provide utilities for the additional blocks created. This makes it much easier and attractive for building on these additional blocks. Perhaps the Cardinals would be willing to sell these plots to other developers and then we might see a more organic, diverse end product that gets built in a quicker timeframe.
- No mention of the "urban plaza". Hopefully this gets scrapped since we have an urban plaza a block away.
I am about the making the urban fabric more traditional and allowing subsequent development, but at what cost?

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJan 19, 2011#4672

Not new today, but the latest rendering I'm aware of:


3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostJan 19, 2011#4673

No, please no surface parking. I don't care if Dewitt lake forms again, it's much better than a surface lot. Hopefully they stick to their word building the utilities for the remainder. I can honestly see this phase getting developed and the surface lot being present 10 years from now.

66
New MemberNew Member
66

PostJan 19, 2011#4674

downtown2007 wrote:No, please no surface parking. I don't care if Dewitt lake forms again, it's much better than a surface lot. Hopefully they stick to their word building the utilities for the remainder. I can honestly see this phase getting developed and the surface lot being present 10 years from now.
We've just go to hope that the next few phases happen quickly.

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostJan 19, 2011#4675

Alex Ihnen wrote:Not new today, but the latest rendering I'm aware of:

How many renderings will there eventually be :!:
Looks like something else may have been shared today...


metzgda wrote:No mention of the "urban plaza".
Is the green area on the screen an urban plaza? :( or Phase 1?

Read more posts (85 remaining)