2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostJul 24, 2008#3751

tm8951 wrote:Here is an article from KMOV, this clears up some confusion about the ranges in office space in phase 1 and 2 as well as retail in phase 1 and 2:



"-The office component is now a range of between 100,000-750,000 square feet in phase 1. The current plan for phase 2 calls for approximately 300,000 square feet of office.
Well, that certainly clears it up.



Maybe Cordish is planning on building the foundations for a 750,000 sf office tower and then financing and constructing it one floor at a time.



After each floor is constructed, they will pause and do a risk analysis. They will review the current state of the market to see if they might have constructed the steel for the story below the story that is one story too many, or maybe (oh the horror! :shock:) the story that is one too many. If the former, they will simply cap it off and do the finish work. If the latter, they will promptly remove the steel for the-one-story-too-many, cap it off, and then do the finish work. :lol:

362
Full MemberFull Member
362

PostJul 24, 2008#3752

tm8951 wrote:
"-The office component is now a range of between 100,000-750,000 square feet in phase 1.


Unbelievable.



Listened to the ballgame tonight and Dewitt Jr. was on. Start planting grass in the next few weeks. Tailgating for the All Star game. Possible construction started by winter. Possibly not. (so obviously not).



Sounds like the plan for the ASG is to have a grass field where people can hang out and do things like play stickball. That is seriously what he said. A stickball tournament on BPV. I kid you not.



Somebody needs to sue these jerks.

729
Senior MemberSenior Member
729

PostJul 24, 2008#3753

Little Egyptian wrote:
tm8951 wrote:
"-The office component is now a range of between 100,000-750,000 square feet in phase 1.


Unbelievable.



Listened to the ballgame tonight and Dewitt Jr. was on. Start planting grass in the next few weeks. Tailgating for the All Star game. Possible construction started by winter. Possibly not. (so obviously not).



Sounds like the plan for the ASG is to have a grass field where people can hang out and do things like play stickball. That is seriously what he said. A stickball tournament on BPV. I kid you not.



Somebody needs to sue these jerks.


In his defense, he was on KMOX earlier today talking about all the events surrounding the ASG in New York this year and one of the events was a stickball tournament. I don't think he was insinuating that we use BPV as a place to play stickball and throw frisbees around during the ASG but more of that he thought it was a cool event in NY and we could duplicate here. He was quoted saying that by the ASG that 2/3 of the site should be under construction and the other 1/3 would be utilized for various events that week of the ASG.

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostJul 24, 2008#3754

Little Egyptian wrote:Somebody needs to sue these jerks.


For what?

359
Full MemberFull Member
359

PostJul 24, 2008#3755

I had to pull a lot of strings to get this new rendering of Ballpark Village:





:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostJul 24, 2008#3756

stlmizzoutiger wrote:I had to pull a lot of strings to get this new rendering of Ballpark Village:




Where do you park?

14
New MemberNew Member
14

PostJul 24, 2008#3757

I am kind of suprised that noone has posted anything yet, But last night Bill Dewitt was at the Cardinal game and said that everything has been set in motion. I missed some of the interview because I was making dinner and watching the game at the same time (and it took me a moment before I realized who was being interviewed).



Dewitt stated taht the siz of the new plan is no different than the original plan except for now the Residential hac become office space and Residential is being moved to phase II.



He also said that by the all-star game they should be in early phases of "construction."



They emphasized in the interview that it was a long time coming (10 years since its conception), but that it will finaly be a reality.



Have mlb.tv, but I haven't gotten a chance to go back and listen to the interview.



Has anyone else heard anything?

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJul 24, 2008#3758

^ See Little Egyptian's post above.

14
New MemberNew Member
14

PostJul 24, 2008#3759

I found this on the Cardinals website.



07/23/2008 9:15 PM ET



Ballpark Village agreement reached

Cards announce construction set to begin across from Busch

By Lee Hurwitz / MLB.com



ST. LOUIS -- For 2 1/2 years, a gaping dirt hole has sat adjacent to Busch Stadium. But after countless hours of negotiations, Ballpark Village will come to fruition.

The Cardinals, along with the city of St. Louis and the Cordish Company, announced an agreement has been reached to begin on revitalizing the downtown district.



"This is an exciting day for the St. Louis Cardinals organization, our fans, and for the city of St. Louis," said Cardinals president Bill DeWitt III in a statement. "We greatly appreciate the efforts of everyone involved in reaching this important milestone. We are absolutely committed to delivering a development of the highest quality for our fans and for the city."



Construction will begin "shortly," according to the press release, and the exact date will be announced in several weeks.



Now that all sides have agreed to terms, there should not be any further holdups. St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay will recommend the project for immediate approval to several government bodies.



When completed, Ballpark Village is planned to be a first-class entertainment and business center. The area will provide shops, restaurants, office space, a residential area and hotel accommodations. The project is expected to cost as much as $600 million, though no general funds will finance the public portion of the project -- future tax revenues of the project will fill that void.



The construction of Ballpark Village will provide 3,000 jobs to build the new center. Another 2,000 permanent jobs are expected to stem from the project. Roughly 300,000 square feet of office space will be provided as well as 100-250 residential units.



"Ballpark Village is going to be spectacular, and we are thrilled that an agreement has been reached," said Blake Cordish, senior vice president of The Cordish Company, in a statement. "Most importantly, as we have experienced in other cities, Ballpark Village will act as an anchor for the continued renaissance of downtown St. Louis."

196
Junior MemberJunior Member
196

PostJul 24, 2008#3760

Why no residential until phase 2? I hate how they think it's because of market conditions...but by the time it's built that could change.



I would prefer more residential in phase 1. As a recent St. Louisian who just moved back here from KC and seeing Cordish's Power and Light District, it worries me that residential will be thrown to a supposed "second phase." I would like to get some defined parameters at when this second phase will start or if it will even happen. It always takes forever until something happens in StL.



KC P&L is great don't get me wrong, but once the hub-bub dies down there, I wonder if there will be enough foot traffic to support it. Currently, there is no residential developments by the power and light district - which reminds me of 1984 a la St. Louis Centre. We all know what happened there.

52
New MemberNew Member
52

PostJul 24, 2008#3761

This is the rendering a friend of mine did. Would love to go to Tito Landrum's!!




14
New MemberNew Member
14

PostJul 24, 2008#3762

KC really needs a Basketball or Hockey team to get people down there. I have not been there yet, but i don't understand the draw. Who are they trying to attract to Power and Light. The Sprint center is an excellent facility, which I am sure has a lot of bookings, but they need a regular tennant.



Correct me if I am wrong, but I do believe that it is close to the convention center, which helps, but kansas city is not a premier convention city.



Back to the topic at hand. I believe that there is more promise with ballpark village. For one the stadium adjacent has a tennant for at least 25 years (per contract - i believe), as well as established and new residential in walking distance. It will happen and it will be good, the question is how good.



And if they put in a bunch of lame establishments at least it will free up some room at the existing local watering holes.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostJul 24, 2008#3763

Survivor147 wrote:Why no residential until phase 2? I hate how they think it's because of market conditions...but by the time it's built that could change.



I would prefer more residential in phase 1. As a recent St. Louisian who just moved back here from KC and seeing Cordish's Power and Light District, it worries me that residential will be thrown to a supposed "second phase." I would like to get some defined parameters at when this second phase will start or if it will even happen. It always takes forever until something happens in StL.
That's a great idea! Why don't you speak with Cordish, the Cardinals and the city and let them know that you'll be assuming all financial risk for building residential in BPV. I'm sure they'll be happy to hear from you.

729
Senior MemberSenior Member
729

PostJul 24, 2008#3764

Charlie Brennan jusy had a nearly hour long interview with DeWitt III and the Chairman of Stifel Nicolaus talking about BPV. If it is posted on KMOX's website I encourage you to listen.



Brennan was kind of on the attack during the interview but Dewitt and the other guy (can't remember name) held themselves very well and explained things in a logical and rational matter. I kind of find myself being a little on their side now.



Dewitt did mention that some residential might be included in phase 1 but more than likely will fall into phase 2.

308
Full MemberFull Member
308

PostJul 24, 2008#3765

Screw all you pessimists. Screw the P-D.



I'm so sick and tired of non-passionate visionless whiners of st. louis. Just because you've never accomplished anything with your lives doesn't mean that you should bring that same sentiment with the city you live in.



I'm happy things are going to move forward, and I look forward to a great development made by a developer with experience all across the country. FINALLY. It's a great stepping stone for the city and a great start at breaking the historic chain of anti-progression and lameness.



This is a great thing!

200
Junior MemberJunior Member
200

PostJul 24, 2008#3766

phoaddict wrote:Screw all you pessimists. Screw the P-D.



I'm so sick and tired of non-passionate visionless whiners of st. louis. Just because you've never accomplished anything with your lives doesn't mean that you should bring that same sentiment with the city you live in.



I'm happy things are going to move forward, and I look forward to a great development made by a developer with experience all across the country. FINALLY. It's a great stepping stone for the city and a great start at breaking the historic chain of anti-progression and lameness.



This is a great thing!


Amen, the complaining is exhausting.

14
New MemberNew Member
14

PostJul 24, 2008#3767

^SALUT



I drank an ice-cold Bud

31
New MemberNew Member
31

PostJul 24, 2008#3768

I really hope that the rendering from stlmizzoutiger is not the real rendering. It would be a huge disappointment. I am just crossing my fingers and hold on to Dewitts words about how the size of the project hasn't changed.

362
Full MemberFull Member
362

PostJul 24, 2008#3769

So, you guys are going to buy it one more time, eh? Well, good for you. I wish I had those kind of rose colored glasses.



Me, I have had enough. DeWitt III is a lying scumbag. You listen closely to that guy, and he really doesn't say anything, but he makes you believe that he said a lot. I guess that is what a Harvard MBA will get you.



Seriously, I have not heard the KMOX/Charlie Brennen interview this morning, but I challenge you to go back to any of the tapes and actually try to parse out the HARD FACTS that this guy says. There aren't any, I promise, but you can go back and check for yourselves anyway.



I believe that one day something will be built on BPV, but I also believe that that someday is probably 2012 at the earliest and probably closer 2015-2020 timeframe.



Why do I believe that? Because these guys are going to sell this ballclub, you wait and see. BPV (the empty lot) will be part of the package of the sale to lure big dollar investors from outside the city.



I think the root of the problem here is the owners of the Cardinals. Not Cordish. Frankly, if Cordish consistently behaved like this they would be out of business in no time, so I refuse to believe that Cordish is the problem here. No. It is the owners themselves. I think it is the ownership that killed the Centene deal. It is the ownership that is prohibiting anything from happening. It is the ownership that is lying to everyone.



Seriously, think about Lamping. The guy loves Saint Louis, loves his job, has been around forever ... and suddenly leaves for, frankly, a crappier job in NY. Explain that. Well, Lamping probably saw the writing on the wall and got the heck out of dodge - literally. That or Lamping was not comfortable with what the owners were doing to the city and was forced out to to make DeWitt III president so that they could consolidate power.



I think that probably next year around the All Star game you will hear rumors of a sale. By the end of next season, a sale will be a reality and sometime the following year they will probably make a deal. Just IMO, until this team is sold, there is nothing happening in BPV. But, listen to Billy Dewitt if you want - if it makes you sleep better. Me, I am through with this ownership group.

359
Full MemberFull Member
359

PostJul 24, 2008#3770

The Central Scrutinizer wrote:
stlmizzoutiger wrote:I had to pull a lot of strings to get this new rendering of Ballpark Village:




Where do you park?


The existing garages :lol:

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostJul 24, 2008#3771

krykel wrote:
phoaddict wrote:Screw all you pessimists. Screw the P-D.



I'm so sick and tired of non-passionate visionless whiners of st. louis. Just because you've never accomplished anything with your lives doesn't mean that you should bring that same sentiment with the city you live in.



I'm happy things are going to move forward, and I look forward to a great development made by a developer with experience all across the country. FINALLY. It's a great stepping stone for the city and a great start at breaking the historic chain of anti-progression and lameness.



This is a great thing!


Amen, the complaining is exhausting.


[rant]



I'll tell you guys what's exhausting: the numerous delays, the occasional and ambiguous statements from the Cardinals and Cordish, the "possible" start dates, the endless changes to the vague "mix" of development, and the multiple announcements of "possible" start dates with no development contracts signed.



I could probably think of a few more things about this project that are getting under my skin, but I guess I'd be whining then.



Some of you really need to understand that those of us critiquing the project here are looking at this much differently than the average person b*tching on STLtoday.com or the television station forums.



Unfortunately, many people on those forums simply couldn't care less about St. Louis, so they'll say it's a waste of taxpayer dollars, and they won't go anyway because downtown is so unsafe. Of course, both of these generalizations are patently untrue. The city has negotiated the best possible deal despite all of the delays, as the city isn't on the hook if revenue fails to meet expectations. And anyone that says downtown is unsafe obviously hasn't been there in 30 years, with the possible exception of walking from Busch Stadium to Stadium West to get to their cars after a game. :roll:



Meanwhile, those of us here on this forum that dare to question the direction of the Cardinals and Cordish love St. Louis. We're passionate and bullish about its future. Most of us live here, and a lot of us work here, and we shop and seek entertainment within its boundaries as much as possible. We're excited by the ongoing renaissance and the amazing transformation of downtown. We want St. Louis to put its best face forward. We believe it's come a long way in a short time, and we're optimistic about continued progress.



We also seek the best and highest uses for areas that aren't living up to their potential. And in the case of Ballpark Village, we've gone from renderings released about eight years ago, to a major announcement in June 2005 when Cordish was picked by the Cardinals as the developer. Then, on October 27, 2006, the two parties announced an agreement had been reached. Then, countless delays ensued, including the brief courtship with Centene, leading up to yesterday's announcement.



Of course, yesterday's announcement did not include a signed agreement between all parties involved, or any firm construction dates. Office space could be anywhere from 100,000 to 750,000SF in Ballpark Village. Even meteorologists don't use that type of ridiculous range with their forecasts. Oh, and remember when the Cardinals and Cordish were talking about 1,200 residential units? Now it might be 100 or 250, with market conditions to blame. Of course, market conditions wouldn't have really been a problem if the parties involved had their acts together two or three years ago. Recent/current market conditions didn't really impact the sale of the Ballpark Lofts to the west either. Meanwhile, the Cardinals have blamed everyone but themselves for the inaction at Lake Dewitt, for a concept they first shared with the public almost a decade ago. :roll:



Although I cannot speak for every 'pessimist' or 'whiner', I must say that up till a few months ago, I was very supportive of this project. I thought the city and state should've approved the initial public funding request, even though I am against public funding of stadiums per se, because of the potential for Ballpark Village to transform downtown. While I was pleased with the progress throughout downtown, to me this site represented a clean slate with unparalleled 'best and highest use' potential. The Cardinals aimed high with their vision and ignored the naysayers. Then, when it came time for action, they couldn't get the job done. While many parties deserve the blame, the Cardinals ultimately must accept it more than any other party because it is their concept that has yet to be realized.



I wanted the Cardinals to deliver on their original promise. I believe more can be done with the Ballpark Village site than the downscaled plans that were announced yesterday. Because this is a clean slate development, St. Louis should strive for the best and highest use of the land, and settle for nothing. If Cordish and the Cardinals can't deliver, the city should begin the eminent domain process to acquire the land and find a developer that would relish the opportunity to build on such prime real estate. And while I am frustrated by Lake Dewitt, years of fruitless talk, and the lack of a signature development in time for the 2009 All-Star Game, I think St. Louis will be just fine with or without Ballpark Village.



[/rant]



Now that I've had my say, I've got one more thing to say as a moderator: Please remember that ideas and opinions are fair game, but people are not. Nothing said really offended me, but statements like the one below are counterproductive and add nothing to the debate:


phoaddict wrote:Screw all you pessimists. Screw the P-D.



I'm so sick and tired of non-passionate visionless whiners of st. louis. Just because you've never accomplished anything with your lives doesn't mean that you should bring that same sentiment with the city you live in.


I'll happily speak for the other "non-passionate visionless whiners" by saying that you couldn't be further off-base with that remark.

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostJul 24, 2008#3772

stlmizzoutiger wrote:
The Central Scrutinizer wrote:
stlmizzoutiger wrote:I had to pull a lot of strings to get this new rendering of Ballpark Village:




Where do you park?


The existing garages :lol:


Too far away. Can't they build a parking lot behind that read building?

PostJul 24, 2008#3773

Little Egyptian wrote:Seriously, think about Lamping. The guy loves Saint Louis, loves his job, has been around forever ... and suddenly leaves for, frankly, a crappier job in NY. Explain that.


That one is easy to explain - it wasn't a crappier job. It was a lot more money and a lot more responsibility. A big move up.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJul 24, 2008#3774

ThreeOneFour wrote:
krykel wrote:
phoaddict wrote:Screw all you pessimists. Screw the P-D.



I'm so sick and tired of non-passionate visionless whiners of st. louis. Just because you've never accomplished anything with your lives doesn't mean that you should bring that same sentiment with the city you live in.



I'm happy things are going to move forward, and I look forward to a great development made by a developer with experience all across the country. FINALLY. It's a great stepping stone for the city and a great start at breaking the historic chain of anti-progression and lameness.



This is a great thing!


Amen, the complaining is exhausting.


[rant]



I'll tell you guys what's exhausting: the numerous delays, the occasional and ambiguous statements from the Cardinals and Cordish, the "possible" start dates, the endless changes to the vague "mix" of development, and the multiple announcements of "possible" start dates with no development contracts signed.



I could probably think of a few more things about this project that are getting under my skin, but I guess I'd be whining then.



Some of you really need to understand that those of us critiquing the project here are looking at this much differently than the average person b*tching on STLtoday.com or the television station forums.



Unfortunately, many people on those forums simply couldn't care less about St. Louis, so they'll say it's a waste of taxpayer dollars, and they won't go anyway because downtown is so unsafe. Of course, both of these generalizations are patently untrue. The city has negotiated the best possible deal despite all of the delays, as the city isn't on the hook if revenue fails to meet expectations. And anyone that says downtown is unsafe obviously hasn't been there in 30 years, with the possible exception of walking from Busch Stadium to Stadium West to get to their cars after a game. :roll:



Meanwhile, those of us here on this forum that dare to question the direction of the Cardinals and Cordish love St. Louis. We're passionate and bullish about its future. Most of us live here, and a lot of us work here, and we shop and seek entertainment within its boundaries as much as possible. We're excited by the ongoing renaissance and the amazing transformation of downtown. We want St. Louis to put its best face forward. We believe it's come a long way in a short time, and we're optimistic about continued progress.



We also seek the best and highest uses for areas that aren't living up to their potential. And in the case of Ballpark Village, we've gone from renderings released about eight years ago, to a major announcement in June 2005 when Cordish was picked by the Cardinals as the developer. Then, on October 27, 2006, the two parties announced an agreement had been reached. Then, countless delays ensued, including the brief courtship with Centene, leading up to yesterday's announcement.



Of course, yesterday's announcement did not include a signed agreement between all parties involved, or any firm construction dates. Office space could be anywhere from 100,000 to 750,000SF in Ballpark Village. Even meteorologists don't use that type of ridiculous range with their forecasts. Oh, and remember when the Cardinals and Cordish were talking about 1,200 residential units? Now it might be 100 or 250, with market conditions to blame. Of course, market conditions wouldn't have really been a problem if the parties involved had their acts together two or three years ago. Recent/current market conditions didn't really impact the sale of the Ballpark Lofts to the west either. Meanwhile, the Cardinals have blamed everyone but themselves for the inaction at Lake Dewitt, for a concept they first shared with the public almost a decade ago. :roll:



Although I cannot speak for every 'pessimist' or 'whiner', I must say that up till a few months ago, I was very supportive of this project. I thought the city and state should've approved the initial public funding request, even though I am against public funding of stadiums per se, because of the potential for Ballpark Village to transform downtown. While I was pleased with the progress throughout downtown, to me this site represented a clean slate with unparalleled 'best and highest use' potential. The Cardinals aimed high with their vision and ignored the naysayers. Then, when it came time for action, they couldn't get the job done. While many parties deserve the blame, the Cardinals ultimately must accept it more than any other party because it is their concept that has yet to be realized.



I wanted the Cardinals to deliver on their original promise. I believe more can be done with the Ballpark Village site than the downscaled plans that were announced yesterday. Because this is a clean slate development, St. Louis should strive for the best and highest use of the land, and settle for nothing. If Cordish and the Cardinals can't deliver, the city should begin the eminent domain process to acquire the land and find a developer that would relish the opportunity to build on such prime real estate. And while I am frustrated by Lake Dewitt, years of fruitless talk, and the lack of a signature development in time for the 2009 All-Star Game, I think St. Louis will be just fine with or without Ballpark Village.



[/rant]



Now that I've had my say, I've got one more thing to say as a moderator: Please remember that ideas and opinions are fair game, but people are not. Nothing said really offended me, but statements like the one below are counterproductive and add nothing to the debate:


phoaddict wrote:Screw all you pessimists. Screw the P-D.



I'm so sick and tired of non-passionate visionless whiners of st. louis. Just because you've never accomplished anything with your lives doesn't mean that you should bring that same sentiment with the city you live in.


I'll happily speak for the other "non-passionate visionless whiners" by saying that you couldn't be further off-base with that remark.




HERE HERE =D>

200
Junior MemberJunior Member
200

PostJul 24, 2008#3775

Hey, I stand corrected. I can admit when I am wrong, however I want to know what WE can do besides talk about it on a forum. I am not being sarcastic, I actually want to know. There are several of us on here that really care about St Louis, strength in numbers, lets talk about a solution.

Read more posts (985 remaining)