2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostJan 25, 2008#2851

^Yes, they were supposedly discussing it, but I don't think anything has been signed. And no, A-B isn't exactly the kind of tenant to which I was referring.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostJan 25, 2008#2852

You guys are really silly, TWofTA & TG"E". I enjoy your repartee.

1,770
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,770

PostJan 25, 2008#2853

Humbug. If anybody wants me I'll be in my cave.

1,878
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,878

PostJan 25, 2008#2854

http://www.mayorslay.com/desk/display.asp?deskID=897


A story in this morning’s newspaper quotes a Cordish Co. spokesman explaining why there is still a big hole outside Busch Stadium – and may still be a big hole there for the next several months. He attributed the delay to continuing negotiations with Centene Corp., which plans to relocate its headquarters to downtown from Clayton.



Representatives of the Cordish Co. have told us they are ready to move forward with the Ballpark Village development. But, they have also told us that the Centene deal significantly changes the design of Ballpark Village. We have told them to finish their deal with Centene so we can move forward with all of the projects together and not have to change them later.



Centene is a great company. They will make the Ballpark Village project better, and their presence in Downtown St. Louis will be a tremendous boost to the City’s economy and add to our momentum.



But, I don’t believe Centene is to blame for the delay. Cordish has had four months to complete the negotiations and finish the development agreement. Like everyone else, I am growing impatient. I want to see construction start soon.



I remain confident that Ballpark Village will begin construction in the next couple of months. I am even more confident, however, that taxpayers are protected by an ordinance that will let us collect penalties from the Cardinals should they fail to meet their obligations.


-RBB

604
Senior MemberSenior Member
604

PostJan 26, 2008#2855

Whether it was strictly a PR move, or, Mr. Slay actually does feel the way he states I'm glad he posted the response.



I think we're nearing the point where the city should start putting the pressure back on the Cards and Cordish.

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostJan 27, 2008#2856

He doesn't want Cordish throwing a new corporate citizen under the bus. And I respect that 9even if Cordish is speaking the truth.)



And I'm glad he's getting impatient.

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostJan 27, 2008#2857

I think PE must have tipped off the Mayor that the Urban St. Louis forumers were getting restless and were revolting >insert joke here<, so he issued the statement to placate us. :P Yeah...that must be it.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostFeb 01, 2008#2858

[size=0]Mayor Slay 'losing patience' with Cordish on Ballpark Village[/size]

Four months have passed since Centene Corp.'s blockbuster announcement that it plans to build its $250 million headquarters at Ballpark Village downtown.



Mayor Francis Slay says that's long enough for Baltimore-based Cordish Co. to have re-worked its plans for the $387 million first phase of Ballpark Village, which will have 250 condos, 270,000 square feet of restaurant and entertainment space, and 100,000 square feet of office space. The development is slated to be built on vacant ground north of the new Busch Stadium.



"We're sitting on the sidelines like everyone else, waiting for this to happen," said Jeff Rainford, Slay's chief of staff.



The city of St. Louis is planning to sell $115.8 million in bonds to finance state and local subsidies for the project. To move forward, Cordish has to hammer out financing and other logistical details about Centene Center, and come back to the city for a final redevelopment agreement. It was originally planned that the bulk of Ballpark Village's first phase would be completed in time for the July 2009 All-Star Game in St. Louis, but a groundbreaking date has not yet been set.



On his blog this week, Slay wrote that he doesn't blame the delay on Centene. "Cordish has had four months to complete the negotiations and finish the development agreement," Slay wrote. "Like everyone else, I am growing impatient. I want to see construction start soon."







http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... tory4.html

1,364
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,364

PostFeb 01, 2008#2859

This had better get under way soon. I hope we don't end 2008 with a pond sitting there. It's kind of sad actually. It takes a village to raise a child, what's it going to take to raise a village?

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostFeb 02, 2008#2860

It takes a village to raise a child, what's it going to take to raise a village?
A child of David Cordish...if they deign us worthy. :wink:

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostFeb 08, 2008#2861

Centene shares plummet after fourth-quarter earnings miss

STAFF AND WIRE

02/08/2008



Shares of Centene Corp. fell 13 percent Friday after the company reported fourth-quarter earnings significantly lower than analysts expectations.



Centene, which manages health programs for states, said it earned 20 cents a share in the fourth quarter. Analysts had expected the company to report a fourth-quarter profit, excluding restructuring charges, of 48 cents a share.



Part of the problem an accounting issue that prevented Centene from including a retroactive rate increase in the fourth-quarter's revenue and profit.



Centene shares closed at $21.42, down $3.25. The decline was the biggest since July 18, 2006, when the Clayton-based company lowered a profit forecast.

407
Full MemberFull Member
407

PostFeb 09, 2008#2862

^And now the truth comes out. You know this has to be a source of concern for Centene. How financially viable is this company?

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostFeb 09, 2008#2863

^I believe U.S. Equities of Chicago is the developer of Centene Center at BV, not Centene. Centene has only agreed to be the signature tenant in the new building. I don't think there's too much to worry about.

80
New MemberNew Member
80

PostFeb 09, 2008#2864

I haven't reviewed their financials but a simple earnings miss isn't the end of the world. This is still a profitable company were talking about.

2,190
Life MemberLife Member
2,190

PostFeb 09, 2008#2865

Centene had revenues of about $3B for FY2007 and is projecting about $3.4B for FY2008. It was profitable this year and will be profitable next year. I seriously doubt its stock market performance has any relation to its headquarters-building decisions.

362
Full MemberFull Member
362

PostFeb 10, 2008#2866

bonwich wrote:Centene had revenues of about $3B for FY2007 and is projecting about $3.4B for FY2008. It was profitable this year and will be profitable next year. I seriously doubt its stock market performance has any relation to its headquarters-building decisions.


Centene scares me. Period. They have always scared me as an outsider looking at their business and strategies. I think they are going to get this thing done, but what the final product looks like should be interesting. But, the thing with Centene is that they have equally as much chance at really succeeding as they do at failing. So, it is equally likely that they will have a reduced presence in BPV as it is that they will have an increased presence and build the other tower. So, we just don't know with them in a lot of ways, which is probably what is accounting for some of the delay in the construction. If it was AB that was doing this, we pretty much understand their long term health. But, with Centene they could boom, bust, or be sold and each seems like an equally likely possibility.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostFeb 11, 2008#2867

Little Egyptian wrote:
bonwich wrote:Centene had revenues of about $3B for FY2007 and is projecting about $3.4B for FY2008. It was profitable this year and will be profitable next year. I seriously doubt its stock market performance has any relation to its headquarters-building decisions.


Centene scares me. Period. They have always scared me as an outsider looking at their business and strategies. I think they are going to get this thing done, but what the final product looks like should be interesting. But, the thing with Centene is that they have equally as much chance at really succeeding as they do at failing. So, it is equally likely that they will have a reduced presence in BPV as it is that they will have an increased presence and build the other tower. So, we just don't know with them in a lot of ways, which is probably what is accounting for some of the delay in the construction. If it was AB that was doing this, we pretty much understand their long term health. But, with Centene they could boom, bust, or be sold and each seems like an equally likely possibility.


Even with Centene's rosy (recent and projected) revenue picture, I share your concern.

2,190
Life MemberLife Member
2,190

PostFeb 11, 2008#2868

Perhaps we should hold out for a solid, established, long-time St. Louis company -- such as Mercantile Bank, Boatmen's Bank, Centerre Bank, Pet, General American or AG Edwards. Or May Co.

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostFeb 11, 2008#2869

I wonder if we can get an "urban" Venture as an anchor tenant for the 1st floor retail? :lol:

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostFeb 11, 2008#2870

bonwich wrote:Perhaps we should hold out for a solid, established, long-time St. Louis company -- such as Mercantile Bank, Boatmen's Bank, Centerre Bank, Pet, General American or AG Edwards. Or May Co.


How about SW Bell?

139
Junior MemberJunior Member
139

PostFeb 11, 2008#2871

Moorlander wrote:
bonwich wrote:Perhaps we should hold out for a solid, established, long-time St. Louis company -- such as Mercantile Bank, Boatmen's Bank, Centerre Bank, Pet, General American or AG Edwards. Or May Co.


How about SW Bell?


Don't forget other up upstanding St. Louis based community-oriented corporate pillars like McDonnell Douglas, TWA, Ralston-Purina, and General Dynamics...

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostFeb 12, 2008#2872

Lots of cities have lost major corporate headquarters, including New York. I'd like to see a list of cities and the companies they lost. St. Louis isn't alone in this, I'm pretty sure. percentage-wise, maybe we're up there, but I don't know.. :?:

1,400
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,400

PostFeb 12, 2008#2873

St Louis isn't alone in this, things get moved around a lot, but as far as THE CITY goes (not the region), we have lost a whole lot and acquired little.

2,190
Life MemberLife Member
2,190

PostFeb 12, 2008#2874

Maybe. Maybe not. But it's beside the point of the past few posts, which was that it's pretty darned silly to question whether $3B Centene is a good choice for having a headquarters in BPV based on a screwy accounting anomaly in its latest quarter.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostFeb 12, 2008#2875

bonwich wrote:Maybe. Maybe not. But it's beside the point of the past few posts, which was that it's pretty darned silly to question whether $3B Centene is a good choice for having a headquarters in BPV based on a screwy accounting anomaly in its latest quarter.


I don't question Centene's health per se, I'm just skeptical about future of the proposed headquarters due to all the delays in Ballpark Village.



I realize Centene's inclusion in the overall development led to at least some of the delays, but I'm not really going to believe in anything related to Ballpark Village until I see construction crews setting up shop in Pujols Pond.

Read more posts (1885 remaining)