wheelscomp wrote:And whats best, the two Centene buildings arent even the tallest ones in the model. The tower nearest the stadium on Clark street was taller than the two office towers.
KSDK showed the same thing.
wheelscomp wrote:And whats best, the two Centene buildings arent even the tallest ones in the model. The tower nearest the stadium on Clark street was taller than the two office towers.
TimeForGuinness wrote:If Centene stayed in Clayton and the public (especially on this board) found out that Downtown was in the running but came up short due to tax relief, I'm sure Slay would be torn a new one for not being aggressive enough.
Do I like the way business is handled these days, no...will it change...not until the cost of business in this country dips below China and/or the rest of the world.
ThreeOneFour wrote:TimeForGuinness wrote:If Centene stayed in Clayton and the public (especially on this board) found out that Downtown was in the running but came up short due to tax relief, I'm sure Slay would be torn a new one for not being aggressive enough.
Do I like the way business is handled these days, no...will it change...not until the cost of business in this country dips below China and/or the rest of the world.
I completely agree with both points. Mayor Slay's in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" position again. I don't like the (ab)use of public subsidies either, but it seems like those that don't play the game usually get left behind. I was excited about the announcement when I first heard the news after returning from a weekend road trip. While some cautionary perspective is necessary and shouldn't be taken lightly, I still feel very good about this deal overall.
Framer wrote:Someone's gotta post an image of that model!
what4 wrote:bonwich wrote: ...
Now, however, we have the city giving away another hundred mill or so -- and likely Clayton looking to give away the store to fill the void left by Centene.
It's nice Centene is staying, but it looks like a Pyrrhic victory, and business as usual in the St. Louis region.
i agree with your statement about centene bargaining with the private land owners to secure the land they wanted, but hey hindsight is 20/20.
as for the new hq location, i am no expert in the financial dealings that went down to secure centene's HQ in bpv - but i don't understand how the city can be giving away something they never had - the tax income from something (hq) that never existed on that site in the first place. i would phrase it as a tradeoff - giving up fiuture tax income from centene in exchange for other benefits such as the 1% city tax for 1200 new workers (i'm no fan of this tax btw, but i'm sure it was in the cities thoughts), potential real estate tax income from the new workers who move to DT, and especially maintainig the momentum in DT investment (retail, restaurants, other service industries) that partly results from the influx of new downtown residents/workers, etc. ... benefits that may be hard to measure in some circumstances but that seems like the gamble a lot of cities take rather than being left out in the cold. will the city ever recoup this potential source of revenue? maybe.. maybe not - but i'd rather the city try than wait.
MattnSTL wrote:This was certainly nice to come home to. While I have some minor concerns about the proposed parking garage, this seems to sound pretty solid. Downtown scores the headquarters of a rapidly growing corporation and we get a couple of towers as well.
I'll celebrate now and leave my cynicism for another day.
dweebe wrote:Even a heavy hitter like Chicago had to bend over and grab their ankles to get Boeing to locate their HQ there.
MattnSTL wrote:This was certainly nice to come home to. While I have some minor concerns about the proposed parking garage, this seems to sound pretty solid. Downtown scores the headquarters of a rapidly growing corporation and we get a couple of towers as well.
I'll celebrate now and leave my cynicism for another day.
bonwich wrote:dweebe wrote:Even a heavy hitter like Chicago had to bend over and grab their ankles to get Boeing to locate their HQ there.
Chicago/Illinois incentives to Boeing: $63M.
Boeing's annual revenue: $52.6B.
The state of Illinois lured at least 400 jobs (probably very well-paying jobs) away from the State of Washington.
Part of the incentive was needed to get an existing tenant to move out of a fully occupied building (into another downtown Chicago space) to make room for Boeing.
Intangible: Cachet value of saying "Chicago is home to Boeing."
St. Louis incentives to Centene: $78M. "More promised" from the state.
Centene's annual revenue: $2.3B.
The state of Missouri creates no net new jobs by Centene moving from Clayton to St. Louis.
Intangible: Cachet value of saying "St. Louis is home to Centene."
Mill204 wrote:You know, Centene's hq is going to be adjacent to the lumbering Ballpark East parking garage. Is that not large enough for their needs? Do that many people park there already? Though the proposal does have accomodations for retail and a future tower, I'd hate to see another block consumed by parking when there are other facilities that are up to the task. Otherwise, two thumbs up.
BGeldy wrote:That's all Fox 2 was concerned about last night. Every person they talked to worried about the view from Busch Stadium and how it would be affected.
My wife agrees. She thinks they need to just put in a park. I feel so sorry for her.
RBB wrote:On the KSDK feed I watched this morning, Mayor Slay can be overheard telling someone "no, it won't block the Arch".
:bash:
-RBB
