1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostOct 31, 2016#2626

What is the real timeline for the Phase 2 tower to get started? I know the Aldermanic bill was filed last week, but when would the vote actually happen? Would they need to obtaining any zoning variances prior to filing building permits? I just want to see construction start before anything can slow it down.

9,566
Life MemberLife Member
9,566

PostOct 31, 2016#2627

^ zoning code doesn't apply to ballpark village...

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostOct 31, 2016#2628

So really then the only hurdle is the 1% tax bill already filed. Got it. Hopefully this means we'll see some actual site movement within the year and it doesn't get pushed back or delayed.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostOct 31, 2016#2629

chaifetz10 wrote:So really then the only hurdle is the 1% tax bill already filed. Got it. Hopefully this means we'll see some actual site movement within the year and it doesn't get pushed back or delayed.
That bill according to Alderman Joe Vaccaro could pass before January


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostNov 06, 2016#2630

What do you think the viability of a market is at BPV?

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostNov 06, 2016#2631

Good question. I'm wondering if they're thinking of a model similar to the Foundry or—if any remembers—the short-lived, rather popular market at the Old Post Office in the late 80s/early 90s.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostNov 06, 2016#2632

Phase 2 now has its own website. This is probably where people can apply for a lease in the apartment Tower and see amenities that come with the development once is gets underway phase2.stlballparkvillage.com


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

55
New MemberNew Member
55

PostNov 07, 2016#2633

^ A thought I had about the market is the possibility of Dierbergs opening their first store inside city limits and/or moving their HQ from Chesterfield to the new office building. What are the odds of this happening?

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostNov 07, 2016#2634

FirSTLove wrote:^ A thought I had about the market is the possibility of Dierbergs opening their first store inside city limits and/or moving their HQ from Chesterfield to the new office building. What are the odds of this happening?
That's what I thought to. I think the Market may just be a independent store. It's a very small possibility.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostNov 07, 2016#2635

^ How about Schnucks relocating and changing up there downtown store. I just see BPV desiring a brand/chain name first and foremost.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostNov 07, 2016#2636

shadrach wrote:Good question. I'm wondering if they're thinking of a model similar to the Foundry or—if any remembers—the short-lived, rather popular market at the Old Post Office in the late 80s/early 90s.
huh did not know there once was a market at OPO... as for BPV, I've raised that question before on whether it really would be a good location for broad downtown neighborhood services like a grocer or drug store; I'm just not convinced it is and think more regional draw stuff is what would be best down there. So maybe more of a marketplace than a standard grocer. But as you say that's getting a bit crowded with Foundry and Union Station, to a degree.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostNov 07, 2016#2637

FirSTLove wrote:^ A thought I had about the market is the possibility of Dierbergs opening their first store inside city limits and/or moving their HQ from Chesterfield to the new office building. What are the odds of this happening?
I'd put the odds at around 0%.

2,634
Life MemberLife Member
2,634

PostNov 07, 2016#2638

If any local chain was to move to BPV it would likely be a Schnucks, as they are a sponsor of the Cardinals. While it may be unlikely, it definitely would be an interesting opportunity to build a flagship store, of similar quality to the one in Des Peres, in a high profile location across from Busch.

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostNov 07, 2016#2639

dredger wrote:^ How about Schnucks relocating and changing up there downtown store. I just see BPV desiring a brand/chain name first and foremost.
This would be a bad move. It would be moving the store away from the residential and convention base it serves most. Plus the store does just fine in that location.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostNov 07, 2016#2640

downtown2007 wrote:
dredger wrote:^ How about Schnucks relocating and changing up there downtown store. I just see BPV desiring a brand/chain name first and foremost.
This would be a bad move. It would be moving the store away from the residential and convention base it serves most. Plus the store does just fine in that location.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can see your points but also think GoHarvoGoHome also brings up some good points why Schnucks might think differently. Not as convenient location to Wash ave lofts but what 4-5 blocks difference while a short hop from Soulard, some decent office space/workers in between as well as more office & residential being proposed in the immediate area. At end of day, I don't see a grocery store but more along the idea of BPV floating a food stall idea like the Foundry.

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostNov 07, 2016#2641

dredger wrote:
downtown2007 wrote:
dredger wrote:^ How about Schnucks relocating and changing up there downtown store. I just see BPV desiring a brand/chain name first and foremost.
This would be a bad move. It would be moving the store away from the residential and convention base it serves most. Plus the store does just fine in that location.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can see your points but also think GoHarvoGoHome also brings up some good points why Schnucks might think differently. Not as convenient location to Wash ave lofts but what 4-5 blocks difference while a short hop from Soulard, some decent office space/workers in between as well as more office & residential being proposed in the immediate area. At end of day, I don't see a grocery store but more along the idea of BPV floating a food stall idea like the Foundry.
Furthermore, Culinaria is about as centrally located as a store can get and draws a lot of activity to the OPO district. By removing it, the area will become a dead zone and revert back to 2003 activity levels. And very few people from Soulard will come Downtown to shop for groceries. Too many other locations close to them. Most of the shoppers in the loft district visit Culinaria by foot. If you move it to BPV, they will have to hop in the car and may just go somewhere else. I can't believe someone actually mentioned this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostNov 07, 2016#2642

I think the Market ill be similar to Consentinos Market in Kansas City. Now I am not implying that a KC Business will come over here but we can expect something similar out of this like that.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostNov 07, 2016#2643

Downtown2007, what can't you believe? That a major business sponsor of the Cardinals might entertain new space or at least look at BPV that is about two blocks to the west and four blocks to south of their current location. Especially if it is a bigger footprint, gives more floor space and might offer better lease rates if the additional subsidy is added, BPV keeping 1% sales tax believe is the next request.

I don't give the idea much chance either but your last comment/sentence is pointless and pretty much defeats the purpose of even having this forum or discussion.

PostNov 07, 2016#2644

dredger wrote:Downtown2007, what can't you believe? That a major business sponsor of the Cardinals might entertain new space or at least look at BPV that is about two blocks to the west and four blocks to south of their current location. Especially if it is a bigger footprint thus gives more floor space to sell from and might offer better lease rates if the additional subsidy is added, BPV keeping 1% sales tax believe is the next request.

I don't give the idea much chance either but your last comment/sentence is pointless and pretty much defeats the purpose of even having this forum or discussion.

7,810
Life MemberLife Member
7,810

PostNov 08, 2016#2645

debaliviere wrote:
FirSTLove wrote:^ A thought I had about the market is the possibility of Dierbergs opening their first store inside city limits and/or moving their HQ from Chesterfield to the new office building. What are the odds of this happening?
I'd put the odds at around 0%.
I think you're being too generous.

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostNov 08, 2016#2646

dredger wrote:Downtown2007, what can't you believe? That a major business sponsor of the Cardinals might entertain new space or at least look at BPV that is about two blocks to the west and four blocks to south of their current location. Especially if it is a bigger footprint, gives more floor space and might offer better lease rates if the additional subsidy is added, BPV keeping 1% sales tax believe is the next request.

I don't give the idea much chance either but your last comment/sentence is pointless and pretty much defeats the purpose of even having this forum or discussion.
So your going to subsidize them once to open in Culinaria and then again to move 4 blocks south? That, in my mind, is pointless.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostNov 08, 2016#2647

^ Agree, subsidies for Schnucks moving a few blocks is pointless because I don't think anyone on this thread can see how the city or downtown would gain anything. Much different then Cupples X IMO with legitimate gain in Class A space and the possibilities of a significant job gains of an expanding company for downtown, even if the company is downtown already.

But my point is that it is not too far fetched of an idea that Schnucks as a business would entertain the idea or crunch the numbers of relocating to BPV if they believe it would be financial gain for them. The scenario in my speculative mind is BPV/Cordish would actively peddle the space to Schnucks, Target small store format, or anyone else. while letting it be known indirectly who is interested or not and see what happens.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostNov 22, 2016#2648

The vote on whether or not to pass the Ballpark Village subsidy and amendment has been pushed back to November 30th. It will be interesting to see what the vote will be out of the members of the board. I am sure they will vote in a area of 18-11 (Because Lewis Reed is involved) but we will see. I just hope that this is passed so constriction can begin sooner rather than later. I would also like to say that I read on the updated Hord Coplan Macht site that this phase still has a 220 room hotel. That hotel could be the leaked tower form earlier or included inside of the Office Building. But 220 rooms in a 10 floor building is a tight squeeze. I think they are still planning another building for this phase but trying to cover up the hotel tower and "put" it into the Office Building. Here is the project description

" The western-most block is a 10-story mixed-use building with 100,000 square feet of office space and a 200 key hotel, with additional retail in the base."

PostNov 25, 2016#2649

I have an idea on the remaining heights of the buildings that could be built on the remaining 3 lots. That leaked tower will be tossed for a new design but the height will stay the same. The middle lot will be about the same Height as the eventual Four Light in Kansas City and around 30-35 floors. The final lot will not go over 425 feet and will not go over 35 floors. So think it will be good stuff built on the remaining lots. ALL of these 3 Buildings will be built on top of a large base as seen in the leaked images and the site plan shadows.

I think that Cordish and the Cardinals will save the tallest buildings for the Eastern part of the project for revenue purposes. This will also kill 360 because the building will block the view of the stadium.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostNov 26, 2016#2650

dredger wrote:^ Agree, subsidies for Schnucks moving a few blocks is pointless because I don't think anyone on this thread can see how the city or downtown would gain anything. Much different then Cupples X IMO with legitimate gain in Class A space and the possibilities of a significant job gains of an expanding company for downtown, even if the company is downtown already.

But my point is that it is not too far fetched of an idea that Schnucks as a business would entertain the idea or crunch the numbers of relocating to BPV if they believe it would be financial gain for them. The scenario in my speculative mind is BPV/Cordish would actively peddle the space to Schnucks, Target small store format, or anyone else. while letting it be known indirectly who is interested or not and see what happens.
Any chance downtown could sustain a second culinaria location at BPV. Certainly if it was fully built out BPV and the cupples complex could be a significant number of built in customers. If Schnucks rest on their laurels then will repeat what's going on in CWE where every grocer under the sun is pushing in on their turf. United provision kinda already claimed the Loop as well.

Targeted expansion of the culinaria brand should be a high priority IMHO. If not downtown, then maybe clayton...?

Read more posts (3006 remaining)