Did anyone notice in this 2012 rendering the tower to the left and the base of the building in to the right? Maybe it was a tease then, but maybe it is what we might get. ![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wouldn't be surprised a bit if Cordish/DeWitt have gone back to the city and asked the city to back the bonds on a new high rise residential and or even a hotel tower. Question in my mind, would that require BofA approval or something that can pulled off through the treasurer office?chaifetz10 wrote:I would bet that it's another 6+ months before any plans are released and then 2+ years before any construction begins. My reasoning and logic is the fact that I know of concrete plans they had years ago that fell through (I even teased them here). It wouldn't surprise me one bit if they release plans and then either substantially reduced the size/complexity before it's built or used them as a leverage tool to get even more incentives out of the city.
Thanks, I edited it. I also forgot to put in "Thin and Tall". It should make a little bit more sense.user28 wrote:The opus development at Lindell and Euclid is over 200 units
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks, I edited it. I also forgot to put in "Thin and Tall". It should make a little bit more sense.user28 wrote:The opus development at Lindell and Euclid is over 200 units
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I made a new thread. Ballpark Village Phase 2 is up under Development and Construction Downtown Saint Louis section on UrbanSTL.dredger wrote:Given the history, shouldn't we just start a new thread for phase II after we hit 100 pages and see if we can't hit another 100 or so pages? If not mistaken, believe we are on phase II of posting comments about Ballpark Village.
At the moment I'm inclined to share Chaifetz sentiments, maybe see plans in another +6 month and maybe something be built in two years.
Agreed!GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:The Mike Shannon's site is an amazing opportunity to build something great in a prime location. Putting a Ferris wheel there would be an absolute waste and would arguably hurt DT south of Market street more than it would help. Especially if another wheel is already being built just a few blocks away.
Build something like what?GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:The Mike Shannon's site is an amazing opportunity to build something great in a prime location. Putting a Ferris wheel there would be an absolute waste and would arguably hurt DT south of Market street more than it would help. Especially if another wheel is already being built just a few blocks away.
The site seems pretty small. I wonder what type of apartment building could be built there and if it would make financial sense. I imagine, if a developer were to build a new construction apartment building, there would need to be parking included. A new apartment building at that site may be too expensive.wabash wrote:^Apartments are the only thing supporting new construction these days, except for purpose-built corporate construction projects like BJC, RGA, WWT, or Centene. Since no corporations seem to be sniffing around Downtown, an apartment building seems like the best bet.
Well in that case, it could be a pretty nice site for residential or office. Anything but a ferris wheel.wabash wrote:The site is plenty big. It could fit a mid-rise (like The Euclid) or a high-rise (like The Park East), both of which include parking.
Wont happen since the Cardinals/Cordish get to approve any height where Shannon's is now. Until they have BPV built all the way out, there's zero chance they'd let a competitor build something right next to their investment; at least one that would be competition to their potential high rises.chriss752 wrote:If the Mike Shannon's building is demoed and a high rise rises in its place, it would look great there. Then the lot next door to Busch Stadium to the East could get built on. But I only see these starting if Ballpark Village begins
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
