5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostAug 23, 2016#2451

Did anyone notice in this 2012 rendering the tower to the left and the base of the building in to the right? Maybe it was a tease then, but maybe it is what we might get.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostAug 23, 2016#2452

^I like that version of BPV. The outdoor corridor/courtyard is an improvement over what got built.

103
Junior MemberJunior Member
103

PostAug 23, 2016#2453

So we are probably looking at plans being revealed in the next month or so. Any bets on when actual construction will begin? This time next year?

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostAug 23, 2016#2454

I would bet that it's another 6+ months before any plans are released and then 2+ years before any construction begins. My reasoning and logic is the fact that I know of concrete plans they had years ago that fell through (I even teased them here). It wouldn't surprise me one bit if they release plans and then either substantially reduced the size/complexity before it's built or used them as a leverage tool to get even more incentives out of the city.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostAug 23, 2016#2455

chaifetz10 wrote:I would bet that it's another 6+ months before any plans are released and then 2+ years before any construction begins. My reasoning and logic is the fact that I know of concrete plans they had years ago that fell through (I even teased them here). It wouldn't surprise me one bit if they release plans and then either substantially reduced the size/complexity before it's built or used them as a leverage tool to get even more incentives out of the city.
I wouldn't be surprised a bit if Cordish/DeWitt have gone back to the city and asked the city to back the bonds on a new high rise residential and or even a hotel tower. Question in my mind, would that require BofA approval or something that can pulled off through the treasurer office?

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostAug 23, 2016#2456

Master plan info? But at the same time, this includes 7 blocks and Bowling Hall of fame. So maybe we should aim for just the offices, hotel and Residential pointed out in this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostAug 23, 2016#2457

^that must be at least 10 years old considering the BHOF building was torn down in 2008 and relocated to Texas in 2011.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostAug 24, 2016#2458

I am going to make a prediction on Ballpark Village. Mr. Bill Dewitt said in Phase 2 he wants 290 units of condos. The 12 floor OPUS on Lindell in CWE has about 200+ units. But he wants luxury condos in one, thin building. 290 units in 1 thin building? It's possible. 7 units per floor is a good size so times it by 40. 280 units above the lobby. Then add another floor, you have then 287 units. Then have 3, 42nd floor penthouses. Because the residents don't want to live in a very compact area with low ceilings, make them 12-15 feet tall depending on the rent cost. Add the lobby a height of 25ft so retailers can be two floors tall. The height of the building would be (with utilities in the roof) 540feet tall. That would make the building 4th tallest in the city and only 10ft shorter than the Eagleton Courthouse.

In short, 42 floors tall, 540 feet, Saint Louis' 4th Tallest, Missouri's 7th Tallest. With out the Arch, Saint Louis' 3rd Tallest, Missouri's 6th Tallest. it would also become the Midwest's tallest residential building outside of Chicago. Beating the current tallest 909 Walnut residential building in Kansas City in the soon to be tallest in the Midwest Kansas City power and light building

Or, If they want to (which they may) divide up the 290 units into 2 20-25 floor buildings on the site that would be around 275ft-325ft.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

215
Junior MemberJunior Member
215

PostAug 24, 2016#2459

The opus development at Lindell and Euclid is over 200 units


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostAug 24, 2016#2460

http://www.stltoday.com/business/column ... e3a1e.html
Lets hope that the Mike Shannons Location becomes something better than this. We don't need 2 Ferris Wheels in the General Downtown area. Plus this Ferris Wheel would cause issues on Walnut and Market with traffic. The thing would also be weird to have next door to Ballpark Village.

PostAug 24, 2016#2461

user28 wrote:The opus development at Lindell and Euclid is over 200 units


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks, I edited it. I also forgot to put in "Thin and Tall". It should make a little bit more sense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

PostAug 24, 2016#2462

user28 wrote:The opus development at Lindell and Euclid is over 200 units


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks, I edited it. I also forgot to put in "Thin and Tall". It should make a little bit more sense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostAug 24, 2016#2463

Given the history, shouldn't we just start a new thread for phase II after we hit 100 pages and see if we can't hit another 100 or so pages? If not mistaken, believe we are on phase II of posting comments about Ballpark Village.

At the moment I'm inclined to share Chaifetz sentiments, maybe see plans in another +6 month and maybe something be built in two years.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostAug 24, 2016#2464

dredger wrote:Given the history, shouldn't we just start a new thread for phase II after we hit 100 pages and see if we can't hit another 100 or so pages? If not mistaken, believe we are on phase II of posting comments about Ballpark Village.

At the moment I'm inclined to share Chaifetz sentiments, maybe see plans in another +6 month and maybe something be built in two years.
I made a new thread. Ballpark Village Phase 2 is up under Development and Construction Downtown Saint Louis section on UrbanSTL.


Witnessing and being part of Saint Louis history is one of the best things to witness.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostAug 24, 2016#2465

^Doesnt really seem necessary to have multiple threads on a single topic.

2,634
Life MemberLife Member
2,634

PostAug 24, 2016#2466

The Mike Shannon's site is an amazing opportunity to build something great in a prime location. Putting a Ferris wheel there would be an absolute waste and would arguably hurt DT south of Market street more than it would help. Especially if another wheel is already being built just a few blocks away.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostAug 24, 2016#2467

GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:The Mike Shannon's site is an amazing opportunity to build something great in a prime location. Putting a Ferris wheel there would be an absolute waste and would arguably hurt DT south of Market street more than it would help. Especially if another wheel is already being built just a few blocks away.
Agreed!


Witnessing and being part of Saint Louis history is one of the best things to witness.

PostSep 15, 2016#2468

Anything new that anyone knows about on the project?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1,093
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,093

PostSep 16, 2016#2469

GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:The Mike Shannon's site is an amazing opportunity to build something great in a prime location. Putting a Ferris wheel there would be an absolute waste and would arguably hurt DT south of Market street more than it would help. Especially if another wheel is already being built just a few blocks away.
Build something like what?

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostSep 16, 2016#2470

^Apartments are the only thing supporting new construction these days, except for purpose-built corporate construction projects like BJC, RGA, WWT, or Centene. Since no corporations seem to be sniffing around Downtown, an apartment building seems like the best bet.

1,093
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,093

PostSep 16, 2016#2471

wabash wrote:^Apartments are the only thing supporting new construction these days, except for purpose-built corporate construction projects like BJC, RGA, WWT, or Centene. Since no corporations seem to be sniffing around Downtown, an apartment building seems like the best bet.
The site seems pretty small. I wonder what type of apartment building could be built there and if it would make financial sense. I imagine, if a developer were to build a new construction apartment building, there would need to be parking included. A new apartment building at that site may be too expensive.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostSep 16, 2016#2472

The site is plenty big. It could fit a mid-rise (like The Euclid) or a high-rise (like The Park East), both of which include parking.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostSep 19, 2016#2473

If the Mike Shannon's building is demoed and a high rise rises in its place, it would look great there. Then the lot next door to Busch Stadium to the East could get built on. But I only see these starting if Ballpark Village begins


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1,093
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,093

PostSep 19, 2016#2474

wabash wrote:The site is plenty big. It could fit a mid-rise (like The Euclid) or a high-rise (like The Park East), both of which include parking.
Well in that case, it could be a pretty nice site for residential or office. Anything but a ferris wheel.

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostSep 19, 2016#2475

chriss752 wrote:If the Mike Shannon's building is demoed and a high rise rises in its place, it would look great there. Then the lot next door to Busch Stadium to the East could get built on. But I only see these starting if Ballpark Village begins


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wont happen since the Cardinals/Cordish get to approve any height where Shannon's is now. Until they have BPV built all the way out, there's zero chance they'd let a competitor build something right next to their investment; at least one that would be competition to their potential high rises.

Read more posts (3181 remaining)