3,767
Life MemberLife Member
3,767

PostFeb 01, 2016#2251

I love how Budweiser Brew House is on Taphunter (draft listings site), so you can see exactly how badly they're ripping people off.
http://www.taphunter.com/location/Budwe ... 9945764864
I'm shocked they sell so many non-AB products at BBH.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostFeb 01, 2016#2252

I guess my major questions off the top of my head for BPV are...

-- do Cards really want to see quality mixed-use?
-- if so, what are the primary issues?
-- is Cordish the primary problem?
-- are both hustling but just can't work the numbers and/or find office tenants?
-- if hustling, what can move the needle?
-- was Centene really interested or was it just using it to successfully leverage subsidies from Clayton?
-- if they really were at the table in earnest, what went wrong?
-- if Cordish is a primary problem, can they be jettisoned?
-- if Cards aren't really committed, are there any penalties still available?

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostFeb 01, 2016#2253

DogtownBnR wrote:
I love how Budweiser Brew House is on Taphunter (draft listings site), so you can see exactly how badly they're ripping people off.
http://www.taphunter.com/location/Budwe ... 9945764864
I'm shocked they sell so many non-AB products at BBH.
I don't think these are all available through the entire BBH. Just a few taps on the second or third floor. The majority of the hundred+ taps are AB products. They really do focus on Bud, Bud Light, Select, etc...

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostFeb 02, 2016#2254

roger wyoming II wrote:I guess my major questions off the top of my head for BPV are...

-- do Cards really want to see quality mixed-use?
-- if so, what are the primary issues?
-- is Cordish the primary problem?
-- are both hustling but just can't work the numbers and/or find office tenants?
-- if hustling, what can move the needle?
-- was Centene really interested or was it just using it to successfully leverage subsidies from Clayton?
-- if they really were at the table in earnest, what went wrong?
-- if Cordish is a primary problem, can they be jettisoned?
-- if Cards aren't really committed, are there any penalties still available?
Your continued interest is admirable RW, but optimism seems futile on this one. Hard to believe, but Busch Stadium opened a decade ago. And the plot known as BPV is now making its way through a second economic expansion, with nothing mixed-use to show for it. :cry: :(

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostFeb 02, 2016#2255

^ I'm not sure I have optimism; I'm drowning in a torrent of tears! I guess part of it is I want to know who to blame, and while I didn't include this above, what Slay's role has been here.... if he's been putting pressure on DeWitts to get something done. If I were him, I would call the project out

2,427
Life MemberLife Member
2,427

PostFeb 02, 2016#2256

roger wyoming II wrote:^ I'm not sure I have optimism; I'm drowning in a torrent of tears! I guess part of it is I want to know who to blame, and while I didn't include this above, what Slay's role has been here.... if he's been putting pressure on DeWitts to get something done. If I were him, I would call the project out


Exactly. Another failure of our leadership. At the very least, we're leaving money on the table since penalties for not developing the site are in the contract.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostFeb 02, 2016#2257

^ The Ballpark Village failure certainly is something to add to Slay's lack of accomplishments. It's amazing to me that it is possible that no mixed-use will have arrived to the site by the end of his 80th term or whatever # he is on now.

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostFeb 03, 2016#2258

That's something I've been meaning to ask for a long time.

How do St. Louisans feel about Mayor Francis Slay?

472
Full MemberFull Member
472

PostFeb 03, 2016#2259

stlgasm wrote:
roger wyoming II wrote:^ I'm not sure I have optimism; I'm drowning in a torrent of tears! I guess part of it is I want to know who to blame, and while I didn't include this above, what Slay's role has been here.... if he's been putting pressure on DeWitts to get something done. If I were him, I would call the project out


Exactly. Another failure of our leadership. At the very least, we're leaving money on the table since penalties for not developing the site are in the contract.

Are they big enough to cover payments on a football stadium?

249
Junior MemberJunior Member
249

PostFeb 03, 2016#2260

KansasCitian wrote:That's something I've been meaning to ask for a long time.

How do St. Louisans feel about Mayor Francis Slay?
Depends on who you ask. And where/what your priorities are.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostFeb 03, 2016#2261

Slay retains solid support of old school Saint Louis and part of his advantage is that in past campaigns there was never a viable candidate that could create a successful new school coalition. That may be changing though and the next election may be a tough one.

472
Full MemberFull Member
472

PostFeb 03, 2016#2262

But we still don't have a candidate. Reed is just the anti-Slay not a viable figure on his own. They both make political decisions out of spite for the other.

Ogilvie for the win! He's a white male, which the "old school" you talk of would like. He's got a beard and rides a bike, which the "new school" should like. More importantly, he is an independent pragmatist that isn't afraid to step on toes to keep the city from making stupid decisions.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostFeb 03, 2016#2263

I used to be pretty indifferent about Slay, possibly verging on supportive at times. After the whole stadium fiasco and his shady role in stealing the public vote I want him gone.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostFeb 03, 2016#2264

Slay has just been in office too long. We need new blood. It's really a shame no good candidate has stepped up.

7,810
Life MemberLife Member
7,810

PostFeb 03, 2016#2265

framer wrote:Slay has just been in office too long. We need new blood. It's really a shame no good candidate has stepped up.
I'm looking at you Ogilvie. Save us.

55
New MemberNew Member
55

PostFeb 03, 2016#2266

dweebe wrote:
framer wrote:Slay has just been in office too long. We need new blood. It's really a shame no good candidate has stepped up.
I'm looking at you Ogilvie. Save us.
Help us, Ogil-Wan, you're our only hope.

249
Junior MemberJunior Member
249

PostFeb 03, 2016#2267

I'm not a fan of Slay, and that pre-dates the stadium stuff. If the city loses out on NGA, his goose is cooked.

I personally hope either Ogilvie or Tishaura Jones run. Both have their heads screwed on straight and the citizenry's best interests in mind, instead of just select portions. Reed has shown a willingness, repeatedly, to blow wherever the political winds may take him.

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostFeb 03, 2016#2268

I think the "been in office too long" excuse is a bad one. Let's face it, he is no different now than he was 10 years ago. We just demand more change and betterment now.

The main issue is that he is unwilling to risk an ounce of political capital to get something done. He also has no problem jumping on the bandwagon of a trendy issue he may not have agreed with years ago. He pivots well.

472
Full MemberFull Member
472

PostFeb 03, 2016#2269

Slay has seemed pretty consistent to me. Whenever a historic building is in trouble, he's there to spend money on the wrecking ball. Whenever there's a big project to wipe away all the organically gained achievements of regular citizens, he's there with a mini-poll and a smile. When there's a good idea, he is silent or working behind the scenes against it. When there's a bad idea, he'll work out a way to wield giant scissors or a golden shovel.

The bigger issue though is that St. Louis mayors for quite some time have been black or white. Slay's a symbol of the white Catholic machine. He cannot heal the distrust in our community when he ignores north city as a matter of policy or only takes an interest when he can help somebody erase it. We need a mayor that doesn't smell like Civic Progress.

17
New MemberNew Member
17

PostFeb 03, 2016#2270

Remember guys, he is at fault for killing the Century Building: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Century_B ... ._Louis%29

103
Junior MemberJunior Member
103

PostFeb 24, 2016#2271

I recently moved to Dallas and they have quite a few building lit up here at night. I would love to see any buildings in BPV have some neon red lighting (Cardinals) incorporated into the design. It really sticks out at night and makes the skyline that more impressive to look at.

472
Full MemberFull Member
472

PostFeb 24, 2016#2272

A very long time ago Alex Ihnen proposed lit up towers all over town in different colors so you could know roughly where you are in town by the dominant color and those placemaking landmarks would help in giving people directions. Like you head from blue to green and then try to get to purple. You could figure it out because you'd see the tall lit up towers on the horizon.

Then time passed. Then SLU lit up midtown in blue. Now you are suggesting the cardinals light up the river to 14th street in red. A color often associated with other activities. :wink: But the St. Louis Blues can't claim blue if SLU already did it.

2
New MemberNew Member
2

PostFeb 26, 2016#2273

I have a distant friend who works somewhat closely to Cordish in Baltimore. She says BPV phase 2 is happening, and an announcement might be coming soon.

DowntownNick
DowntownNick

PostFeb 26, 2016#2274

I certainly hope that's true. Would certainly make that area of Downtown more aesthetically pleasing. Keep us updated if you hear more!

9,566
Life MemberLife Member
9,566

PostFeb 26, 2016#2275

^ yeah....my friend worked on the actual design of a residential tower...in summer of 2014 and expected an announcement after the 2014 season. Than Cordish got cold feet

Read more posts (3381 remaining)