Stlien,stlien wrote:Can you give an idea of how the timing has now doubled? For instance, is "placed in service to issuance" now a one year process when previously it was a six month process?John Coctostan wrote: However, state LIHTCs are a very political process and the DED has been slow-playing the HTC program for 2 years now. The timing at DED has now doubled from placed in service to issuance of the state HTCs. This has been a complete turn off to most developers and has hindered some development lately.
And how does this affect development?
Yes, it now takes roughly one year from when the project incurs its last QRE until the certificate is received by the applicant. I've seen a few projects take almost 2 years from PIS to issuance of the HTCs. While this has never been confirmed, it's been assumed that the order to slow things down came from Nixon. I heard that other incentive programs, like grants, were to be given first priority.
This effects potential redevelopment in a few ways: 1) developers don't like uncertainty. Not only are they unsure of when the certificate will be issued, this gives the impression that the entire program is precarious. 2) A major reason why a certificated state HTC program is successful is because it widens the pool for buyers of the credits. Because the credits can be sold (and are considered property), banks can use them as collateral. Most of the times the state credits are used as collateral for bridge loans. Bridge loans typically have a small term life. By stretching out the time it takes to get the certificates (and pay off/down the b loan), you run the risk of defaulting. Not only that, but you're paying interest each day the bridge loan remains unpaid.
In Minnesota, for example, it typically takes 3-4 months from PIS to issuance of the certificate. To be fair, Missouri's program requires a full audit of the cost certification while Minnesota's does not. However, over the past year or so, that review has been done with the finest-toothed comb one has ever seen.






