5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostMay 07, 2010#276

The Central Scrutinizer wrote:Don't be surprised if Steffan ends up in jail before all is said and done.
I wouldn't be surprised at all. Somehow the name Pyramid seems rather appropriate.

339
Full MemberFull Member
339

PostMay 07, 2010#277

threeonefour wrote:
The Central Scrutinizer wrote:Don't be surprised if Steffan ends up in jail before all is said and done.
I wouldn't be surprised at all. Somehow the name Pyramid seems rather appropriate.
(rimshot)

2
New MemberNew Member
2

PostMay 17, 2010#278

There are several HVAC and electric contractors parked outside the building this morning. Anyone know why?

1
New MemberNew Member
1

PostMay 17, 2010#279

I would think they are parked there while they work on repairs at the Laclede Gas building...just speculation

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostMay 17, 2010#280

Chris1 wrote:There are several HVAC and electric contractors parked outside the building this morning. Anyone know why?
Maybe the air conditioner quit working?

1,093
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,093

PostMay 19, 2010#281

The Central Scrutinizer wrote:
Chris1 wrote:There are several HVAC and electric contractors parked outside the building this morning. Anyone know why?
Maybe the air conditioner quit working?
way too funny.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostAug 13, 2010#282

According to the Business Journal, the RFP has been issued and there has been some interest, although there's no indication as to who the prospective developers are.

Proposals due Sept. 30. The city is willing to mothball the building if necessary.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostAug 14, 2010#283

Any way we can get a copy of the RFP?

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostAug 15, 2010#284

Alex Ihnen wrote:Any way we can get a copy of the RFP?
Scroll down about half way: http://stlouis.missouri.org/development ... s/rfp-rfq/

1,364
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,364

PostAug 30, 2010#285

The "C" document has some interior pictures. The elevator shaft is interesting.

There's also an aerial photogaph from 1952. The warehouses on the riverfront had already been demolished but the arch was not there yet. Interesting picture. Kind of sad, too. In 1952 Downtown was much more dense. It is odd to see the arch grounds as a giant parking lot. The 1971 map shows Busch Stadium.

It's amazing how much Downtown has changed over time. It's a shame in a lot of ways.

8,907
Life MemberLife Member
8,907

PostAug 30, 2010#286

Re - elevator shafts. The elevator cars were dropped from the top floors by a previous owner in an attempt to get the building condemned. Why? So they could tear down the A/W and PB buildings to build a gothic style parking garage.

1,364
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,364

PostAug 30, 2010#287

Someone that stupid and dangerous should never be allowed to own a building.

Did it do any substantial damage? Do you think the building is an any danger?

258
Full MemberFull Member
258

PostSep 02, 2010#288

I would bet on it being no problem for the building. Usually elevator shafts are pretty well built, and also all of the force from an elevator falling would be straight down so that should have been pretty easily transfered into the foundations.

In my opinion, if the building was in any danger, it would most likely have been due to environmental exposure.

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostOct 01, 2010#289

Proposal deadline pushed back. Interesting quote....

City development officials might be open to a variety of plans except one: Replacing the Arcade with surface parking.

http://www.stltoday.com/business/column ... 78c22.html

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostOct 01, 2010#290

But a nice tall multi-level parking garage may just work! :)

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostOct 01, 2010#291

ha, I had the same thought!

1,877
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,877

PostOct 13, 2010#292

Developer wants to buy Arcade Building for $1, then rehab it
ST. LOUIS • A developer is proposing a nearly $80 million rehab of the vacant Arcade Building for companies doing business through the proposed Midwest China Cargo Hub at Lambert-St. Louis International Airport.

The plan made public Tuesday also calls for using parts of the downtown building as data centers, lab space and final assembly of 'small high-value electronic devices." But the primary use proposed by Global Facilities Development, of Encinitas, Calif., would be as a sales and office center for the planned cargo hub.

Bruce DeBolt, the company's chief executive, said he sees potential for the Arcade as an international trade center.
^ Full story at the link.

-RBB

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostOct 13, 2010#293

This article makes the proposal sound like a big bag of magical thinking with little substance behind it. Has this developer ever exectued this type or development before? Have they ever done business with Air China, or any other foreign or multinational corporation before? Is a realistic and appropriate plan for the arcade itself to have it be a showcase for various foreign companies?

If St. Louis/Lambert were to become a China cargo hub (which is still a total unknown) I imagine most of the initial investments would comprise of warehouses and logistics offices in and around Lambert.

The idea that The Arcade will become some sort of cutting edge world trade center just seems to be way ahead of itself. I would much rather see an experienced developer convert it to retail in the arcade and along the sidewalk, office space on the first few floors, and apartments on the upper floors, in a more conventional and time-tested model.

"lab space and final assembly of 'small high-value electronic devices" What the? Seriously? They should also propose a monorail while they're at it.

8,907
Life MemberLife Member
8,907

PostOct 13, 2010#294

Not only that but they propose that $68 mill of the $80 million dollar project would be financed through TIF and Tax credits...

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostOct 13, 2010#295

The developer is screwed. I just bid $2. Your move, sucker...

I agree with Wabash's sentiment. Here's their website FWIW: http://globalfacilitiesdevelopment.com/

1,448
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,448

PostOct 13, 2010#296

I don't know, I really like the plan. It sounds visionary to me, but then again I'm practically a rube when it comes to such things. But to me, this sounds like an extremely exciting opportunity for downtown and for the region as a whole. "Retail, offices, and apartments" is tried-and-true as a concept, but I'd like for us to swing for the fences every now and then too.

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostOct 13, 2010#297

Wow. I am very disappointed that there was only 1 proposal submitted for the Arcade. Its also disappointing that the only proposal was for $1. I think the potential developer is greedy but what do you expect when you are the only one that has submitted a proposal. You set your own price.
 
I think the China Trade offices are interesting and am all for it but what if we don’t get the China Hub. What is the new primary use and is there a backup plan.
 
In regards to the data center, I am not sure if I am on board with a data center occupying such an important building like this. I would be interested in knowing how much of the building would be used for the data center. Some will say that they bring in jobs, which is true, however is it enough jobs for the amount of square footage it occupies? Do we really want the storage of data taking up space in such a beautiful and important building? I think not. I would much rather see residential take the place of the data center.
 
Where are the heavy hitters in the region? Does the region really have any idea or care how important this building is? Why can’t we create an interest in the business community to have companies relocate their operation in this building. Build a Bear just relocated to Sunset Hills. Why couldn’t we have attracted them to move into the Arcade.
 

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostOct 14, 2010#298

^I agree with all your points. Without seeing the details of their proposal, I'm guessing—

This building has large plats. The windows/views are the best feature of the building but, you can't fill the entire floor with offices. That's why sliver buildings are being built. The 'data center' could occupy the core of the structure, while ample office/apt/whatnot would occupy the ring.

The floors with the most interesting features—the large, vaulted windows—would be reserved for human occupied space.

They are the only bidders so they can call the shots to some extent. Their website seems to project they know what they're doing regarding international development. The parent company (according to their site/google search) deals with building materials/fabrication in China and the US. It would seem they know what they're talking about. Furthermore, their interest seems to validate the China hub.

Looking for the silver lining in all this.

907
Super MemberSuper Member
907

PostOct 14, 2010#299

Here we go....

Have Peabody buy it and make it their new HQ. Only have to move 2 blocks north.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostOct 14, 2010#300

It may not be my best idea (and frankly I don't know what would be...), but I'd love to see a coal museum in the arcade of the Arcade Building. Why not?

Read more posts (462 remaining)