249
Junior MemberJunior Member
249

PostJan 31, 2016#276

Seeing the rehab patterns here in TGS and Shaw, I'm wondering how much of that drop was a function of former 4 families getting converted to 2 families, and 2 families to single family dwellings, etc.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 31, 2016#277

^ Certainly a fair amount, but I think a lot of it last decade was older folks retiring or passing away and the more marginal losing their homes or being driven out (the latter moreso in Shaw than TGS). The amount of vacant housing units in 2010 actually grew from 2000, and the great recession certainly took its toll. But the good news is that if we make good progress in filling them up we can still grow a fair amount even without new construction and smallish average household size.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostJan 31, 2016#278

roger wyoming II wrote:I lifted this comment by urban_dilettante from another thread over here:

» Sat Jan 30, 2016 8:21 pm
^ there may be a few more. seems like Shaw, Tower Grove South and Southampton are all growing, for example. any others?
yeah, i think "growing" was a poor choice of words. those neighborhoods all feel more activated to me than they did 10 or 15 years ago, though. And they all seem to have a considerable amount of rehab activity going on (probably of the flat-to-single-family variety that andrew mentioned).

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 31, 2016#279

^ definitely.... more investment and activity. TGS compared to Shaw though, in part b/c it is larger geographically and has a wider stock of housing types, retains more racial and socio-economic diversity while Shaw pretty much is flat out gentrifying and losing its diversity,

PostJan 31, 2016#280

by PeterXCV » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:37 am

It's difficult to find an entire page on the city's website devoted to the definitions but they do so here on the city's 2010 census results page http://dynamic.stlouis-mo.gov/census/corridor.cfm . Central Corridor neighborhoods are Skinker Debaliviere, Debaliviere Place, Wydown Skinker, the Dogtown neighborhoods, Kings Oak, FPSE, Botanical/Mcree Town, Tiffany, Gate District, CWE, MIdtown, Grand Center, Laffayette Square, Peabody-Darst Webbe, Lasalle and Downtown/Downtown West.

^ brought over from another thread

I agree with the sentiment that it seems that say Lafayette Square and The Gate are considered Central Corridor but not Columbus Park or Carr Square which are just a couple blocks to WashAve. Seems like if Delmar is the divide with the North Corridor, then either I-64 or Chouteau/Manchester should be the boundary for the South Corridor and not i-44/55. Not sure though the city's designation impacts actual planning/funding etc.

1,102
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,102

PostJan 31, 2016#281

There certainly is a difference in race with the lower central corridor/near southside neighborhoods as compared with the north city neighborhoods that border the central corridor (see statistics at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neighborh ... _St._Louis) as in the 'whitest' near northside neighborhood of West End is 8.1%, still lower than Peabody/Darst Webbe at 10.3%. It makes me wonder if race played a role with the city drawing up these distinctions when they were made however long ago.

On a related note I'm curious about what the 2020 census will have to say about the near southside in terms of race. If you look at the racial demographics of the city there's clearly a band (with Lafayette being the exception) of black-majority neighborhoods between Chouteau and I-44 and frankly I wonder how much longer that will be the case. It's difficult to say if this is positive (integration/redevelopment) vs. negative (gentrification/urban renewal) but it doesn't seem unlikely to me that Botanical Heights and FPSE will not be majority black by 2020 and that it's a matter of time before something similar happens in The Gate District and Tiffany (Darst Webbe and Lasalle being less influenced due to public housing).

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJan 31, 2016#282

^ I think that's all spot on. Certainly the renewed interest in these nabes is needed and a good thing but on the other hand the massive movement of blacks out of these neighborhoods is concerning and something that needs to be addressed. With Tiffany, I can also see the new hospital being a significant driver for renewed interest in that nabe and potentially for the The Gate District (which to me is one of the oddest in our city.)

PostMar 17, 2016#283

2015 population estimates for Counties (including STL City) will be out any day now... any predictions? I say steady as she goes, with slight loss in the City and slight gain in the County. Biggest gain in St. Chuck's.

Age, sex, race breakdown will be released in June.... if pattern holds there it will show more whites and fewer blacks in the city and more blacks and fewer whites in the county. And slight increase in Hispanics & Asians in both.

2,037
Life MemberLife Member
2,037

PostMar 17, 2016#284

Could the City be potentially on track to be plurality white in 2020?

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMar 17, 2016#285

^ Likely before.

403
Full MemberFull Member
403

PostMar 18, 2016#286

St.Louis City will be neutral and County will have slight gain St. Charles county moderate gains

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostMar 18, 2016#287

Even if the city has no gains, it will probably have higher incomes. And be white plurality, which might start to change the calculus of regional cooperation.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMar 18, 2016#288

^ hard to say if the City overall will have income levels above what we might expect as a reflection of overall national and regional economic growth. Certainly there are parts of our City that are seeing some serious new money, but at the same time other parts continue to face serious challenges and disinvestment.

2,685
Life MemberLife Member
2,685

PostMar 18, 2016#289

http://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-re ... 16-44.html
Will be released to public on Thursday, March 24th.

2,056
Life MemberLife Member
2,056

PostMar 23, 2016#290

I guess I'm just realizing this, but the "Clayco East Loop: 14-Story Apartment Proposal" will be in St. Louis City population... that would be 200+ people if they fill that building.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMar 23, 2016#291

^ results to vary depending on where they are moving from. But it should add 200+ to the West End neighborhood as it's unlikely many of the residents will come from there.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 23, 2016#292

pattimagee wrote:I guess I'm just realizing this, but the "Clayco East Loop: 14-Story Apartment Proposal" will be in St. Louis City population... that would be 200+ people if they fill that building.
More like 400

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMar 24, 2016#293

addxb2 wrote:http://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-re ... 16-44.html
Will be released to public on Thursday, March 24th.
I'm going to go with another slight loss for the city and another slight gain for the county. But I wouldn't be surprised by a slight gain for the city and slight loss for the county.

2,685
Life MemberLife Member
2,685

PostMar 24, 2016#294

Census projections have the city taking a sharp turn for the worst, now at 315,685
also 4 homicides today. Keep bringing the good news.

PostMar 24, 2016#295

What an ass.

Yael Abouhalkah.

9,558
Life MemberLife Member
9,558

PostMar 24, 2016#296

^ he is an expert troll.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 24, 2016#297

Not seeing new numbers on the census website.

2,685
Life MemberLife Member
2,685

PostMar 24, 2016#298

quincunx wrote:Not seeing new numbers on the census website.
http://www.freep.com/story/news/2016/03 ... /82186278/

3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostMar 24, 2016#299

addxb2 wrote:Census projections have the city taking a sharp turn for the worst, now at 315,685
also 4 homicides today. Keep bringing the good news.
Any figures on HH Income and % with Higher Education?

3,544
Life MemberLife Member
3,544

PostMar 24, 2016#300

In all honesty, St. Louis will continue to fade as a region until there is some real kind of unification between the city and county. There is no excuse that cities like Nashville and Indianapolis should be growing way faster than St. Louis. The region's performance has been pathetic. Only places doing worse than St. Louis are Detroit, Cleveland, Buffalo, and Pittsburgh. Not exactly who we want to be associated with. Even places like Baltimore and New Orleans are higher growing regions....its pathetic.

Read more posts (1061 remaining)