Looks like some good baby steps are being taken in Ferguson:
http://fox2now.com/2014/09/08/ferguson- ... g-changes/
http://fox2now.com/2014/09/08/ferguson- ... g-changes/
Akron is the New Saint Louis!matguy70 wrote:The grass is always greener somewhere else. If you feel there are better pastures waiting for you - C'est la vie. Ciao
i'd like to add, though, that sticking it out because you care about a place is a cause as good as any other. if you're seriously unhappy, then go. if you can provide better for your family elsewhere, then go. But don't delegitimize other people's drive to better a place—even at the expense of their salary or professional advancement—in order to rationalize your own desire to leave. it boils down to priorities.STLEnginerd wrote:If you have to go for your career's sake or your families sake, then by all means GO. Loyalty to a city should not be at the expense of your own livelihood. St. Louis is a great place to be but there are plenty of others. Just please don't blame STL for you pursuing the best course for you and your family.
Also, I wonder how much jobs numbers are distorted and vary from area to area by the age demographic breakdown in any particular area. I wonder if around here one factor distorting things is there are more people leaving the job market due to retirement than entering it, where instead of new jobs created its filling jobs by people retiring.arch city wrote:The St. Louis jobs market is still about 30-to-40,000 jobs below its pre-recession peak level, while cities such as Pittsburgh and Dallas have regained their lost jobs. Pittsburgh and Dallas recovered in 2012.
By comparison, Kansas City is only about 12-14,000 jobs away from full recovery.
So while St. Louis certainly is adding jobs, the jobs added in the St. Louis region certainly aren't enough to send new immigrants or domestics running to St. Louis in waves yet. I would venture to say the jobs being added are only helping to reemploy locals who were recently underemployed or unemployed. In other words, the added jobs are not "surplus" jobs like what you find in Houston where there's a boom across all sectors. In St. Louis, they are "recovery" jobs.
And yes, one of St. Louis' bright jobs spots has been STEM employment, but a lot of the new jobs added are also service based - which aren't exactly the highest paying jobs like STEM jobs.
This is really getting to me. I love this city and have lived here for multiple years, I have been to more places than anyone I know 45 countries and 40 states, and really can't see what the natives constantly complain about.We are way to hard on ourselves
But when hard numbers are staring us in the face (very low population growth, job loss, corporate HQ loss etc) it's hard to be happy.Ebsy wrote:Some recent additions to our great City, on this site in particular, make it seem like the City is continuing to decline at an extraordinary rate.
Actually wasn't that what happened in a number of areas of Texas in the 1970s and 1980s due to a non-diversified economy? Which also shows things can change in not that long of a time.runbch wrote:Every city goes through ups and downs. Unless you are Detroit where the one industry you are heavily invested in takes a downswing, things will get better.