936

Post5:13 PM - Apr 27#601

Would love to see WUSTL/Barnes involved in Railway or any of the large vacant lots or buildings - they have the capital and they will bring the jobs


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

514
Senior MemberSenior Member
514

Post5:36 PM - Apr 27#602

dbInSouthCity wrote:
5:02 PM - Apr 27
Space is already constrained at BJC HealthCare / Washington University Medical Campus, so WUSTL acquiring St. Louis College of Pharmacy, it would make strategic sense to fold those existing pharmacy school buildings into the broader medical campus. That could free up an opportunity to relocate the pharmacy college itself to the Railway Exchange Building.  It’s about 1000 people between staff & students.  May need some other functions at railway but STLCOP has dorms too
is this hypothetical, creative thinking (which I appreciate) or is this somehow based on something you've heard?   Be shocked if WashU moves *anything* from the BJC campus, as the campus/transit connectivity provides enormous economies of scale.  From the outside, those dorms look terrible, btw. like a cheap hotel.

462
Full MemberFull Member
462

Post6:11 PM - Apr 27#603

I would love to see that; however, since WashU owns Fontbonne, I believe that will address any needed space.

9,621
Life MemberLife Member
9,621

Post6:17 PM - Apr 27#604

soulardx wrote:
5:36 PM - Apr 27
dbInSouthCity wrote:
5:02 PM - Apr 27
Space is already constrained at BJC HealthCare / Washington University Medical Campus, so WUSTL acquiring St. Louis College of Pharmacy, it would make strategic sense to fold those existing pharmacy school buildings into the broader medical campus. That could free up an opportunity to relocate the pharmacy college itself to the Railway Exchange Building.  It’s about 1000 people between staff & students.  May need some other functions at railway but STLCOP has dorms too
is this hypothetical, creative thinking (which I appreciate) or is this somehow based on something you've heard?   Be shocked if WashU moves *anything* from the BJC campus, as the campus/transit connectivity provides enormous economies of scale.  From the outside, those dorms look terrible, btw. like a cheap hotel.
Bit of both, a university has looked at the building in 2026

1,121
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,121

Post6:01 PM - 17 days ago#605

I've been seeing stories that the demo of the garage and charlie gitto's is moving forward through the City's bureaucracy. Does anyone know if the Charlie Gitto's building can be demo'd without going to the preservation board? And if so why? 

961
Super MemberSuper Member
961

Post8:43 PM - 13 days ago#606


44

Post10:10 PM - 6 days ago#607

PeterXCV wrote:
6:01 PM - 17 days ago
I've been seeing stories that the demo of the garage and charlie gitto's is moving forward through the City's bureaucracy. Does anyone know if the Charlie Gitto's building can be demo'd without going to the preservation board? And if so why? 
Currently the building's demolition would be reviewed by the Cultural Resources Office (and perhaps the Preservation Board, if the CRO determines the building to be "high merit"). If the Board of Aldermen were to pass a redevelopment ordinance specifically suspending the review, the demolition permit could be issued by the Building Division at any time -- but no legislation is pending yet.

1,121
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,121

Post11:23 PM - 6 days ago#608

Thanks Michael, I'm curious what the CRO will do. 

116
Junior MemberJunior Member
116

Post5:14 PM - 5 days ago#609

Letter: Instead of saving the Railway Exchange Building, make it a park

Why, just why. I do not think Mr. Barket fully understands the architectural significance of this building, nor do I think he understands just how abundant green space already is in Downtown. He wants a “Town Square”-type space, well, one already exists exactly one block away from Railway, the Old Post Office Plaza. Is this a serious idea, or just a joke/ragebait?
IMG_0468.jpeg (3.02MiB)

Post5:16 PM - 5 days ago#610

Also, is anyone able to read comments on P-D articles? This letter has 12 comments which I would be very interested in seeing, but I haven’t been able to read comments on articles for a long time now. I’ve tried following their directions to enable cookies and whatnot, but it doesn’t work.

94
New MemberNew Member
94

Post5:37 PM - 5 days ago#611

I'd strongly suggest not reading the P-D comments. 95% of them are the exact garbage you'd expect.

EDIT: I just read them and actually most of them are deriding this idea, lol. I spoke too soon

207
Junior MemberJunior Member
207

Post5:37 PM - 5 days ago#612

What the heck is going on with this project? 

3,776
Life MemberLife Member
3,776

Post6:06 PM - 5 days ago#613

I'm just as curious why it is taking so long to demo the RX parking garage. Damn, pick a demo contractor (if you haven't) & knock down the damn thing! Why the delay?! 

Anyone know when demo is set to begin?

1,121
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,121

Post1:40 AM - 5 days ago#614

The why not more parks is a common delusion of people who don't think too hard about anything. That's my best explanation.

582
Senior MemberSenior Member
582

Post2:28 AM - 5 days ago#615

PeterXCV wrote:The why not more parks is a common delusion of people who don't think too hard about anything. That's my best explanation.
Feels like all the letters and opinions in the P-D on downtown recently have been absolute garbage. Bill McClellan has an opinion piece a few days ago where he declares the Landing should be the late night district while the rest of downtown should be closed after 10 because of "lawlessness", and the ultimate cure to downtown's woes are more jobs and after-work drinks.

It's all just so unserious.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

Post1:04 PM - 4 days ago#616

I find McClellan entertaining, but his mindset is definitely stuck in the last century. 

514
Senior MemberSenior Member
514

Post1:51 PM - 4 days ago#617

framer wrote:
1:04 PM - 4 days ago
I find McClellan entertaining, but his mindset is definitely stuck in the last century. 
that's his whole schtick!  but, yes. agree.  like having a convo with my dad.

1,627
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,627

Post4:17 PM - 4 days ago#618

Hahahahaha

207
Junior MemberJunior Member
207

Post10:37 PM - 4 days ago#619

be bold 
tear it down 
in its place
put this:  https://ambrook.com/offrange/environment/a-forest-in-your-pocket

1,645
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,645

Post11:21 AM - 3 days ago#620

Basically all the raggedy parking garages will have to be torn down. Theoretically, if there was a day in the future where one of the old parking garages were at capacity with 90% electric vehicles it would very likely collapse under the weight. This is a problem across the country with old parking garages.

9,621
Life MemberLife Member
9,621

Post10:14 PM - 1 day ago#621

I took a prospective buyer of locust and tucker garage to city hall last week for a meeting and it went well.  He would demolish it and build a mixed use garage.

936

Post11:20 PM - 1 day ago#622

What about a mixed used building that includes a garage…I would like that quite a bit better

Mixed use garages are still scourges on downtown


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

116
Junior MemberJunior Member
116

Post2:15 AM - Today#623

StlAlex wrote:
2:28 AM - 5 days ago
PeterXCV wrote:The why not more parks is a common delusion of people who don't think too hard about anything. That's my best explanation.
Feels like all the letters and opinions in the P-D on downtown recently have been absolute garbage. Bill McClellan has an opinion piece a few days ago where he declares the Landing should be the late night district while the rest of downtown should be closed after 10 because of "lawlessness", and the ultimate cure to downtown's woes are more jobs and after-work drinks.

It's all just so unserious.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
I actually found some of them rather insightful and useful. Of course, there was the usual crop of haters and “it’s too dangerous” naysayers, but I tend to tune them out.

Post2:19 AM - Today#624

dbInSouthCity wrote:
10:14 PM - 1 day ago
I took a prospective buyer of locust and tucker garage to city hall last week for a meeting and it went well.  He would demolish it and build a mixed use garage.
I’m sorry, I know I’ve asked this before, but I don’t remember what the response was. I’m almost certain that Alterra said they were planning to rehab that garage and use it for Jefferson Arms guests and residents. They were also planning to reactivate the first floor retail in that garage. Has that deal fallen through, or is this Alterra’s new plan? Am curious to know whatever else you can share right now.

By the way, I’m in your guys’ neck of the woods right now. Drove past Downtown on I-44 earlier today on my way down from Lambert. The city really does look spectacular. Don’t take that for granted, honestly. I was almost overtaken by the beauty of the skyline, it had an even bigger effect on me for some reason than my last visit,

9,621
Life MemberLife Member
9,621

Post2:21 AM - Today#625

Ragtimer wrote:
2:19 AM - Today
dbInSouthCity wrote:
10:14 PM - 1 day ago
I took a prospective buyer of locust and tucker garage to city hall last week for a meeting and it went well.  He would demolish it and build a mixed use garage.
I’m sorry, I know I’ve asked this before, but I don’t remember what the response was. I’m almost certain that Alterra said they were planning to rehab that garage and use it for Jefferson Arms guests and residents. They were also planning to reactivate the first floor retail in that garage. Has that deal fallen through, or is this Alterra’s new plan? Am curious to know whatever else you can share right now.
They don’t have the money for it.

If you recall it was announced they bought the Syndicate but that’s back on market. Never closed.

Read more posts (2 remaining)