Would love to see WUSTL/Barnes involved in Railway or any of the large vacant lots or buildings - they have the capital and they will bring the jobs
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
is this hypothetical, creative thinking (which I appreciate) or is this somehow based on something you've heard? Be shocked if WashU moves *anything* from the BJC campus, as the campus/transit connectivity provides enormous economies of scale. From the outside, those dorms look terrible, btw. like a cheap hotel.dbInSouthCity wrote: ↑5:02 PM - Apr 27Space is already constrained at BJC HealthCare / Washington University Medical Campus, so WUSTL acquiring St. Louis College of Pharmacy, it would make strategic sense to fold those existing pharmacy school buildings into the broader medical campus. That could free up an opportunity to relocate the pharmacy college itself to the Railway Exchange Building. It’s about 1000 people between staff & students. May need some other functions at railway but STLCOP has dorms too
Bit of both, a university has looked at the building in 2026soulardx wrote: ↑5:36 PM - Apr 27is this hypothetical, creative thinking (which I appreciate) or is this somehow based on something you've heard? Be shocked if WashU moves *anything* from the BJC campus, as the campus/transit connectivity provides enormous economies of scale. From the outside, those dorms look terrible, btw. like a cheap hotel.dbInSouthCity wrote: ↑5:02 PM - Apr 27Space is already constrained at BJC HealthCare / Washington University Medical Campus, so WUSTL acquiring St. Louis College of Pharmacy, it would make strategic sense to fold those existing pharmacy school buildings into the broader medical campus. That could free up an opportunity to relocate the pharmacy college itself to the Railway Exchange Building. It’s about 1000 people between staff & students. May need some other functions at railway but STLCOP has dorms too
Currently the building's demolition would be reviewed by the Cultural Resources Office (and perhaps the Preservation Board, if the CRO determines the building to be "high merit"). If the Board of Aldermen were to pass a redevelopment ordinance specifically suspending the review, the demolition permit could be issued by the Building Division at any time -- but no legislation is pending yet.PeterXCV wrote: ↑6:01 PM - 16 days agoI've been seeing stories that the demo of the garage and charlie gitto's is moving forward through the City's bureaucracy. Does anyone know if the Charlie Gitto's building can be demo'd without going to the preservation board? And if so why?
Feels like all the letters and opinions in the P-D on downtown recently have been absolute garbage. Bill McClellan has an opinion piece a few days ago where he declares the Landing should be the late night district while the rest of downtown should be closed after 10 because of "lawlessness", and the ultimate cure to downtown's woes are more jobs and after-work drinks.PeterXCV wrote:The why not more parks is a common delusion of people who don't think too hard about anything. That's my best explanation.
that's his whole schtick! but, yes. agree. like having a convo with my dad.framer wrote: ↑1:04 PM - 3 days agoI find McClellan entertaining, but his mindset is definitely stuck in the last century.