5,704
Life MemberLife Member
5,704

Post4:33 PM - Feb 11#201

^ Yes, I agree it is part of it but it data center usage only accounted for 4% and maybe double by 2030.   There is a lot going on and like everything else, like roads and bridges, we are good at adding but not maintaining it while finding the villian/blame game being the easy answer.  Some answers on electric rising prices and some answers on how much power is coming online (still a fair share of solar) & proposed.    In the meantime everything we do on this blog is digital and data going through the infrastructure you need to maintain it.

 https://time.com/7355839/why-are-electr ... high-2026/

Data Centers

Demand for electricity has been skyrocketing in the U.S.—and it’s only expected to go up. That’s due in large part to a rising number of data centers cropping up in neighborhoods around the country. Data centers accounted for 4% of total U.S. electricity use in 2024, and their energy demand is expected to more than double by 2030.

https://www.utilitydive.com/news/us-ins ... Commission.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

Post4:36 PM - Feb 11#202

Terrible time to spike solar, wind, and transmission lines like Grain Belt Express.

117
Junior MemberJunior Member
117

Post6:38 PM - Feb 11#203

chris fuller wrote:any caves/mines in the region?
In Finland, something extraordinary is happening beneath the surface—literally. While most countries struggle to cool energy-hungry data centers or burn fuel to heat homes during harsh winters, Finland has found a brilliant way to solve both problems at once. The country is now heating entire cities using waste heat from underground data centers built inside old bomb shelters and abandoned mines.
https://delmergroup.com/en-us/blogs/news/finland-is-heating-entire-cities-using-waste-heat-from-underground-data-centers-a-sustainability-masterclass
Maybe near Waterloo and New Valmeyer? Some of the caves in the bluff could be used for that sort of thing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5,704
Life MemberLife Member
5,704

Post8:05 PM - Feb 11#204

quincunx wrote:
4:36 PM - Feb 11
Terrible time to spike solar, wind, and transmission lines like Grain Belt Express.
Absolutely, killing cheap/clean reliable immediate energy to appease Trump is another idiotic move within our society

Fortunately for Northeast/Mid Atlantic states the courts have been siding with the offshore wind guys.  See those huge offshore wind power towers every time I travel to Norfolk for work.    But a lot of damage done and because of that the folks will pay a premium on their electricity.   We talk data centers but reality is idealogy and fossil fuel profits is driving energy policy right now in a very big way.   

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

Post10:27 PM - Feb 11#205

Nuclear is the future. Even hard-core environmentalists are starting to see the light.

951
Super MemberSuper Member
951

Post1:04 AM - Feb 12#206

A majority of the NRC is now Trump appointees. And last month, he named the new chair of the NRC, and pretty much immediately they published new rules that are going to allow nuclear startups connected to Trump-friendly investors to fast-track construction:
https://www.eenews.net/articles/trump-replaces-nrc-chair-as-he-remakes-agency/

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

Post1:55 AM - Feb 12#207

Did anyone attend the planning commission meeting?

Post5:47 PM - Feb 12#208

Stl PR - Ameren Missouri signed confidential contracts with multiple big data centers this week

Multiple large data centers have signed binding electric agreements with Ameren Missouri this week, CEO Marty Lyons said during the company’s earnings call Thursday.
“We're off to an exciting start to 2026, February in particular,” Lyons said.
The agreements total 2.2GW of new demand for electricity, which is almost the entire capacity of the Labadie coal plant, Ameren’s largest power plant. A new gas plant that received approval to build Wednesday would generate a peak of 800MW.
https://www.stlpr.org/health-science-en ... -this-week

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

Post10:23 PM - Feb 12#209

WTAF. These deep pockets have to pay for their power and their impact on power availability.

2,675
Life MemberLife Member
2,675

Post11:57 PM - Feb 12#210

Reading the articles about the planning meeting. It's interesting how many people are using arguments related to AI impact's on labor. As if all of that wouldn't happen if a City in Missouri banned data centers. Taking time to talk about the future of AI prevents neighbors from either arguing a regional case (energy, environment) or formulating regulations. 

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

Post12:33 AM - Feb 13#211

Stl PR - St. Louis residents say ‘no’ to data centers at first public hearing on proposed zoning rules

https://www.stlpr.org/government-politi ... ing-zoning

451
Full MemberFull Member
451

Post12:55 AM - Feb 13#212

The state of Democracy:

Residents hate data centers, but our elected officials are working hard to make sure sure one gets built right in the middle of the city.

Residents want light rail, but our elected officials are working hard to make sure we don't get light rail.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk


5,704
Life MemberLife Member
5,704

Post2:15 AM - Feb 13#213

StlAlex wrote:
12:55 AM - Feb 13
The state of Democracy:

Residents hate data centers, but our elected officials are working hard to make sure sure one gets built right in the middle of the city.

Residents want light rail, but our elected officials are working hard to make sure we don't get light rail.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk
Maybe this quote from the NPR argument is how you can afford light rail.  Maybe you got a mayor understands what Sean is telling the alderman

Sean Faust, a resident of Ward 1, was among a handful of speakers who called for “sensible” rules for data center development, pointing to the potential tax revenue from the projects that cost more than $1 billion.

“This is a revenue opportunity for our city,” he said. “We have police officers that are looking to get more money. We have city employees looking to get more money. We have SLPS that's talking about closing schools. We need revenue.”

451
Full MemberFull Member
451

Post3:06 AM - Feb 13#214

dredger wrote:
StlAlex wrote:
12:55 AM - Feb 13
The state of Democracy:

Residents hate data centers, but our elected officials are working hard to make sure sure one gets built right in the middle of the city.

Residents want light rail, but our elected officials are working hard to make sure we don't get light rail.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk
Maybe this quote from the NPR argument is how you can afford light rail.  Maybe you got a mayor understands what Sean is telling the alderman

Sean Faust, a resident of Ward 1, was among a handful of speakers who called for “sensible” rules for data center development, pointing to the potential tax revenue from the projects that cost more than $1 billion.

“This is a revenue opportunity for our city,” he said. “We have police officers that are looking to get more money. We have city employees looking to get more money. We have SLPS that's talking about closing schools. We need revenue.”
Brother, if these data centers were being proposed in the parts of the city that are already industrial wastelands and not places that people have higher expectations for, you wouldn't see the opposition we see here.

There's also the very real problem of future expendability of these developments is being wholly overlooked. No matter how many people in this thread want to talk up AI, we have yet to see the abundant revenue that shareholders have been promised and the AI industry is one of the largest bubbles we have ever seen. (This is also all putting aside the fact AI steals and distorts human made content, will and already has stunted human job growth, is currently killing our education system, and is being used frequently in propaganda.....it's a moral evil). There is a world where the city bends over backwards to accomodate the unpopular billionaires just to get screwed when the bubble bursts and it's no longer needed. Or maybe it sticks around for a while, but do you think the technology will stop developing? Will these massive data centers always be needed? Remember how many office buildings were built downtown 40 years go? 1010 Market, 600 Washington, BoA Plaza, US Bank Plaza, ATT, and Met Square were all built between 1976 and 1988. I don't know for sure but I'm sure at least some of them received tax breaks. Objectively, we have an abundance of office space with no easy ways out, in large part because the city bent over backwards to accomadate the big businesses and suburban workforces and short term gain over the long-term health of the city.

And this is all assuming we get some insane tax revenue, none of which is a sure thing, and there aren't adverse affects that are being overlooked/ignored.

And SLPS closing schools is objectively good and much needed, anyone disagreeing is just objectively wrong. They don't have a funding issue whatsoever.

Edit: Another great example of the city not looking past its nose is the St. Louis Marketplace on Manchester. Look how great that turned out.....

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk




117
Junior MemberJunior Member
117

Post4:32 AM - Feb 13#215

StlAlex wrote:The state of Democracy:

Residents hate data centers, but our elected officials are working hard to make sure sure one gets built right in the middle of the city.

Residents want light rail, but our elected officials are working hard to make sure we don't get light rail.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk
Here’s the issue, tons of private capital goes into data centers and very little goes into rail, Brightline being the notable exception. All we can do on AI is wait until the bubble bursts. That’s why I had the idea to move data center building to Monroe County, well outside of St. Louis.

Rail is an issue because sadly our country has no idea on how to build rail inexpensively. That’s not a St. Louis issue. That’s an issue with the country. Metro doesn’t really have any people on their own that can do basic construction jobs and they also massively overspent on the new gates. That’s not exactly going to earn trust on new projects.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

451
Full MemberFull Member
451

Post4:58 AM - Feb 13#216

Fraydog wrote:
StlAlex wrote:The state of Democracy:

Residents hate data centers, but our elected officials are working hard to make sure sure one gets built right in the middle of the city.

Residents want light rail, but our elected officials are working hard to make sure we don't get light rail.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk
Here’s the issue, tons of private capital goes into data centers and very little goes into rail, Brightline being the notable exception. All we can do on AI is wait until the bubble bursts. That’s why I had the idea to move data center building to Monroe County, well outside of St. Louis.

Rail is an issue because sadly our country has no idea on how to build rail inexpensively. That’s not a St. Louis issue. That’s an issue with the country. Metro doesn’t really have any people on their own that can do basic construction jobs and they also massively overspent on the new gates. That’s not exactly going to earn trust on new projects.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well aware capital is the problem, most on here are not.

Sent from my SM-G990U2 using Tapatalk


12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

Post5:00 PM - Feb 13#217

AI: The 21st Century Bogeyman.

2,928
Life MemberLife Member
2,928

Post8:32 PM - Feb 13#218

If we can put data centers in the industrial areas, and get around a billion in new revenues apiece from them, then that'd be great. There are plenty of spots along Hall Street that can host big data centers, including the old Workhouse site. Imagine what the City could do with a couple extra billion in new revenues... 

117
Junior MemberJunior Member
117

Post8:37 PM - Feb 13#219

framer wrote:AI: The 21st Century Bogeyman.
When you don’t have a good argument… people have a right to be concerned about power consumption, environmental issues, and societal effects. I’m not anti-AI but this sort of cheerleading isn’t it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

488
Full MemberFull Member
488

Post8:50 PM - Feb 13#220

Fraydog wrote:
8:37 PM - Feb 13
framer wrote:AI: The 21st Century Bogeyman.
When you don’t have a good argument… people have a right to be concerned about power consumption, environmental issues, and societal effects. I’m not anti-AI but this sort of cheerleading isn’t it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I still don't fully understand what we should be concerned about?  I've used AI in many different ways at my job and personally - it seems super helpful at a lot of things.

Any activity requires inputs.  If it takes an accountant 1 hour to do 15 tax returns with the help of AI or it takes them 20 hours to do 15 tax returns without AI, are we sure we know which one is using more energy?

If an estate lawyer can now draft documents for 30 people a day instead of 3 people is the world worse because maybe we need less legal help - or is it better because now more people may be able to afford legal help?  Which one is going to happen?  I don't feel confident in a prediction.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

Post9:08 PM - Feb 13#221

Just a few decades ago people feared that computers would take all the jobs away. Before that it was the steam engine. And I'm sure some caveman threw a hissy-fit the first time he saw a wheel.

New technology can be scary, but the world adapts and moves on.

173
Junior MemberJunior Member
173

Post9:10 PM - Feb 13#222

Why I’m not worried about AI job loss
https://davidoks.blog/p/why-im-not-worried-about-ai-job-loss

9,541
Life MemberLife Member
9,541

Post9:27 PM - Feb 13#223

Board of Alders votes 8-7 not to pause approval of data centers in the City

8 No Votes: Oldenburg, Cohn, Narayan, Devoti, Cox-Antwi, Clark-Hubbard, Keys, Boyd 

7 Yes Votes: Schweitzer, Velazquez, Sonnier, Browning, Tyus, Aldridge, Pres. Green 

Fascinating split, needed 10 Yes

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

Post9:38 PM - Feb 13#224

Josh Hawley actually doing something useful!

https://www.kcur.org/environment-agricu ... wer-plants

So exactly in line with what I was saying about containing their impact / effect on consumers but coming at it from different angle.

117
Junior MemberJunior Member
117

Post9:49 PM - Feb 13#225

mjbais1489 wrote:
Fraydog wrote:
8:37 PM - Feb 13
framer wrote:AI: The 21st Century Bogeyman.
When you don’t have a good argument… people have a right to be concerned about power consumption, environmental issues, and societal effects. I’m not anti-AI but this sort of cheerleading isn’t it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I still don't fully understand what we should be concerned about?  I've used AI in many different ways at my job and personally - it seems super helpful at a lot of things.

Any activity requires inputs.  If it takes an accountant 1 hour to do 15 tax returns with the help of AI or it takes them 20 hours to do 15 tax returns without AI, are we sure we know which one is using more energy?

If an estate lawyer can now draft documents for 30 people a day instead of 3 people is the world worse because maybe we need less legal help - or is it better because now more people may be able to afford legal help?  Which one is going to happen?  I don't feel confident in a prediction.
If AI is good enough to do that, who’s to say it won’t be used to eliminate those jobs altogether at the next iterative improvement? Also it’s flippant to dismiss energy concerns when coal fired power plants like Baldwin are staying online to power AI data centers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Read more posts (143 remaining)