B/w Jones and Spencer which is more concerned with building a more urban environment?
I also feel that Jones is on path to an easy victory. Her biggest challenge is speed. She has to get her projects and impact out the door much faster. I also wish someone would be honest with Butler that he’s not electable.
- 740
Where do people get the idea that Jones is going to "coast to victory"? Polls should be taken with a grain of salt, but those who completely dismiss them will likely eat their words. I think it'll be close but honestly considering the anti-incumbent mood of the electorate lately--even an overwhelmingly Democratic electorate (look at the CD-1 primary in August)-- I'd rather be Spencer to be honest.
https://info.stlmag.com/daily-newsletter-112124
https://info.stlmag.com/daily-newsletter-112124
- 9,528
Incumbent being 42 fav and 44 unfavorable is pretty good actually
Also “blurry screenshot of a poll result has made the rounds among political insiders in recent weeks”. This never happened, I am regularly texting with reporters that cover city hall/politics from papers to 3 local channels and nobody was talking about this because it’s pointless. General public doesn’t pay attention until February to the mayor’s race and even it does it’s 1 out of every 4 residents.
Also “blurry screenshot of a poll result has made the rounds among political insiders in recent weeks”. This never happened, I am regularly texting with reporters that cover city hall/politics from papers to 3 local channels and nobody was talking about this because it’s pointless. General public doesn’t pay attention until February to the mayor’s race and even it does it’s 1 out of every 4 residents.
- 6,117
Is there really that much daylight between Jones and Spencer? I can believe they might have different leadership styles, but I'm not sure what real policy differences they might have. I voted for Jones, but Spencer seems like a smart and capable woman. I don't think she'd be handing out incentives like Candy in the way the Krewson administration or previous Alderfolk did. I think they both favor road diets and smarter infrastructure. I can't imagine either of them wanting to hand away police control, say. Is the difference what to do with relief spending?
- 9,528
Thoughts from me on the 2025 Mayoral Election
St. Louis City has transitioned to a nonpartisan mayoral election system, where candidates no longer run based on party affiliation. Instead, they compete on their track record and results. This coming spring, the city will hold an election to select its next mayor. The incumbent, Mayor Tishaura Jones, is seeking re-election. Among her challengers are 8th Ward Alder Cara Spencer and Recorder of Deeds and former State Representative Michael Butler. Additional candidates may enter the race in the coming weeks.
In any election involving an incumbent, the primary question voters should ask is whether the current officeholder has demonstrated the accomplishments and leadership necessary to merit another term. In my view, which I will elaborate on in the paragraphs to follow, Mayor Jones has not only met this standard but has exceeded expectations during her tenure, earning the opportunity to serve for another four years.
First, let me address the two other candidates. Alderwoman Cara Spencer has been an outstanding public servant throughout her tenure, first as the alderwoman for the former 20th Ward and now representing the 8th Ward. Her dedication to St. Louis is evident, and she has consistently demonstrated her commitment to the city’s well-being. Many of the issues she highlights in this mayoral campaign appear to be ward-specific concerns that are most effectively addressed in her current role as alderwoman. I believe she will continue to excel in that capacity, where her focus and efforts can yield the greatest impact for the residents she represents.
Recorder of Deeds Michael Butler assumed office with a promise to modernize the office. However, after six years in the role, it is difficult to find any substantial evidence that this promise has been fulfilled. Additionally, during his time as chair of the Missouri Democratic Party, his tenure produced no significant positive results for the state party and ended in controversy. Based on this record, I find no reasonable argument to support Mr. Butler as the next mayor of St. Louis.
Mayor Tishaura Jones took office in the spring of 2021, during the early stages of recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Since then, the City of St. Louis has made significant progress in several key areas.
Public Safety:
Violent crime in the city is at its lowest in decades. While the crime rate remains high, any reduction is a positive step forward. The role of a mayor in influencing crime trends is limited, as these patterns often mirror national trends. However, local government can make impactful decisions. One such decision was Mayor Jones’s hiring of Police Chief Robert Tracy, which has contributed to the city's progress. Although much work remains, St. Louis is a safer city today than it was in 2020, 2016, 1994, or 1984.
Economic Growth and City Operations:
The city’s economy has grown to a GDP of $39 billion, ranking second in the region behind St. Louis County and well ahead of slightly larger St. Charles County. Additionally, improvements have been made in critical city services, such as 911 response times. By the summer of 2023, the administration had made significant strides in addressing staffing shortages in the 911 system, bringing response times closer to the national standard of answering 90% of calls within 10 seconds. To further enhance emergency response, the administration broke ground this year on a $41 million state-of-the-art 911 operations center, which will co-locate police and fire dispatch services—a decades long-discussed project now becoming a reality.
Police
Mayor Jones signed a historic contract with the police union, providing officers with a 10-12% pay raise, take-home vehicles, and performance bonuses. This progress in aligning compensation with that of other municipalities represents another step toward improving public safety, though additional work remains. While operating below their budgeted allocation, the SLMPD has made remarkable progress in reducing violent crime to historic lows, alongside significant decreases in overall crime over the past three years. It is my hope that the police union will work collaboratively with City Hall to enhance recruitment efforts and fulfill the department’s budgeted manpower levels. Achieving this goal would allow the SLMPD to focus not only on reducing violent crime but also on critical areas such as traffic enforcement and other quality-of-life issues that greatly impact the community. The police union has no reason to take a combative stance with City Hall, it benefits nobody, especially the taxpayers.
City Planning and Development:
With my background in transportation and land use planning I understand the need for sound plans in those areas to get this City growing again. We have talked about updating the land use plan and the zoning code and developing the first ever city-wide transportation plan for over a decade and now her administration is updating the city’s outdated zoning code and land use plan. And is finally developing a citywide transportation plan under her leadership. The administration has also acted on long-vacant properties like the Railway Exchange Building, Municipal Courts Buildings and the Millennium Hotel, projects that have remained stagnant for years. The City is also funding the development of Neighborhood Plans, letting the residents of each neighborhood have say in how the future of their neighborhood will look. Finally, city roads and bridges are getting a much-needed investment with over $300,000,000 in work between the city and partner agencies. This investment will greatly improve the transportation system and make it safer.
While challenges remain and not every policy and program went as planned, the progress over the past four years under Mayor Jones is undeniable. Even the mayor herself might acknowledge areas where she wishes progress had been faster or more comprehensive—a sentiment echoed by cities nationwide. However, the strides made during her tenure demonstrate that she has earned another four years to continue building on this momentum and addressing the challenges that got away during the first term.
St. Louis City has transitioned to a nonpartisan mayoral election system, where candidates no longer run based on party affiliation. Instead, they compete on their track record and results. This coming spring, the city will hold an election to select its next mayor. The incumbent, Mayor Tishaura Jones, is seeking re-election. Among her challengers are 8th Ward Alder Cara Spencer and Recorder of Deeds and former State Representative Michael Butler. Additional candidates may enter the race in the coming weeks.
In any election involving an incumbent, the primary question voters should ask is whether the current officeholder has demonstrated the accomplishments and leadership necessary to merit another term. In my view, which I will elaborate on in the paragraphs to follow, Mayor Jones has not only met this standard but has exceeded expectations during her tenure, earning the opportunity to serve for another four years.
First, let me address the two other candidates. Alderwoman Cara Spencer has been an outstanding public servant throughout her tenure, first as the alderwoman for the former 20th Ward and now representing the 8th Ward. Her dedication to St. Louis is evident, and she has consistently demonstrated her commitment to the city’s well-being. Many of the issues she highlights in this mayoral campaign appear to be ward-specific concerns that are most effectively addressed in her current role as alderwoman. I believe she will continue to excel in that capacity, where her focus and efforts can yield the greatest impact for the residents she represents.
Recorder of Deeds Michael Butler assumed office with a promise to modernize the office. However, after six years in the role, it is difficult to find any substantial evidence that this promise has been fulfilled. Additionally, during his time as chair of the Missouri Democratic Party, his tenure produced no significant positive results for the state party and ended in controversy. Based on this record, I find no reasonable argument to support Mr. Butler as the next mayor of St. Louis.
Mayor Tishaura Jones took office in the spring of 2021, during the early stages of recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Since then, the City of St. Louis has made significant progress in several key areas.
Public Safety:
Violent crime in the city is at its lowest in decades. While the crime rate remains high, any reduction is a positive step forward. The role of a mayor in influencing crime trends is limited, as these patterns often mirror national trends. However, local government can make impactful decisions. One such decision was Mayor Jones’s hiring of Police Chief Robert Tracy, which has contributed to the city's progress. Although much work remains, St. Louis is a safer city today than it was in 2020, 2016, 1994, or 1984.
Economic Growth and City Operations:
The city’s economy has grown to a GDP of $39 billion, ranking second in the region behind St. Louis County and well ahead of slightly larger St. Charles County. Additionally, improvements have been made in critical city services, such as 911 response times. By the summer of 2023, the administration had made significant strides in addressing staffing shortages in the 911 system, bringing response times closer to the national standard of answering 90% of calls within 10 seconds. To further enhance emergency response, the administration broke ground this year on a $41 million state-of-the-art 911 operations center, which will co-locate police and fire dispatch services—a decades long-discussed project now becoming a reality.
Police
Mayor Jones signed a historic contract with the police union, providing officers with a 10-12% pay raise, take-home vehicles, and performance bonuses. This progress in aligning compensation with that of other municipalities represents another step toward improving public safety, though additional work remains. While operating below their budgeted allocation, the SLMPD has made remarkable progress in reducing violent crime to historic lows, alongside significant decreases in overall crime over the past three years. It is my hope that the police union will work collaboratively with City Hall to enhance recruitment efforts and fulfill the department’s budgeted manpower levels. Achieving this goal would allow the SLMPD to focus not only on reducing violent crime but also on critical areas such as traffic enforcement and other quality-of-life issues that greatly impact the community. The police union has no reason to take a combative stance with City Hall, it benefits nobody, especially the taxpayers.
City Planning and Development:
With my background in transportation and land use planning I understand the need for sound plans in those areas to get this City growing again. We have talked about updating the land use plan and the zoning code and developing the first ever city-wide transportation plan for over a decade and now her administration is updating the city’s outdated zoning code and land use plan. And is finally developing a citywide transportation plan under her leadership. The administration has also acted on long-vacant properties like the Railway Exchange Building, Municipal Courts Buildings and the Millennium Hotel, projects that have remained stagnant for years. The City is also funding the development of Neighborhood Plans, letting the residents of each neighborhood have say in how the future of their neighborhood will look. Finally, city roads and bridges are getting a much-needed investment with over $300,000,000 in work between the city and partner agencies. This investment will greatly improve the transportation system and make it safer.
While challenges remain and not every policy and program went as planned, the progress over the past four years under Mayor Jones is undeniable. Even the mayor herself might acknowledge areas where she wishes progress had been faster or more comprehensive—a sentiment echoed by cities nationwide. However, the strides made during her tenure demonstrate that she has earned another four years to continue building on this momentum and addressing the challenges that got away during the first term.
- 209
Well said and kindly worded. A consultant/marketeer would be jealous. I agree with many of your points. But how do you justify the appointments at jail, SLDC and takes or lack of on SLPS, parks, refuse and streets issues. I hear you, we are a weak mayoral power city, there's only so much they can do. But the people she puts in high dollar department jobs don't deliver the services/dignity they are supposed to provide. I'm not sure Jones relates to what we, the hoi polloi, see and experience with city services, all the while our taxes go up. I'm not trying to be a jerk, just trying to dig a layer deeper to see why we wouldn't want a new boss, somewhat same as the old boss...change/hope is good. What do I know? I just want the basics and dream of bureaucrats that do a solid, non-corrupt, non-controversial job that deliver services on par with the suburban cities.dbInSouthCity wrote: ↑Dec 10, 2024Thoughts from me on the 2025 Mayoral Election
St. Louis City has transitioned to a nonpartisan mayoral election system, where candidates no longer run based on party affiliation. Instead, they compete on their track record and results. This coming spring, the city will hold an election to select its next mayor. The incumbent, Mayor Tishaura Jones, is seeking re-election. Among her challengers are 8th Ward Alder Cara Spencer and Recorder of Deeds and former State Representative Michael Butler. Additional candidates may enter the race in the coming weeks.
In any election involving an incumbent, the primary question voters should ask is whether the current officeholder has demonstrated the accomplishments and leadership necessary to merit another term. In my view, which I will elaborate on in the paragraphs to follow, Mayor Jones has not only met this standard but has exceeded expectations during her tenure, earning the opportunity to serve for another four years.
First, let me address the two other candidates. Alderwoman Cara Spencer has been an outstanding public servant throughout her tenure, first as the alderwoman for the former 20th Ward and now representing the 8th Ward. Her dedication to St. Louis is evident, and she has consistently demonstrated her commitment to the city’s well-being. Many of the issues she highlights in this mayoral campaign appear to be ward-specific concerns that are most effectively addressed in her current role as alderwoman. I believe she will continue to excel in that capacity, where her focus and efforts can yield the greatest impact for the residents she represents.
Recorder of Deeds Michael Butler assumed office with a promise to modernize the office. However, after six years in the role, it is difficult to find any substantial evidence that this promise has been fulfilled. Additionally, during his time as chair of the Missouri Democratic Party, his tenure produced no significant positive results for the state party and ended in controversy. Based on this record, I find no reasonable argument to support Mr. Butler as the next mayor of St. Louis.
Mayor Tishaura Jones took office in the spring of 2021, during the early stages of recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Since then, the City of St. Louis has made significant progress in several key areas.
Public Safety:
Violent crime in the city is at its lowest in decades. While the crime rate remains high, any reduction is a positive step forward. The role of a mayor in influencing crime trends is limited, as these patterns often mirror national trends. However, local government can make impactful decisions. One such decision was Mayor Jones’s hiring of Police Chief Robert Tracy, which has contributed to the city's progress. Although much work remains, St. Louis is a safer city today than it was in 2020, 2016, 1994, or 1984.
Economic Growth and City Operations:
The city’s economy has grown to a GDP of $39 billion, ranking second in the region behind St. Louis County and well ahead of slightly larger St. Charles County. Additionally, improvements have been made in critical city services, such as 911 response times. By the summer of 2023, the administration had made significant strides in addressing staffing shortages in the 911 system, bringing response times closer to the national standard of answering 90% of calls within 10 seconds. To further enhance emergency response, the administration broke ground this year on a $41 million state-of-the-art 911 operations center, which will co-locate police and fire dispatch services—a decades long-discussed project now becoming a reality.
Police
Mayor Jones signed a historic contract with the police union, providing officers with a 10-12% pay raise, take-home vehicles, and performance bonuses. This progress in aligning compensation with that of other municipalities represents another step toward improving public safety, though additional work remains. While operating below their budgeted allocation, the SLMPD has made remarkable progress in reducing violent crime to historic lows, alongside significant decreases in overall crime over the past three years. It is my hope that the police union will work collaboratively with City Hall to enhance recruitment efforts and fulfill the department’s budgeted manpower levels. Achieving this goal would allow the SLMPD to focus not only on reducing violent crime but also on critical areas such as traffic enforcement and other quality-of-life issues that greatly impact the community. The police union has no reason to take a combative stance with City Hall, it benefits nobody, especially the taxpayers.
City Planning and Development:
With my background in transportation and land use planning I understand the need for sound plans in those areas to get this City growing again. We have talked about updating the land use plan and the zoning code and developing the first ever city-wide transportation plan for over a decade and now her administration is updating the city’s outdated zoning code and land use plan. And is finally developing a citywide transportation plan under her leadership. The administration has also acted on long-vacant properties like the Railway Exchange Building, Municipal Courts Buildings and the Millennium Hotel, projects that have remained stagnant for years. The City is also funding the development of Neighborhood Plans, letting the residents of each neighborhood have say in how the future of their neighborhood will look. Finally, city roads and bridges are getting a much-needed investment with over $300,000,000 in work between the city and partner agencies. This investment will greatly improve the transportation system and make it safer.
While challenges remain and not every policy and program went as planned, the progress over the past four years under Mayor Jones is undeniable. Even the mayor herself might acknowledge areas where she wishes progress had been faster or more comprehensive—a sentiment echoed by cities nationwide. However, the strides made during her tenure demonstrate that she has earned another four years to continue building on this momentum and addressing the challenges that got away during the first term.
- 9,528
SLPS As you know, the district operates as its own political subdivision. Just as the mayor of Chesterfield has no authority or involvement in Parkway School District matters, the County Executive has no role in the governance of any other school district within the county.
Refuse: Significant progress has been made in refuse collection since the challenges of the COVID era. While the system isn’t perfect, it’s worth noting that privately contracted trash collection (required for apartment buildings with six or more units) isn’t perfect either for the same reasons
SLDC: Neal Richardson, one of the city’s most capable leaders, has done commendable work with the St. Louis Development Corporation. he inherited the $33 million North City grant program, championed by Lewis Reed. While this administration attempted to administer the program, they acknowledged its shortcomings and are actively working on a solution to improve its implementation.
The condition of our streets didn’t deteriorate overnight or since 2021, they’ve been in disrepair for decades. What’s changed, however, is that since 2021, we now have a $300 million down payment to begin addressing them
There is also this
City GDP Growth by Mayoral years (real = inflation adjusted)
Slay (2001-2017): 27.2%, -11.3% real
Krewson (2017-2021): 11.7%, 1.2% real
Jones (2021-2023) 15.2%, 2.8% real
As for the question of something new, voters should evaluate whether the current administration has done enough to earn a second term. Based on the progress outlined above, the honest and fair answer is yes.
Refuse: Significant progress has been made in refuse collection since the challenges of the COVID era. While the system isn’t perfect, it’s worth noting that privately contracted trash collection (required for apartment buildings with six or more units) isn’t perfect either for the same reasons
SLDC: Neal Richardson, one of the city’s most capable leaders, has done commendable work with the St. Louis Development Corporation. he inherited the $33 million North City grant program, championed by Lewis Reed. While this administration attempted to administer the program, they acknowledged its shortcomings and are actively working on a solution to improve its implementation.
The condition of our streets didn’t deteriorate overnight or since 2021, they’ve been in disrepair for decades. What’s changed, however, is that since 2021, we now have a $300 million down payment to begin addressing them
There is also this
City GDP Growth by Mayoral years (real = inflation adjusted)
Slay (2001-2017): 27.2%, -11.3% real
Krewson (2017-2021): 11.7%, 1.2% real
Jones (2021-2023) 15.2%, 2.8% real
As for the question of something new, voters should evaluate whether the current administration has done enough to earn a second term. Based on the progress outlined above, the honest and fair answer is yes.
This Friday is the deadline for alders and citywide races
Of note;
Pam Boyd (13th) & Browning (9th) have no opponent yet, incumbent alder Keys hasn’t filled to run in 11th yet (2 others have), in the 5th the choose successor (Matt devoti) to Vollmer also no opponent yet
Andrew Jones, fresh of losing whatever the last thing he ran for is running for Mayor. Cedric Redmon is giving elected office a shot again in the 7th. 3 candidates in for Comptroller (incumbent Green, former alderman/state rep Baringer & Celeste Matcalf
In the 3rd, Shane Cohn has 2 opponents, I think this is a first time he’s had opponents since 2009
In the 1st, a rematch of 2023 race incumbents Schweitzer vs city deputy Sheriff Kirchner (I assume he still in that job unless the new sheriff has him on the to fire list)
Of note;
Pam Boyd (13th) & Browning (9th) have no opponent yet, incumbent alder Keys hasn’t filled to run in 11th yet (2 others have), in the 5th the choose successor (Matt devoti) to Vollmer also no opponent yet
Andrew Jones, fresh of losing whatever the last thing he ran for is running for Mayor. Cedric Redmon is giving elected office a shot again in the 7th. 3 candidates in for Comptroller (incumbent Green, former alderman/state rep Baringer & Celeste Matcalf
In the 3rd, Shane Cohn has 2 opponents, I think this is a first time he’s had opponents since 2009
In the 1st, a rematch of 2023 race incumbents Schweitzer vs city deputy Sheriff Kirchner (I assume he still in that job unless the new sheriff has him on the to fire list)
The field is set.
Elected by default to a 4 year term:
Matt Devoti in the 5th
Michael Browning in the 9th
Pam Boyd in the 13th
Elected by default to a 4 year term:
Matt Devoti in the 5th
Michael Browning in the 9th
Pam Boyd in the 13th
- 502
Doesn't appear there will be any surprises or upsets (at least in my opinion).
- 9,528
I’m expecting a low turn out election and if that holds true all 6 incumbents with opponents will win.
- 79
Jones may in fact deserve another term, though I don't agree that it is quite a done deal as you do. But glazing over the obvious problems with SLDC leadership as "commendable work" is simply avoiding their obvious shortcomings. SLDC has become Jones' biggest liability (Thanks, in part, to the P-D having already picked another horse.) To the extent that this goes unaddressed, Spencer's base, on top of having name recognition and being a non-incumbent, growsdbInSouthCity wrote: ↑Dec 12, 2024SLPS As you know, the district operates as its own political subdivision. Just as the mayor of Chesterfield has no authority or involvement in Parkway School District matters, the County Executive has no role in the governance of any other school district within the county.
Refuse: Significant progress has been made in refuse collection since the challenges of the COVID era. While the system isn’t perfect, it’s worth noting that privately contracted trash collection (required for apartment buildings with six or more units) isn’t perfect either for the same reasons
SLDC: Neal Richardson, one of the city’s most capable leaders, has done commendable work with the St. Louis Development Corporation. he inherited the $33 million North City grant program, championed by Lewis Reed. While this administration attempted to administer the program, they acknowledged its shortcomings and are actively working on a solution to improve its implementation.
The condition of our streets didn’t deteriorate overnight or since 2021, they’ve been in disrepair for decades. What’s changed, however, is that since 2021, we now have a $300 million down payment to begin addressing them
There is also this
City GDP Growth by Mayoral years (real = inflation adjusted)
Slay (2001-2017): 27.2%, -11.3% real
Krewson (2017-2021): 11.7%, 1.2% real
Jones (2021-2023) 15.2%, 2.8% real
As for the question of something new, voters should evaluate whether the current administration has done enough to earn a second term. Based on the progress outlined above, the honest and fair answer is yes.
- 740
I don't think Jones is a "done deal" at any stretch. The hive mind of UrbanSTL may disagree but Spencer has a very real chance and it may not be close.
- 9,528
I assume the oppo kitchen sink will be thrown at Spencer soon. And there is a lot to it. She’s got some real issues that she’s have to answer to the voters about and they’ll decide if that’s the temperament someone should have when being a mayor. That’s nothing different that jones will also face, butler and every other candidate.
- 1,793
I think Jones has done a commendable job in the teeth of racism and misogyny (coming predominantly from outside the City). I’m not itching to unseat her just because it will mean fewer hit pieces from the Business Journal.
Can someone break down the key platform differences between the two?
Can someone break down the key platform differences between the two?
Cara Spencer is running on efficiency - "city that works for everyone." She's mentioned the City using outdated systems and processes. (Think carbon copy paper, lack of digital resources, automation, over-staffing of multiple departments). Cara would probably argue that she's an ardent supporter of the core city and prioritizing Downtown, and the Riverfront. She seems more aggressive regarding providing basic services as a city.
Jones is running on economic justice and north side parity. She's mentioned MLK as a main thoroughfare for development and job center anchors. She refers to Downtown as one of many neighborhoods and reiterates that it's important, but so are the other disinvested areas of the city. She'll tout crime reduction and utilizing other methods/programs to de-escalate violent crime and their root causes.
Spencer and Jones seem united on the public transportation front, population growth, and transparency in government.
Jones is running on economic justice and north side parity. She's mentioned MLK as a main thoroughfare for development and job center anchors. She refers to Downtown as one of many neighborhoods and reiterates that it's important, but so are the other disinvested areas of the city. She'll tout crime reduction and utilizing other methods/programs to de-escalate violent crime and their root causes.
Spencer and Jones seem united on the public transportation front, population growth, and transparency in government.
Tishaura and her administration have not been transparent at all.dylank wrote: ↑Jan 05, 2025Cara Spencer is running on efficiency - "city that works for everyone." She's mentioned the City using outdated systems and processes. (Think carbon copy paper, lack of digital resources, automation, over-staffing of multiple departments). Cara would probably argue that she's an ardent supporter of the core city and prioritizing Downtown, and the Riverfront. She seems more aggressive regarding providing basic services as a city.
Jones is running on economic justice and north side parity. She's mentioned MLK as a main thoroughfare for development and job center anchors. She refers to Downtown as one of many neighborhoods and reiterates that it's important, but so are the other disinvested areas of the city. She'll tout crime reduction and utilizing other methods/programs to de-escalate violent crime and their root causes.
Spencer and Jones seem united on the public transportation front, population growth, and transparency in government.
- 732
4 more years of Tishaura means 4 more years of same policies. If a voter thinks those policies are working, he or she will vote for her. Pretty simple.
Jones has STL City outperforming Missouri in GDP growth again for the first time in decades. Her policies are working. And she's a hell of a lot more transparent than Slay who did nothing for the city while being extremely corrupt and somehow got re-elected over and over again.
More transparent than Slay doesn't mean she's transparent.Auggie wrote: ↑Jan 06, 2025Jones has STL City outperforming Missouri in GDP growth again for the first time in decades. Her policies are working. And she's a hell of a lot more transparent than Slay who did nothing for the city while being extremely corrupt and somehow got re-elected over and over again.
My point is that this city re-elected a horrible mayor who was unbelievably corrupt over and over again but apparently an actually decent mayor who doesn't appear more corrupt than average apparently garners a serious opposition.STLAPTS wrote: ↑Jan 06, 2025More transparent than Slay doesn't mean she's transparent.Auggie wrote: ↑Jan 06, 2025Jones has STL City outperforming Missouri in GDP growth again for the first time in decades. Her policies are working. And she's a hell of a lot more transparent than Slay who did nothing for the city while being extremely corrupt and somehow got re-elected over and over again.