12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostMar 20, 2023#2576

Good stuff! And the record-breaking 4 and 0 start hasn't been bad either.

6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostMar 20, 2023#2577

I'd almost swear my grandmother, who warshed her dishes in the kitchen zinc, might have said "St. Lousians." It's tickling an old corner of my brain. (And for the record, she was a native. Never lived anywhere else. Just had a very very old St. Louis accent that's more or less gone now, sadly. The one where St. Louis is said almost "sint LOOus" with just the tiniest hint of a u before the final s so that it's almost one syllable. Forgive me, but I miss it.)

Anyway, yes, great video. :)

340
Full MemberFull Member
340

PostMar 20, 2023#2578

My dad pronounces the city like "Sane Luhss," and sometimes it's closer to "San Luhss."

Sent from my LM-V600 using Tapatalk


6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostMar 21, 2023#2579

^I miss the old accents more and more all the time somehow. I expect you do, but . . . treasure those quirks while you can! :)

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostMar 21, 2023#2580

symphonicpoet wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
^I miss the old accents more and more all the time somehow. I expect you do, but . . . treasure those quirks while you can! :)
It's a fading record of a time before the whole planet was homogenized into a single corporate culture slurry.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMar 21, 2023#2581

soulardx wrote:Would a STL City MLS game get 10% of that that NASCAR total in TV viewership?  Heck, it probably didn't hit 1% of that 3.5M.  No hyperbole. 
^Good point.  Most, ~95%+, MLS games will only be available on MLS Season Pass, which is only available through the Apple TV+ app.  I think you have to have an Apple TV+ subscription and then an additional subscription to MLS Season Pass, which makes it incredibly difficult for an average person to stumble upon and become a fan.  Kind of short-sighted of MLS to bury it's games so far into a streaming service.

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostMar 21, 2023#2582

Damn you, great vowel shift!

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostMar 21, 2023#2583

Bart Harley Jarvis wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
soulardx wrote:Would a STL City MLS game get 10% of that that NASCAR total in TV viewership?  Heck, it probably didn't hit 1% of that 3.5M.  No hyperbole. 
^Good point.  Most, ~95%+, MLS games will only be available on MLS Season Pass, which is only available through the Apple TV+ app.  I think you have to have an Apple TV+ subscription and then an additional subscription to MLS Season Pass, which makes it incredibly difficult for an average person to stumble upon and become a fan.  Kind of short-sighted of MLS to bury it's games so far into a streaming service.
You do not need an AppleTV subscription to get the games, just the MLS subscription. It's the same as MLB and the other major sports do just without an independent branded app and without local blackouts.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMar 21, 2023#2584

_nomad_ wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
Bart Harley Jarvis wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
soulardx wrote:Would a STL City MLS game get 10% of that that NASCAR total in TV viewership?  Heck, it probably didn't hit 1% of that 3.5M.  No hyperbole. 
^Good point.  Most, ~95%+, MLS games will only be available on MLS Season Pass, which is only available through the Apple TV+ app.  I think you have to have an Apple TV+ subscription and then an additional subscription to MLS Season Pass, which makes it incredibly difficult for an average person to stumble upon and become a fan.  Kind of short-sighted of MLS to bury it's games so far into a streaming service.
You do not need an AppleTV subscription to get the games, just the MLS subscription. It's the same as MLB and the other major sports do just without an independent branded app and without local blackouts.
Ah, ok. Didn't know you could get MLS without already subscribing to Apple TV+.  Only difference is that, I believe, there's no choice for RSN's to carry MLS games, correct?  It's either the Season Pass or the random few games that are on Fox or FS1/2.

3,958
Life MemberLife Member
3,958

PostMar 21, 2023#2585

Bart Harley Jarvis wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
_nomad_ wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
Bart Harley Jarvis wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
^Good point.  Most, ~95%+, MLS games will only be available on MLS Season Pass, which is only available through the Apple TV+ app.  I think you have to have an Apple TV+ subscription and then an additional subscription to MLS Season Pass, which makes it incredibly difficult for an average person to stumble upon and become a fan.  Kind of short-sighted of MLS to bury it's games so far into a streaming service.
You do not need an AppleTV subscription to get the games, just the MLS subscription. It's the same as MLB and the other major sports do just without an independent branded app and without local blackouts.
Ah, ok. Didn't know you could get MLS without already subscribing to Apple TV+.  Only difference is that, I believe, there's no choice for RSN's to carry MLS games, correct?  It's either the Season Pass or the random few games that are on Fox or FS1/2.
That’s correct. Fox has some but all are on apple. The first 4 away games (2 played, 2 upcoming) are free on apple so far. You only need an Apple ID no subscription

7,801
Life MemberLife Member
7,801

PostMar 21, 2023#2586

_nomad_ wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
Bart Harley Jarvis wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
soulardx wrote:Would a STL City MLS game get 10% of that that NASCAR total in TV viewership?  Heck, it probably didn't hit 1% of that 3.5M.  No hyperbole. 
^Good point.  Most, ~95%+, MLS games will only be available on MLS Season Pass, which is only available through the Apple TV+ app.  I think you have to have an Apple TV+ subscription and then an additional subscription to MLS Season Pass, which makes it incredibly difficult for an average person to stumble upon and become a fan.  Kind of short-sighted of MLS to bury it's games so far into a streaming service.
You do not need an AppleTV subscription to get the games, just the MLS subscription. It's the same as MLB and the other major sports do just without an independent branded app and without local blackouts.
Apparently sports bars with DirecTV can still get the games instead of having to buy a bunch of Apple TV boxes or other streaming devices. This will be the same deal the NFL will have when they move Sunday Ticket to Google/You Tube TV.

6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostMar 21, 2023#2587

^As long as their screen is some kind of smart device it probably has Apple TV prepackaged on it. And even if it doesn't, it's just an ap and any fairly modern set should have the capacity to connect to WiFi and download the thing. My wife's TV is a "roku ready" device and had Apple on it from the beginning, though we hadn't used it. (Along with Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime, and a host of other ap based streaming services.) Your typical TV set at this point is really a specialized computer, rather like a tablet or smartphone, just with a very different form factor and specifications. Obviously if your set is older it won't have the kind of memory or processor power required to run even the most dead simple applications, but . . . most modern ones do. And you can download stuff onto them just like a phone. (Her TV didn't have Crunchyroll pre-installed, but it's on there now.)

474
Full MemberFull Member
474

PostMar 21, 2023#2588

^ and ^^Although the TVs could probably stream Apple TV, the Apple TV subscription isn't licensed for commercial locations. DirectTV has contracted the commercial side of things from Apple.

6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostMar 23, 2023#2589

^Fair enough. You can't get a commercial subscription then? I've never actually used anything like cable or Direct TV. Simply didn't have a TV after 1992, so that's a side of the world I don't really know. I wonder if Apple will leave it like that or eventually move to a commercial licensing model cutting out the middle man.

947
Super MemberSuper Member
947

PostMar 23, 2023#2590

soulardx wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
gary kreie wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
With all the excitement about soccer in St. Louis, I'm surprised the club has not been able to find a buyer for the stadium name.  

Centene had bought the stadium naming rights, but then backed out saying they wanted to invest in more medical oriented sponsorship.  So it was with some surprise when I saw that Centene sponsored the Ambetter Health 400 NASCAR race in Atlanta last Sunday on TV.  Ambetter is Centene Corporation's Health Insurance Marketplace product.  I guess car wrecks generate more healing opportunities than soccer?

No matter what Centene's new leadership claimed, it's probably just as simple as MLS just not being a sport with a critical mass of TV viewership,  badly limiting a chance for wider awareness for whatever brand/offer Centene wants to promote.
Which is largely due to the fact that Apple TV+ has locked up the broadcast rights to nearly all the games. Apple TV+ is a great service, but it's pretty far down the list of U.S. streaming services in terms of their subscription numbers (estimates put it around 25M in the U.S., 40M-50M global). And the number of Apple TV+ subscribers who also have the MLS Season Pass is probably not even a tenth of their overall subscription base, so we're talking about less than 1% of the U.S. population having viewing access to all MLS games. Extrapolate that to local numbers, and I'm guessing that fewer than 50K people in the entire metro area are even able to watch most City SC games.

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostMar 23, 2023#2591

DTGstl314 wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
soulardx wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
gary kreie wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
With all the excitement about soccer in St. Louis, I'm surprised the club has not been able to find a buyer for the stadium name.  

Centene had bought the stadium naming rights, but then backed out saying they wanted to invest in more medical oriented sponsorship.  So it was with some surprise when I saw that Centene sponsored the Ambetter Health 400 NASCAR race in Atlanta last Sunday on TV.  Ambetter is Centene Corporation's Health Insurance Marketplace product.  I guess car wrecks generate more healing opportunities than soccer?

No matter what Centene's new leadership claimed, it's probably just as simple as MLS just not being a sport with a critical mass of TV viewership,  badly limiting a chance for wider awareness for whatever brand/offer Centene wants to promote.
Which is largely due to the fact that Apple TV+ has locked up the broadcast rights to nearly all the games. Apple TV+ is a great service, but it's pretty far down the list of U.S. streaming services in terms of their subscription numbers (estimates put it around 25M in the U.S., 40M-50M global). And the number of Apple TV+ subscribers who also have the MLS Season Pass is probably not even a tenth of their overall subscription base, so we're talking about less than 1% of the U.S. population having viewing access to all MLS games. Extrapolate that to local numbers, and I'm guessing that fewer than 50K people in the entire metro area are even able to watch most City SC games.
You can't use AppleTV+ to estimate MLS streaming. MLS Season Pass is independent from AppleTV+, it's not an add on, they are separate streaming services that just use same app, subscribing to one is not necessary to subscribe to the other.

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostMar 23, 2023#2592

DTGstl314 wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
Extrapolate that to local numbers, and I'm guessing that fewer than 50K people in the entire metro area are even able to watch most City SC games.
Seems like it should be illegal?

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMar 23, 2023#2593

MarkHaversham wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
DTGstl314 wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
Extrapolate that to local numbers, and I'm guessing that fewer than 50K people in the entire metro area are even able to watch most City SC games.
Seems like it should be illegal?
How so?

474
Full MemberFull Member
474

PostMar 23, 2023#2594

Every MLS season ticket holder gets free access to MLS Season Pass. Every T-Mobile and MetroPCS customer also gets it included with their plan. I'm not sure how much it's helping AppleTV+ subscription numbers but it should be getting the app on a lot of phones and smart TVs.

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostMar 23, 2023#2595

Bart Harley Jarvis wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
MarkHaversham wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
DTGstl314 wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
Extrapolate that to local numbers, and I'm guessing that fewer than 50K people in the entire metro area are even able to watch most City SC games.
Seems like it should be illegal?
How so?
Public support money + anti-trust law? Why did we pay for a stadium to acquire a team we can't watch?

7,801
Life MemberLife Member
7,801

PostMar 23, 2023#2596

MarkHaversham wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
Bart Harley Jarvis wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
MarkHaversham wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
Seems like it should be illegal?
How so?
Public support money + anti-trust law? Why did we pay for a stadium to acquire a team we can't watch?
We didn't pay for the stadium. It got voted down.
https://soccerstadiumdigest.com/2017/04 ... oted-down/

Citypark was  close to 100% privately paid for by the Taylor family with the following public allowances.
(https://www.stltoday.com/business/local ... 688e2.html)

The stadium is largely privately financed, an anomaly among arenas across the country: $5.7 million of tax credits; 25 years of real estate tax abatement worth $35 million; amusement tax abatement worth $22 million; plus 2% in special sales taxes at CityPark.

991
Super MemberSuper Member
991

PostMar 23, 2023#2597

That's not how it works? No professional team broadcasts or streams their games for free. Why should this be any different?

7,801
Life MemberLife Member
7,801

PostMar 23, 2023#2598

Laife Fulk wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
That's not how it works? No professional team broadcasts or streams their games for free. Why should this be any different?
Because he says so. 

Plus we're in uncharted territory with the MLS being the first league to go 95%ish streaming-only. 
  • With the Diamond/Sinclair/Ballys Sports bankruptcy we could soon see the Blues and Cardinals on streaming shortly.
  • Supposedly the NBA's new TV contract with Google could involve 50-75% of the games being on streaming.
In a few short years streaming might be the only option. We don't know how the NFL will go as they're with their current TV, cable and Thursday night games on Amazon deal until 2030.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMar 23, 2023#2599

MarkHaversham wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
Bart Harley Jarvis wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
MarkHaversham wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
Seems like it should be illegal?
How so?
Public support money + anti-trust law? Why did we pay for a stadium to acquire a team we can't watch?
You'd buy a ticket to the game? Or pay to watch it, just like the Blues, Cardinals, Lakers, Canucks, Bears or any other team?

7,801
Life MemberLife Member
7,801

PostMar 23, 2023#2600

Bart Harley Jarvis wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
MarkHaversham wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
Bart Harley Jarvis wrote:
Mar 23, 2023
How so?
Public support money + anti-trust law? Why did we pay for a stadium to acquire a team we can't watch?
You'd buy a ticket to the game? Or pay to watch it, just like the Blues, Cardinals, Lakers, Canucks, Bears or any other team?
Or listen on Y98 radio?

https://www.stlcitysc.com/news/st-louis ... l-and-kxok

Read more posts (149 remaining)