788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostSep 16, 2019#7376

dbInSouthCity wrote:If I had to put some money down I’d say this is a love triangle
Why do you think this?

1,878
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,878

PostSep 17, 2019#7377

It's just a comment on Reddit so take it for what it's worth (rumors, unofficial sources, et al), but since the police haven't released any information this is all we've got so far:
Shaw resident checking in. My wife and I are shocked, we live a block away from Sasha's.

Our neighborhood FB and ND groups are obviously all focused on on the shooting this morning. It's still not confirmed and only have first hand accounts but folks have described it like, shooter comes in and fires at a specific guy in the bar. The target was hit in the neck and is the person in critical. Two others injured but did not appear to be targets. A woman was injured by "shrapnel" not sure about the other victim except it's not a serious injury.
-RBB

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostSep 17, 2019#7378

^ Reporting in the Post-Dispatch this morning had a quote from the alderwoman that said police had informed her it was an isolated incident. But gave no further details.

1,093
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,093

PostSep 17, 2019#7379

rbb wrote:It's just a comment on Reddit so take it for what it's worth (rumors, unofficial sources, et al), but since the police haven't released any information this is all we've got so far:
Shaw resident checking in. My wife and I are shocked, we live a block away from Sasha's.

Our neighborhood FB and ND groups are obviously all focused on on the shooting this morning. It's still not confirmed and only have first hand accounts but folks have described it like, shooter comes in and fires at a specific guy in the bar. The target was hit in the neck and is the person in critical. Two others injured but did not appear to be targets. A woman was injured by "shrapnel" not sure about the other victim except it's not a serious injury.
-RBB
The shooting happened inside Sashas!?!?

788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostSep 17, 2019#7380

stlien wrote:
rbb wrote:It's just a comment on Reddit so take it for what it's worth (rumors, unofficial sources, et al), but since the police haven't released any information this is all we've got so far:
Shaw resident checking in. My wife and I are shocked, we live a block away from Sasha's.

Our neighborhood FB and ND groups are obviously all focused on on the shooting this morning. It's still not confirmed and only have first hand accounts but folks have described it like, shooter comes in and fires at a specific guy in the bar. The target was hit in the neck and is the person in critical. Two others injured but did not appear to be targets. A woman was injured by "shrapnel" not sure about the other victim except it's not a serious injury.
-RBB
The shooting happened inside Sashas!?!?
That's what it sounds like. Hardly any details out though. Not even a description/sex of anyone involved. I hope that is because they don't want to chase away suspects or witnesses rather than not knowing anything.

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostSep 17, 2019#7381

^ Could be that.  Or they could be waiting for the guy in critical condition to come around, hopefully he does.  IF it is an isolated incident and the man shot in the neck was targeted then he probably knows who it is.

958
Super MemberSuper Member
958

PostSep 27, 2019#7382


788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostSep 27, 2019#7383

Has anyone heard anything about the shooting in the grove area yesterday?

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostSep 27, 2019#7384


788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostSep 27, 2019#7385

Not good. Someone told me they saw a bunch of police cars with a guy in custody as they drove past. 

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostSep 27, 2019#7386

flipz wrote:
Not good. Someone told me they saw a bunch of police cars with a guy in custody as they drove past. 
Small update, it does appear a man is in custody.  Probably a domestic dispute (that's my assumption, that wasn't mentioned in the paper).
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/cri ... beabb.html

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostSep 27, 2019#7387

^ in the first PD link she was in her 20s with wounds to her head and arms. in the second she was 33 with a gunshot wound to her chest.

they can't get the details straight but they sure didn't forget to mention both times that crime is up 12% in FPSE over last year.

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostSep 27, 2019#7388

^ Crime stats notwithstanding, I'd imagine the PD reporting is only as good as what SLMPD tells them.

3,434
Life MemberLife Member
3,434

PostOct 03, 2019#7389

2018 FBI Crime Data Tables just came out showing crime rates - crimes per 100K population.  Here are some charts I created from FBI Table 6 that shows St Louis Metro ranking with respect to 1) 25 largest metros, 2) 50 largest metros, and 3) all 345 metros that had data in Table 6.  

Some metros are not in the table at all such as NY City metro, Denver metro, and Kansas City metro.  And others have data in the table for some crime categories but not others.  St. Louis metro is missing some of the property crime data.









788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostOct 03, 2019#7390

If I'm reading this correctly then these charts are a terrible way to present the data. It is not clear what rank means. We're 18th out of the top 23 in terms of population (17 others have more population). We're 2nd in murder which means either we have the 2nd lowest or 2nd highest numbers. Based on how the population is presented it means we have the 2nd highest murder rate per 100k. Is this correct?

3,434
Life MemberLife Member
3,434

PostOct 03, 2019#7391

Sorry, I was trying to find a good way in Google Sheets to show just all St. Louis ranking for all categories.  So yes, of the 23 metros out of the 25 largest that have crime data in the report, St. Louis metro ranks #2, second worst, for Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter.  So these are crime rankings. Not safety rankings.  A ranking of 2 of 23 reporting crimes is not good.

Here is a chart of only violent crime rates per 100K (& populations) for the 25 largest metros.  Violent crime rates are just a sum of the four violent crime categories: 1) Murder and non negligent manslaughter, Rape 1, Robbery, and Aggravated assault.
 FBI did not compute a violent crime rate for 5 metros in the top 25.


12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostOct 03, 2019#7392

Poor Baltimore. They've been having a rough couple of years, both crime-wise as well as PR wise. I think we know how they feel.  

788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostOct 03, 2019#7393

gary kreie wrote:Sorry, I was trying to find a good way in Google Sheets to show just all St. Louis ranking for all categories.  So yes, of the 23 metros out of the 25 largest that have crime data in the report, St. Louis metro ranks #2, second worst, for Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter.  So these are crime rankings. Not safety rankings.  A ranking of 2 of 23 reporting crimes is not good.

Here is a chart of only violent crime rates per 100K (& populations) for the 25 largest metros.  Violent crime rates are just a sum of the four violent crime categories: 1) Murder and non negligent manslaughter, Rape 1, Robbery, and Aggravated assault.
 FBI did not compute a violent crime rate for 5 metros in the top 25.
Thanks for clarifying. I was under the impression that if were to consider the whole MSA that STL would be much lower on list of violet cities. I thought that was a major point of the merger.

3,434
Life MemberLife Member
3,434

PostOct 03, 2019#7394

flipz wrote:
gary kreie wrote:Sorry, I was trying to find a good way in Google Sheets to show just all St. Louis ranking for all categories.  So yes, of the 23 metros out of the 25 largest that have crime data in the report, St. Louis metro ranks #2, second worst, for Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter.  So these are crime rankings. Not safety rankings.  A ranking of 2 of 23 reporting crimes is not good.

Here is a chart of only violent crime rates per 100K (& populations) for the 25 largest metros.  Violent crime rates are just a sum of the four violent crime categories: 1) Murder and non negligent manslaughter, Rape 1, Robbery, and Aggravated assault.
 FBI did not compute a violent crime rate for 5 metros in the top 25.
Thanks for clarifying. I was under the impression that if were to consider the whole MSA that STL would be much lower on list of violet cities. I thought that was a major point of the merger.
I think we used to be better.  Also, the FBI used to compute an overall crime index which also included property crime.  St. Louis metro property crime is usually low compared to other areas which moves our total crime ranking to the middle.  But the FBI doesn't compute total crime index anymore.  And some entities in our metro, not St. Louis City or St. Charles, were so far off from UCR reporting standards I guess, that the FBI didn't even try to estimate burglary or motor vehicle crime.  Only larceny.  So I couldn't do a property crime chart that included St. Louis.

788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostOct 03, 2019#7395

gary kreie wrote:
flipz wrote:
gary kreie wrote:Sorry, I was trying to find a good way in Google Sheets to show just all St. Louis ranking for all categories.  So yes, of the 23 metros out of the 25 largest that have crime data in the report, St. Louis metro ranks #2, second worst, for Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter.  So these are crime rankings. Not safety rankings.  A ranking of 2 of 23 reporting crimes is not good.

Here is a chart of only violent crime rates per 100K (& populations) for the 25 largest metros.  Violent crime rates are just a sum of the four violent crime categories: 1) Murder and non negligent manslaughter, Rape 1, Robbery, and Aggravated assault.
 FBI did not compute a violent crime rate for 5 metros in the top 25.
Thanks for clarifying. I was under the impression that if were to consider the whole MSA that STL would be much lower on list of violet cities. I thought that was a major point of the merger.
I think we used to be better.  Also, the FBI used to compute an overall crime index which also included property crime.  St. Louis metro property crime is usually low compared to other areas which moves our total crime ranking to the middle.  But the FBI doesn't compute total crime index anymore.  And some entities in our metro, not St. Louis City or St. Charles, were so far off from UCR reporting standards I guess, that the FBI didn't even try to estimate burglary or motor vehicle crime.  Only larceny.  So I couldn't do a property crime chart that included St. Louis.
I wasn't thinking. The MSA includes both sides of the river. There is significant amount of violent crime on the IL side that wouldn't be counted with just STL city plus STL county. 

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostOct 09, 2019#7396

urban_dilettante wrote:
Oct 25, 2017
^ 30-something gunshots just north of Marquette Park a few minutes ago... not so sure it isn't out of control. we need to try something new. i'm a big advocate for https://www.pss-1.com/.
Aerial Surveillance Proposal Could Fight St. Louis Crime, But Raises Privacy Concerns
https://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/ae ... y-concerns

i've been advocating for Persistent Surveillance Systems to come to St. Louis for several years now and it appears it might happen if certain alders and paranoid idiots don't f*ck it up. i say we give Alderwoman Rice the job of informing parents that their kids were murdered in a drug-related shootout that could have been prevented but at least they can rest assured that their funeral procession won't be hypothetically monitored by nefarious forces en route to the cemetery. I mean, why try anything in the present that has measurably reduced crime in other cities when we can just hope that improved police-community relations might lead to fewer dead children three generations from now?

Oh, by the way, there was another car jacking around the corner from my house the other morning. Less than a block away. Same street as the double murder a few weeks ago. That jacked car would have been tracked to its destination and the perp arrested if surveillance were in place.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostOct 09, 2019#7397




2,059
Life MemberLife Member
2,059

PostOct 09, 2019#7398

I'm pretty on board with this program. If it saves 1 Amber Alert, or stops 1 drug related murder... its worth some privacy. Again, only my opinion - I can understand some of the uneasiness, but I think the tool for prosecutors/policie outweighs the risks. 

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostOct 09, 2019#7399

Don't commit crime and you'll be just fine. 

I'd love to see this implemented. 

788
Super MemberSuper Member
788

PostOct 09, 2019#7400

I'm also for this if it is done right. I feel that we give up way more privacy through the internet than this system.

Read more posts (3300 remaining)