That would make a parking lot for what, ten spots?
Such a loss. I remember this building when I would go downtown as a kid.
Such a loss. I remember this building when I would go downtown as a kid.
What would urban townhouses even look like?STLhistoryBuff wrote: ↑May 24, 2017TWG Properties plans to develop 88 market-rate apartments and five new townhouses at 917-923 Locust in downtown St. Louis. They are currently seeking more incentives -
Anyone have access to full story? http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/news ... ntown.html
Trying to picture five three story townhouses with entrances facing side street & can't see how it comes out good.
I think the point with tall and skinny is those townhouses or maybe a better term is row house often have depth or elongated which the site might not have if you have any kind of setback, stairs up to front door.goat314 wrote: ↑May 25, 2017I think 5 contemporary townhouses fit onto that space rather easy, especially the tall and skinny type. Aren't there lots in the Central West End and Lafayette Square where this has been pulled off with a similar amount of space? Townhouses in the middle of the high rise districts are very common in cities like New York, San Francisco, Chicago etc. You are even start to see it in places like Denver and Minneapolis. I think St. Louis could easily pull it off. In fact, I would like to see that type of development fill lots throughout downtown west and midtown.
Well, not quite the same thing, but apparently maisonette apartments are all the rage in New York.JaredOpsal wrote: ↑May 26, 2017Can anyone find an example of town homes being placed in the central business district of another major city?
Well, to be fair, the proposal is for five town homes next to a redeveloped mid-rise and a high-rise apartment building with 80 new apartments between them.urban_dilettante wrote: ↑May 25, 2017This smells fishy. Four random, lonely town homes in the middle of the CBD... I can imagine examples of preexisting town houses surrounded by newer high rise development, but I can't think of any examples where a handful of town houses has been squeezed into the middle of a city's CBD.
i didn't mean lonely in the sense that there is no other residential around, but that there are no other similarly scaled single-family residences around. if this were a larger development, or if there were other clusters of town houses around downtown, it wouldn't seem weird to me. but, hey, if people will buy them then i'm all for it. i'd rather see a denser development but, like you said, there are windows to consider.
Ah, I understand now thanks. I have an affinity for things off-the-wall - I like the out-of-the-box thinking. If the Tudor building has to go, here's hoping the design (and the renderings of the design) are refined enough to make the replacement a positive contribution to the built environment.urban_dilettante wrote: ↑May 26, 2017i didn't mean lonely in the sense that there is no other residential around, but that there are no other similarly scaled single-family residences around. if this were a larger development, or if there were other clusters of town houses around downtown, it wouldn't seem weird to me. but, hey, if people will buy them then i'm all for it. i'd rather see a denser development but, like you said, there are windows to consider.
