480
Full MemberFull Member
480

Post2:21 PM - Today#7901

dbInSouthCity wrote:
12:46 PM - Today
There is really not good way to do downtown to downtown comps that make sense.  For example: here is downtown KC overlaid(orange) with downtown STL.  More people visit the downtown STL boundary then they visit the kc one despite it being 6sq miles vs 2 here

Through March, downtown neighborhood had less than 1 crime against a person per day (most between parties having a dispute) and 3 crimes per day against property; car, building, etc.  

Downtown west had 1 against a person almost every other day and 3 a day against property.  

So with that in mind, consider that daily there is 11,000 residents, 40-60,000 workers and on a week like this 20,000-25,000 visitors for robotics, conferences, tourists.     So average day this week had 75,000 people in downtown and downtown west and 1.5 crimes against a person (again between people that know each other) and 6 crimes against property.

And the people who say “I don’t feel safe” would say there is 4 murders, 18 shootings and 25 car jackings a day (btw, downtown has had 1 car jacking through March). There is nothing that can be done to fix that kind of stupid
two things here.

1) Would it be wise to sharply consolidate the parts of downtown that STL subsidizes/invests in?  I mean, the Arch is about equidistant to Soulard Market and Lafayette Square than it is to Enterprise Park.  Yet, the Arch and EP are in "downtown."  So, should we focus nearly ALL investment/subsidy from the river west to only 14th (not Jefferson), south to only 64 (not Chouteau), north to only Washington (not Delmar).  Cut "downtown" by like 2/3. I can't say I like this, as it will only weaken the link between downtown and surrounding neighborhoods, but limited investment/subsidy $$ demands we prioritize. 

2). I'm beating a dead horse here but "feeling safe" is not about reported violent crime. it's about overly aggressive street people, drug addicts, the apocalyptic vibe of vacant buildings like the Railway Exchange, and car cloutings. Excessive disorder. While I spent much of my life dismissing suburbanites who kept yammering about "not feeling safe" because the data showed otherwise, it's the disorder. it's always been the disorder. 

2,628
Life MemberLife Member
2,628

Post2:39 PM - Today#7902

I would love for downtown to include the Soulard Farmer's Market, it's not even that far fetched. If we can find a way to properly develop the 4th/Broadway/7th street corridors going south it would become functionally connected. Similar to how KC's is connected to their downtown. 

9,553
Life MemberLife Member
9,553

Post2:54 PM - Today#7903

soulardx wrote:
2:21 PM - Today
dbInSouthCity wrote:
12:46 PM - Today
There is really not good way to do downtown to downtown comps that make sense.  For example: here is downtown KC overlaid(orange) with downtown STL.  More people visit the downtown STL boundary then they visit the kc one despite it being 6sq miles vs 2 here

Through March, downtown neighborhood had less than 1 crime against a person per day (most between parties having a dispute) and 3 crimes per day against property; car, building, etc.  

Downtown west had 1 against a person almost every other day and 3 a day against property.  

So with that in mind, consider that daily there is 11,000 residents, 40-60,000 workers and on a week like this 20,000-25,000 visitors for robotics, conferences, tourists.     So average day this week had 75,000 people in downtown and downtown west and 1.5 crimes against a person (again between people that know each other) and 6 crimes against property.

And the people who say “I don’t feel safe” would say there is 4 murders, 18 shootings and 25 car jackings a day (btw, downtown has had 1 car jacking through March). There is nothing that can be done to fix that kind of stupid
two things here.

1) Would it be wise to sharply consolidate the parts of downtown that STL subsidizes/invests in?  I mean, the Arch is about equidistant to Soulard Market and Lafayette Square than it is to Enterprise Park.  Yet, the Arch and EP are in "downtown."  So, should we focus nearly ALL investment/subsidy from the river west to only 14th (not Jefferson), south to only 64 (not Chouteau), north to only Washington (not Delmar).  Cut "downtown" by like 2/3. I can't say I like this, as it will only weaken the link between downtown and surrounding neighborhoods, but limited investment/subsidy $$ demands we prioritize. 

2). I'm beating a dead horse here but "feeling safe" is not about reported violent crime. it's about overly aggressive street people, drug addicts, the apocalyptic vibe of vacant buildings like the Railway Exchange, and car cloutings. Excessive disorder. While I spent much of my life dismissing suburbanites who kept yammering about "not feeling safe" because the data showed otherwise, it's the disorder. it's always been the disorder. 
Downtown subsides the rest of the City, it produces $100,000,000 in revenue for City gov and gets back $28M

174
Junior MemberJunior Member
174

Post3:07 PM - Today#7904

GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:
2:39 PM - Today
I would love for downtown to include the Soulard Farmer's Market, it's not even that far fetched. If we can find a way to properly develop the 4th/Broadway/7th street corridors going south it would become functionally connected. Similar to how KC's is connected to their downtown. 
And/or ... 😏
TuckerMarketv2A.png (1.99MiB)

480
Full MemberFull Member
480

Post51 minutes ago#7905

GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:
2:39 PM - Today
I would love for downtown to include the Soulard Farmer's Market, it's not even that far fetched. If we can find a way to properly develop the 4th/Broadway/7th street corridors going south it would become functionally connected. Similar to how KC's is connected to their downtown. 
ohhh, you to do the opposite? LOL. I get it, but my half-ass thought here is trying to focus downtown's efforts more. get more wins in a more compact area.  get the PR and vibe wins rolling there.

Post46 minutes ago#7906

dbInSouthCity wrote:
2:54 PM - Today
soulardx wrote:
2:21 PM - Today
dbInSouthCity wrote:
12:46 PM - Today
There is really not good way to do downtown to downtown comps that make sense.  For example: here is downtown KC overlaid(orange) with downtown STL.  More people visit the downtown STL boundary then they visit the kc one despite it being 6sq miles vs 2 here

Through March, downtown neighborhood had less than 1 crime against a person per day (most between parties having a dispute) and 3 crimes per day against property; car, building, etc.  

Downtown west had 1 against a person almost every other day and 3 a day against property.  

So with that in mind, consider that daily there is 11,000 residents, 40-60,000 workers and on a week like this 20,000-25,000 visitors for robotics, conferences, tourists.     So average day this week had 75,000 people in downtown and downtown west and 1.5 crimes against a person (again between people that know each other) and 6 crimes against property.

And the people who say “I don’t feel safe” would say there is 4 murders, 18 shootings and 25 car jackings a day (btw, downtown has had 1 car jacking through March). There is nothing that can be done to fix that kind of stupid
two things here.

1) Would it be wise to sharply consolidate the parts of downtown that STL subsidizes/invests in?  I mean, the Arch is about equidistant to Soulard Market and Lafayette Square than it is to Enterprise Park.  Yet, the Arch and EP are in "downtown."  So, should we focus nearly ALL investment/subsidy from the river west to only 14th (not Jefferson), south to only 64 (not Chouteau), north to only Washington (not Delmar).  Cut "downtown" by like 2/3. I can't say I like this, as it will only weaken the link between downtown and surrounding neighborhoods, but limited investment/subsidy $$ demands we prioritize. 

2). I'm beating a dead horse here but "feeling safe" is not about reported violent crime. it's about overly aggressive street people, drug addicts, the apocalyptic vibe of vacant buildings like the Railway Exchange, and car cloutings. Excessive disorder. While I spent much of my life dismissing suburbanites who kept yammering about "not feeling safe" because the data showed otherwise, it's the disorder. it's always been the disorder. 
Downtown subsides the rest of the City, it produces $100,000,000 in revenue for City gov and gets back $28M
Knowing this comment was coming, it's why I also used "invests in."  

Post45 minutes ago#7907

stldotage wrote:
3:07 PM - Today
GoHarvOrGoHome wrote:
2:39 PM - Today
I would love for downtown to include the Soulard Farmer's Market, it's not even that far fetched. If we can find a way to properly develop the 4th/Broadway/7th street corridors going south it would become functionally connected. Similar to how KC's is connected to their downtown. 
And/or ... [emoji unicode-emoji="1f60f"]1f60f[/emoji]
TuckerMarketv2A.png
LOL

AI Slop jokes aside, Soulard Market deserves like $25M of that Rams money. 

Read more posts (-18 remaining)