Tapatalk

St Louis Immigration

St Louis Immigration

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostSep 06, 2013#1

With STL being a huge safe haven for Bosnians during their conflict, what about STL opening up our front door for some of the 1,000,000+ Syrian refugees? I do know a few have come here, but I think STL has a HUGE opportunity here!

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostSep 06, 2013#2

I'm not sure if cities can lobby the State Dept. on such things, but hopefully we are throwing out the welcome mat. And sadly, I don't think the refugees will be able to go back anytime soon.

btw, have you heard about the new MOSAIC program intended to bring more immigrants to the region?
http://stlmosaicproject.org/

It has an ambitious goal for being the fastest growing region for immigrants by 2020. I guess I could be sarcastic, but since we're basically at the bottom currently we just might hit that goal. But more seriously, we need to be successful in such efforts if we're ever going to truly compete.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostSep 06, 2013#3

I just had a pretty crazy idea, with Colorado looking the other way regarding marijuana law and Missouri pondering the idea of nullifying federal gun laws, what if the city of St. Louis decided to nullify immigration law. I'm sure the population would explode if we told every undocumented immigrant in the country and every potential immigrant in the world that we would never ever deport them if they made their way to our city and decided to live here/bought property here.

Like some countries have special economic zones, St. Louis would be a special immigration zone.

Some would argue that this would heavily favor low income immigrants but the salient problem here is we need to fill the city with people, even if they are low income, the majority would be hardworking and productive.

Nobody who risks everything to travel halfway around the world has the intention of being a bum.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostSep 06, 2013#4

^ Ha, you must have been smokin some of that Colorado Mile High!

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostSep 06, 2013#5

^ Lol, not saying this is the best idea ever but if the goal is to only boost population/immigration, this would be by far the fastest solution. :D

PostSep 06, 2013#6

JuanHamez wrote:I just had a pretty crazy idea, with Colorado looking the other way regarding marijuana law and Missouri pondering the idea of nullifying federal gun laws, what if the city of St. Louis decided to nullify immigration law. I'm sure the population would explode if we told every undocumented immigrant in the country and every potential immigrant in the world that we would never ever deport them if they made their way to our city and decided to live here/bought property here.

Like some countries have special economic zones, St. Louis would be a special immigration zone.

Some would argue that this would heavily favor low income immigrants but the salient problem here is we need to fill the city with people, even if they are low income, the majority would be hardworking and productive.

Nobody who risks everything to travel halfway around the world has the intention of being a bum.
You know, on second thought this idea isn't so crazy. Think about it: other cities have huge structural advantages for attracting immigrants. The coasts are closer and first stops for ships and airplanes. Many already have large existing immigrant populations. San Francisco, for instance, is 20% chinese and increasing the last time I checked. As my investment banking friends say: what is your edge? you have to have an edge or we're not going to consider you. you will simply be outcompeted and crushed if you don't have one.

What is St. Louis's Edge? Other places that are considered less desirable use money. Alaska, for instance, has no income tax and actually pays all their residents a salary each year just for living there. St. Louis obviously can't afford to do that. Unless we can define some way of leveling the playing field with coastal cities or gaining an advantage even if "unfairly", we're not going to win.

Perhaps it could be that if you are a young couple and come to St. Louis and do honest work, your future children would be American citizens - no questions asked and no fussy immigration paperwork either.

On the bright side, this strategy would suddenly revive the public school system and make every country in the world want to have a direct flight into Lambert... We'd be a gateway once again.


Back to the original conversation (sorry to hijack!), yes it would be AWESOME if we could send a big cruise ship to Syria, pick up a million refugees, and bring them up the Mississippi.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostSep 06, 2013#7

I still advocate an LRA Homestead Program. LRA properties while not super valuable now, would rise in value with a rising population.

If a immigrant moves here they would be given an LRA property. Instantly roots them to St. Louis. Initially I was thinking they could require them to stay in St. Louis for 3 years in exchange for ownership but the more i think about it the more i think it'd be better to just give them away immediatly. The immigrant would be tied to the St. Louis region because you can't move land if they can sell it good for them the city can't seem to.

1,982
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,982

PostSep 06, 2013#8

^

Couple issues (maybe not deal breakers there). What if the immigrants aren't the least bit wealthily?

Are they required to pay property tax on the land? How can they be expected to build on the land?

Or would you make the LRA land simply an offer that they could turn down?

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostSep 06, 2013#9

I like the LRA concept, but again it goes back to the discussion on other thread(s) of how you make vacant buildings or land economically feasible to do on a significant basis. I believe we certainly could achieve success if we made it a regional priority and added a dose of creativity. Since MOSAIC is bringing together a lot of organizations already, perhaps it could help tackle the problem as part of its housing solutions. North City and North County transformed through mass immigration. I like it!

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostSep 06, 2013#10

I believe Missouri law already bars local and state law enforcement from enforcing federal laws prohibiting the distillation of alcohol for personal use (up to 100 gallons/year). I believe we're one of only three states that have legal moonshining for private use.

I see no reason an elected body couldn't take similar action concerning undocumented migration.

1,518
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,518

PostSep 06, 2013#11

Mods want to fold this conversation here? -

http://urbanstl.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... ic#p216640

Bottom line guys - Immigration is Fed issue - in natural foreign immigration we are barely a blip on the radar due to the same image problems we have with natural domestic immigration (Midwest phobia, backwater, crime filled, desolate)

Refugees are different - they are relocated and settled - the Bosnians have been a huge success even attracting Bosnian refugees from other relocation centers - they were completely unburdened by StL image and found StL to have similar urban systems they were use to in Europe in Bevo, but at a much lower cost than Chicago.

We can lobby the Feds but immigration and especially refugees have always been a political hot potato - in our current hyper political polarization it could just get worse.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostSep 20, 2013#12

This isn't immigration per se, but a couple of nice tidbits on Hispanic leadership in the national business community:

1) Saint Louis Hispanic Chamber of Commerce was recognized as the Small Hispanic Chamber of the Year by the US Hispanic Chamber. Hopefully we won't be in the small category too long from now.
2) Separately, George Paz of Express Scripts was named top salaried Hispanic CEO in the nation.

Nice to see.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostNov 11, 2013#13

So I've been thinking about the refugee crisis in Syria, roughly 2 million people in refugee camps, and now the recent typhoon in the Philippines, roughly 4 million people without homes. I wish the Political leader of the city and state would lobby for the opportunity to absorb some of these people. But its got me thinking about the challenges of absorbing a huge influx of poor immigrants (I assume they would be poor at least for a few years).

There is a lot of underutilized housing stock but how much currently livable versus crumbling LRA properties, whats the maximum number of people the city could absorb with the existing stock.

The local job market is stable but not rapidly growing. What rate of absorption into low skill jobs is possible? Obviously an increase in population would increase demand but I'm sure there is a limit.

I was looking at the Mosaic projects strategy and basically the strategy seems to be to focus on attracting nationalities with currently larger populations in the metro area. Philippines is on the list but not Syria. I think since because the most successful influx of immigrants to St. Louis in recent history has been due to refugee populations that that should be though focus. It does create a short term problem though because of the huge burden it puts on the social safety net.

Hopefully the Mosaic project will reap rewards as I'm sure many Filipinos will be search for a new life and new opportunities. Hopefully St. Louis can be there for them.

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostNov 11, 2013#14

^ How hard would it be to create a group to lobby the mayor, and possibly pay for him to meet with people in Syria and the Philippines? I bet for $50k or so, Slay and several key staffers could travel to both places and make an offer to the displaced. If we could snag 20k people from each, what an impact it could make.

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostNov 11, 2013#15

There is a very old and well-established Lebanese population in St. Louis. Think Francis Slay, St. Raymonds, etc. Syrians and Lebanese share the same levantine culture. St. Louis Lebanese may be too assimilated to relate, though. I doubt many still speak much Arabic.

I would love to see St. Louis welcome Syrian refugees.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostNov 11, 2013#16

onecity wrote:^ How hard would it be to create a group to lobby the mayor, and possibly pay for him to meet with people in Syria and the Philippines? I bet for $50k or so, Slay and several key staffers could travel to both places and make an offer to the displaced. If we could snag 20k people from each, what an impact it could make.
Interesting idea but have you contemplated the hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars it would cost to bring them here, provide transitionary housing, language and skills training? How would that get paid?

Anyway, why would people in Phil want to leave in the first place. It's pretty stable. Do you think there was demand for Japanese refugees after their typhoon/Fukushima disaster? Doubtful. Syrians may be able to apply for asylum or the normal immigration process but I think they choose where to come.

How was the Bosnian immigration wave facilitated?

1,218
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,218

PostNov 11, 2013#17

^The State Dept under the Clinton Admin was involved. This has to be Federally driven I would guess. Great thoughts though, we need immigrants BADLY.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostNov 11, 2013#18

^ US State Dept. plays the critical role in refugee immigration settlement.... I believe it coordinates with local regions on large-scale re-settlement but I'm not quite sure how regions may be selected for hosting.

EDIT: Mark beats me on the draw!

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostNov 11, 2013#19

^ I understand there is a "process" for doing this, but sometimes it makes more sense to beg for forgiveness than to ask for permission. This is one of those times when you have to go Ready! Fire! Aim! because the opportunity is exactly right now.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostNov 11, 2013#20

onecity wrote:^ I understand there is a "process" for doing this, but sometimes it makes more sense to beg for forgiveness than to ask for permission. This is one of those times when you have to go Ready! Fire! Aim! because the opportunity is exactly right now.
That's not how it works as it takes an immense amount of resources and coordination to make it happen.

FWIW, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) helped my family escape Russia for Chicago because of the anti-semitism there. A couple other people you may know that HIAS brought over include Sergey Brin (Co-Founder of Google) and Regina Spektor. Here's Regina's story. This article describes this particular wave: http://forward.com/articles/146812/how- ... -us/?p=all

As a footnote, HIAS doesn't just help Jewish refugees, they help many others as well. Basically, NGO's like HIAS need to step up in concert w/ the State Dept, Congresspersons, and local municipalities.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostNov 11, 2013#21

In a large way you are right its got to be primarily federally funded, but it also has to be locally supported. If Claire McCaskill, or Jay Nixon pushed hard to make St. Louis a Refugee Immigration Destination vocally supported By Slay and Dooley now you have an environment where the federal government might pay attention.
Interesting idea but have you contemplated the hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars it would cost to bring them here, provide transitionary housing, language and skills training? How would that get paid?
Well I'm thinking the location of Scott Air force Base which is basically the home of the Air Mobility Command makes for an ideal hub for refugees. Humanitarian aid is shipped to these refugees on a regular basis, they could easily load the planes up with refugees on the return trip. (at least thas how i imagine it in my mind). There is no shortage of inexpensive housing here but I imagine a large building unused or under utilized building could be rehabbed into temporary beds. Could easily be a warehouse with rows of beds. Wherever it would be it probably would need good access to a metrolink or major bus route since the majority would not be able to drive right away.

There are a number of organization that handle training and job placement. Not sure what their capacity is, and I'm sure they would be over loaded if number jumped dramatically but they could be expanded based on need and funding. If St. Louis is to become an immigrant destination that needs to happen anyway.

I suppose I am just speaking into the darkness hoping someone out there that follows this forum work the vision to a level where some actual action can be put in place. Its frustrating that the Mosaic project for all its hype hasn't been very visible nor does it seem to be publicly pursuing opportunities along these lines.

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostNov 11, 2013#22

Although not related to St Louis, the Feds recently began to relocate Sudanese immigrants to Sioux Falls. Almost 13 of every 20 leave for Omaha. I don't blame them.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostNov 11, 2013#23

^Interesting. I wonder why Omaha as opposed to Minneapolis, other than it being an additional hour away by car. I've heard Minneapolis has a strong immigrant support infrastructure, and has large Tibetan and Somali populations.

It seems that this year has been a sort of ongoing commemoration of the success of the Bosnian relocation effort: between the visit by the Bosnian President, the construction of a Bosnian Sebilj in Bevo, and the upcoming Bosnia v. Argentina soccer match. Events like these really establish the community as a visible and integral part of St. Louis culture. Is there a Bosnian independence day parade in Bevo? St. Louis is such a city of parades, fair, and festivals. If there isn't one, there should be.

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostNov 12, 2013#24

wabash wrote:^Interesting. I wonder why Omaha as opposed to Minneapolis, other than it being an additional hour away by car. I've heard Minneapolis has a strong immigrant support infrastructure, and has large Tibetan and Somali populations.
The Twin Cities have very high taxes, and a climate similar to Sioux Falls, and less job opportunities . Omaha is a bit warmer, lower taxes, and a booming economy.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostNov 12, 2013#25

wabash wrote:^Interesting. I wonder why Omaha as opposed to Minneapolis, other than it being an additional hour away by car. I've heard Minneapolis has a strong immigrant support infrastructure, and has large Tibetan and Somali populations.
No kiddin... the census figures for Minneapolis/St. Paul are amazing. Very diverse and the percentage of foreign born is much, much higher than here.

Read more posts (262 remaining)