2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostJan 29, 2013#1801

An excerpt from Gov. Nixon's State of the State speech last night...
For the third straight year, I am proud to report that we are shipping more Missouri goods around the world than ever before.

Missouri exports hit record levels in 2010, and topped the $14 billion mark with double-digit growth in 2011. And we’re on track to break records again. That’s because we’re taking a pro-active approach.

In October of 2011, I led a group of Missouri business leaders on a highly successful trade mission to China. We secured agreements to sell $4.6 billion in Missouri goods.

In April of 2012, we went to Brazil, and signed our first-ever trade agreement with the state of Sao Paulo, the financial capital of one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. And this coming March, I will lead a trade mission to South Korea and Taiwan.

We’re making this a priority because it’s critical for every business in the state – no matter how small – to think globally. Because companies that once only did business with customers around the corner are finding new customers around the world. And when we sell more Missouri products overseas, we’re creating more jobs here at home.

That’s why my budget includes $2.3 million to enter new markets, expand foreign trade, and help Missouri businesses develop a world-wide customer base.

One of our export superstars comes from one of Missouri’s oldest family-owned businesses, Volpi Foods in St. Louis. Next time you are in St. Louis, stop by their shop on The Hill.

Volpi is a prime example of a traditional business that with visionary new leadership has broken the mold. With the help of our departments of Agriculture and Economic Development, Volpi has doubled its exports in growing markets like Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Costa Rica.

Please welcome the CEO of Volpi Foods, Lorenza Pasetti.

There’s no doubt that Missouri is ready to meet the challenges of a global economy.
Source: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt ... a41de.html

Side note: Speaker Jones' rebuttal to the State of the State speech did not mention Missouri exports.

1,524
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,524

PostFeb 28, 2013#1802

Efforts getting some press... outside of St. Louis


76
New MemberNew Member
76

PostMar 01, 2013#1803


2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostMar 07, 2013#1804

Mid-America Airport is close to securing regular flights between Southwest IL and Ningbo, China after the Ningbo Airport completes construction of refridgerated warehouses able to receive US food products. The anticipated market within China for these SW-IL goods is in the neighborhood of 250 million likely consumers (holy crap!).

Among the first goods to be shipped is... Yogurt. No kidding.
Source: http://www.bnd.com/2013/03/06/2522048/t ... erica.html

Dairy Diplomacy...

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMar 07, 2013#1805

gone corporate wrote: Among the first goods to be shipped is... Yogurt. No kidding.
Source: http://www.bnd.com/2013/03/06/2522048/t ... erica.html

Dairy Diplomacy...
I thought you were going to say "Asian Carp!"

2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostMar 07, 2013#1806

Very quietly, with little to no fanfare, the Missouri General Assembly is getting things done that it should have done two years ago. Now that the chief obstructionists in the MO House & Senate have been term-limited out, the revamped Trade Hub legislation is progressing well.

What’s going through now is a tax credit program for freight forwarders only. Warehousing is excluded because real estate tax credits remain a very hot issue, and they want to keep this relatively simple.

This new legislation seeks to provide freight forwarders (logistics managers) $60 million in incentives for shipping goods out of STL by air, effectively providing a discount to the shipments based on total weight of the shipments. The goal is to have these shipments help create a regular series of cargo flights out of Lambert over the next eight years, until the funding expires. By this time, it is anticipated that demand for these regular flights out of Lambert are strong enough to survive without subsidation. Meanwhile, as there would now be these regular freight flights in and out of the airport, it is anticipated that the framework for this new global cargo hub would be fully self-sustainable and will attract new cargo flights around the world to fly in and out of STL.

Pretty much, this is encouraging people to walk down a new path through the woods. This new path starts off with growth and rough grounds, but it provides a new passageway where one wasn’t beforehand. With time, and after enough people walk down the same woody path, the path becomes established, both physically as trampled ground and as a regular way for people to walk. In time, no one needs to encourage people to take the new path, as it is effectively a new road with enough traffic to survive on its own...

Last week, the MO Senate passed legislation authorizing the new Trade Hub tax credits as part of an overhaul to the tax credit system in the state. By cutting back on the total allocations for Historic and (especially) Low Income Housing credits, credits for the Trade Hub can move forward. As well, credits for other projects are advancing, including for attracting high tech companies / data centers, and national sports events (Final Four, etc.).

Yesterday, the MO House also gave initial backing to the new Trade Hub legislation.
Source: http://www.ktts.com/news/195704391.html

It is very likely that these will pass very soon. With the memory of 2011’s failures at the front of their minds, the General Assembly looks like they’re going to actually do what they need to do this time around. Keep hope alive…

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostMar 07, 2013#1807

Awesome. Thanks for the updates on both airports.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostMar 07, 2013#1808

Love the comment posted to Biz Journals morning call report on tax credit legislation.

http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/morn ... w-tax.html

Guy has a point, Data Centers require a lot of space, electricity and only a few employees to maintain. Where as logistics is significantly more job intensive

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostMar 07, 2013#1809

^Well, it depends on the type of data center. Mastercard's Global Technology Center in O'Fallon is essentially considered a data center. Below, check out Visa's new state-of-the-art data center.

Top secret Visa data center banks on security, even has moat
By Jon Swartz, USA TODAY
Updated 3/25/2012 5:27 PM

SOMEWHERE ON THE EASTERN SEABOARD – Prisons are easier to enter than Visa's top-secret Operations Center East, its biggest, newest and most advanced U.S. data center.


Employees work in the Command Center for Visa's Operations Center East, where global payment transaction volume is analyzed.


The 8-acre facility looks like any other industrial park in a sleepy suburb. But the serene setting masks hundreds of cameras and a crack team of former military personnel. Hydraulic bollards beneath the road leading to the OCE can be quickly raised to stop an intruding car going 50 mph. Any speed faster, and the car can't navigate a hairpin turn, sending it into a drainage pond that functions as a modern-day moat.

The data center resembles a fortress, with dogged attention to detail. It can withstand earthquakes and hurricane-force winds of up to 170 mph. A 1.5-million-gallon storage tank cools the system. Diesel generators onsite have enough power, in the event of an outage, to keep the center running for nine days. They generate enough electricity for 25,000 households.

Once you get clearance from a guard station, get an OK from a roving security guy in a golf cart, and surrender a photo and fingerprint inside, the adventure begins.

There are plenty of reasons for the airtight security. Billions, in fact.

In an era when mobile purchases on smartphones and tablets are expected to grow 73% to $11.6 billion in the U.S. this year, security is a necessary obsession at OCE — and an acknowledgment of the perils posed by profit-minded hackers.

Mobile payments are just a trickle of the more than 200 million daily transactions processed here and at one other Visa data center in North America.

Read More

PostMar 08, 2013#1810

What is wrong with people in St. Charles?

Yesterday, Ann Zerr, this j/a from St. Charles, amended the freight-forwarding bill to include ALL international airports in Missouri. This potentially defeats the purpose of making Lambert-St. Louis Missouri's primary international air cargo hub if has to compete with Kansas City and Springfield. It potentially means less business and traffic for Lambert.

Was she pressured by KC and out-state representatives to change the language so that it could pass or was she being the typical anti-St. Louis St. Charles politician?

It seems some St. Charles politicians will do anything to sabotage Lambert-St. Louis.
_________________________________________________

Posted on March 7, 2013

Freight Forwarder Incentives

House Bill 201, also sponsored by Rep. Neil Torpey, was amended by Rep. Anne Zerr during floor debate to provide incentives for businesses that forward freight internationally through any international airport in Missouri. Under this legislation, qualified freight forwarders would receive tax credits against income tax, based on the volume of outbound air cargo. The credits are capped at $7.5 million per year.

“This legislation opens the door in Missouri to international markets,” said King. “If international demand is increasing for American beef, we want to make sure that it is Missouri beef that is being shipped to satisfy that demand. If the demand for American pharmaceuticals growing, we want to make sure those products are coming from Missouri. We want Missouri farmers, Missouri manufacturers, Missouri truckers, and Missouri planes to be providing this growing international demand.”

(Source)

3,552
Life MemberLife Member
3,552

PostMar 08, 2013#1811

^ St. Charles is a joke. From the development patterns, to the highway extensions, to the politics, to the zoo district, to the anti-Metrolink crowd. I actually think St. Charles is running out of steam, because soon or later they will learn, like St. Louis County, their economic development cannot depend on leaching off of the core counties. Plus I doubt their ability to attract talent in the new economy once the boomers die off.

64
New MemberNew Member
64

PostMar 08, 2013#1812

arch city wrote:What is wrong with people in St. Charles?
Having grown up there I can honestly say a lot.
“This legislation opens the door in Missouri to international markets,” said King. “If international demand is increasing for American beef, we want to make sure that it is Missouri beef that is being shipped to satisfy that demand. If the demand for American pharmaceuticals growing, we want to make sure those products are coming from Missouri. We want Missouri farmers, Missouri manufacturers, Missouri truckers, and Missouri planes to be providing this growing international demand.”

(Source)
I think the proof that pressure is coming from the other side of the state is in that quote. I don't believe this Missouri beef thing for a second, Kansas and Nebraska have a vast supply of livestock that I'm sure they'd rather ship out of KC than STL.

2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostMar 08, 2013#1813

arch city wrote:What is wrong with people in St. Charles?

Yesterday, Ann Zerr...
NO.

Anne Zerr has been a friend of the Trade Hub Initiative for a long time. Last year, she submitted House Bill 1476 (with STL County Rep Mike Leara) to resurrect the Freight Forwarders tax credits. She has continued to seek out the Lambert Cargo Hub this whole time, even amidst the "no-nothings" of the previous Missouri Senate.

If she has acted to amend part of the current legislation, it must be for a good reason, most likely to ensure passage in the MO House from KC-based members of the General Assembly.

There is no doubt that Anne Zerr has been, and continues to be, a strong advocate for this. Don't throw stones at her.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostMar 08, 2013#1814

^ Gone Corporate, this is the only time I have seen her name mentioned. Amending the legislation as such opens the door to allow the following scenario.

1) Mid-America as the cargo hub on the east side of state with its heavy subsidies, from outright free warehouse space to cold storage equipment and relative close location to larger urban markets. Don't forget the extremely low landing fees compliments of the federal government giving Metro East an extra airport to take Scotts AFB off the closure list.

2) KC Airport on West Side as defactor carge hub for Kansas/Nebraska/Missouri meat products headed to Asia. Why take a refrigerated market that much farther down the road to a plane in STL when you get the same credit wiht less transportation cost.

3) China Eastern doesn't renew its lease and Lambert effectively is a non player within a year even if the tax credit passes. Just to add a little salt in the wound, St. Louis loses out on a significant chunk of Histoical tax credits with legislation going through the chambers. Where is her position on that one? Sure she will favor a less of a hit to low income credit but can't back up that speculation and data centers can go anywhere, why not St. Charles or Columbia.

4) St. Charles legislator gains some favors.

Obviously, don't know the whole picture but not hard to start seeing an outcome just layed out. Nor do I believe their is a big enough cargo market for three airports. Which comes back to a basic, she is effectively stating that she supports export trade which is great in my opinion. But she is also effectively removing a specific targeted incentive for St Louis region that got hit hard by losing Hub status.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostMar 09, 2013#1815

^This hub stuff is a mess all over again, it seems. But I don't think an additional 30-minute flight east to St. Louis is going to be much of an issue.

Plus, when I measure the potential competition from KC, this is what I put together.

St. Louis Disadvantages

1.Poor promotion/marketing of metro transportation distribution system. KC has its KC SMARTPORT website. St. Louis - not so much. St. Louis is so lame in this area. Information is all over the place. This has to change regardless. Better marketing is essential to growth.
2. KC is planning to build a new airport. They potentially could entice an international air cargo freight-forwarder to build new facilities in conjunction.
3. BNSF's new 443-acre intermodal facility.
4. New 4-lane CKC Corridor bypasses St. Louis and goes fairly straight to Chicago.

A Draw (no advantage for either region)
1. Tie. Locally-based major corporate ground freight-forwarders - St. Louis: UniGroup (United/Mayflower), Kansas City: Yellow
2. Tie. Six Class I railroads. However, KC does have Kansas City Southern based there.

St. Louis Advantages

1. St. Louis (Lambert and MidAmerica) is farther along in negotiations with the Chinese than either Kansas City or Denver, which is also exploring air cargo from China and other countries.
2. Both airports have either tested and/or is operating regular international air cargo flights.
3. Lambert has excess facility capacity that can be tweaked and utilized almost immediately.
4. St. Louis is the closest metro to 3/4th's of America's population.
5. Proximity to more domestic and international manufacturing companies/product.
6. Industrial/Warehouse Inventory. St. Louis 234-million. KC 193-million.
7. Port advantages: St. Louis - especially ag commodities. St. Louis is widely regarded as the largest inland water port for agricultural products in the world. Read this article from Inbound Logistics.
8. St. Louis interstate advantage. Plus major interstate connectors I-57 and I-24 (Nashville and Atlanta) traverse the region. Even U.S. 61 (Avenue of The Saints) ties into I-35 (MSP).


2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostMar 11, 2013#1816

dredger wrote:^ Gone Corporate, this is the only time I have seen her name mentioned...
Understandable. Here's some background...

House Bill 1476 (2012) to establish the Freight Forwarders Incentive Act (pretty much what's underway today). This bill never made it into law as the MO General Assembly couldn't overcome the power of the "no nothings" that prevented the Trade Hub legislation in 2011 (when it was called "Aerotropolis").
http://www.house.mo.gov/billsummary.asp ... 012&code=R

An article from Frank DeGraaf last year mentioned HB 1476:
http://nextstl.com/transportation/once- ... onal-cargo

Very much, I agree that it would be preferable to just have the submitted legislation go right through the General Assembly and be passed as was written by Senator Eric Schmitt. Same time, that's not how legislation usually goes, and amendations are common and often necessary to win support from various interests. And, what Senator Schmitt has going forward now is pretty much the same thing that Reps Zerr & Leara fought for last year with HB 1476: $60M x 8 years for freight forwarders.

If it needs to include airports other than just Lambert in order to pass, then so be it. Quite frankly, no other airport in MO is anywhere close to where Lambert is today in attracting & securing international cargo flights. These amendations don't mean the sky is falling all over again.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostMar 29, 2013#1817



Making Global Local -- St. Louis Aiming to be Gateway of Opportunity
In 2011, Missouri's trade with China grew 18%.
Adrienne Selko
Jan. 22, 2013

A successful strategic plan often calls for determining areas of strength and building upon it. That’s exactly what St. Louis is doing based on the state’s strong record of trade with China. The growth in 2011 was valued at $1.2 billion.

A successful strategic plan often calls for determining areas of strength and building upon it. That’s exactly what St. Louis is doing based on the state’s strong record of trade with China.

In 2011, Missouri's trade with China grew 18%. In 2010 growth was even stronger increasing 44%.

The growth in 2011 was valued at $1.2 billion, with copper scrap, fan parts, lead ores, aluminum scrap, and semiconductor devices among China’s most demanded Missouri commodities.

Exports translate directly into jobs. Since 2010, 21% percent of Missouri’s total employment, or 774,300 jobs can be tied to trade-supported jobs.

Part of the job growth was brought about due to programs and initiatives created by the World Trade Center of St. Louis. This group is focusing on ways to keep the momentum going.

“By offering to become a freight hub for China, St. Louis is positioning itself as a spot for international activity,” explained Tim Nowak, executive director for the World Trade Center of St. Louis. “The Lambert-St. Louis International Airport is set to become a Midwest hub for trade, increasing the $1 billion in goods that Missouri exports to China annually.”

Steps to ensure success include a national partnership with the U.S. Trade and Development Agency. St. Louis was selected to be involved in the Making Global Local initiative. This partnership will enable targeted reverse trade missions to St. Louis, connecting interested local companies with foreign buyers.

Trade Missions Useful Tool

“We are working with World Trade Center and its Asia Trade Desk to position St. Louis for further business opportunities in Asia through specialized training and high‐level trade missions.” said Denny Coleman, CEO of the St. Louis County Economic Council.

A recent trade mission occurred last November in Hangzhou, when more than a dozen businesses and two universities participated in the 5th U.S.-China Transportation Forum, held jointly by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Chinese Ministry of Transport.

Also last year executives from Boeing, Monsanto, Emerson, Innoventor and Nestle Purina PetCare completed a trade mission to Indonesia.

Specialized training is taking the form of a new online Chancellor’s Certificate in International Trade that is being offered through the University of Missouri.

The certificate is a six-month online training program, providing participants with the opportunity to learn practical aspects of international business from experienced industry professionals.

(Read More)

2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostApr 25, 2013#1818

Great article on STL being a strong location as a new Third Party Logistics Hub
Source: http://interact.stltoday.com/pr/busines ... O4.twitter

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostMay 15, 2013#1819

I can't help but notice that MO statehouse is in last week of session and tax credit discussion, reform and legislation is none existent. Gone Corporate, do you have any feedback?

It is like they spend all winter to do back room deals on the budget and tax cut so they can have a free pass of passing all the ultra conservative legislation they can think of. Some of the stuff this week out of the state house is something else. Somehow St. Louis and KC survive this bush league.

At the same time have to chuckle, it must be driving McKee up the wall with his army of lobbyist and the biggest concern is a supposed conspiracy theory between DMV, Nixon and the FEDS REAL ID

In the meantime, big news on Boeing and 600 IT jobs. But does anybody realize how much Amazon has invested into Seattle the last couple of years, the job growth, and real estate. Not to mention that Seattle is tearing down the Alaskan Way viaduct to replace it with a tunnel that will connect Downtown with the waterfront via a billion dollar investment, the continuing transit expansion and a private deal plop down $500 million on a basketball arena to bring NBA back. Heck, Missouri is about to quit on the River Runner according Biz Journals because state can't keep up payments on $8.5 million annual expenditure. That shows the non sense when new bi level passengers that will expand capacity and revenues are about to go into production.

2,932
Life MemberLife Member
2,932

PostMay 16, 2013#1820

^ Trust me, actions are still hopping for the Trade Hub initiative, just not necessarily in Jeff City. Have to be vague right now, sorry, but believe me when I say that this is not a forgotten opportunity. Will talk more when I have clearance...

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostMay 16, 2013#1821

gone corporate wrote:^ Trust me, actions are still hopping for the Trade Hub initiative, just not necessarily in Jeff City. Have to be vague right now, sorry, but believe me when I say that this is not a forgotten opportunity. Will talk more when I have clearance...
Thanks, I certainly can see where the metro region has embraced the idea after a lot of hard work.

I think it is disappointing as whole for Missouri residents who probably don't realize the impact to budget items as well as losing out on the opporutniy and ability to strengthen economic activity by the status of quo of doing nothing in Jeff City. I would like to see the region prosper and my Missouri home/property value rise even though I'm no longer a resident. I just have to chuckle on how the Jeff City will put forth a last minute effort to put the right to farm constitutional amendment on the 2014 ballot but won't do something that would help Missouri agriculture exports tremendously. Has anybody told them that as long as their is people their is a need for farming :)

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostMay 30, 2013#1822

I wish the capital stayed in st. Louis or even st. Charles.

516
Senior MemberSenior Member
516

PostMay 30, 2013#1823

gone corporate wrote:^ Trust me, actions are still hopping for the Trade Hub initiative, just not necessarily in Jeff City. Have to be vague right now, sorry, but believe me when I say that this is not a forgotten opportunity. Will talk more when I have clearance...
Has there been any talk of a special session to tackle tax credits?

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMay 30, 2013#1824

south compton wrote:Has there been any talk of a special session to tackle tax credits?

I don't think so. Parties are too far apart.

PostMay 30, 2013#1825

Speaking of special sessions, today it was reported that our marvelous republican leadership "inadvertently" repealed the sales tax exemption for prescription medication as part of its income tax cut bill. Said leaders are asking Nixon to not veto the bill, promising to fix it in special session or next year. Morons.

Read more posts (23 remaining)