
Really loving the night rendering. Although it does look a little like a graduation cap during the day.
Roof deck looks pretty sweet...


Disparate design elements, disparate massing, clumsy, overscaled roof overhang. Basically, it looks like somebody tried to pimp-out a 1974 Pinto.pjeckelkamp wrote:What's awkward about it?
Just don't call Xzibit...pat wrote:^Sounds like architect speak.
And if all you have is a 1974 pinto to pimp out, what are you going to do?
Yo! I know you like to law school dawg, so we put a law school in your lawschool! Damn yo! Even yo books got books!innov8ion wrote:Just don't call Xzibit...pat wrote:^Sounds like architect speak.
And if all you have is a 1974 pinto to pimp out, what are you going to do?
See the full article here: http://goo.gl/LhLyHMs. Clark’s exit, which was first reported by the St. Louis blog nextSTL, followed public disagreement with the university administration over the selection of a new law school building downtown and funding for summer research stipends, according to one professor at the law school.
I believe it was more the latter.moorlander wrote:So was dean Clark also upset about the location of the new law school or just upset she was completely kept in the dark on the decision process?
But the gift didn't come a couple of years ago, and were committed after the move was announced, and were purposefully given in support of the new facility. The visibilty, the complete new construction build-out, and the proximity of the new location to courts, city gov't, and law firm HQ's has to be exciting. Setting and place ovbioulsy don't make a school, but it sure does have an effect.Alex Ihnen wrote:^ I was just pointing out that the two significant gifts cited only came about because of someone passing away. If it had happened a couple years ago, could someone have concluded that the gifts supported the new law school on the Frost campus? No. I'm not saying there's no support - and I like the move as well, but those gifts don't indicate support.

