741
Senior MemberSenior Member
741

PostJan 20, 2023#451

Could Missouri adopt the same approval voting method St. Louis has? 

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/gov ... 8f766.html

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostJan 20, 2023#452

This seems like a way to keep only Republican names on our Missouri ballots. 

I'm very skeptical that this would be a good thing for the state. 

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostJan 21, 2023#453

RockChalkSTL wrote:
Jan 20, 2023
This seems like a way to keep only Republican names on our Missouri ballots. 

I'm very skeptical that this would be a good thing for the state. 
If it was good they wouldn't be doing it.

741
Senior MemberSenior Member
741

PostJan 21, 2023#454

I doubt it will happen anyways. Republicans are skeptical of any ranked choice voting system as they think it cost them the lone Alaska US House seat last year.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostJan 23, 2023#455

Something similar was proposed for the Nov 2022 election but didn't meet signature threshold.

https://ballotpedia.org/Missouri_Approval_Voting_Initiative_(2022)

So, if this is being proposed as a constitutional amendment, directly ratified by the electorate.  Missouri electorate is conservative but not nearly as conservative as the statehouse representation would suggest.  I actually think this would be very likely pass as a ballot measure.  I'm not even sure if mainstream republicans would be against it.  It should tack the party back to a more center right dominated party rather than extreme right which is healthier for the GOP in the long-term anyway.

Who are the big money donors who want to see more candidates like Eric Greitens or Katherine Pinner.  I feel like center-right republicans could support this and I feel like the big money would also.  I guess I find it hard to believe the politics is so cynically about a power grab that republican would consolidate around opposing this for the base reason to assure that statehouse control will be unquestionably controlled by republicans but with the downside of possibility of empowering a bunch of far-right-wing looneys.

Side note I would rather not fill vacancies with special elections.  Executives nominating replacements with legislative advise and consent seems perfectly reasonable to temporarily fill a vacancy until the next available election.  Would still vote 'Yes' if given the opportunity as the upside of Rank Choice voting outweighs the downside of cost of Special Elections. IMHO.

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostJan 23, 2023#456

I think it depends on how many anti-establishment, Libertarian-wing Republicans think it would be a good idea to have an available end-run around the party candidates. Easier to see it passing if it's as a ballot measure. The folks in power are, basically by definition, beneficiaries of the current system.

188
Junior MemberJunior Member
188

PostFeb 26, 2023#457


595
Senior MemberSenior Member
595

PostFeb 26, 2023#458

Sad & sickening pathetic


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

188
Junior MemberJunior Member
188

PostMar 08, 2023#459


1,609
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,609

PostMar 08, 2023#460

That was fun to watch.  Theocracy, thy name will be Missouri! 

1,291
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,291

PostMar 09, 2023#461

Federal judge rules Missouri’s ‘Second Amendment Preservation Act’ unconstitutional
A federal judge on Tuesday struck down a controversial Missouri law — known as the Second Amendment Preservation Act — that penalizes police for enforcing federal gun laws.
U.S. District Court Judge Brian Wimes ruled that the 2021 Missouri law is unconstitutional and “invalid, null, void, and of no effect.”

“State and local law enforcement officials in Missouri may lawfully participate in joint federal task forces, assist in the investigation and enforcement of federal firearm crimes,” Wimes wrote in his decision, “and fully share information with the federal government without fear of… penalties.” 

[...]

Federal law cannot be nullified by any state law, Wimes wrote in his ruling, and Missouri legislators are aware of that.

“SAPA is an unconstitutional ‘interposit[ion]’ against federal law and is designed to be just that,” Wimes wrote.

In the ruling, he said the law’s practical effects are counterintuitive to its stated purpose. 

[...]

In a statement on social media, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey said his office will appeal the decision, and he anticipates “a better result” at the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

“If the state legislature wants to expand upon the foundational rights codified in the Second Amendment, they have the authority to do that,” Bailey stated. “But SAPA is also about the Tenth Amendment. It’s about federalism and individual liberty.”

Wimes addressed this argument in his ruling.

“The Missouri General Assembly’s assertion that the Supremacy Clause does not extend to acts of Congress,” Wimes states, “does not make it so.”
Wonder how this plays out.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 16, 2023#462

Maybe the state should take over

KSDK - Iron County Sheriff, other department members accused of helping man in alleged parental kidnapping scheme

https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/crime ... d8b7d6693c

320
Full MemberFull Member
320

PostMar 21, 2023#463

Two big pieces of news out of Jeff City today, first up the house passed a bill today that will allow sports betting. It will head next to the senate. Also, the house voted to cut corporate and personal income taxes by $1B

Missouri House approves sports wagering bill favored by casinos, sports teams
The Missouri House overwhelmingly approved a bill Monday to legalize sports wagering, with Republicans siding with casino companies to defeat Democratic amendments seeking higher taxes and limits on promotional costs. The bill needs a formal roll-call vote, expected later this week, to send it to the Missouri Senate. With all but three adjoining states allowing sports wagering, the failure of the General Assembly to follow suit in previous legislative sessions is an embarrassment, said Rep. Ashley Aune, D-Kansas City. As she campaigned last year, Aune said, the question of when lawmakers would pass sports wagering came up repeatedly. “It seems so simple and our constituents genuinely don’t understand why we haven’t got it to the finish line yet,” Aune said.
https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/news/2023/03/21/missouri-house-approves-sports-wagering-bill.html

Missouri House votes to cut corporate, personal income taxes by $1B
The Missouri House gave first-round approval to a $1 billion personal and corporate income tax cut Tuesday, as Republicans pushed the bill through despite Democratic warnings that vital services would be starved for funds.
The bill would cut the top rate on personal income taxes, cut the corporate income tax rate in half and exempt Social Security payments from taxation. State Rep. Dirk Deaton, R-Noel, said the bill would promote economic growth, noting that future tax cuts included in the bill only take effect when triggered by revenue growth.

“This is really just limiting the growth of government,” Deaton said.
 Democrats, however, said a tax cut — coming on top of a tax cut approved in September that has not been fully implemented — would put the state into a potentially precarious financial position. Despite recent pay raises and incentives, state employees are still the worst paid in the nation and teachers are near the bottom of the pay scale, said state Rep. Peter Merideth, D-St. Louis.
https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/news/2023/03/21/missouri-corporate-income-tax-personal-1-billion.html

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMar 21, 2023#464

If all the states are cutting taxes, none of the states are cutting taxes. And MO doesn't have the climate/geography of Sunbelt states. Iowa is trying to do the same thing and it's really stupid.

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostMar 21, 2023#465

I still remember when KS did the same thing…

…it didn’t work lol.

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostMar 22, 2023#466

Bart Harley Jarvis wrote:
Mar 21, 2023
If all the states are cutting taxes, none of the states are cutting taxes. And MO doesn't have the climate/geography of Sunbelt states. Iowa is trying to do the same thing and it's really stupid.
It's stupid anyway, just raise taxes on the wealthy and use that money to pay workers more. The tax cuts are a gift to the rich bosses, the justifications are just to satisfy the suckers.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMar 22, 2023#467

The best thing most of the more industrial Midwestern states have going for them that southern states can't compete with are their school systems (generally).  Cutting taxes (or in Iowa's case, cutting taxes AND providing vouchers for private schools) weakens one of the most compelling reasons to settle here.  Raise the taxes on actual wealthy people, cut it for the poorer people, invest in education and infrastructure and you'll have a much happier state. 

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostMar 22, 2023#468

I always think it telling that they tend toward cutting the top line rate rather than raising the standard deduction.  Both qualify as cutting taxes but the communities most impact are complete opposites.

320
Full MemberFull Member
320

PostApr 04, 2023#469

A couple of updates....

Missouri House passes tax credit aimed to luring film, television production to state
A bill that would incentivize film and television production in Missouri gained final House approval in a 104-50 vote Monday.
HB675, sponsored by Rep. Kurtis Gregory, R-Marshall, “authorizes a tax credit equal to 20% of qualifying expenses … associated with the production of a qualified motion media production project.”

Additional credits may be awarded if certain conditions are met, such as at least 50% of the production being filmed in Missouri, or at least 15% of the project taking place in a “rural or blighted area” within the state, according to the bill.
The total of the tax credits for such productions is limited to $16 million per year.
https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/news/2023/04/04/mo-house-passes-tax-credit-lure-film-tv-production.html


Missouri Senate set to restore cuts to public libraries
The chief Senate budget writer said he plans to restore state funding for Missouri’s public libraries that was stripped out of the House version of the state’s spending plan.
Sen. Lincoln Hough, R-Springfield, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee, said Tuesday that the panel will place $4.5 million back in the budget, which covers spending for the fiscal year beginning July 1.
“There is no way that money is not going back into the budget,” Hough told the Post-Dispatch.
The restoration could mark the second reversal of a House budget priority that has stirred controversy under the Capitol dome. Hough and Senate President Caleb Rowden earlier said they oppose Republican language in the House blueprint that would prohibit the state from spending tax dollars on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/missouri-senate-set-to-restore-cuts-to-public-libraries/article_75add4d1-0ce4-5d2f-985d-216b799d741e.html

9,558
Life MemberLife Member
9,558

PostApr 04, 2023#470

Senator Hough is a Roy Blunt type of Republican and one of few left in Jeff City. I don’t agree with his policy on many issues but he also isn’t a ***** moron like the maga cult gop

320
Full MemberFull Member
320

PostApr 11, 2023#471

It looks like Gov. Parson's plans for widening I-70 has survived the House's latest budget plan. In addition, $15 million would be set aside for a pharmaceutical center in St. Louis, $1 million for the Powell Hall renovation, $3 million for a Kirkwood Community Center and $48 million for widening I-44.

Missouri House budget backs push to widen Interstate 70, renovate Powell Symphony Hall
House Budget Committee Chairman Cody Smith, R-Carthage, unveiled the latest list of brick-and-mortar projects Tuesday, including $15 million for a pharmaceutical center in St. Louis, $3 million for Kirkwood's community center, $1 million for Powell Symphony Hall — and $859 million to upgrade the interstate near Wentzville, Columbia and Kansas City.

Earlier versions had taken some of that amount for projects on Interstate 44, but in the latest spending blueprint those also are funded at about $48 million.

All told, the construction spending outlined in the plan amounts to $2.8 billion.

The state is currently sitting on a surplus estimated at about $5 billion. And new revenue figures show the state could add another $1 billion in unspent tax receipts before the end of the fiscal year, giving budget writers even more of a cushion heading into the final weeks of the legislative session.
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/missouri-house-budget-backs-push-to-widen-interstate-70-renovate-powell-symphony-hall/article_bb7972b4-5264-58f3-a8b0-bee3b314b65d.html#tracking-source=home-top-story

741
Senior MemberSenior Member
741

PostApr 13, 2023#472

Well they can't fund libraries but 12 yr old can get married so there's that!

Missourah Republicans folks!

https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/ ... 107573007/

337
Full MemberFull Member
337

PostApr 13, 2023#473

Baltimore Jack wrote:Well they can't fund libraries but 12 yr old can get married so there's that!

Missourah Republicans folks!

https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/ ... 107573007/
Citing a situation from 40 years ago is crazy. Times have technologically advanced so much yet this guy is nostalgic for the early 1900s when he wasn’t even alive.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostApr 13, 2023#474

LArchitecture wrote:
Apr 13, 2023
Baltimore Jack wrote:Well they can't fund libraries but 12 yr old can get married so there's that!

Missourah Republicans folks!

https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/ ... 107573007/
Citing a situation from 40 years ago is crazy. Times have technologically advanced so much yet this guy is nostalgic for the early 1900s when he wasn’t even alive.
Or, maybe, someone could counter with some same-sex couples that have been together that long, or some trans people who have been happily living their lives (and not molesting children) for that long.  Or maybe call bullsh*t on using one, possibly real, data point as the basis for making laws?

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostApr 13, 2023#475

Bart Harley Jarvis wrote:
Apr 13, 2023
LArchitecture wrote:
Apr 13, 2023
Baltimore Jack wrote:Well they can't fund libraries but 12 yr old can get married so there's that!

Missourah Republicans folks!

https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/ ... 107573007/
Citing a situation from 40 years ago is crazy. Times have technologically advanced so much yet this guy is nostalgic for the early 1900s when he wasn’t even alive.
Or, maybe, someone could counter with some same-sex couples that have been together that long, or some trans people who have been happily living their lives (and not molesting children) for that long.  Or maybe call bullsh*t on using one, possibly real, data point as the basis for making laws?
What is even the point, legally, of 12 year olds getting married versus having a long engagement? So they can get a joint checking account and own a house together?

We know the only reason they legalize child marriage is to allow adults to legally molest children.

Read more posts (370 remaining)