8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostSep 25, 2006#51

ChesterfieldKid03 wrote:Here are some new renderings I found.....















any thoughts on what might be going in that brentwood facing retail? and whats up with that waste of space green space? too bad the development couldn't spread south and somehow tie in nicely with the Boulevard... Maybe we'll see some improved access to the Link

70
New MemberNew Member
70

PostSep 28, 2006#52

Can you please post the link to where you got these renderings.



What is interesting about the renderings is that green space at the corner of Brentwood and the Galleria Parkway is suppose to be developed by the new owners of the U Club Towers as a box type retail space. And there is no current plan to replace the current buildings housing Yen Ching to Wolf Camera. And between the corner hotel and Yen Ching is a Ameren substation which is not going to be moved.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostSep 28, 2006#53

The Curmudgeon wrote:Can you please post the link to where you got these renderings.



What is interesting about the renderings is that green space at the corner of Brentwood and the Galleria Parkway is suppose to be developed by the new owners of the U Club Towers as a box type retail space. And there is no current plan to replace the current buildings housing Yen Ching to Wolf Camera. And between the corner hotel and Yen Ching is a Ameren substation which is not going to be moved.


Are you kidding me? they aren't going to move the substation???

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostSep 28, 2006#54

^ I think that rendering takes into account the substation. Notice the Hotel at the corner of brentwood and Clayton and then the internal street intersecting with Brentwood south of the hotel. Then notice the gap between the intersection and the locaiton of the new single story retail building. That space is where the substation will remain.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostSep 28, 2006#55

JMedwick wrote:^ I think that rendering takes into account the substation. Notice the Hotel at the corner of brentwood and Clayton and then the internal street intersecting with Brentwood south of the hotel. Then notice the gap between the intersection and the locaiton of the new single story retail building. That space is where the substation will remain.


nice eyes..i didn't notice that b4... that substation looks like vomit by the way... strange they wouldn't have that moved... I guess they'll dress it up some

1,391
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,391

PostNov 12, 2006#56

There is a crane waiting to be assembled on the corner lot across from IHOP. Anything special going on or has it been there for a while and I never noticed it until today?

667
Senior MemberSenior Member
667

PostNov 12, 2006#57

I believe they are getting ready to build those new hotels at that corner. More can be found here. :)



http://www.urbanstl.com/viewtopic.php?t ... c&start=45




8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostNov 29, 2006#58

They originally brought 2 cranes to the site, now only one remains... Nothing has been done at the site as of today.

70
New MemberNew Member
70

PostDec 04, 2006#59

Permits have been drawn to start the hotel work but some negotiations are still in progress with the Lionstone Group about the parking structure to be added.



I hear March 1st as a start date.

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostDec 04, 2006#60

I wonder how the Boulevard St. Louis, these hotels, and the new Metro station will cause the redevelopment of surrounding properties?



Will the Tower lose its surface lots?

Will the Galleria lose its surface lots?



How will vehicular and pedestrian traffic be managed on Brentwood, Clayton, and entrances to huge parking garages?



Maybe this area will redevelop more intensely to prevent office and hotel development on the central commercial fringe being Chesterfield, Fenton, O'Fallon.

70
New MemberNew Member
70

PostDec 05, 2006#61

SMSPlanstu wrote:I wonder how the Boulevard St. Louis, these hotels, and the new Metro station will cause the redevelopment of surrounding properties?



Will the Tower lose its surface lots?

Will the Galleria lose its surface lots?



How will vehicular and pedestrian traffic be managed on Brentwood, Clayton, and entrances to huge parking garages?



Maybe this area will redevelop more intensely to prevent office and hotel development on the central commercial fringe being Chesterfield, Fenton, O'Fallon.


Will the Tower lose its surface lots?



Just the one behind the Matress giant Store.



Will the Galleria lose its surface lots?



Who know's. The previous plans all called for building over that flood plain and the southern most part of the lot.



How will vehicular and pedestrian traffic be managed on Brentwood, Clayton, and entrances to huge parking garages?



Last I heard St Louis County was trying to add a lane to Brentwood before the Highway 40 project starts. Now there's a story about St Louis County taking over Clayton and Ladue Rds before the Highway 40 project starts.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJan 12, 2007#62

They're starting to erect the tower crane...

377
Full MemberFull Member
377

PostJan 25, 2007#63

Galleria area will get more retail

By Riddhi Trivedi-St. Clair

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

01/25/2007



Three companies are planning a $150 million hotel and retail project on a prime location along the Brentwood Boulevard corridor in Richmond Heights.



The project calls for two hotels, 30,000 square feet of retail space and parking for more than 600 cars.



The 7.4-acre site, across the street from the St. Louis Galleria, is owned by Houston-based Lionstone Group, and already includes one notable building, the University Club Tower.



Developers hope the commercial, office and retail space already in the area will provide a base for the more than 450 hotel rooms and the specialty retail stores they are looking to include.



Mike Mullenix, chairman and chief executive of Brentwood-based Equis Hospitality Group, said he has been waiting a long time for the project to come to fruition after a deal with the previous owner of the site fell through. Equis, which manages and develops hotels, began discussions with Lionstone after it bought the property in 2005 from Glenborough Realty Trust of San Mateo, Calif. for $40 million.



It took two years to work out another deal, but Mullenix said it provided an opportunity to expand the project's scope. The original plans only included the hotels and parking. The new plans include the retail space.



"It turned out to be a blessing in disguise although it didn't seem like it at the time," Mullenix said.



The hotels will be a 235-room Westin and a 144-suite Homewood Suites by Hilton.



The all-suite hotel will be only the second extended-stay hotel in the immediate area, Mullenix said. The only other one nearby is in Clayton.



The delay on the project may have worked in Mullenix's favor on the hotel side. National research shows it is a good time and place to be a hotel developer in the local market.



Demand for hotel rooms in St. Louis area grew 3.2 percent in 2006 while supply only grew by 2.5 percent, according to data from Smith Travel Research, a national lodging and hospitality research company.



The St. Louis metro area, which is one of the top 25 hotel markets, has consistently seen greater growth in demand than supply. That makes existing — and new — hotels more profitable.



St. Louis is projected to see 8.9 percent growth in the number of hotels in the next three years, said Bruce Ford, senior vice president of Lodging Econometrics, which tracks new construction and performance of hotel properties around the country.



That's lower than the average, which Ford said is positive. It prevents the market from getting saturated and putting downward pressure on prices and occupancy rates.



Hotels that locate near shopping malls, medical centers and office buildings — all of which generate demand for hotels — are likely to do especially well, Ford said.



In addition to the Galleria, the project also is close to the intersection of Highway 40 (Interstate 64) and Interstate 170, adding to visibility.



Clayton-based Sansone Group is developing the retail portion of the project, which also will include a restaurant. The company also manages the University Club Tower for Lionstone. The 23-story, 275,000-square-foot tower is more than 90 percent occupied. Tenants include St. Louis University, which has 14,000 square feet, and the accounting firm of Mueller Prost, which has 20,000 square feet.



When his firm stepped in as manager, said Jim Sansone, principal with the Sansone Group, he realized the potential for additional development on the site.



Instead of working individually, Sansone and Equis decided to work together and create an unified project.



With his company's experience, Sansone said, he is hoping to bring in small, specialty retailers that are either new to the St. Louis market or at least to that area. The project will fit in and in some ways complete the development corridor along Brentwood Boulevard, Sansone said.



rtstclair@post-dispatch.com | 314 340 8206

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostJan 26, 2007#64

Great deal. It would be great if Lionstone Group would reclad (update) the facade of the University Club Tower.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJan 28, 2007#65

Arch City wrote: It would be great if Lionstone Group would reclad (update) the facade of the University Club Tower.


You're kidding, right?

70
New MemberNew Member
70

PostJan 28, 2007#66





ChesterfieldKid03 you left out the best part.



1. Westin

2. Hilton

Homewood

Suites

3. New four-story

parking

4. New restaurant

5. New retail

6. New four-story parking

7. University Club

Tower

8. Existing

parking deck



Note the three small buildings in front of #3. Those are Matress Giant, Ritz Camera, Yen Ching, and Casual Male XL which are apparently staying

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJan 28, 2007#67

The Curmudgeon wrote:


Note the three small buildings in front of #3. Those are Matress Giant, Ritz Camera, Yen Ching, and Casual Male XL which are apparently staying


...they will fit right in :roll: Somehow they should be able to purchase those as well. Wouldn't you think?



Any speculation on what might go into 4 and 5? Any dream tenants?

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostJan 28, 2007#68

Yeah, those three small ones should be demolished and relocated into a larger building, or at least re-clad to fit in with the surrounding area.



I have major concerns with this though - 2 new multi storey parking decks? as if brentwood doesn't have enough traffic problems, now they're going to add two hotels (which has steady trips in and out all day), and retail to the area. At what point does Brentwood reach total saturation? Also, the plans don't look pedestrian friendly in the slightest - in fact, I don't even see a visual connection to the Metrolink station. Shouldn't a development like this be more appropriate for 'the clayton hole', or somewhere else?

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostJan 28, 2007#69

Wow... I can't tell if that new rendering is a step forward or a step backward from the rendering a few pages back. I think step backward. The lack of improvements along Brentwood (keeping the Matress Giant?) combined with a new building and garage near the BLVD that as far as I can tell, blocks pedestrian access between the hotels and the Metro stop. Really doesn't look good at all. Richmond heights should ask for better.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostJan 29, 2007#70

I personally don't see anything wrong with those retailers staying - it's just the buildings they will stay in. Seems like a new structure could have been built to accommodate them.

PostJan 29, 2007#71

Framer wrote:


You're kidding, right?
Nope. I have seen buildings recladded in Houston, KC and other cities. They usually turn out for the better. UCT is not an eyesore, but it is a bit dated considering that the Galleria area is updating.

70
New MemberNew Member
70

PostJan 29, 2007#72

I have seen the renderings for this project It all looks very good (except for those three buildings and the Amren UE substation). So far none of the parties involved has the renderings on there sites.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJan 29, 2007#73

Arch City wrote:
Framer wrote:


You're kidding, right?
Nope. I have seen buildings recladded in Houston, KC and other cities. They usually turn out for the better. UCT is not an eyesore, but it is a bit dated considering that the Galleria area is updating.


I guess we just have differant tastes. I've always liked the tower. It's one of the few examples St. Louis has of an "international style" highrise (along with the Laclede Gas Tower downtown, for example). Plus, the whole idea of "recladding" is pretty dubious. Just think of all the buildings downtown that were reclad years ago, and are now being uncovered again. Architectural tastes change every couple of decades. I think having a large variety of styles co-existing makes for a much more interesting city.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJan 29, 2007#74

The Curmudgeon wrote:I have seen the renderings for this project It all looks very good (except for those three buildings and the Amren UE substation). So far none of the parties involved has the renderings on there sites.


??

86
New MemberNew Member
86

PostJan 30, 2007#75

From the look of buildings number 5 and 6, this development is trying to wall itself off from The Boulevard development. Wouldn't you think that people in those hotels may want to walk to dinner at PF Chang's for instance? The connection to The Boulevard would make those hotels more desirable so why not encourage the connection?

Read more posts (93 remaining)