Arch City wrote:Clearer renderings. Looks like the southern base might resemble structures on LaClede's Landing.
Here is another angle...

Arch City wrote:Clearer renderings. Looks like the southern base might resemble structures on LaClede's Landing.
TheWayoftheArch wrote:Unfortunately, I think Mississippi nights is on the chopping block regardless of which casino gets it. All those buildings are owned by the city, they're just operating until given notice. It could be six months, could be a couple years, but with all the interest I wouldn't expect MN to remain an institution.
Citylover wrote:
As part of the deal, a May auction has been set during which other companies could outbid Pinnacle.
loftlover wrote:Citylover wrote:
As part of the deal, a May auction has been set during which other companies could outbid Pinnacle.
I read this at like 5 this morning before my first coffee, and I thought it was me. Does anyone else think its weird that as part of the deal, there would be an auction where someone else could out-bid them?
St. Louis Texan wrote:Well if the landing had 2 competeing casinos then eventually one would bump the other out, and even if the Admiral does survive pinnacle would probably crush it in a year.
Bastiat wrote: I think this area could easily hold two competing casinos and hope it does. It will really spark the area north of the landing as the next loft district as well.